| Français | |
Contact us | |
Help | |
Search | |
Canada Site |
|
||||||||
| Justice Home | |
Site Map | |
Programs and Initiatives | |
Proactive Disclosure | |
Laws |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
 |
SOME THOUGHTS ON BIJURALISM IN CANADA AND THE WORLD
Table
of Contents
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PART I — |
Characteristics and Context of the Two Legal Traditions Historical Background Characteristics of the two legal traditions
Characterization
of the two legal traditions: private law and common law in Canada |
|
| PART II — |
Forms of Coexistence of the Two Legal Traditions in Canada Influence through interpretation or integration Interaction between the two legal traditions: the relationship of complementarity and its exception, dissociation The realization of the Complementarity relationship
|
|
| PART III — |
Forms of Coexistence of the Two Legal Systems in Other Parts of the World The United Kingdomand laws applicable in Scotland United States and laws applicable in Louisiana Europe and the autonomy of European law |
|
| General Conclusion | ||
 |
 | |||
| Last Updated: 2007-07-10 |  |
Important Notices | ||
The civil law tradition