It is recommended that either the Word or PDF file be downloaded and used,
located on the left side menu.
RECORD OF AMENDMENTS
Amendment No.
Date
Inserted by
Remarks
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
CATEGORY DEFINITION
GROUP DEFINITION
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
DEFINITIONS OF FACTORS, CHARACTERISTICS AND DEGREE, AND NOTES
TO RATERS
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING FEATURES
LIST OF BENCH-MARK POSITIONS
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: RATING SUMMARY
BENCH-MARK POSITIONS: DESCRIPTIONS, SPECIFICATIONS AND
RATINGS
INTRODUCTION
This standard describes the plan to be used to classify
positions allocated to the Chemistry Croup. It consists of an
introduction, definitions of the Scientific and Professional
Category and the occupational group, a glossary of terms, factor
definitions, characteristics and degree highlights, and
bench-mark position descriptions.
The ultimate objective of job evaluation is the determination
of the relative values of jobs in each occupational group. A
classification plan of five levels, representing significant
differences in the difficulty of the work, has been established
for this group. Jobs assigned to a given level are regarded as
being of equal difficulty.
Factors
The evaluation of positions and their assignment to a
classification level will be determined by the application of
five factors:
Kind of Assignments
Complexity of Work
Professional Responsibility
Management Responsibility
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
Each factor is described, and the descriptions designate the
features of the work assigned to positions allocated to the
group.
Factor Characteristics
The factor characteristics are shown under each factor. The
characteristics indicate the features of the work that are to be
considered when evaluating a position under a particular
factor.
Highlights which describe and distinguish the increasing
difficulty of the work from the lowest to the highest degree, are
provided for the five degrees of each factor characteristics.
These highlights describe the features of the work that will be
found in most positions.
Bench-mark Positions
Bench-mark positions exemplify the degrees of the
characteristics, the degrees of each factor and the levels of the
classification plan. Each bench-mark consists of a descriptive
title, a series of statements of the principal duties, and a set
of specifications describing the features of the work of the
position in terms of the characteristics of each of the five
factors. The specifications exemplify the application of the
evaluation plan to the duties and responsibilities of the
bench-mark position and substantiate the degree assigned to the
position for the characteristics and the factors. A
classification level is assigned to each bench-mark position.
Use of the Standard
There are six steps in the application of this classification
standard.
1. The position description is studied to ensure
understanding of the position as a whole and of the nature of the
duties and responsibilities as they relate to the characteristics
of each factor. The relationship of the position being studied to
positions above and below it in the organization is also
studied.
2. Allocation of the position to the category and group is
confirmed by reference to the definitions and the descriptions of
inclusions and exclusions.
3. A degree under each of the factor characteristics is
tentatively assigned to the position being evaluated, by
considering the duties and responsibilities of the position in
relation to the degrees described for the factor characteristics,
and attributing to the position the degree whose definition best
reflects the conditions that are typical of the work of the
position and most closely corresponds to its difficulty in terms
of the characteristic. The degree tentatively assigned is
confirmed by comparison with the bench-mark position descriptions
and rating specifications for the characteristic.
4. A degree under each factor is assigned to the position.
The degree to be assigned for a factor is determined by the
degree which predominates for the factor's characteristics. When
one degree does not predominate, the raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position with
respect to the various characteristics of the factor with the
bench-mark position, and attribute to the position the factor
degree that best equates, on the whole, to the bench-mark
positions.
5. The level of the position is determined by the degree
that has been assigned to the position for at least three of the
five factors. When one degree does not predominate, raters are to
compare the total job with the bench-mark position descriptions
and determine the level that best corresponds on the whole with
the duties and responsibilities of the position.
6. The position is compared with bench-mark position
descriptions that have been assigned to the same level, as a
check on the validity of the level selected.
Guide
A Guide identifying a series of distinguishing features
characterizing positions found typical of each level is included
in the standard.
CATEGORY DEFINITION
Occupational categories were repealed by the Public Service Reform Act (PSRA), effective April 1, 1993. Therefore, the occupational category definitions have been deleted from the classification standards.
GROUP DEFINITION
For occupational group allocation, it is recommended that you
use the Occupational Group Definition
and the Occupational
Sub-group Definition Maps, which provide the
2005 group and sub-group definition and their corresponding inclusion and
exclusion statements. The maps explicitly link the relevant
parts of the overall 2005 occupational sub-group definition to each
classification standard.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
For the purpose of this standard -
Biochemistry - Refers to the science which deals with
all aspects of chemistry that apply to living organisms or life
processes.
Chemistry - Refers to the science which deals with or
investigates the chemical composition and the properties,
interactions and changes of matter. It includes analytical,
physical, organic and inorganic chemistry and biochemistry. It
also includes the application of the principles of chemistry to
biological, physical and geological systems.
Chemistry (Analytical) - Refers to the branch of
chemistry concerned with the qualitative and quantitative
composition of substances and materials.
Chemistry(Inorganic) - Refers to the branch of
chemistry concerned with the study of all substances other than
compounds of carbon.
Chemistry (Organic) - Refers to the branch of chemistry
concerned with the study of the compounds of carbon.
Chemistry (Physical) - Refers to the branch of
chemistry concerned with the interpretation of chemical phenomena
and properties of substances in terms of underlying physical
process.
Chemical Processes - Refers to a procedure or series of
steps which results in new substances or products through
chemical or physico-chemical changes; extraction, separation, or
purification; or the formulation of mixtures.
Chemical Products - Refers to substances obtained as a
result of a chemical process or reaction.
ConflictingInterests - Refers to different
opinions or points of view that lead to a confrontation between
individuals or organizations in respect of the advantageous or
detrimental results of a contemplated action.
Continuing Operation - Refers to tasks or
investigations, usually of an ongoing nature or occurring in a
pattern or in repetitive cycles.
Contracts/Agreement (Evaluating of) - Refers to the
critical examination of contract/agreement proposals or work done
under contract for scientific merit or quality and the provision
of a recommendation of acceptance with or without modifications
or rejection.
Implications of External Matters - Refers to the
difficulty added to the work because of the need to recognize the
interests of others, including those over whom little effective
influence can be exercised.
Matter - Refers to substances in the form of solid,
liquid, gas or plasma.
Matter(Behaviour of) - Refers to the ability of
a substance to undergo changes in chemical structure or
composition.
Matter(Composition of) - Refers to the chemical
make up or structure of substances.
N.B. Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used
in this standard. However, the definition of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
Matter Properties of) - Refers to those attributes of
matter which are studied in chemistry.
OrganizationalControl - Refers to the control
over a staff and its work that is exercised through an
established organizational structure by means of which levels of
responsibility and authority are clearly identified.
Organizational Unit - In terms of size, refers to that
which makes up or is understood to be encompassed by "normal span
of supervisory control of professionals". - As illustrated by
bench-mark positions, the number of staff is normally a function
of the nature/complexity, conditions and requirements of the work
as well as of the type of organizational structure applied.
Outside Assistance - Refers to temporary assistance
needed for the work and which must be obtained from sources
ranging from outside the immediate organizational unit to
organizations outside the Public Service.
Policy- Refers to a declaration of aims
and intent established by legislation or ministerial authority to
guide future courses of action.
Program - Refers to the general plan designed to
achieve the objectives determined by a department or agency to
meet the aims and intent of policy.
Project - Refers to a unit of work for which objectives
have been defined and which is circumscribed by budgetary
controls, time limits and the availability of resources.
Related Fields - Refers to general or specialized
fields that are pertinent to or associated with the work of
professionals in chemistry.
Significant Program Activity - Refers to that portion
of a scientific based program which is visible as an entity and
is comparable to work at the senior management level but with
emphasis on the scientific nature of the work.
Specialized Subject Area - Refers to a "subject area"
in which there is a narrowing of scope and the work to be
performed necessitates an enhanced development of knowledge and
experience.
Standards - Refers to:
(i) A recognized weight, measure or material of specified
composition or characteristics, or experimental procedure used as
a reference for uniform measurement, comparison or
calibration;
(ii) A set of recognized criteria (mandatory or voluntary)
specifying a minimum level of quality, purity, uniformity,
performance, or safety for the manufacture, use or handling of a
material, product, or device.
Studies - Refers to an in-depth examination or
investigation of an area of interest.
Subject Areas - Refers to the facts, theories, ideas,
techniques and related matters that are encompassed by a study,
investigation, project or program, and include the application of
one or more disciplines.
Supervisory Responsibility - Refers to the
responsibility for scheduling and allocating work, instructing,
training, controlling and assessing performance of other
employees and for ensuring satisfactory completion of their
work.
Survey - Refers to a general or broad examination of an
area of interest.
N.B. Some of the terms defined in this Glossary are not used
in this standard. However, the definition of such terms can help
ensure consistency where their use may be indicated.
FACTORS AND FACTOR CHARACTERISTICS
FACTOR
CHARACTERISTICS
FACTOR
CHARACTERISTICS
9KIND OF ASSIGNMENT»
a)
b)
c)
d)
Objectives establishing by others for the work;
Extent of the work;
Variety of activities;
Scope for planning and conducting work.
((MANAGEMENT Responsibility))
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
(Responsibility for:
Control of staff;
Control of physical resources;
Committing departmental resources;
Obtaining outside assistance;
Administrative control of work;
Co-ordination of work performed for, or in conjunction with
other organizational units;
Implementing or developing administrative procedures, safety
and management directives and guidelines.
COMPLEXITY OF WORK»
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
Availability and problems involved in obtaining information
and data;
Validity of information and data;
Number and variability of the variables and ambiguity of
information and data;
Relationships of the variables;
Effect of activities of others on the work;
Nature and purpose of contacts;
Development of concepts and approaches, procedures, techniques
and practices, their adaptation and application;
Theoretical knowledge which must be applied.
((IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND
ACTIVITIES»
a)
b)
c)
(Impact - Governmental)
On departmental work or other government program;
(Impact - External)
On an industrial or commercial process, operation or
product;
On the state of natural resources or the environment;
On public health and safety;
On other external areas.
On development and understanding of a body of knowledge.
((PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
Extent work is checked by others;
Professional guidance received; Initiative and judgement in
defining objectives, dealing with problems and establishing
scientific guidelines;
Judgement in reviewing and assessing work of others;
Judgement in interpreting results of work;
Judgement in giving advice.
FACTOR: "KIND OF ASSIGNMENT"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of its objectives and extent, the variety of activities and
the scope for planning and conducting work.
Notesto Raters
i) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters are to
consider the factor characteristics and their intensity ranging
from degree I to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for
each characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects
the conditions that are typical of the work of the position and
most closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in
terms of the characteristic.
ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least three of the four
characteristics - "A", "B", "C" and "D"). When one degree does
not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity of
the requirements of the position under the factor with that of
the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic A: The objectives
established by others for
the conduct of the work.
