Human Resources and Social Development Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada

Understanding the Early Years An Update of Early Childhood Development Results in Four Canadian Communities - July 2005

Previous Table of Contents Next

VI. Early Childhood Development in Southwestern Newfoundland

This chapter describes the results for Southwestern Newfoundland for five sets of measures. As in the previous three chapters, the first two sets of results describe the demographic characteristics, family processes, and community factors, based on data collected in 2000 and 2004, and using the measures described in Chapter II. These findings are followed with a presentation of results pertaining to early childhood outcomes, based on the direct assessments and the indirect assessments by parents and teachers. For each analysis, the results for 2000 and 2004 are compared, and changes that are statistically significant are indicated with an arrow pointing upward for positive changes, and a downward-pointing arrow for negative changes. For the three sets of outcome measures, the results are also compared to national norms. Results that differ significantly from national norms are indicated with bold text.

A. Demographic characteristics

Table 6-1
Demographic Characteristics for the Southwest Newfoundland community
 
SW
Newfoundland
 
 
 
SW
Newfoundland
UEY 2000
UEY 2004
Family Income (x $1,000)
(Ns = 289, 227)
34.9
44.8
Mother’s Education (years)
(Ns = 282, 224)
11.5
12.4
Father’s Education (years)
(Ns = 208, 153)
11.0
12.1
Mother Not Working Outside the Home (%)
(Ns = 280, 223)
60.4
 
55.6
Father Not Working Outside the Home (%)
(Ns = 212, 149)
39.6
 
35.6
Single Parent Family (%) (Ns = 289, 227)
27.7
 
31.3
Number of Siblings (Ns = 289, 227)
0.9
1.0
Aboriginal Status (%) (Ns = 287, 205)
2.4
14.6

Note: Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

Table 6-1 displays the demographic characteristics for Southwestern Newfoundland for 2000 and 2004. Average family income increased substantially during that period, with the average income of the 2004 sample at $44,800, compared with $34,900 for the 2000 sample. Levels of parental education also rose significantly, increasing from 11.5 to 12.4 years for mother’s education, and from 11.0 to 12.1 years for father’s education. The percentage of mothers who were not working outside the home decreased from 60.4% to 55.6%, while the percentage of fathers not working outside the home declined from 39.6% to 35.6%, although these changes were not statistically significant. The percentage of children living in single parent families increased from 27.7% to 31.3%. The 2004 sample included a considerably higher percentage of Aboriginal children – 14.6% compared with 2.4% in 2000.

B. Family and community factors

The 2004 results for Southwest Newfoundland showed significant improvement in five areas. Parents were more engaged with their children, with scores rising from 8.9 to 9.2, while their use of resources also increased, from 2.7 to 4.1. Levels of Social Support increased from 7.3 to 7.8. The score for neighbourhood social capital and neighbourhood safety also increased, from 6.8 to 7.1, and from 7.0 to 7.4 respectively. Scores declined in only one area, demanding parenting, which declined from 7.5 to 7.3.

Table 6-2
Family and Community Characteristics for the Southwest Newfoundland community
 
SW
 
 
 
 
 
SW
Newfoundland
Newfoundland
UEY 2000
UEY 2004
Score on
10-Point Scale
Score on
10-Point Scale
Responsive Parenting (Ns = 279, 223)
7.8
7.7
Demanding Parenting (Ns = 279, 223)
7.7
7.5
Family Functioning (Ns = 288, 224)
7.2
 
 
7.3
Mother’s Mental Health (Ns = 287, 222)
8.9
8.8
Parental Engagement (Ns = 287, 227)
8.9
9.2
Use of Resources (Ns = 278, 227)
2.7
4.1
Social Support (Ns = 288, 222)
7.3
7.8
Neighbourhood Social Capital (Ns = 288, 225)
6.8
7.1
Safe neighbourhood (Ns = 288, 225)
7.0
7.4
Quality neighbourhood (Ns = 288, 225)
6.4
 
6.4

Note: Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

The average scores in Receptive Vocabulary and the Who Am I developmental assessment did not change significantly between 2000 and 2004. The scores on Receptive Vocabulary are consistent with national norms, while scores on the Who Am I Developmental Assessment are 5 points above the national norm.

