Environment Canada signature Canada Wordmark
Skip first menu
  Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New
About Us
Topics Publications Weather Home
illustration HomeLinksSite Map
Existing Substances Evaluation
CEPA Registry
Priority Substances Assessment Program ()
Domestic Substances List Program
Categorization
Screening Assessment
Pilot Project
DSL Notices
Related Activities
Substance Search
DSL Comments
Section 75
Portal

Frequently Asked Questions and
Description of Colour Codes

What is an existing substance?

An existing substance is a substance that has been or is currently used in Canada as a commercial substance or product, or released as a single substance, an effluent, a mixture or a contaminant into the Canadian environment. This includes substances appearing on the Domestic Substances List.

What is the Domestic Substances List (DSL)?

The Domestic Substances List (DSL) includes substances that were, between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1986:

1) in Canadian commerce, or
2) used for manufacturing purposes, or
3) manufactured in or imported into Canada in a quantity of 100 kg or more in any calendar year.

Substances on the DSL are also referred to as “existing” substances. There are approximately 23,000 substances on the DSL. The types of substances on the DSL include, organic chemicals (which make up half of the DSL substances), polymers, inorganic substances, products of biotechnology, and substances that are of “Unknown or Variable Composition, complex reaction products, or Biological materials” (referred as UVCBs).

Although “new substances” are also included on the DSL, only those substances which have not or will not be evaluated as a new substance will be examined under the DSL Categorization and Screening exercise; otherwise these “new substances” are subject to the New Substances Notification Regulations (NSNR) of CEPA 1999.

What is “Categorization and Screening” of substances the DSL?

CEPA 1999 requires that all substances on the DSL that have not been subject to notification and assessment as new substances be categorized by September 2006.

The first phase of this program, categorization, involves the systematic identification of substances on the DSL that should be subject to screening level risk assessment. For this purpose, categorization is looking for substances that:

1. are “inherently Toxic”, and display either of the characteristics of persistence (take a long time to break down) or bioaccumulation (collect in living organisms and end up in the food chain), or
2. may present to individuals in Canada the greatest potential for exposure.

The screening level risk assessment involves a more in-depth analysis of a substance to determine whether the substance is “toxic” or capable of becoming “toxic” as defined in CEPA 1999. This determination of toxic consists of integrating the assessment of known or potential exposure of a substance with known or potential adverse effects on the environment. The screening level risk assessment may result in one of the following outcomes:

  • no further action is taken at that time under CEPA in respect of the substance, if: (a) the screening assessment indicates that the substance does not pose a risk to the environment or human health, or (b) if risk preventive or control activities for the substance are already being adequately addressed in a program outside of CEPA;
  • the substance is added to the CEPA Priority Substances List to assess more comprehensively the risks associated with the release of and exposure to the substance; or
  • it is recommended that the substance be added to the List of Toxic Substances, Schedule 1 of CEPA 1999, if required, and that risk preventive or control instruments be developed.

What is the definition of CEPA "toxic"?

According to Section 64 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA 1999), a substance is "toxic" if it is entering or may enter the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that:

a. have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity;
b. constitute or may constitute a danger to the environment on which life depends; or
c. constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health.

What do P, B, and iT stand for?

P stands for Persistent, B stands for Bioaccumulative, and iT stands for “inherently Toxic”.

What is Persistence?

Environmental persistence refers to the length of time a substance resides in the environment. A common measure of a substance’s persistence is its half-life — i.e., the time required for the concentration of a substance to diminish to half of its original value in a particular environmental medium of interest. A substance is considered persistent if its transformation half-life satisfies this criterion in any one environmental medium or if it is subject to long-range transport. Only degradation through chemical, biochemical, and photochemical processes is considered. In other words, degradation refers to the breakdown of the substance rather than its removal from a given media by physical transport processes. In the case of air, a substance may be considered as persistent in air if it is shown to be subject to atmospheric transport to remote regions, such as the Arctic.

What is Bioaccumulation?

Bioaccumulation is a general term describing a process by which substances are accumulated by organisms directly from the surrounding media and through consumption of food containing the substances. Bioconcentration is a process by which there is a net accumulation of a substance directly from water into aquatic organisms resulting from simultaneous uptake (e.g., gills or epithelial tissue) and elimination (CCME 1987). In the categorization process, bioaccumulation factors (BAF) are preferred over bioconcentration factors (BCF); in the absence of BAF or BCF data, the octanol–water partition coefficient (log Kow) shall be used.

The octanol-water partition coefficient is the ratio of the concentration of a material in the octanol phase to the concentration in the aqueous phase of a two-phase octanol/water system.

What is inherently Toxic to non-human organisms?

The term “inherently Toxic” has been proposed and used under CEPA 1999 to distinguish from the word “toxic,” which is defined under section 64. “Inherently Toxic” refers to the hazard a substance presents to the environment or human health, which can be represented by the toxic effect caused by the substance — i.e., the toxicity found in a study or predicted due solely to the test substance, or the effect that has not been masked or mitigated by some factor or parameter.