Objectives and instructions are provided for the work.
Objectives of the work are clearly defined.
Objectives of the work are defined in terms of activity or
project goals.
Objectives of the work are stated in terms of operational
goals.
Objectives of the work are stated in terms of goals for a
significant program activity.
Characteristic B: The extent
of the work.
Work normally consists of a part or phase of a project, study
or continuing operation requiring limited investigation.
Work normally consists of a number of discrete projects,
studies or investigations.
Work involves comprehensive investigations, projects or
studies within a specialized subject area.
Work involves the application of a number of scientific
principles and theories to complex investigations or studies,
within a specialized subject area; or the direction of work in
diverse subject areas.
Work is performed within a number of related specialized
subject areas and comprises a significant program activity.
Characteristic C: The variety
of activities.
Activities closely resemble one another inmost aspects and
consist of a limited number of straight-forward tasks performed
successively.
Activities differ from one another and consist of a variety of
tasks such as: using a number of related scientific techniques
for surveying, observing, analysing and evaluating products,
phenomena or processes; investigating the composition,
performance or effect of substances; allocating work to support
staff; providing advice.
Activities differ from one another and include using a wide
variety of scientific techniques for investigating the
composition, performance or effect of substances or systems; or
supervising the work of staff engaged in the conduct of analyses
or investigations; and providing advice.
Activities differ from one another in many aspects and include
several of the following: conducting complete investigations,
providing functional direction; coordinating the work with other
activities; providing advice; organizing, controlling and
supervising the work of staff engaged in the conduct of analyses
or investigations; controlling the use of facilities, materiel
and human resources.
Activities involving abroad spectrum of scientific and
administrative duties which differ from one another in most
aspects and include: evaluating and authorizing projects or
studies; making recommendations or providing advice on policy or
legislation; assessing the implications of work progress on
program objectives; providing guidance on the determination of
approaches to complex problems; and managing a significant
program activity, or coordinating activities at the national and
international levels.
Characteristic D: The scope
for planning and conducting work.
Scheduling and performing work using standardized procedures
and techniques.
Planning activities, determining approaches and selecting
methods to ensure that the work meets clearly defined
objectives.
Planning and performing abroad diversity of work within a
subject area, or planning and assigning tasks for the ongoing
work of an organizational unit, or a project or study team to
ensure that the objectives are met within established
guidelines.
Planning, organizing and delegating work of a number of
organizational units, or planning and co-ordinating complex
projects or studies to ensure that operational goals are achieved
within resources limitations; or planning, organizing and
conducting complex projects or studies within a specialized area
with high degree of freedom and latitude.
Planning, coordinating and implementing a significant program
activity or major scientific studies.
FACTOR: "COMPLEXITY OF WORK"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the nature of the information and data used; the
influences external to the work; the nature and purpose of
contacts with others; the requirement for the development of
concepts and approaches, procedures, techniques and practices,
their adaptation and application; and, the theoretical and
practical knowledge which must be applied.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this
factor, raters are to consider the factor characteristics and
their intensity ranging from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for each
characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects the
conditions that are typical of the work of the position and most
closely corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in terms
of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of
the characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for
the whole factor, is determined by the degree which predominates
(i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least five of the
eight characteristics - "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G" and
"H"). When one degree does not predominate, raters are to compare
the overall intensity of the requirements of the position under
the factor, with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine
and attribute to the position the degree which best equates to
the bench-mark positions.
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic A: The availability
of, and the problems involved
in obtaining information and
data.
The work requires obtaining or receiving information and data
from easily accessible sources.
The work requires obtaining information and data by direct
observation, collection or selection from established recognized
sources.
The work requires obtaining, by investigation, information and
data which are often difficult to obtain, interpret and select.
Sources may be identified from past practices or guidelines.
The work requires obtaining, by intensive investigation,
information and data which are often difficult to obtain,
interpret and select. Sources are difficult to identify and to
access.
The work requires coordinating the collection and selection of
information and data which are usually obtained with great
difficulty and require the conduct of intensive study and
investigation. Sources are likely to be obscure or have to be
developed.
Characteristic B: The validity
of information and data.
Information and data of known validity are obtained from
recognized reliable sources or by standardized procedures.
Information and data can normally be validated by known
procedures or literature references.
Information and data can normally be validated by a
combination of experimentation and detailed literature
referencing or further field investigations.
Information and data can be validated only by difficult or
complex investigations.
Information and data may not be completely validatable.
Characteristic C: The number
and variability of the variables
and the ambiguity of information
and data.
Information and data are characterized by few variables, low
variability, lack of ambiguity and are of known implications,
Information and data are characterized by several variables
requiring interpretation, but of known implications and
variability.
Information and data can be characterized by several variables
requiring interpretation, poorly defined variability and some
ambiguity.
Information and data can be characterized by variability, many
variables, difficulty of interpretation, and the need for
judgement to use the data.
Information and data are characterized by high variability,
many variables, ambiguity, and require ingenuity and highly
selective judgement to use.
Characteristic D: The relationships
of the variables.
Relationships between the variables are simple and known.
Relationships between the variables can be established and
inconsistencies resolved by straightforward investigation.
Relationships between variables are sometime conflicting and
require investigation and interpretation.
Relationships between variables are complicated and require
in-depth investigation to identify and resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
Relationships between variables are often conflicting and
difficult to define and measure.
Characteristic E: The effect
of the activities of others on
the work.
Limited effects from the activities of others within the
organizational unit.
Work is normally affected by the activities of others within
the organizational unit and occasionally by the activities of
others outside the organizational unit.
Work is frequently affected by the activities of scientists
and officials outside the organizational unit.
Work is normally affected by the activities of scientists and
officials outside the organizational unit, and requires
consideration of the implication of their activities on a
projector the ongoing activity.
The work of a significant program activity is affected by the
activities of other organizations or agencies and requires
consideration of the implications of the activities of their
senior scientists or officials.
FACTOR: COMPLEXITY OF WORK (CONT'D)
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic F: The nature and
purpose of contacts with others.
Contacts are with others within own organizational unit for
obtaining and discussing information.
Contacts are with others working in the same or closely
related subject areas for obtaining and exchanging information
and discussing problems. May provide information and facts to the
public and the media.
Contacts are with scientists and officials for obtaining and
exchanging information, participating in cooperative projects,
resolving problems, and providing advice. May explain on-going
activities and objectives of the work and exchange information
with the public and the media.
Contacts are with scientists and officials outside the
organizational unit for arranging cooperative projects,
negotiating terms of agreements, establishing standards,
implementing regulations, and for providing advice based on
recognized expertise. May provide scientific and technical
information to the public and the media on contentious
issues.
Contacts are with senior scientists and officials at the
national and international levels at meetings where conflicting
interest are represented, and agreement affecting a significant
program activity are negotiated. May represent the department at
public forums and with the media.
Characteristic G: The requirement application.
for the development of concepts
and approaches, procedures,
techniques and practices, their
adaptation and
The work involves applying conventional practices, techniques
and procedures. Minor adaptations may be required.
The work requires adapting practices, techniques, and
procedures.
The work requires developing new techniques and procedures
using known approaches and existing precedents.
The work requires developing new procedures and techniques
using novel approaches where precedents often do not exist.
The work requires approving or recommending new procedures and
developing new concepts and approaches. Work is characterized by
the absence of precedents.
Characteristic H: The theoretical
and practical knowledge which
must be applied.
The work requires the application of a sound knowledge of the
principles and theories of a discipline and some familiarity with
its practices.
The work requires the application of a sound knowledge of the,
principles, theories and practices of a discipline and some
familiarity with the practices in related disciplines.
The work requires the application of a thorough knowledge of
the principles, theories and practices of a subject area and its
pertinent disciplines, and familiarity with the practices in
related disciplines, subject areas or supervisory practices.
The work requires the application of a thorough knowledge of
the principles, theories and practices of a specialized subject
area, and a knowledge of related scientific disciplines, subject
areas or of management practices.
The work requires the application of an advanced knowledge of
the principles, theories and practices of a specialized subject
area, and a good knowledge of related scientific disciplines,
subject areas or of management practices.
FACTOR: "PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the checks and controls over the work and the
professional leadership received. It is also used to measure the
requirement to exercise initiative and professional judgement in
defining objectives and dealing with problems, and establishing
scientific guidelines; and judgement in reviewing and assessing
the work of others, interpreting results, findings and
recommendations, and in providing advice.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating a position under this factor, raters are
to consider the factor characteristics and their intensity
ranging from degree 1 to degree 5, and attribute to the position,
for each characteristic, the degree whose definition best
reflects the conditions that are typical of the work of the
position and most closely corresponds to the intensity of its
requirements in terms of the characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for the whole
factor, is determined by the degree which predominates (i.e. the
degree that has been assigned for at least four of the six
characteristics - "A", "B", "C", D", "E", "F"). When one degree
does not predominate, raters are to compare the overall intensity
of the requirements of the position under the factor, with that
of the bench-mark positions, and determine and attribute to the
position the degree which best equates to the bench-mark
positions.
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic A: The extent
to which work is checked by others.
Work is reviewed for consistency and accuracy while in
progress and on completion.
Work is accepted as technically accurate. Work assignments and
conclusions are reviewed for consistency and completeness.
Work approaches, recommendations and conclusions are reviewed
for soundness of judgement in terms of the attainment of study or
project objectives.
Key recommendations and conclusions are reviewed for
effectiveness. Results are periodically reviewed in terms of the
attainment of objectives.
Results are evaluated in terms of achievement of policy and
program objectives.
Characteristic B: The professional
guidance received.
Professional guidance is received to assure correct use of
methods and techniques.
Professional guidance is received on new aspects of the
work.
Professional guidance is received on the resolution of
difficult problems.
Professional guidance is received on the resolution of unusual
and complex problems.
Guidance is received on policy intent and program
implications. Professional guidance may be received from other
scientific authorities.
Characteristic C: The requirement guidelines.
to exercise initiative and
judgement in defining objectives
and dealing with problems
and establishing scientific
Work requires indicating problems and selecting methods,
techniques according to established procedure manuals, guidelines
or precedents.
Work requires identifying problems and determining approaches
and suitable methods for their resolution.
Work requires defining objectives of studies, identifying
problems and determining approaches for the resolution of
difficult problems within own subject area.
Work requires establishing the limitations and defining the
objectives of projects or studies and indicating likely
approaches for the resolution of unusual and difficult problems
within related subject areas.
Work requires defining objectives, developing conceptual
approaches to complex problems and establishing scientific
guidelines for a significant program activity.
Characteristic D: The requirement
to exercise judgement in
reviewing and assessing the work
of others.
Work of support staff is checked for correct application of
procedures and consistency of results.
