Search Engine

Hosted by Jesse Brown

Thursdays at 11:30am (12:00 NT) and Tuesdays at 3:30 pm (4:00 NT, select markets) on CBC Radio One.

This week's show (Nov.8/07). Links & music.

Music downloads increase CD sales: the Industry Canada study, Michael Geist's blog item.

America's tech-election (part 1- the Democrats)
:
The Politics of Pile On (Clinton's clip)

The Politics of Parsing (Edward's response clip)

Other YouTube election clips mentioned: Vote Different, Obama Girl

Micah Sifry's sites- PersonalDemocracyForum and TechPresident

James Kotecki (AKA Emergency Cheese) interviews Mike Gravel in his dorm room and hits the mid-time on Politico.com


Comments

The study that Michael Geist referred to is terribly flawed. A complete dismantling of the studies analysis and conclusion can be found at http://www.utdallas.edu/~liebowit/intprop/main.htm#canadian

the author, Stan Leibowitz is a noted academic. perhaps Mister Geist should have done more research before research before championing such a poor piece of work.

You said that there was no "obama girl" video for Clinton. I guess you haven't seen the "hot for Hil video". . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LWF9LF_NQM

I agree with the comment made by Don Berkowitz.

The debate on P2P-CD sales is difficult to track. As the study's authors write themselves, there are certainly two factors at play: sampling (P2P -> +CD) and substitution (P2P -> -CD).

I went back to the study. On page 24 the authors write that "[R]egressions based on cross-sectional data cannot prove causality; instead they only show an association between variables." Later they acknowledge that simultaneous equations systems ("capable" of dealing with circular causality) would have required "instrumental variables" (indicators that are unambigously related to only one of the two inter-related variables) that were not available. Too bad.

But then, how can the authors conclude that 12 P2P downloads per year increase CD purchases by 0.44? (!!) (rather than say an increase of .44 CD per year increase the likelihood of P2P downloads by 12).

I suppose that everybody will agree that:

1) the more I like music, the more I am likely to sample
2) the more I like music, the more I am likely to acquire music

So there is no surprise if we find a positive correlation between P2P and purchases. (the Leibowitz file has a useful numerical example)

The question is whether the positive sampling effect on CD sales is larger than the negative substitution effect. Possible, but frankly, I doubt it. And the aforementioned study doesn't provide a satisfactory answer.

I agree totally.

Comment on this post

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published may be edited for language, brevity, clarity or anonymity. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Comments which do not relate to this post will not be published. Please use the Contact Us link for other means of offering feedback.

Items marked with a red arrow [This is a required selection.] are required
CBC Privacy Policy

This is a required field.Name:
This is a required field. e-mail Address
This is a required field. Comments

Radio OneRadio 2R3Sirius