Environment Canada has chosen to use the results of aquatic toxicity tests to represent the character of “inherently Toxic” to non-human organisms. A common test of aquatic toxicity considered by Environment Canada for categorization is the 96 hour LC50. This test determines the concentration of substance in water that kills 50% of the organisms (e.g. water fleas).

What are the Environment Canada criteria for Categorization for P,B,iT?

The P and B criteria are in accordance with the Persistence and Bioaccumulation Regulations (CEPA 1999). The criteria for iT to non-human organisms for Environment Canada are outlined in the Guidance Manual for the Categorization of Organic and Inorganic Substances on Canada’s Domestic Substances List.

The criteria for P, B, and iT are as follows:

Persistence
Medium
Air
Water
Sediment
Soil
Half-life
>= 2 days
>= 6 months
>= 1 year
>= 6 months

 

 

 

 

Substances that have the potential to be transported to remote areas of the globe are considered persistent, and the relevant evidence for long-range transport (LRT) will be taken into consideration in determining the persistence of substances.

Bioaccumulation
BAF >= 5,000
or
BCF >= 5,000
or
Log KOW >= 5

 

 

 

 

Bioaccumulation factor (BAF) refers to the ratio of the concentration of a substance in an organism to the concentration in water, based on uptake directly from the surrounding medium and food.

Bioconcentration factor (BCF) refers to the ratio of the concentration of a substance in an organism to the concentration in water, based only on uptake directly from the surrounding medium.

The octanol-water partition co-efficient refers to the ratio of distribution of a substance in octanol compared to that in water.

Exposure Duration Criteria

Acute
Chronic

LC50(EC50) <= I mg/L
NOEC <= 0.1 mg/L

 

 

 

LC50 represents the concentration of a substance in water causing death in 50% of the experimental organisms in the water.

EC50 represents the concentration of a substance in water inducing toxic effects on 50% of the experimental organisms.

NOEC, the non-observed-effect concentration, refers to the highest concentration of a substance at which there is no adverse effect observed in a toxicological study.

Health Canada is responsible for the development of criteria for “inherently Toxic” to humans. For more information, please visit the website of Health Canada at http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/contaminants/existsub/index_e.html.

What happens when a substance is CEPA "toxic"?

For substances that are determined to be "toxic" under CEPA and are added to the List of Toxic Substances in Schedule 1 of the Act, Environment Canada and Health Canada will propose at least one instrument to establish preventive or control actions for managing the substance and thereby reduce or eliminate its release into the environment. These instruments and tools may be used to control any aspect of the substance's life cycle - from the design and development stage to its manufacture, use, storage, transport and ultimate disposal. For those substances deemed persistent and bioaccumulative and which result primarily from human activity, virtual elimination of their release to the environment is the objective.

What is "virtual elimination"?

Under CEPA 1999, virtual elimination means, in respect of a toxic substance released into the environment, the ultimate reduction of the quantity or concentration of the substance in the release below concentrations that can accurately be measured using sensitive but routine sampling and analytical methods.

Virtual elimination is usually achieved through a series of progressive release limits set by regulations and, when appropriate, other risk management measures.

The virtual elimination of toxic substances, which are persistent, bioaccumulative, result mainly from human activity and are not naturally occurring radionuclides or naturally occurring inorganic substances, is also at the core of Canada’s Toxic Substances Management Policy, a leading-edge policy among industrialized countries. By putting the virtual elimination elements of the policy into CEPA 1999, Canada is moving ahead of other countries in dealing with these toxic substances.

More information on the Toxic Substances Management Policy can be found on the Environment Canada website at http://www.ec.gc.ca/toxics/TSMP/.

What are the categorization colour groups?

The colour groups are used to identify priorities for filling data gaps. The colours used are: Yellow, Purple, Blue, Green, White, Red and Orange (see Table 2, below).

Table 1. Description of Categorization Groups (according to colour assignment)