The work of subordinate staff is reviewed while in progress
and on completion for technical accuracy. External submissions
are reviewed for completeness and compliance with data
requirements.
Work of subordinate staff or project team members is reviewed
for completeness and compliance with standards and guidelines.
Within own subject area, results and findings of other scientists
are reviewed for validity or for applicability to own subject
area.
Work approaches, recommendations and conclusions of
subordinate staff or project team members, are reviewed for
soundness of judgement. Other scientists' proposals and studies
that are related to own specialized subject area, are reviewed
for acceptability.
Recommendations and conclusions of staff are reviewed in term
of validity and effectiveness with respect to established policy,
directives, guide-lines and resource limitations. Major studies
or activities of other scientists are evaluated with respect to
own program's objectives.
Characteristic E: The requirement
to exercise judgement in
interpreting results of work.
Own observations are reviewed to ensure reliability and
consistency.
Scientific observations and results are interpreted to produce
meaningful information, conclusions, recommendations or
reports.
Complex scientific data or results, conclusions and
recommendations of subordinate staff or other scientists are
interpreted to determine their meaning and implications on work
activities.
Results of studies or projects are interpreted to determine
the implications of conclusions and recommendations on the
objectives of own work and significance to related scientific and
other activities.
Results of major studies, conclusions and recortmendations are
interpreted to determine their broad implications on scientific
or other related activities affecting a significant program
activity.
Characteristic F: The requirement
to exercise judgement in
giving advice.
Instructions and guidance may be provided to support staff on
matters closely related to the work performed.
Advice is provided to colleagues and support staff on matters
closely related to own area of work.
Specific technical advice within own subject area is provided
to other scientists and officials and immediate superior.
Guidance on scientific matters is provided to subordinate staff
or to other scientists contributing to the work.
Advice based on recognized expertise within a specialized
subject area, is given to other scientists and officials.
Authoritative advice and recommendations in a number of
related specialized subject areas affecting a significant program
activity, are provided to other scientists and senior
officials.
FACTOR:"MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY"
This factor is used to measure the difficulty of the work in
terms of the responsibility for committing, controlling and
managing resources; obtaining outside assistance; controlling and
co-ordinating work; and, for implementing or developing
procedures, directives and guidelines.
Notes to Raters
(i) When evaluating positions under this factor,
raters are to consider the factor's characteristics and their
intensity ranging from degree 1
to degree 5, and attribute to the position, for each
characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects the
conditions that are
typical of the work of the position and most closely
corresponds to the intensity of its requirements in terms of the
characteristic.
(ii) For a same degree of intensity, all of the
characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
(iii) The degree to be assigned to the position for
the whole factor, is determined by the degree which predominates
(i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least four of the
seven characteristics - "A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G"). When
one decree does not predominate, raters are to compare the
overall intensity of the requirements of the position under the
factor, with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equates to the
bench-mark positions.
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic A: Responsibility
for the control of staff.
The work occasionally requires assigning work to
non-subordinate support staff.
The work normally requires supervision of support staff.
The work requires the supervision of a unit normally including
professional staff.
The work requires the operational management of professional
staff including specialists or subordinate supervisors.
The work requires the management and human resources planning
through subordinate supervisors of a large staff of
professionals.
Characteristic B: Responsibility
for the control of physical
resources.
Planning day-to-day use of equipment and supplies for own
work,
Ensuring proper use of allocated equipment, supplies and
facilities.
Controlling the use and the maintenance of allocated
equipment, supplies and facilities.
Allocating the use of equipment, supplies and facilities.
Planning, directing and controlling the physical resources
allocated for a significant program activity.
Characteristic C: Responsibility
for committing departmental
resources.
Limited to the spending of own time and the use of materials
and equipment for own work.
Identifying the -requirement for equipment, material and
services for assigned work.
Recommending the acquisition of specific equipment, material
and services to meet work requirements.
Assessing requirements and developing and recommending plans
for the acquisition and use of resources, and the expenditure of
funds to meet work priorities and objectives.
Exercising delegated authority under the Financial
Administration Act for the acquisition of resources and
expenditure of funds; or, providing authoritative advice for
major expenditures or commitments of depart-mental resources.
Characteristic D: Responsibility
for obtaining outside assistance.
Informing supervisor concerning the need for assistance.
Recommending on the need for assistance.
Substantiating the need for, defining specific requirements,
and identifying suitable sources of assistance; and, arranging
for readily available assistance.
Selecting and negotiating for suitable sources of assistance
relating the probable costs and benefits; or, providing advice
based on a recognized expertise within a specialized subject
area, on requirements and selection of outside assistance.
Approving or recommending the expenditure of funds for outside
assistance; or, providing authoritative advice on requirements
and outside assistance for major commitments.
Characteristic E: Responsibility
for the administrative control
of work.
Complying with procedures, directives and guidelines
established for the work.
Ensuring that quality, quantity, safety and other standards
for own responsibility are maintained.
Implementing quality assurance, performance measurement and
safety procedures to meet unit's objectives.
Controlling and coordinating project schedules and
establishing and implementing performance and safety standards
and controls to meet priorities and objectives.
Preparing budgets and work plans, planning and implementing
safety. quality and cost controls, and recommending objectives
and priorities for a significant program activity.
Characteristic F: Responsibility
for the co-ordination of work
performed for, or in conjunction
with other organizational
units.
Limited requirement for coordination of activities with those
of others.
Occasionally coordinating related activities with those of
others.
Coordinating related activities with those of others.
Coordinating differing activities with those of one or more
organizational units.
Coordinating activities with several other organizational
units with differing interests or conflicting priorities.
Characteristic G: Responsibility
for implementing or developing
administrative procedures,
safety and management directives
and guidelines.
Following straightforward office or field administrative
procedures.
Implementing office or field administrative procedures.
Interpreting and implementing guidelines and directives.
Recommending and developing internal administrative, safety
and management directives and guidelines.
Approving internal administrative, safety and management
directives and guidelines, and ensuring correct and consistent
application of department and central agency policy, directives
and guidelines.
FACTOR:"IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS
AND ACTIVITIES"
This factor is used to measure the nature and the extent of
the impact directly attributable to the recommendations and
activities of the position, given its particular purpose or
mission, on governmental work or programs; on industrial or
commercial operations, natural resources or the environment,
public health and safety, and other external areas directly
affected by the position; and, on the development and
understanding of a body of knowledge in a subject area.
NotestoRaters
i) When evaluating a position under
this factor, raters are to consider the factor characteristics
and the extent of the impact ranging from degree 1 to degree 5,
and attribute to the position, for each applicable
characteristic, the degree whose definition best reflects or
corresponds to the extent of the most likely impact of the
position.
ii) For a same degree of impact, all of
the characteristics of the factor are considered equal.
iii) The degree to be assigned to the
position for the whole factor is determined by the degree which
predominates (i.e. the degree that has been assigned for at least
two of the three characteristics - "A"; the one "B"
characteristics: i, ii, iii, or iv identified as the most
pertinent to the purpose or mission of the position; and, "C").
When one degree does not predominate, raters are to compare the
overall extent of the impact of the position under the factor
with that of the bench-mark positions, and determine and
attribute to the position the degree which best equate to the
bench-mark positions.
(Impact - Governmental)
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
Characteristic A:
The impact of recommendations policies.
and activities on departmental
work or other government programs
in terms of changes to on-going
activities, programs or
Information and results of the work have limited effects on a
continuing operation, project or study in own area of work.
Information and results of the work affect a continuing
operation, projects or studies in owner closely related areas of
work.
Recommendations, advice and results of the work affect a
continuing operation, the formulation of guidelines, regulations,
specifications or standards, and the development or conduct of
projects or studies in own and related areas of work.
Recommendations, advice or consultations contribute to the
development of policies and affect the development, conduct or
modification of a significant program activity; or decisions
affect the implementation of projects, studies, guidelines and
directives.
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations affect
the development of departmental policies and programs; decisions
and activities affect the program(s) or activities of other
government organizations; or decisions and recommendations affect
the development, initiation, conductor continuation of a
significant program activity.
(Impact - External)
Characteristics B:
(i) The impact of recommendations
regulatory effect.
and activities on an
industrial or commercial process,
operation or product in terms
of the contributory or
Information and results of the work have limited effects on an
industrial or commercial product, process or operation.
Information and results of the work have economic or
technological effects on an industrial or commercial product,
process or operation.
Recommendations, advice and results of the work have economic
or techno-logical effects on related industrial or commercial
products, processes or operations.
Recommendations, advice, consultations or decisions have
economic or technological effects on an industry or a broad range
of products, processes or operations.
Authoritative recommendations, advice, consultations or
decisions have a substantial effect on the development,
initiation, modification or continuation of industrial or
commercial enterprises.
(ii) The impact of recommendations
environment.
and activities in terms
of the contribution to or control
of the state of natural
resources or the
Information and results of the work have limited effects on
the state of a natural resource or the environment.
Information and results of the work contribute to improvements
for developing, protecting, conserving or using natural resources
or the environment.
Recommendations, advice and results of the work affect the
state of natural resources and, natural resource and
environmental management practices.
Recommendations, advice or consultations contribute to the
development of environmental and natural resource policies; or
decisions and recommendations affect the state of the environment
or the conservation and use of natural resources within
established policies.
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations have a
substantial effect on the development of policies relating to
natural resources or the environment; or decisions and
recommendations substantially affect natural resources or the
environment.
FACTOR:IMPACT OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND
ACTIVITIES (CONT'D)
DEGREE 1
DEGREE 2
DEGREE 3
DEGREE 4
DEGREE 5
CharacteristicsB: (Cont'd)
(iii) The impact of recommendations safety
hazards.
and activities in terms
of the contribution to public
health and the reduction or
the control of health and
Information and results of the work have limited effects on
public health or safety.
Information and results of the work contribute to determining
the efficacy and safety of the processing or use of foods, drugs
or medical and radiation emitting devices or to the regulatory
control of potentially hazardous products or substances.
Recommendations, advice and results of the work affect the
approval and use of foods, drugs, or medical and radiation
emitting or other devices with respect to efficacy and safety, or
the regulatory control of potentially hazardous products or
substances.
Recommendations, advice or consultations contribute to the
development of policies; or decisions and recommendations affect
the approval and use of foods, drugs or medical and radiation
emitting or other devices or other potentially hazardous products
or substances with respect to efficacy or safety.
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations have a
substantial effect on the development of public health and safety
policies; or decisions and recommendations substantially affect
the control of potential hazards to public health or safety.
(iv) The impact of recommendations areas directly
affected
and activities in terms by the position, given
its
of the contributory or regulatory particular purpose or
mission.
effect on other specifically
identified external
Information and results of the work have limited effects on
the specifically identified area directly affected by the
position.
