Flag of Canada
Government of Canada - Gouvernement du Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Commissioners Board of Referees HRSDC Site
Jurisprudence Library Office of the Umpire Home
    Home > Board of Referees > Tribunal Proceedings > Dominant Features of Administrative Justice and Tribunal Proceedings
     

  Introduction to
  Administrative
  Justice


  Foreword -
  Tribunal
  Proceedings


  Table of
  Contents


  Chapter 1
  Administrative
  Justice and
  Tribunal
  Proceedings


  Chapter 2
  The Hearing


  Chapter 3
  Evidence


  Chapter 4
  Interpreting
   the Act
  and the
  Regulations


  Chapter 5
  Deliberations
  and Decision


  Conclusion

  Appendix

  Index

  End notes

  Synoptic
  Tables


  Canadian
  Human Rights
  Tribunal


  Tribunal Proceeding

SYNOPTIC TABLES

 

ROLE OF THE CHAIRPERSON

Before the hearing

  • Check formalities and rules. Send the notice and the file. Determine that there is a quorum.
  • Check the condition of the premises.
  • Check those in attendance (they must be authorized persons).
  • Require a person to attend the hearing.
  • Grant a postponement or adjournment where appropriate.
  • At the hearing
  • Preside over and direct the proceedings.
  • Allow the parties and their representatives to speak.
  • Allow the members to speak.
  • Maintain order.
  • Exercise the right to refer any question to the Commission - (R. 82).
  • Grant an adjournment where appropriate.

Deliberation and decision

  • Lead the discussion with the members.
  • See to the drafting of the unanimous or majority decision.
  • Accept a dissenting opinion (the chairperson may also dissent).
  • Record everything in the minutes of the proceedings.
  • Communicate the decision to the office of the Commission.


INDEPENDENCE AND IMPARTIALITY OF THE BOARD

INDEPENDENCE

Institutional

  • not removable for the duration of its term, except in the event of revocation for cause.
  • financial security (Treasury Board).
  • functional autonomy (in relation to the Commission).

Individual

  • no external pressure on the decision makers.
  • deliberations are secret.


EVIDENCE

(before the Board of Referees)

BURDEN

  • Appellant.
  • Shared between the appellant, the Commission or the employer.
  • The Commission: shift of the burden in a number of cases.

STANDARD

  • Balance of probabilities or preponderance of the evidence.

MEANS OF PROOF

  • Testimonies.
  • Written documents (various documents, affidavit).
  • Material evidence (objects, photos, recordings).
  • Presumptions (legal or factual).
  • Admissions or confessions.
  • Judicial notice (matters of common knowledge, personal knowledge of the board members, experience, etc.).

TYPES OF EVIDENCE

  • Direct (direct link between the means and what - has to be proved).
  • Indirect or secondary (inference)
  • hearsay
  • circumstantial evidence
  • similar facts.

TYPES OF EVIDENCE

(definitions)

Direct

  • The means employed (testimonies, written documents, admissions, etc.) is closely and directly related to the - proof that is sought.

Indirect

  • The proof that is sought is inferred from the means employed (testimonies, written documents, objects, etc.).

Hearsay

  • What a person reports orally or in writing after having - heard it said or read it.

Circumstantial evidence

  • On the basis of indications of time, place and persons, the existence of a fact or the occurrence of an event is inferred.

Similar facts

  • Proof of facts or situations that are comparable - to the fact in dispute.

Documentary evidence

  • Any document or writing.
  • An authentic deed or official public document.
  • A writing in the form of an instrument, which relates - a legal act (contract, testament, etc.).
  • Affidavit: a sworn statement.
  • Other document: any other writing, report or letter.

Testimonial evidence

  • A statement by which a person relates the facts of which - he or she has knowledge, or by which an expert gives his - or her opinion.

Admission

  • Recognition, by written or oral testimony, of a fact that can have legal consequences for the person responsible for the fact.