Group Description
Yellow
  • These substances are more likely to progress to the screening assessment stage where additional toxicity data will eventually be needed.
  • Substances in this group meet the ecological categorization criteria, and have moderate production/import quantities as reported in 1986.
  • For organics: The uncertainty in the ecological categorization conclusions varies from a high weight of evidence to a low weight of evidence. Many of these substances have met the criteria of inherent toxicity to non-human organisms based on a weight of evidence approach using Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships (QSARs). Additional toxicity, degradation or bioaccumulation data would serve to address the uncertainty and could be valuable in the prioritization and screening assessment process.
  • For inorganics: The uncertainty in the ecological categorization conclusions varies from a high confidence to a low confidence. Additional aquatic toxicity or water solubility data would serve to address the uncertainty and could be valuable in the prioritization and screening assessment process.
  • If these were new substances, the quantities would be sufficient to trigger experimental data requirements under the New Substances Program, including tests of inherent toxicity to non-human organisms and physical-chemical properties.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a higher priority for stakeholder involvement.
  • Purple
  • Substances in this group meet the ecological categorization criteria, and have high production/import quantities as defined in international programs.
  • Most of these substances have already been included or identified in High Production Volume (HPV) programs internationally or in the United States. These programs will yield much data in upcoming years.
  • For these substances, Environment Canada will seek access to this HPV data and hazard assessments conducted in other jurisdictions.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a lower priority for stakeholder involvement because inclusion in HPV programs will ensure the appropriate data sets are available at the time of screening assessments.
  • Blue
  • Substances in this group meet ecological categorization criteria, but had low production/import quantities reported in 1986.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a lower priority for stakeholder involvement because the current information is likely to be sufficient to reach a conclusion at the screening assessment stage.
  • The lower potential for exposure means that additional property information from stakeholders would probably not be required for screening assessments.
  • These quantities would not have been sufficient to trigger notification or experimental data requirements under the New Substances Notification Regulations and would have been exempted under the current REACH1 proposal.
  • Environment Canada is developing a tool to assess worst-case exposure scenarios to identify those substances in this group that may require additional screening assessment work.
  • Green
  • Substances in this group have considerable uncertainty surrounding their ecological categorization.
  • These are both data-poor and model-difficult.
  • These data gaps are considered by Environment Canada as a global issue and should be addressed at the international level and not solely through our domestic program.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a lower priority for stakeholder involvement.
  • White
  • Substances in this group meet P and/or B categorization criteria, but not the criterion of iT to non-human organisms.
  • These substances will be additionally prioritized by Health Canada for consideration of inherent toxicity to humans.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a lower priority for stakeholder involvement with Environment Canada.
  • Red
  • Substances in this group meet neither the P nor B categorization criteria. o For inorganics, Metal-containing substances in this group (for which B is not applicable) meet neither the P nor the water-solubility criteria.
  • Environment Canada will stop ecological categorization work and rely on the other feeders for new information that would identify substances or groups of substances that the program should prioritize for assessment.
  • Substances in this group have been assigned a lower priority for stakeholder involvement.
  • Orange
  • Unknown quantities
  • 1 REACH: Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals legislation as proposed by the European Union http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/reach/index.htm

    For detailed descriptions of colour groups assigned for organics, inorganics, and organic metal salts, please refer to the corresponding fact sheets.

    How are the values calculated for P, B, and iT?

    Generally the data selection process involves a search of the scientific literature and databases for quality experimental data for each of P, B, and iT. If acceptable data is not found, QSARs or models are used to estimate the Persistence, Bioaccumulation and aquatic Toxicity of substances based on structure and physical-chemical properties. There are a number of models available for each of P, B, and aquatic iT, and the resulting predictions are weighted to produce a result. If reliable QSAR predictions are not available for a substance, professional judgement is used to provide a qualitative assessment of the substance.

    What are QSARs?

    A quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is a quantitative relationship between a biological activity (e.g. toxicity) and one or more descriptors that are used to predict the activity. For example, for many chemicals, there is a relationship between octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and aquatic toxicity. Kow is therefore used to estimate this endpoint.

    How are QSARs used in the Categorization?

    QSARs are used only when valid quality experimental data were not found during searches of available databases and the scientific literature. They are used to provide predictions of P, B, and aquatic iT.

    What will happen to the chemicals that have received categorization decisions?

    If a substance meets the Categorization criteria through to a final Categorization decision, it will proceed to Risk Assessment – a tiered approach to assess the potential adverse effects of a substance in the environment. The inclusion of a substance on this list does not mean that action will be taken to restrict its use or to ban it.

    What if there is a substance on this list that may have been incorrectly categorized?

    Environment Canada is providing the opportunity for individuals and interested parties to submit data. Guidance for this data submission is outlined in the fact sheet Submitting Experimental Data to the Existing Substances Program, as well as available via the website of Environment Canada, at http://www.ec.gc.ca/substances/ese/eng/dsl/cat_index.cfm.

    What chemicals are on Canada’s DSL?

    A complete listing of all of the substances on Canada’s DSL (identified by both their chemical names and their CAS (Chemical Abstracts Service) registry numbers, can be found in the spreadsheet entitled: Index of DSL Substances.

    Reference

    CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment). 1987. Canadian Water Quality Guidelines. Appendix I. Glossary, Symbols and Abbreviations (updated periodically)


    Disclaimer: Although care has been taken to ensure that the information found on this website accurately reflects the requirements prescribed in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (1999), you are advised that, should any inconsistencies be found, the legal documents, printed in the Canada Gazette, will prevail.

    Top of Page

    | What's New | About Us | Topics | Publications | Weather | Home |
    | Help | Search | Canada Site |
    The Green LaneTM, Environment Canada's World Wide Web site
    Important Notices