Information and results of the work have contributory effects
on the specific-tally identified area directly affected by the
position.
Recommendations, advice and results of the work have direct
effects on the specifically identified area directly affected by
the position.
Recommendations, advice or consultations contribute to the
development of policies; or decisions and recommendations have
wide-ranging effects on the specifically identified area directly
affected by the position.
Authoritative recommendations, advice or consultations have a
substantial effect on the development of policies; or decisions
and recommendations have substantial effects on the specifically
identified area directly affected by the position.
Characteristic C:
The impact of recommendations
and activities in terms of the
contribution to the development
and understanding of a body of
knowledge.
Information and results of the work contribute to knowledge in
own area of work.
Information and results of the work contribute to improvements
in methods and procedures in own area of work.
Development of new methods and procedures and the
investigation, analysis and interpretation of scientific
information provide knowledge and improved understanding in own
subject area.
Development of new concepts and approaches; or, decisions or
recommendations contribute to knowledge and improved
understanding in a specialized subject area.
Decisions and recommendations affect the initiation,
continuation or orientation of studies or projects for the
development of concepts, methods, approaches and procedures to
acquire new knowledge in one or more specialized subject
areas.
POSITION LEVELS: TYPICAL DISTINGUISHING
FEATURES
"AGUIDE FOR OVERALL
CONSISTENCY"
Intent: This Guide broadly aims at providing a
consistent approach to a global perception or an orientation for
a determination of the approximate classification level of a
position, using a series of discernible main features
characterizing positions identified as typical of each level.
Proviso: i) Notwithstanding the above, the
Guide is not intended nor shall be used as a substitute for the
formal position classification process and the detailed analysis
and rating of each position, as required in accordance with the
provisions of the rating plan of the Classification Standard.
ii) The series of distinguishing features
shown for the levels, characterizes, as a whole, universes of
positions considered typical of each level. - The series of
features for a level shall not be construed as all inclusive nor
as relevant in its entirety, to all positions at that level.
Advantages: The use of the Guide can be of
assistance in narrowing, at the outset, the range of possible
levels indicated for a position and thus, contributes to a less
erratic approach to the discussions for its subsequent detailed
analysis and rating. Further, the distinguishing features shown
for the various levels in the Guide, and which have been found
typical of positions at those levels, provide a broad reference
framework which can be of value and, contributes in achieving
greater overall consistency in the classification of the
positions at the various levels for the Group.
LEVEL 1
(Positions at Recruiting/Familiarizing
Developing Level as well as Positions conducting Work of
Relatively Low Complexity)
Repetitive, Standardized work of relatively low
Complexity
Work subjected to Detailed Review- Limited scope for
Independent Actions
Carry out Scientific Procedures under supervision
Indicate required Support Work to non-subordinate support
staff
LEVEL 2
(Positions Conducting Basic Professional Work of Moderate
Complexity/Diversity)
Moderate Complexity/Diversity
Scope for Independent Actions
May Instruct Junior Scientists and Supervise Support
Staff
Work Reviewed at Critical Stages/Phases
LEVEL 3
(Positions with Significant Specialization,
Diversity/Complexity or with Significant Supervisory
Responsibility)
(Positions requiring a High Level of Scientific
Expertise or Position comprising the First Level of Science Based
Management Responsibility)
High Level of Expertise in a specialized subject area
Second Level of Scientific Advisory Responsibility
- Recognized Authority in a Subject
- Scientific Co-ordination Responsibility
- First Level of Management Responsibility
- Project Objective Responsibility
- Second Level Supervision
LEVEL 5
(Positions at the Highest Level of Scientific Management
within the Group or Positions requiring the Highest level of
Scientific Expertise within the Group
Highest Level of Expertise in a Specialized Subject Area
A Senior Departmental Scientific Advisor
High Level Co-ordination/Liaison
Broad scope for Independent Actions within Policy and
Resources Framework
Significant input in Policy Development
Management of a Science Based Significant Program Activity, a
Significant Work Group or Large Complex Project
LIST OF BENCH-MARK POSITIONS
BM#
TITLE
LEVEL
BM-1
Analytical Chemist, Mineral Sciences Laboratory (EMR)
1
BM-2
Chemist, Development Grade (CE)
1
BM-3
Project Chemist, Consumer Product Safety (CCAC)
2
BM-4
Chemist, Organic Residues (HWC)
2
BM-5
Chemist, Major Ions and LRTAP (EC)
2
BM-6
Biochemist, Applied Endocrinology (F&O)
2
BM-7
Quality Assurance Chemist (EC)
3
BM-8
Chemist, Drinking Water and Human Tissues
Surveys(HWC)
FACTOR: 5IMPACT OF RECOlM. &
ACTIVITIES, CHARACTERISTIC/DEGREE
A
B
C D
FACT
A
B
C D
E
F G
H FACT
A
B
C
D
E
F
FACT
A
B
C D
E F
GFACT
A
(i)
(if)
(iii)
(iv)
= BC FACT
I
Analytical Chemist, Mineral Sciences Laboratory
(EMIR )
1
2
1
1 1
1
2
1
1 1
1
1 2
1 1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1
-
-
-
11 1
2
Chemist, Development Grade (CE)
1
1
2
2 2
2
2
2
2 2
1
1 2
1 2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
2
-
.
-
21 1
3
Project Chemist, Consumer Product Safety
(CCAC)
2
3
2
2 2
2
2
2
3 2
1
3 2
2 2
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
2
-
2
-
22 2
4
Chemist, Organic Residues (MNG)
2
2
2
2 2
2
3
3
3 3
2
3 1
3 3
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
1
1
1 1
1 1
1 1
2
2
-
2
-
22 2
5
Chemist, Major Ions and LRTAP(EC)
2
2
2
2 2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2 2
2 2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 1
2 3
2 2
2
1
2
-
22 2
6
Biochemist, Applied Endocrinology(F6O)
2
3
2
2 2
2
2
2
2 2
2
2 3
2 2
3
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2 1
2 2
1 2
2
2
2
-
-
23 2
7
Quality Assurance Chemist (EC)
3
3
3
3 3
3
2
2
3 3
3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
2
3
3
3
2
2
2 3
2 3
1 2
3
-
2
-
-
23 3
8
Chemist, Drinking Water andHuman Tissues
Surveys (HWC)
3
3
3
2 3
3
3
3
3 2
3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
2 3
2 3
2 2
3
1
-
2
-
23 3
9
Head, Solution Chemistry Section(EAR)
3
3
2
3 3
3
2
2
2 2
3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
2
2
3
3
3
3
3 1
3 3
3 3
3
2
2
-
-
23 3
10
Chemist, Pesticide Evaluation(ACR)
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3 3
3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
1
1 1
1 3
1 1
3
3
2
3
-
33 3
11
Drug Evaluator (HWC)
3
3
3
3 3
3
4
3
4 4
3
3 3
4 4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1 1
1 3
1 1
3
3
-
3
-
33 3
12
Analytical Advisor, Organics Section (CE)
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
4
4 4
3
3 3
3 3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
1
2
3 2
2 2
1 2
3
3
-
-
-
33 3
13
Specialist, Trace Inorganic(HWC)
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3 3
3
3 3
3 3
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
1
2
3 1
3 3
2 2
3
3
-
3
-
33 3
14
Chemist, Mass Spectrometry Methodology
(AGR)
3
3
3
3 3
3
3
3
3 3
3
3 4
3 3
3
4
3
3
3
4
3
1
3
3 1
2 2
1 2
3
3
-
2
-
33 3
15
Specialist, Drug Analysis (HWC)
3
3
3
4 3
3
4
3
4 4
4
4 3
4 4
3
3
3
3
3
4
3
1
3
3 1
3 3
2 3
3
-
-
3
3
33 3
16
Chemistry Specialist, Drug Evaluation (HWC)
4
4
4
4 4
4
4
4
5 5
4
4 4
5 4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
1
1
1 1
1 3
1 1
4
4
-
4
-
43 4
17
Environmental Chemistry Advisor, Fish Habitat
(F&0)
4
4
4
4 4
4
4
4
4 4
4
4 4
4 4
4
5
4
4
4
5
4
1
1
2 2
1 3
1 1
4
4
3
-
-
44 4
18
Head, Organic Residues Laboratory Unit
(HWC)
4
4
4
4 4
4
4
3
4 3
4
4 4
4 4
4
4
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4 4
4 4
4 4
4
3
-
4
-
44 4
19
Senior Program Advisor
5
5
5
5 5
5
4
4
4 4
5
4 4
5 4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
1
4 4
4 4
4 4
5
4
5
2
-
54 5
20
Chief, Food and Drug Laboratories Division,
Atlantic Region
5
5
5
5 5
5
4
4
5 5
5
5 5
5 5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5
4
-
5
5
55 5
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Key in order of appearance of letters under the
factors.
A - Objectives estbls by othrs
B - Extent of Work
C - Variety of activities
D - Scope for plan'g& condct'ng wrk
A = Info./Data - Avlblty/Problems
B = Info./Data - Validity
C = Info./Data - N/Varblty /Ambg'ty of variables
D = Info./Data - Relnshps of variables
E = Effect of actvty of others on wrk
F = Contacts - Nature/Purpose
G = Regrm'nt for: Devlpm'ntadpt'n, appictln,appprchs, procdrs
andtech.
H = Knowledge
A - Extent wrk check'd byothers
B - Profsn'l guidance recv'd
C = Init./Judg'mt in Def'ng objectives Dealing w problems
Estblsh'ng guidelines
D = Judgm'nt in assess'ng work of others
E = Judgm'nt of intrprt'ng results
F = Judgm'nt in providing advice
A = Resp.: Control ofStaff
B = Resp.: Control of physical resources
C = Reap.: Comet'ng resources
D = Resp.: Obt'ng outside asstnce
E = Resp.: Adman, contrl of wrk
F = Resp.: Co-ord'n of wrk perf.for/with othr orgnztn'l
units
G = Resp.: Implemnt'ng or Devlp'ng guidelines
IMPACT (Governmental)
A = on Dept'l wrk/Other Gov.programs
IMPACT (External)
B = i) on Ind'I/Commrc'1
prod/open
.ii) = on Natrl. res./Envrnmnt
iii) = on Public health/safety
iv) = on Other external areas
C = Impact on body of knowledge
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 1
Descriptive Title: Analytical Chemist, Mineral Sciences
Laboratory
Level: 1
Reporting to the Head, Solution Chemistry Section:
Conducts chemical analyses of mineralogical, metallurgical and
related materials in support of a research program directed to
improving mining and related processing technology. Discusses
sample requirements with the section head and selects suitable
procedures from known acceptable methods. Ensures selected
methods are suitable for the sample, identifies interferences,
makes minor modifications, and determines accuracy and precision
by preparing and analysing synthetic samples of known
composition. Maintains detailed records and reports results to
the section head.
