A-986-96

MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC, THIS 9th DAY OF OCTOBER 1997

CORAM:             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY

            THE HONOURABLE DEPUTY JUSTICE CHEVALIER

BETWEEN:             RENÉE BEAUDRY (ST-JEAN),

     Applicant,

            AND:

            HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

     Respondent.

     J U D G M E N T

     The application for judicial review is dismissed.

     Pierre Denault

     J.A.

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

---

     A-986-96

CORAM:             DENAULT J.A.

            DÉCARY J.A.

            CHEVALIER J.A.

BETWEEN:            

     RENÉE BEAUDRY (ST-JEAN),

     Applicant,

AND:

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

     Respondent.

     Hearing held at Montréal

     on Thursday, October 9, 1997

     Judgment delivered at Montréal

     on Thursday, October 9, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:      DÉCARY J.A.

     A-986-96

CORAM:             THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DENAULT

            THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DÉCARY

            THE HONOURABLE DEPUTY JUSTICE CHEVALIER

BETWEEN:             RENÉE BEAUDRY (ST-JEAN),

     Applicant,

            AND:

            HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

     Respondent.

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

     (Delivered from the bench at Montréal

     on Thursday, October 9, 1997)

DÉCARY J.A.

     There is nothing in this case that warrants our intervention.

     The principles which the umpire and, before him, the board of referees applied are the principles that this Court laid down in A.G. of Canada v. Jouan (1995), 179 N.R. 127 (F.C.A.) and A.G. of Canada v. Taschuk (1996), 199 N.R. 6 (F.C.A.), in relation to the interpretation of subsection 43(2) of the Unemployment Insurance Regulations, and in A.G. of Canada v. Gates (1995), 125 D.L.R. (4th) 348 (F.C.A.), in relation to the interpretation of subsection 33(1) of the Unemployment Insurance Act.

     The matter is then merely a question of assessing the evidence, and the applicant has not established that the lower tribunals could not have reached the conclusion that they reached.

     The application for judicial review will be dismissed.

     Robert Décary

     J.A.

Certified true translation

C. Delon, LL.L.

     Federal Court of Canada

    

     Court file No. A-986-96

between

     RENÉE BEAUDRY (ST-JEAN),

     Applicant,

     " and "

     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

     Respondent.

    

     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

    

     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

     NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

COURT FILE NO:      A-986-96

STYLE OF CAUSE:      RENÉE BEAUDRY (ST-JEAN),

     Applicant,

         AND:

         HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,

     Respondent.

PLACE OF HEARING:      Montréal, Quebec

DATE OF HEARING:      October 9, 1997

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (DENAULT AND DÉCARY JJ.A., CHEVALIER D.J.)

DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY:      The Honourable Mr. Justice Décary

     Dated:          October 9, 1997

APPEARANCES:

     Christopher R. Mostovac          for the applicant

     Sylvie Martin          for the respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:

     RAVINSKY RYAN          for the applicant

     1010 de la Gauchetière Ouest     

     Place du Canada, suite 1200

     Montréal, Quebec

     H3B 2P9

     George Thomson          for the respondent

     Deputy Attorney General

     of Canada

     Ottawa, Ontari