Date: 20060119
Docket: A-22-02
Citation: 2006 FCA 24
BETWEEN:
ANTHONY JURAK
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
[1] This is an assessment of costs following a judgment dated February 3, 2003. On October 18, 2005, we sent a letter to the appellant requiring him to file his written submissions against the respondent's bill of costs. To date, there has not been a reply to our request.
[2] In the circumstances, with the exception of item 26, the bill of costs is assessed as submitted since all of the claims are reasonable and consistent with the application of Tariff B in general. I am awarding 2 units for the assessment of costs since this is a very simple matter and is not contested. Note that the fees are calculated according to the value of the unit, which has been $120 since April 1, 2005.
[3] A certificate of assessment is therefore issued in the amount of $1,515.85.
Signed: "Michelle Lamy"
|
MICHELLE LAMY
ASSESSMENT OFFICER
|
MONTRÉAL, QUEBEC
January 19, 2006
Certified true translation
Francie Gow
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-22-02
STYLE OF CAUSE: Anthony Jurak
v. Her Majesty the Queen
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE
PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Montréal, Quebec
REASONS OF MICHELLE LAMY, ASSESSMENT OFFICER
DATED: January 19, 2006
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Mendelsohn Rosentzveig Shacter
|
FOR THE APPELLANT
|
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Montréal, Quebec
|
FOR THE RESPONDENT
|