Participates inthe modification and adaptation of methods of
analysis, suggests modifications and tests new procedures.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
1
Degree 2 - Objectives are defined by the supervisor. Samples
are assigned but methods are selected from known acceptable
procedures.
Degree 1 - The generation of analytical data is part of a
continuing operation requiring limited investigation.
Degree 1 - Although a variety of materials are tested the
analyses consist of limited number of straightforward
procedures.
Degree 1 - Daily work is planned using precedents and
discussions with supervisor to select standard methods.
Complexity of Work
1
Degree 2 - Information in terms of the methods and procedures
is readily available, but data are generated by direct
observation using standardized procedures.
Degree 1 - Closely follows prescribed standard methods which
produce data of known validity.
Degree 1 - The samples usually result from controlled
research experiments and are normally well characterized. The
work involves the determination of discrete parameters.
Degree 1 - The work involves the determination of discrete
parameters using standardized methods in which the relationships
of variables are known and controlled.
Degree 1 - Activities of others within the unit may affect
the availability of common facilities or shared equipment.
Degree 1 - Contacts are normally with others in the unit to
obtain information and as applicable with Research Scientists who
submitted samples to discuss the analytical results.
Degree
Degree 2 - The work requires adapting standard methods to
suit the specific requirements of samples, and the testing of new
procedures.
H. Degree 1 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles and theories of analytical inorganic
chemistry and of the procedures used in the analysis of
mineralogical and metallurgical materials.
Professional Responsibility
1
Degree 2 - The work requires the generation of complete
analytical results which are checked for precision and accuracy
by the supervisor.
Degree 2 - There is a requirement to use and apply standard
methods correctly, but the supervisor provides guidance on new
aspects of the work.
Degree 1 - Problems and potential solutions are discussed
with the supervisor before proceeding.
Degree 1 - As applicable the work of support staff may be
checked for correct application of procedures.
Degree 1 - Final results are reviewed for reliability and
consistency and reported to supervisor.
Degree 1 - As applicable, instructions and guidance may be
provided to support staff engaged in similar activities.
Management Responsibility
7
Degree 1 - Occasionally, technical instructions or requests
for assistance are given to support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans use of equipment and supplies for assigned
work.
Degree 1 - Limited to the use of own time and to the use of
equipment and supplies for assigned work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is requested
from the supervisor.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with
individual Researchers outside the Unit.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
7
Degree 1 - Analytical results support ongoing
research projects and may have limited effect on this work.
Degree 1
Degree 1 - Analytical results support research projects
directed towards the improvement of mining and related processing
technology and may have a limited effect on these
industries.
No significant Impact.
No significant Impact.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - Analytical results contribute to the
development of improved methods of analysis for mineralogical and
metallurgical materials.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Assistant Manager, Operations
Head, Solutions Chemistry Section
- Chemist
* - Analytical Chemist CH-1
- Technicians (4)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 2
Descriptive Title: Chemist - Development Grade Reporting to
the Section Head and under the guidance of a senior chemist:
Level: 1
Conducts analyses, of progressively increasing diversity and
complexity, of organic industrial commodities to provide
information for the administration of Customs legislation, and to
acquire the specific knowledge and skills necessary to function
independently as a Customs chemist. Plans and organizes daily
work, selects appropriate methods and conducts analyses using a
variety of chemical and instrumental techniques. Identifies
analytical problems and adapts methods and procedures to meet
sample requirements and the progress of the investigation.
Interprets results and prepares reports for review by the senior
chemist or Section Head.
Carries out a continuing study of the chemistry, industrial
technologies and Customs legislation relevant to the work.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
2
Degree 1 - Objectives are defined by the supervisor and the
work is conducted under the close guidance of a senior
chemist.
Degree 2 - The work consists of a number of discrete
investigations involving analysis and interpretation of data to
determine the Customs classification of industrial organic
commodities.
Degree 2 - Diverse organic industrial commodities are
analysed to determine their composition using a wide range of
chemical and instrumental procedures.
Degree 2 - Own work is planned and methods are selected and
adapted to meet the objectives of the work.
Complexity of Work
2
Degree 2 - Analytical data are generated by direct
observation using recognized procedures. Information on
industrial products, processes and classification precedents is
available from recognized sources.
Degree 2 - Information and data can be validated by repeat
analysis, standard confirmation procedures or reference to
previous casework.
Degree 2 - Information from different sources must be
interpreted and integrated to determine the composition of
organic industrial products. Implications of the data are known
or may be obtained from the Senior Chemist.
Degree 2 - Relationships between the analytical results and
the identity of organic industrial commodities can be established
and inconsistencies resolved by straightforward
investigation.
Degree 1 - Activities of others within the laboratory
may affect the availability of common facilities or shared
equipment.
Degree 1 - Contacts are normally with others in the
laboratory to obtain information.
Degree
Degree 2 - The work requires modifying and adapting methods
of analyses to suit the requirements of samples and the progress
of the investigation.
Degree 1 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles and theories of analytical organic
chemistry and of the procedures used to identify organic
industrial commodities.
Professional Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - The work is reviewed in progress by a senior
chemist and results are reviewed by a senior chemist or the
section head.
Degree 1 - Guidance on the selection and correct
application of methods and procedures is received from a senior
chemist.
Degree 1 - Problems and potential solutions are
discussed with a senior chemist before proceeding.
Degree 1 - Results received from a technical services
unit are checked to ensure that the correct methods were used and
that the results are consistent with expectations.
Degree 1 - Final results are reviewed for reliability and
consistency and reported to a senior chemist or section
head.
Degree 1 - As applicable, instructions and guidance may
be provided to support staff engaged in related activities.
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or requests
for technical assistance are given to support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans use of equipment and supplies for
assigned work.
Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and to
the use of equipment and supplies for assigned work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the section head.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with
technical support services unit.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
1
Degree 1 - Analytical results are used to
administer Customs legislation, but are reviewed and checked by
the Senior Chemist or Section Head prior to use.
Degree 2 -
Degree 2 - The analytical results have economic effects as
they are used to classify goods for the purpose of determining
the applicable tariff.
No significant impact.
No significant impact.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 1 - Analytical results contribute to the knowledge
of organic industrial commodities entering the country.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Canadian Customs Laboratory
- Head, organics Section
- Head, Polymers Section
- Head, Foodstuffs and Textiles Section
- Head, Organics Section
- Analytical Advisor, Organics
- Chemists (4)
* - Chemist, Development Grade CH-1
* Bench-mark Position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 3
Descriptive Title: Project Chemist, Consumer Product Safety
Reporting to the Project Manager, Flammability:
Level: 2
Conducts scientific investigations to determine the fire and
flammability hazards in a variety of consumer products. Designs
suitable approaches and carries out chemical, physical and
instrumental tests for flammability, explosively, durability,
labelled guarantees, and for the presence and production of toxic
products. Interprets results and prepares reports.
Studies the application of instrumental techniques to the
analysis of consumer products, and conducts assigned projects to
resolve problems arising from regulatory changes. Interprets test
results and recommends methods and procedures to the Project
Manager.
Provides interpretation of results and technical advice to
officials of the department and industry. Assists the Department
of Justice in the preparation of prosecutions, conducts analyses
as an Official Analyst and provides testimony as an expert
witness in court.
Degree
Specifications
KindofAssignments
2
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Project manager in
terms of product investigations and problem solving
assignments.
Degree 2 - The work consists of a number of discrete product
investigations and problem solving assignments.
Degree 2 - The work requires investigating the chemical and
flammability hazards of consumer products, adapting methods and
procedures, and resolving technical problems.
Degree 2 - Own work is planned and approaches are determined
to ensure that objectives are met.
Complexity of Work
2
Degree 2 - Information in terms of methods and procedures is
readily available, but data is generated by direct
observation.
Degree 2 - Data can be validated by alternative procedures or
literature references.
Degree 3 - The identification of flammability hazards
requires the measurement and interpretation of several chemical
and physical parameters.
Degree 2 - Relationships between the chemical and physical
properties and flammability can be established and
inconsistencies resolved by straightforward investigations.
Degree 1 - Activities of others within the unit may affect
the availability of common facilities or shared equipment.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with officials of the department and
industry to explain results of investigations and with crown
attorneys of the Department of Justice to provide factual
information for the preparation of prosecutions.
Degree
Degree 2 - The work requires modifying and adapting
instrumental methods of analysis.
Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles and theories of analytical chemistry
and of the procedures used to assess the hazards associated with
flammable consumer products.
Professional Responsibility
2
Degree 2 - The work requires the completion of assignments
and the preparation of final reports which are reviewed by the
Project manager.
Degree 2 - There is a requirement to use and apply standard
methods correctly, but the Project Manager provides guidance on
problem solving assignments.
Degree 2 - The work requires determining approaches and
selecting methods for the identification of hazards.
Degree 1 - As applicable, the work of support staff may be
checked for correct application of procedures.
Degree 2 - Results of the investigations are interpreted to
produce an assessment of consumer hazard.
Degree 3 - Technical advice and interpretation of results is
provided to departmental and industry officials and to crown
attorneys.
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or requests
for assistance are given to support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans use of equipment and supplies for own
work.
Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and to the use
of equipment and supplies for assigned work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is requested
from the Project Manager.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with others
outside the laboratory.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
2
Degree 1 - Results of investigations are used to administer
consumer product safety legislation.
Degree 2
Degree 2 - Identification of a product hazard may result in
the regulatory control of a commercial consumer product.
No significant impact.
Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the regulatory
control of hazardous consumer products.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Results of investigations contribute to a
knowledge of the properties and hazards of consumer products.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Scientific and Laboratory Services Division -
Project Manager, Chemistry
- Project Manager, Engineering
- Project Manager, Flammability
- Senior Project Chemist
- Project Chemists (3)
* - Project Chemist CH-2
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 4
Descriptive Title: Chemist, Organic Residues
Level: 2
Reporting to the Head, Organic Residues Unit:
Conducts analyses of a wide variety of food products for trace
levels of pesticides and environmental contaminants to assist in
the enforcement and establishment of regulations and provisions
of the Food and Drugs Act. Provides scientifically valid
qualitative and quantitative information employing a variety of
scientific techniques and instrumentation for the extraction,
clean-up, identification, quantitation and, confirmation of
organic residues.
Provides interpretation of results and technical advice to
officials of the department and industry, conducts analysis as an
Official Analyst, and provides testimony as an expert witness in
court.
Adapts methods to suit the unique requirements of samples and
assists in the development and evaluation of new methods,
procedures and instrumental techniques.
Ensures the correct application of safety and quality
assurance standards. Participates in the training of junior
chemists and technical staff.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
2
Degree 2 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head. Samples
are assigned but methods are selected and adapted from available
procedures.