C. Direct assessments of children’s outcomes

Table 6-3
Mean Scores on the PPVT and Who Am I for the
SW Newfoundland Community
 
SW
Newfoundland
UEY 2000
SW
Newfoundland
UEY 2004
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
PPVT (Receptive Vocabulary)
(Ns = 284, 209)
103.0
16.3
100.8
14.6
Who Am I Developmental Assessment
(Ns = 243, 180)
104.4
15.1
105.0
14.5

Note: Figures in bold text differ significantly (p < .10) from the Canadian mean of 100.
Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

The average scores in Receptive Vocabulary and the Who Am I developmental assessment did not change significantly between 2000 and 2004. The scores on Receptive Vocabulary are consistent with national norms, while scores on the Who Am I Developmental Assessment are 5 points above the national norm.

D. Parents’ assessments of children’s behavioural outcomes

The average score on Positive Behaviour also did not change significantly from 2000 to 2004. The average was 101.1 in 2004, which is consistent with national norms.

Table 6-4
Mean Scores on Positive Behaviour for the SW Newfoundland Community

 
SW Newfoundland UEY 2000
 
SW Newfoundland UEY 2004
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Positive Behaviour
(Ns = 287, 227)
102.3
13.5
101.1
13.9
Note: Figures in bold text differ significantly (p < .10) from the Canadian mean of 100. Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

The prevalence of children classified as hyperactive is below national norms, as is the prevalence of children displaying significant indirect aggression. The prevalence of children with anxiety/emotional problems increased from 3.8% in 2000 to 7.9% in 2004. Similar results are evident for aggression and conduct disorders.

Table 6-5
Prevalence of Children with Behaviour Problems in SW Newfoundland
 
SW
Newfoundland
 
SW
Newfoundland
UEY 2000
UEY 2004
Percent
Percent
Hyperactivity/Inattention
(Ns = 286, 224)
7.7
5.8
Anxiety/Emotional Problems
(Ns = 287, 227)
3.8
7.9
Aggression/Conduct Disorder
(Ns = 286, 224)
4.9
9.4
Indirect Aggression
(Ns = 287, 220)
6.3
 
7.7

Note: Figures in bold text differ significantly (p < .10) from the Canadian mean of 10 percent.
Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

E. Teachers’ assessments of children’s early development

Scores on the Early Development Instrument increased significantly in three of the five domains: Physical Health and Well-being, Emotional Health and Maturity, and Language and Cognitive Development. The children in this community were rated above national norms in all categories except social knowledge and competence.

Table 6-6
Mean Scores on the Early Development Instrument for the SW Newfoundland Community and the Comparison Sample
 
Canada
SW
Newfoundland
 
 
 
 
SW
Newfoundland
 
 
UEY 2000
UEY 2004
(N = 28,250)
(N = 258)
(N = 186)
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Mean
SD
Physical Health and Well-being
8.6
1.1
8.9
1.2
9.2
0.9
Social Knowledge and Competence
7.5
1.5
8.2
1.9
 
8.3
1.8
Emotional Health and Maturity
7.9
1.5
7.6
1.5
7.9
1.5
Language and Cognitive Development
8.1
1.9
8.4
2.0
8.8
1.8
Communication Skills and General Knowledge
7.2
2.1
8.2
1.9
 
8.2
1.9

Note: Figures in bold text differ significantly (p < .10) from the Canadian mean.
Arrows indicate a statistically significant increase or decrease from 2000 to 2004.

F. Summary of Findings for Southwest Newfoundland

The findings suggest that early childhood development outcomes in Southwestern

Newfoundland are average to above average compared with national norms. The prevalence of children with Anxiety and Emotional Problems, and Aggression and Conduct Disorders increased from 2000 to 2004. However, these findings are inconsistent with teachers’ ratings of children’s Emotional Health and Maturity, which improved over that period. The community also showed significant improvements in family processes and community factors. The average levels of income and parents’ education also increased during the study period, and generally, given the relatively low levels of income and education compared with national norms, the children in this community are doing exceptionally well.

Previous Table of Contents Next