 Printer-Friendly Page
Date: 20010703 Neutral citation: 2001 FCA 229 BETWEEN: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS ASSESSMENT OFFICER [1] On June 30, 2000, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed the application for judicial review of a decision of the Umpire and awarded costs. The Respondent filed a bill of costs and requested an assessment in writing without personal appearance. Directions were issued to both parties setting a timetable for serving and filing of materials, including written submissions. The Applicant, who represented himself throughout, did not file any submissions in response. [2] In absence of a response from the Applicant, I examined the items claimed in the bill of costs to ensure that they were within the parameters of the Federal Court Rules and Tariff B. I am satisfied that the supporting materials justify the Respondent's Bill of Costs and I allow it as presented at $935.19. "Rita Bezuhly"
R. Bezuhly Assessment Officer Toronto, Ontario July 3, 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA APPEAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: A-135-99 STYLE OF CAUSE: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant - and - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE OF PARTIES ON MONDAY, JUNE 18, 2001 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS BY: RITA BEZUHLY DATED: TUESDAY, JULY 3, 2001 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada For the Respondent FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA Date: 20010703 Docket: A-135-99 BETWEEN: MURRAY HAYDEN Applicant -and- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA Respondent.
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