Degree 2 - The work involves the complete analysis and
interpretation of results to determine organic residue levels in
food products.
Degree 2 - The work involves the analysis of a wide variety
of foods for pesticide residues and environmental
contaminants.
Degree 2 - Own work is planned and methods are selected to
meet the objectives of the work.
Complexity of Work
3
Degree 3 - Information on the identity and trace levels of
organic residues in foodis obtained through extensive
analyses, often involving method adaptation, and careful
interpretation of the data due to the large number of possible
chemicals and the presence of interferences.
Degree 3 - The identity, once determined, and levels of
organic contaminants in foods can be validated by a combination
of alternative chemical and instrumental techniques and
literature referencing.
Degree 3 - The identification and quantitation of organic
contaminants in foods involve many interferences, ambiguity, and
require careful interpretation.
Degree 3 - The relationships between instrumental responses
and the identity and levels of trace organic residues in foods
are sometimes conflicting and require investigation and
interpretation for each residue/food commodity combination.
E. Degree 2 - The activities of inspection staff affect the
type and priority of samples to be analyzed.
Degree
F. Degree 3 - Contacts are with inspectors and regulated
industry officials to explain results and with crown attorneys of
the Department of Justice to provide information for the
preparation of prosecutions.
G. Degree 2 - The work requires modifying, adapting and
evaluating new methods and procedures for the analysis of organic
residues in food.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles and theories of analytical
organic chemistry and of the procedures and instrumental
techniques used in the trace organic residue analysis of
foods.
Professional Responsibility
2
Degree 2 - The work requires the completion of assignments,
the interpretation of results, and the preparation of final
results which are reviewed by the Unit Head.
Degree 2 - Professional guidance is received from the Unit
Head on new analytical projects.
Degree 2 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and selecting and adapting methods for their
resolution.
Degree 1 - As applicable, the work of technical staff is
checked for correct application of methods and procedures.
Degree 2 - Analytical results are interpreted and
evaluated against specified tolerances to determine compliance
with the Food and Drugs Act and regulations and to indicate
violations of the legislation.
Degree 3 - Technical advice and explanation of results is
provided to inspectors, departmental officials, and to crown
attorneys with respect to prosecutions.
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or requests
for assistance are given to support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
Degree 1 - Limited to spending of own time and to the
use of equipment and supplies for assigned work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Unit Head.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives, guidelines and quality assurance standards
established for the work.
Degree 1 - Limited requirement to coordinate work with
others, except in order to best utilize shared equipment and
facilities.
Degree 1 - Follow administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
2
Degree 2 - Information and results of the work affect the
intensity and direction of inspection activities.
Degree 2 -
Degree 2 - Identification of violations of the Food and Drugs
Act and Regulations may result in the regulatory control of
commercial food products.
No significant impact.
Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the regulatory
control of foods containing violative levels of toxic organic
residues.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results contribute to
knowledge of the levels of organic residues in the food supply
and to improvements in the methods and procedures for the
analysis of trace organics in foods.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food Laboratory Division
- Head, Foods and Canning Microbiology Unit
- Head, Drugs, Cosmetics, and Medical Devices Microbiology
Unit
- Head, Food Additives and Mycotoxins Unit
- Head, Food Chemistry Unit
- Head, Organic Residues Unit
- Specialist, Trace Organic Analysis
* - Chemist, Organic Residues (2) (CH-2
- Chemist, Development grade (2) CH-1
- Technicians (4)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 5
Descriptive Title: Chemist, Major Ions and LRTAP
Level: 2
Reporting to the Head, Inorganic Analysis Laboratory Unit:
Plans, organizes and conducts analyses of water, precipitates
and related environmental samples for the presence of major
inorganic ions for use by other scientists in the department in
monitoring and evaluating the long range effects of airborne
pollutants on the ecology of inland waters.
Carries out studies to evaluate, validate and improve
analytical methods and identifies to the Laboratory Unit Head new
analytical equipment or supplies required for the work.
Supervises the work of support staff and assigns samples for
analysis. Checks results for accuracy, reliability, and
consistency and prepares reports.
Ensures compliance with established quality assurance
practices.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
2
Degree 2 - Objectives are clearly defined by the Laboratory
Unit Head in terms of expected number and quality of
analyses.
Degree 2 - The work involves the complete analysis and
interpretation of results to determine inorganic ions in water
and related environmental samples.
Degree 2 - The work involves the analysis of water and
related environmental samples for inorganic ions, adapting and
evaluating methods and allocating work to subordinate staff.
Degree 2 - Plans and organizes work and assigns samples to
subordinate staff to meet clearly defined objectives.
Complexity of Work
2
Degree 2 - Information in terms of methods and procedures is
readily available, but data is generated by direct
observation.
Degree 2 - Data can be validated by repeat analysis and
confirmation procedures using alternative analytical
schemes.
Degree 2 - The measurement of inorganic ions in environmental
samples involves many interferences which must be
considered.
Degree 2 - Relationships between instrumental responses and
inorganic ion concentration can be established by straightforward
investigations.
Degree 2 - The work is affected by the activities of field
monitoring staff submitting samples.
Degree 2 - Contacts are with scientists for whom analyses are
conducted to explain results.
Degree 2 - The work requires adapting and evaluating new
methods and procedures for the inorganic analysis of water and
related environmental samples.
Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of the principles and theories of inorganic analytical
chemistry and of the procedures and techniques used in the
analysis of water.
Degree
Professional Responsibility
2
Degree 3 - Approaches to meeting analytical demands are
reviewed by the Laboratory Unit Head.
Degree 2 - Professional guidance is received from the
Laboratory Head Unit on new analytical assignments.
Degree 2 - The work requires identifying analytical problems
and selecting and adapting methods for their resolution.
Degree 2 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed for
accuracy, reliability and consistency.
Degree 2 - Own and subordinates' analytical results are
interpreted to produce meaningful reports.
Degree 2 - Advice on the inorganic analysis of water and
related environmental samples is provided to support staff.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of a support
staff consisting of one chemist and two technicians.
Degree 2 - The work requires ensuring the proper use of
analytical instruments assigned for the work.
Degree 2 - The work requires identifying to the Laboratory
Unit Head, new equipment and supplies required for the work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required is requested
from the Laboratory Unit Head.
Degree 2 - The work requires ensuring that quality assurance
and safety procedures are maintained.
Degree 3 - The work requires coordinating the unit's work to
meet the requirements and priorities of field staff.
Degree 2 - Ensures the implementation of administrative and
safety procedures in the nit.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
2
Degree 2 - Results of the work are used by other scientists
in the Department to monitor and evaluate the effects of
pollutants on inland waters and can directly affect these
studies.
Degree 2
(i)Degree 1 - The results of the work may have limited
economic effects on industries contributing to long range
atmospheric pollution of inland waters.
(ii) Degree 2 - Results of the work are used to monitor and
evaluate the effects of pollutants on inland waters and
contribute to the protection of these resources.
(iii) No significant impact.
(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 2 - Information and results contribute to knowledge
of the levels of major inorganic ions in inland waters and to
improvements in the methods and procedures for the inorganic
analysis of water.
Reporting to the Head, Fish Culture Research Section:
Plans and conducts investigations to study the role of thyroid
hormones during smoltification of salmon as a means of
determining smolt quality and to measure corticosteroid levels in
plasma as a means of conducting endocrine stress evaluations.
Collaborates with research scientists to identify parameters
which influence fish physiology, and plans, coordinates and
conducts sampling schemes to collect blood samples, size and
weight data of smolts and related environmental data.
Analyses plasma samples by radio immunoassay for
corticosteroid and thyroid hormone levels; interprets the data,
relating hormone levels to external factors, and prepares
experimental results for publication.
Prepares and purifies salmon gonadotropin and conducts
gonadotropin radioimmunoassays to assist in investigations into
the controlled reproduction and induced ovulation of various fish
species.
Adapts and develops biochemical techniques for the measurement
of fish hormones, and demonstrates these techniques to other
scientists in the department and industry.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
2
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of goals for each investigative study.
Degree 2 - The work consists of a number of discrete
investigations involving the analysis and interpretation of
hormone levels in salmon.
Degree 2 - The work requires planning and conducting
surveys of fish, collecting blood samples and field data, and the
analysis of plasma for hormone levels.
Degree 2 - Investigations and surveys are planned, study
approaches determined, and methods selected to ensure that
objectives are met.
Complexity of Work
2
Degree 2 - Information and data are obtained from field
surveys and straightforward laboratory analyses.
Degree 2 - Radio immunoassay data can be validated by
literature references or comparison with results obtained in
other laboratories.
Degree 2 - Hormone levels are affected by many external
factors but these can be controlled for in the
investigations.
Degree 2 - Relationships between hormone levels and
external factors can be established by straightforward
investigation.
Degree 2 - The work involves collaboration with, and
provision of radioimmunoassay analyses to, research scientists in
the section.
Degree
Degree 2 - Contacts are with research scientists in the
section working on collaborative projects and with other
scientists to explain and demonstrate biochemical assays of fish
hormones.
Degree 3 - The work requires developing and adapting
biochemical techniques for determining hormone levels in fish
plasma.
Degree 2 - The work requires the application of a sound
knowledge of biochemistry and of the techniques used to measure
hormone levels in plasma.
Professional Responsibility
2
Degree 3 - Approaches to investigative studies and sampling
schemes, and conclusions derived from interpretation of the data
are reviewed by the Section Head.
Degree 2 - Guidance on new investigative studies and in
the resolution of unexpected problems is provided by the Section
Head.
Degree 2 - The work requires identifying factors
influencing hormone levels and devising sampling schemes to
measure and interpret them.
Degree 1 - As applicable, the work of summer students is
checked for correct application of procedures.
Degree 2 - Analytical results and field observations are
interpreted to identify the effects of external factors on fish
hormone levels.
Degree 2 - Advice on the biochemical analysis of fish
hormones is provided to other scientists in the section and in
industry.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions are given to
summer students.
Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of equipment and supplies
allocated to the work, including the control of radioactive
materials used in the section.
Degree 2 - Identifies the equipment and supplies required
for the investigations.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Section Head.
Degree 2 - Ensures that the administrative and safety
guidelines required for these of radioactive materials are
maintained.
Degree 2 - Coordinates field sampling with other
researchers in the section.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
2
Degree 2 - Results of investigations contribute to ongoing
programs in fish culture research.
Degree 2
Degree 2 - Results of investigations contribute to
improvements in salmon production affecting the commercial and
sport fisheries.
Degree 2 - Results of investigations contribute to conserving
salmon species.