Presumption

  • Relevant facts that make it possible to infer the existence of the fact in issue through inductive reasoning.
  • Presumption of law: created by statute or a common law rule.
  • Presumption of fact: inference made from one or more known facts to an unknown fact.
  • Absolute presumption: one that is irrefutable, - that cannot be rejected.
  • Simple presumption: one that can be refuted by - evidence to the contrary.

Natural evidence

  • Evidence that a member of a Board of Referees perceives through his or her own senses or through a document - or witness (noting of the condition of a thing, listening - to a recording).

Judicial knowledge

  • The personal knowledge that a member of a board has of - well-known and indisputable facts, personal experience - and expertise.

Admissible evidence

  • Evidence that may be admitted under law.

Relevant evidence

  • Evidence that relates directly or indirectly to the subject of the dispute, and that can establish or render probable the existence or non-existence of the facts that must be proved.

Probative value

  • The weight that the board gives to a piece of evidence intended to convince the board.

BURDEN OF PROOF

APPELLANT - (claimant)

  • Special benefits.
  • Antedating.
  • Refusal of employment: unsuitable employment or just cause.
  • Absence from Canada (R. 55).
  • Undeclared earnings (R. 15).
  • Week of unemployment (A. 9-11; R. 29-32).
  • Availability (A. 18).
  • Existence of illness or injury.
  • Declaration that is false on the face of it, reversal of - the burden of proof.
  • Application for review = new facts.

SHARED BURDEN - (claimant and Commission)

  • Regular benefits: claimant (A. 49), Commission (A. 9).
  • Labour disputes (A. 49, A. 36 (4)).
  • Penalties.
  • Availability for work.
  • Voluntary separation.
  • Earnings.

COMMISSION - (and employer)

-Dismissal for misconduct. PROBATIVE VALUE

WRITTEN DOCUMENTS

Authentic deed and public document

  • Provides proof of its contents.

Private act

  • Act in the form of an instrument (contract): filing with testimony to support it.
  • Other documents: filing with testimony to support it.

TESTIMONIALS

Direct witnesses

  • Examination and cross-examination.

Indirect witnesses

  • Circumstantial evidence.
  • Proof of similar facts.
  • Hearsay.

PRESUMPTIONS

Presumption of law

  • Absolute value.

Presumption of fact

  • Relative value: may be refuted by ordinary evidence.

MATERIAL EVIDENCE

  • Production of an object, photograph or recording.

JUDICIAL NOTICE

  • Matters of common knowledge.
  • Personal experience of the decision maker.


RULES OF INTERPRETATION

LEGISLATIVE RULES - (Federal Interpretation Act)

  • The law is always speaking (s. 10).
  • The law has a remedial effect (s. 12).
  • Can = power; must = duty.
  • The masculine may apply to persons of both sexes.
  • The singular may include the plural.
  • Divergences between the English and French texts; - search the intent of the legislator.

JURISPRUDENTIAL RULES

  • Grammatical or literal method: ordinary - meaning of words or phrases.
  • Systematic and logical method: search for internal consistency or consistency among various statutes or regulations.
  • Teleological method, or method by ultimate purpose - (search for the intention of the legislator).


DECISION

STRUCTURE

  • In writing.
  • Facts taken into consideration.
  • Evidence accepted.
  • Testimonies, documents, presumptions, admissions.
  • Evidence to the contrary: credibility.
  • Findings:
  • findings of law.
  • findings of fact.
  • Terms of the decision.

REASONS - (mandatory, sufficient, complete, intelligible)

  • Essential facts.
  • Based on all the evidence.
  • Sufficient:
  • Analysis of the relationship between the evidence - and the findings.
  • Complete:
  • All the essential facts.
  • Specific relevant criteria according to - the Act and Regulations.
  • Questions of credibility.
  • Intelligible:
  • No contradiction in the statement of the reasons.
  • The reason for the findings.

 

[  notes 6  |  table of contents  ]

     
    Printer version
   
Last modified :  2006-08-31 top Important Notices