 Printer-Friendly Page
Date: 20020122 BETWEEN: TELUS INTEGRATED COMMUNICATION INC. Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and BCE NEXXIA INC. Respondents Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 22, 2002. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on January 22, 2002. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: RICHARD C.J. CORAM: RICHARD C.J. BETWEEN: TELUS INTEGRATED COMMUNICATION INC. Applicant and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and BCE NEXXIA INC. Respondents REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario on January 22, 2002.) RICHARD C.J. [1] In light of the evidence and, in particular, Telus' response to the request for clarification, it was open to the CITT to conclude that the evaluation procedure was not breached and that the Telus complaint was not valid. [2] Accordingly, the application for judicial review will be dismissed with costs to both respondents. "J. Richard" Chief Justice FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-788-00 STYLE OF CAUSE: Telus Integrated Communication Inc. v. The Attorney General of Canada and BCE Nexxia Inc. PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: January 22, 2002 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: Richard, C.J. Strayer, J.A. Noël, J.A. RENDERED FROM THE BENCH BY: Richard. C.J. APPEARANCES: Ms. Barbara A. Mclsaac, Q.C. Mr. Kris Klein for the Applicant Ms. Anne M. Turley Mr. Michael Roach for the Respondent (A.G.C.) Mr. Ronald D. Lunau Ms. Phuong Ngo for the Respondent (BCE-Nexxia Inc.) SOLICITORS OF RECORD: McCarthy Tétrault for the Applicants Ottawa, Ontario Mr. Morris Rosenberg for the Respondent Deputy Attorney General of Canada Ottawa, Ontario Gowling Lafleur Henderson L.L.P. for the Respondent (BCE-Nexxia Inc.) Ottawa, Ontario |
|||
|
|||
|
|