No significant impact.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Biochemical methods for determining hormone
levels in fish are developed, and results of investigations
contribute to the understanding of the role of hormones in fish
reproduction and stress survival.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Resource Services Branch
Head, Fish Culture Research Section
- Biologist, Controlled Reproduction
- Research Scientist, Nutrition
- Research Scientist, Stress & Histophysiology
* - Biochemist, Applied Endocrinology CH-2
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 7
Descriptive Title: Quality Assurance Chemist
Level: 3
Reporting to the Head, Quality Assurance and Methods
Section:
Plans, conducts and coordinates investigations to develop
Certified and other Reference Materials of water and sediment for
use in quality assurance programs. Sets priorities on the type of
substrates and concentration levels of parameters required, and
establishes sampling locations, techniques and frequency to
obtain suitable naturally contaminated materials. Schedules
laboratory analysis of field samples by contract laboratories or
by the National Water Quality Laboratory to fully characterize
each material for a wide variety of organic and trace inorganic
parameters.
Organizes and conducts quality assurance studies to meet the
department's commitments to joint water quality monitoring
programs. Establishes work plans, objectives and resource
requirements for each study and coordinates these with
participating agencies. Selects and applies appropriate
statistical techniques, interprets data collected from various
agencies and writes scientific reports assessing laboratory
performance. Prepares contracts for analyses and assesses data
quality generated by contract laboratories.
Supervises one chemist conducting organic method development
and validation studies to provide methods for use by the regional
and National Water Quality Laboratories. Develops strategies and
experimental design for method development and sample
preservation techniques, reviews work in progress, provides
guidance and advice, and critically reviews reports on developed
methods. Provides advice to other scientists on the use of
reference materials and on the conduct and interpretation of
quality assurance studies.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of developing required reference materials and in
conducting quality assurance studies and method development
projects.
Degree 3 - The work involves the identification,
selection and comprehensive testing of reference materials, the
conduct of extensive quality assurance studies, and the
development of methods for the analysis of water and
sediments.
Degree 3 - The work involves the selection and chemical
characterization of reference materials, the organization and
conduct of quality assurance studies, method development and the
supervision of one chemist.
Degree 3 - Joint quality assurance studies are planned
and organized, investigations to develop reference materials are
planned and coordinated, and method development studies are
planned and assigned to a junior chemist.
Complexity of Work
3
A. Degree 2 - Information necessary to characterize
reference materials and for use in quality assurance studies and
method development projects is obtained by direct analysis.
Degree
B. Degree 2 - Analytical data can be validated by
repeat analysis using alternative procedures.
Degree 3 - The complete characterization of naturally
occurring reference materials requires the identification and
quantitation of a wide range of organic and inorganic
parameters.
Degree 3 - The data and information obtained from quality
assurance studies contain many variables which require
interpretation and are sometimes ambiguous.
Degree 3 - The collection and characterization of reference
materials and the conduct of quality assurance studies are
conducted jointly with, and are affected by scientists outside
the section.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists in the National
Water Quality Laboratory or scientists in contracted laboratories
to obtain chemical analyses, and with scientists in various
national and international agencies to organize, coordinate and
conduct quality assurance studies.
Degree 3 - The work requires developing strategies and
experimental design and guiding one chemist in the development of
methods for the analysis of water and sediment for organic
parameters.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of inorganic and organic analytical chemistry
and of the procedures and techniques used in the analysis of
water and sediments, as well as a knowledge of statistics as
applied to quality assurance studies.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to selecting and characterizing
reference materials and conducting quality assurance studies and
method development projects are reviewed by the Section Head for
soundness of judgement and attainment of objectives.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Section Head on the resolution of difficult method development
problems and on the interpretation of ambiguous quality assurance
study. results.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying the need for and
likely sources of reference materials, determining approaches for
the conduct of quality assurance studies and developing
strategies and experimental design for method development
projects.
Degree 2 - The work of a junior chemist engaged in method
development studies is reviewed in progress and final reports are
critically reviewed prior to release.
Degree 3 - The results of quality assurance studies are
interpreted and analyzed to assess the performance of outside
laboratories.
Degree 3 - Advice on the use of reference materials and
on the conduct and interpretation of quality assurance studies is
provided to other scientists. Guidance on method development
studies is provided to a junior chemist.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of one chemist
engaged in method development studies.
Degree 2 - The work requires ensuring the proper use of
analytical instruments assigned to the Unit.
Degree 2 - The work requires identifying to the Section Head
new equipment and supplies required for the work.
Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining outside assistance for
the collection of samples for use as reference materials and for
the analysis of samples by contract laboratories.
Degree
Degree 2 - Ensures that quality and quantity standards are
maintained in the laboratory.
Degree 3 - Coordinates sample collection and joint quality
assurance studies with other scientists.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Reference materials and results of
quality assurance studies are used throughout the department to
ensure the quality of scientific data produced.
Degree 2 -
No significant impact.
Degree 2 - Results of quality assurance studies contribute to
the department's commitments in the area of joint
environmental monitoring programs.
No significant impact.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Information and results contribute to
improvements in methods for the analysis of water and
sediments.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Analytical Methods Division
Head, Quality Assurance and Methods Section
-
Chemist, Special Analysis
- Inorganic Methods Development
Chemist
- Quality Control Chemist
* - Quality Assurance Chemist
CH-3
- Organic Methods Development Chemist
CH-2
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 8
Descriptive Title: Chemist, Drinking Water and Human Tissue
Surveys
Level: 3
Reporting to the Head, Organic Chemicals Section:
Plans, coordinates and implements drinking water quality
surveys and pollutant surveillance programs for the purpose of
providing information to Federal-Provincial Committees
formulating Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines and for assessing
water quality characteristics, trends and pollution
conditions.
Plans, coordinates and implements surveys of organic
contaminants in human tissues for the purpose of detecting new
contaminants and providing data on human exposure to
Federal-Provincial Committees and provincial and medical
authorities involved in assessing human health risks arising from
chemical pollutants.
Organizes surveys and cooperative projects with officials of
federal and provincial health and water authorities, universities
and medical consultants, determines the physical and chemical
parameters to be measured, and determines optimum sampling
frequency.
Defines the technical scope of contracted work, evaluates
contract proposals for scientific merit, and acts as scientific
authority to ensure integrity of contracted work.
Conducts analyses for a wide range of organic contaminants in
water and human tissue samples and develops and adapts methods
for the simultaneous analysis of complex mixtures of organic
contaminants. Interprets and reports analytical findings.
Provides expert advice to water quality managers and
Federal-Provincial committees and task forces. Supervises one
technician and ensures that safety procedures are maintained.
Degree
Specifications
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of requirements for planning and conducting drinking water
and human tissue surveys.
Degree 3 - The work involves the planning, coordination and
conduct of surveys and analyses to determine levels of a wide
range of organic contaminants in drinking water and human
tissues.
Degree 2 - The work involves planning, coordinating and
conducting joint surveys and laboratory analyses, providing
advice and allocating work to one technician.
Degree 3 - Joint drinking water and human tissue surveys are
planned and conducted with a number of outside agencies.
Complexity of Work
3
A. Degree 3 - Information on the identity and levels of a
wide range of naturally occurring contaminants in drinking water
and human tissues is obtained from extensive surveys and
analytical investigations requiring method adaptation and
development.
Degree
B. Degree 3 - Information and data can be validated by
repeating surveys and by confirming analytical results through a
combination of chemical and instrumental techniques.
Degree 3 - The identification and quantitation of organic
contaminants in drinking water and human tissues involves many
interferences, ambiguity, and requires careful
interpretation.
Degree 2 - Relationships between instrumental responses and
organic contaminant levels can be established by straightforward
investigation using reference standards.
Degree 3 - The surveys are planned and conducted in
cooperation with, and are affected by, officials outside the
section.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials in
other federal and provincial agencies and universities to plan
and participate in cooperative surveys.
Degree 3 - The work requires the development of new sampling
and analytical techniques for the identification and measurement
of organic contaminants in drinking water and human tissues.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the principles and theories of organic analytical
chemistry and of the procedures and instrumental techniques used
in trace organic analysis of drinking water and human issues, as
well as the knowledge of statistical techniques related to
sampling and survey design.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to planning and conducting surveys and
developing methods are reviewed by the Section Head.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the Section
Head in the resolution of difficult method development problems
and in determining survey priorities.
Degree 3 - The work requires defining survey requirements in
terms of parameters to be measured and sampling frequency,
defining the technical scope of contracted work and determining
approaches for method development studies.
Degree 3 - The work of contractors conducting surveys or
analysis is reviewed for scientific integrity.
Degree 2 - Analytical results are interpreted to produce
meaningful results.
Degree 3 - Advice on sampling and analysis of drinking water
and human tissues for organic contaminants is provided to
subordinate staff, contractors and officials of agencies
participating in joint projects.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of one
technician.
Degree 2 - Ensures the proper use of analytical equipment and
supplies allocated for the work.
Degree 2 - Identifies the equipment and supplies required for
survey and analytical work.
Degree 3 - Arranges for survey work with outside agencies and
defines the technical scope for contracted survey and analytical
work.
Degree 2 - Ensures that quality, quantity and safety
standards are maintained in the laboratory.
Degree 3 - Coordinates surveys and analyses with officials in
other agencies and with contractors.
Degree 2 - Implements administrative and safety guidelines in
the laboratory.
Degree
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Information and results of the work
are used by federal and provincial officials to set Canada
Drinking Water Guidelines, and regulations under the Hazardous
Products Act.
Degree 2 -
Degree 1 - The results of the work may have limited economic
effects on industries contributing to the pollution of potable
water supplies.
No significant impact.
Degree 2 - Information and results of the work are used to
control toxic organic contaminants in drinking water and the
human environment.
No other significant impacts.
Degree 3 - Information and results contribute to knowledge of
the levels of organic contaminants in drinking water and human
tissues. New and improved methods and procedures for the analysis
of trace organics in drinking water and human tissue are
developed.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Monitoring and Criteria Division
Head, Organic Chemistry Section
- Research Scientists (3)
* - Chemist, Drinking Water and Human
Tissues Surveys CH-3
- Technician
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 9
Descriptive Title: Head, Solution Chemistry Section, Mineral
Sciences Laboratory
Level: 3
Reporting to the Assistant Manager, Operations, Chemical
Laboratory:
Plans, organizes and controls the Solution Chemistry Section
to provide chemical analytical services for all elements that may
be present in ores, minerals, process solutions and related
materials, in support of the research and development work of the
Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology (CANMET).
Supervises a unit of two chemists and four technicians. Plans
and assigns work, monitors progress of assignments, and reviews
and checks completed work before reporting and discussing results
with clients. Ensures that safety and quality assurance
procedures are implemented in the laboratory and recommends the
purchase of, and writes specifications for, new laboratory
equipment.
Conducts analytical work of a more complex or difficult nature
and investigates, adapts, develops and evaluates analytical
methods and techniques.
