Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Crest Federal Court of Appeal of Canada
français

Access to decisions


Recent Decisions


Access by

Year
Style of Cause
Docket Number
Neutral Citation

Search


Stay Informed


Other Decisions

Federal Court
Tax Court of Canada
Supreme Court of Canada
Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs
Printer-Friendly PagePrinter-Friendly Page



Date:20010123

     Docket: A-518-99



CORAM:      STRAYER J.A.

         NOËL J.A.

         EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:


            RAYMOND F. PASQUAN

     Applicant

    

     - and -            

    

                            

     DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Respondent






    

Heard at Toronto, Ontario, Tuesday, January 23, 2001


Judgment delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario,

on Tuesday, January 23, 2001

                                




REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:             NOËL J.A.



Date: 20010123


Docket: A-518-99



CORAM:      STRAYER J.A.

         NOËL J.A.

         EVANS J.A.

BETWEEN:


            RAYMOND F. PASQUAN

     Applicant

    

     - and -            

    

                            

     DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Respondent



     REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

     (Delivered from the Bench at Toronto, Ontario

     on Tuesday, January 23, 2001)


NOËL J.A.

         _.      This is an application for judicial review of a decision of an Umpire dismissing the applicant's appeal of a decision of the Board of Referees which had held that the applicant had voluntarily terminated his employment without just cause and, therefore, was disqualified from receiving benefits under the Unemployment Insurance Act.
         _.      The applicant complained before the Umpire that he was unable to confront his employer Stan Noort during the proceeding before the Board of Referees. The applicant contends that Mr. Noort had agreed to indicate he had been laid off rather than terminated on the separation form and that his testimony would bring this to light. There is no merit to this argument. As the Umpire pointed out, the essence of the applicant's argument is that Mr. Noort should have misrepresented the cause for the cessation of his employment.
         _.      The applicant also argued that he had just cause for leaving his employment. However, after reviewing the evidence, we are satisfied that the Umpire committed no error in refusing to interfere with the decision of the Board on this ground.
         _.      The applicant also raised certain constitutional arguments which do not appear to have been raised before the Umpire. In any event, these arguments appear to us to be without merit.
         _.      This application will be dismissed with costs.

                                 "Marc Noël"

                                

     J.A.

              FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA

     Names of Counsel and Solicitors of Record

                            

DOCKET:                  A-518-99

STYLE OF CAUSE:             RAYMOND F. PASQUAN

     Applicant

                     - and -            


                     DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA

     Respondent


DATE OF HEARING:          TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2001

PLACE OF HEARING:          TORONTO, ONTARIO

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:      NOËL J.A.

Delivered at Toronto, Ontario on Tuesday, January 23, 2001


APPEARANCES BY:          Mr. Raymond F. Pasquan

                       

                        The Applicant on His Own Behalf

                       

                     Mr. Derek Edwards

                        For the Respondent

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:      Raymond F. Pasquan

                     11 Putney Road

                     Etobicoke, Ontario

                     M8W 2K6

                        The Applicant on His Own Behalf

                     Morris Rosenberg

                     Deputy Attorney General of Canada

    

                        For the Respondent

                        FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL


Date: 20010123


Docket: A-518-99

                       

                        BETWEEN:

                        RAYMOND F. PASQUAN

     Applicant

    

                        - and -            

    

                            

                        DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL

                        OF CANADA

     Respondent


                    

                       

                       

                        REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

                       


Modified : 2007-04-24 Top of the page Important Notices

[ Download Adobe Reader  |  Printer-Friendly Page ]