|
![](/web/20071121024936im_/http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/inter/img/transparent.gif) |
The International Cooperation Group
Publications
![line](/web/20071121024936im_/http://www.justice.gc.ca/en/ps/inter/img/line1.gif)
THE EVOLUTION OF JUVENILE JUSTICE IN CANADA
3 THE ACT OF 1984
In early 1981, Bill C-61, the Young Offenders Act, was introduced
in Parliament. The Bill, unlike the 1908 Juvenile Deliquents Act,
which received less than one hour's discussion in the House of Commons,
was the subject of extensive study and debate in Parliament. More than
40 interest groups made representations to the parliamentary subcommittee
studying the Bill. Although critical of particular aspects of the Bill,
these groups generally supported it. The philosophical direction of the
proposed legislation, in sharp contrast to the failed 1970 Young Offenders
Act, was hardly debated at all. The legal rights orientation of the
Bill went virtually unchallenged ; what was really at issue in this regard
was not the rights in themselves but nuances of their implications. The
two dominant political parties of the time (the Liberal Party and the
Conservative Party) seemed to agree on the fundamental direction of juvenile
justice reform, while a third party (the New Democratic Party) criticised
certain aspects of the Bill but remained relatively quiet in its criticism
of the legislation's philosophical direction.
In 1982, the federal government enacted the Canadian Charter of Rights
and Freedoms, which has become a fundamental part of the country's
Constitution. The Charter protects, among other things, legal rights such
as the right to life, liberty and security of the person. The integration
in the Constitution of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms provided a strong
impetus to federal reform efforts. Many of the provisions of the Juvenile
Delinquents Act appeared to ignore the legal rights guaranteed in
the Charter. Further, the provincial disparities invited challenge under
section 15 of the Charter, which guarantees equality rights. Thus, in
1982, with the support of all political parties, the Young Offenders
Act received parliamentary approval. The Young Offenders Act
came into force on 2 April 1984, replacing the 1908 Juvenile Delinquents
Act.
The Young Offenders Act of 1984 was designed to remedy many
of the shortcomings in the treatment of juvenile delinquents ; in particular,
it addressed the issue of offenders' rights. The Act continued to make
a distinction between youth and adult crime, and to provide for a substantially
different and much more benign approach to dealing with youth. At the
same time, it attempted to make young people more accountable for their
actions. The legislation ended the paternalistic handling of delinquents
by providing young people the same basic rights and freedoms before the
law as those enjoyed by adults, such as the right to legal counsel and
the right to appeal a conviction. It also set out a new range of penalties
that included the options of financial restitution or compensatory work
for the victim. One of the more significant changes, in keeping with the
Act's benevolent approach, was the provision raising the minimum age for
prosecution to 12 years and setting a new, Canada-wide maximum age of
17. The uniform maximum age provision of the Act came into force on 1
April 1985.
The Act initially stipulated that detention could not exceed two years,
except where the crime would ordinarily incur a life sentence, in which
case the maximum period of commitment could not exceed three years. Although
the Act permits transfer to adult court in certain situations, its intent
was that most cases be tried in youth court. There have been a number
of amendments to the Act since it came into force. For example, there
were amendments to the transfer process, amendments increasing the penalty
for first-degree murder to 10 years, and amendments increasing the penalty
for second-degree murder to 7 years.
Despite the considerable amount of criticism it has received, the Young
Offenders Act was clearly an improvement over the Juvenile Deliquents
Act since it represented a balance of the due process rights of young
people, the protection of society and the special needs of young offenders.
While many Canadians thought the Act was too lenient on young offenders,
children's advocates were concerned about the overuse of incarceration
as a method for dealing with troubled youths. A further criticism was
that the principles enumerated in the Young Offenders Act lacked
any indication of priority or order of importance.
In July 1995, the House of Commons Standing Committee on Justice and
Legal Affairs initiated a broad review of the Young Offenders Act.
In order to properly assess the situation, a wide range of groups were
consulted, including criminal justice professionals, children's services
organisations, victims, parents, young offenders, educators, advocacy
groups and social-policy analysts. In its report entitled Renewing
Youth Justice, the federal committee formulated in April 1997 14
suggestions for change, such as providing youth courts the jurisdiction
to deal with 10 and 11 year-olds in certain circumstances, to allow judges
the discretion to permit publication of young offenders' names, and replacing
the Act's declaration of principles with a statement of purpose and an
enunciation of guiding principles for its implementation.
On 12 May 1998, the federal government released its response to the 1997
Renewing Youth Justice report in a document entitled A Strategy
for the Renewal of Youth Justice. This document addressed each of
the recommendations made by the 1997 report and outlined how the government
intended to reform juvenile justice. The strategy focused on three areas
: youth crime prevention, providing young people with meaningful consequences
for their actions, and the rehabilitation and reintegration of young offenders.
|