Assists outside agencies and industry by providing advice on
analytical methods, evaluating and resolving analytical problems,
and by conducting referee analyses to resolve differences.
Supervises and conducts chemical analysis and method
development projects to provide assistance in the certification
of standard reference materials for the Canadian Certified
Reference Materials Project.
Degree
Specifications
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Assistant Manager in
terms of providing acceptable analytical services with respect to
quality, quantity and timeliness.
Degree 2 - The work involves the provision of inorganic
analytical services in support of a number of research
projects.
Degree 3 - The work involves the conduct, and supervision of
staff engaged in the conduct, of inorganic analysis of ores,
minerals, process solutions and related materials.
Degree 3 - The work involves planning, organizing, and
assigning work to a section engaged in the provision of
analytical services.
Complexity of Work
3
Degree 2 - Information in terms of methods and procedures are
normally available, but data is generated by direct
observation.
Degree 2 - Data can be validated by alternate procedures or
literature references.
Degree 2 - The samples submitted to the section usually
result from controlled research experiments and are normally well
characterized. The work involves the determination of discrete
parameters. Samples of a more complex or difficult nature require
interpretation and method adaptation due to interferences.
Degree
Degree 2 - The work involves analysis of a more complex or
difficult nature, and investigations into method development
where the relationships between variables can be established by
straightforward analytical investigations.
Degree 3 - The organization, planning and conduct of
work in the section are affected by the activities of researchers
for whom analytical services are provided.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists, for whom
analytical services are provided, to report and discuss results,
and with scientists in outside agencies and industry to provide
analytical advice.
Degree 3 - The work requires adapting and developing
methods and techniques for the analysis of ores, minerals,
process solutions and related materials.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of inorganic analytical chemistry and of the
procedures and techniques used in the analysis of ores, minerals,
process solutions and related materials, as well as a knowledge
of supervisory practices.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to providing an effective analytical
service are reviewed by the Assistant Manager.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Assistant Manager in the resolution of difficult analytical or
method development problems.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems, determining approaches and adapting or developing
methods for their resolution.
Degree 2 - The work of subordinate staff is reviewed in
progress and checked for technical accuracy before reporting and
discussing results with clients.
Degree 2 - Analytical results are interpreted to produce
meaningful reports.
Degree 3 - Analytical advice is provided to scientists in
other agencies and industry. Guidance on the selection and
application of methods and on the interpretation of results is
provided to support staff.
Management Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - The work requires the supervision of a unit of two
chemists and four technicians.
Degree 3 - The work requires the control and maintenance
of equipment and supplies allocated for the work.
Degree 3 - The work requires making recommendations to
the Assistant Manager and writing specifications for the
acquisition of equipment and supplies required for the work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required is
requested from the Assistant Manager.
Degree 3 - Ensures that quality assurance and safety
procedures are implemented in the section.
Degree 3 - Coordinates the provision of analytical
services for a number of scientists.
Degree 3 - Interprets and implements administrative and
safety guidelines in the section.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
A. Degree 3 - The provision of analytical services is
essential to the ongoing research activities within CANMET.
Degree
B. Degree 2 -
Degree 2 - The provision of analytical services is essential
to research projects directed towards the improvement of mining
and related processing technologies having technological affects
on these industries. The work also contributes directly to the
industry through the development of methods, resolution of
analytical problems and through referee analysis to resolve
differences.
Degree 2 - The provision of analytical services is essential
to ongoing research projects directed to improvements in the use
of mineral resources.
No significant impact.(iv) No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The work involves the development of new
methods and procedures for the analysis of ores, minerals,
process solutions and related materials.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART Manager, Chemical
Laboratory
- Assistant Manager, Operations
- Head, Metals and Alloys Section
- Head, Ores and Precious Metal Analysis Section
- Head, XRF and Radioanalysis Section
- Head Optical Emission and NAA Section
* - Head, Solution Chemistry Section CH-3
- Chemist CH-2
- Chemist CH-1
- Technicians (4)
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 10
Descriptive Title: Chemist, Pesticide Evaluation
Level: 3
Reporting to the Associate Director, Pesticide Laboratory:
Plans, organizes and conducts the scientific appraisal and
review of the chemistry data contained in pre-market evaluation
submissions for new products or new uses of registered products
from the pesticide industry, for completeness and acceptance
against standards, criteria and evaluation protocols required
under the Pest Control Products Act and Regulations.
Reviews and assesses methods of pesticide manufacture,
including primary materials, reaction mechanisms, principal
products, impurities above the level of 0.1% and the possible
presence of toxic micro contaminants in order to assess the
validity, completeness and acceptability of information.
If additional data is required to complete the assessment,
informs industry of the additional requirements, the rationale
and the test protocols.
Plans and conducts laboratory investigations into the validity
of analytical methods submitted by industry and verifies the
compositional analysis of technical pesticides and formulations,
in particular for the presence of toxic impurities and micro
contaminants, to ensure that adequate quality control is
available for marketed products. Develops new or improved methods
when required for the specific analysis of products or
contaminants.
Reviews and determines, from an examination of information
provided with a submission, and from a theoretical review of
reaction mechanisms and pathways, the possible formation of toxic
micro contaminants.
Reports findings and recommends acceptance or rejection of the
application for registration of the product based on the
assessment results.
Participates in the planning of departmental research projects
to investigate the presence of toxic micro contaminants in
suspect products.
Provides advice to officers of other federal or provincial
agencies as well as industry on problems related to the
composition, analysis and contaminants of pesticides.
Supervises one technician engaged in analytical investigations
and method development studies.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignment
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Associate Director
in terms of assignments involving the scientific appraisal of the
chemical data of several pre-market evaluation submissions and
the conduct of related laboratory investigations.
B. Degree 3 - The work involves the comprehensive
evaluation and assessment of the chemistry data in pesticide
submissions as well as laboratory based studies and method
development projects.
Degree
C. Degree 3 - The work involves the evaluation and
assessment of chemical data, the analysis of a wide variety of
pesticide products and contaminants, the critical evaluation and
development of methods of analysis and the provision of
advice.
D. Degree 3 - Plans and conducts the scientific appraisal
and review of the chemistry data of a broad range of pesticides,
laboratory investigations into the validity of analytical
methods, and method development studies.
Complexity of Work
3
Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining information from a
critical review of submitted data, requesting the development and
submission of specific additional data from industry, and from
laboratory based investigations requiring method
development.
Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by industry can
normally be validated by a critical review of the chemistry data,
laboratory based investigations and literature referencing.
Degree 3 - The information and chemical data in submissions
include several chemical and physical parameters, reaction
pathways, information on the presence of contaminants and methods
of analysis, which are sometimes ambiguous or incomplete and
require interpretation.
Degree 3 - Relationships between chemical and physical data
submitted, results of analytical investigations, and the actual
composition of pesticides and presence of microcontaminants are
sometimes conflicting and require investigation and
interpretation.
Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by the activities
of other scientists and evaluators providing or requesting
additional information on the chemical aspects of the
submission.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
industry and other agencies and departments to exchange
information, resolve differences or problems and provide
advice.
Degree 3 - The work requires developing new or improved
methods for the compositional analysis of new pesticides and for
the identification and quantitation of a wide range of micro
contaminants.
H. Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles and theories of organic
analytical and synthetic chemistry and of the procedures and
instrumental techniques used in the analysis of pesticides and
related micro contaminants.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting scientific evaluations,
laboratory investigations and method development projects are
reviewed by the Associate Director for soundness of
judgement.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Associate Director on the resolution of difficult method
development problems and in the interpretation of ambiguous
chemical data contained in submissions.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems with
methods of analysis, incomplete, missing or biased data and
conclusions, and determining approaches for the resolution of
difficult problems.
Degree 3 - The results and findings of other scientists in
the area of pesticide chemistry and analysis of micro
contaminants are reviewed for appropriateness in assessing
pre-market submissions for the registration of pesticides.
E. Degree 3 - Chemical data, results and conclusions of
other scientists, as well as results of own laboratory
investigations are interpreted to determine the validity and
acceptability of data contained in the registration
submission.
F. Degree 3 - Advice on the chemistry of pesticides and
associated microcontaminants and on methods for their analysis is
provided to other scientists and officials in industry and in own
and other agencies.
Degree
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 2 - The work requires the supervision of one
technician.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for own
work.
Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and to the use
of equipment and supplies for own work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is requested
from the Associate Director.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 3 - Coordinates the collection of additional chemical
information from industry, and investigations, scientific
appraisals and method development studies with other
scientists.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Scientific appraisals, laboratory
investigations and methods and procedures developed are used in
the administration of pesticide legislation in general and in the
pre-market evaluation of individual submissions.
Degree 3 -
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the regulatory approval and control of pesticides and may
lead to economic or technological effects on the pesticide
industry.
Degree 2 - The confirmation of pesticide composition and the
identification of microcontaminants contribute to the
registration and use of environmentally acceptable
pesticides.
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice, and results of the work
affect the approval and use of potentially hazardous pesticides
and the control of toxicmicrocontaminants.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of the submitted chemical data
and information, results of laboratory investigations, and new
methods of analysis contribute to improved knowledge and
understanding of the chemistry of pesticides and related
microcontaminants.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Laboratory Services Division
Associate Director, Pesticide Laboratory
- Chief, Pesticide Residues Laboratory
- Chemist, Pesticide Formulation
* - Chemist, Pesticide Evaluation
(3) CH-3
- Technician EG-ESS-7
* Bench-mark Position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 11
Descriptive Title: Drug Evaluator
Level: 3
Reporting to the Chief, Pharmaceutical Evaluation
Division:
Evaluates the chemical and pharmaceutical data contained in
new drug submissions to determine the acceptability of the drug
in meeting standards of safety and efficacy. Adapts the
scientific approach and methodology in the evaluation process and
conducts a scientific appraisal of the chemistry and
pharmaceutical technology data in order to validate the claims of
the manufacturer.
Reviews the chemical process and reaction pathways to identify
potentially toxic reagents, synthetic intermediates, products of
side reactions, and stereo-chemical isomers which may be present
as impurities, ensuring that the drug manufacturer has
investigated these impurities with appropriately validated
methodology. Interprets spectral data to confirm the chemical
structure of drug substances and impurities.
Determines whether the proposed manufacturing and quality
control standards for the drug substance and dosage form are
acceptable to ensure safety and efficacy of each lot produced,
and that proposed analytical methods are properly validated to
ensure accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity.
Determines degradation pathways and predicts potential
degradation products and ensures that the manufacturer has fully
investigated all potential degradation products and has developed
appropriate methodology for their determination. Determines the
acceptability and compatibility of non-medicinal ingredients and
packaging materials to ensure the safety of the product.
Prepares a detailed report summarizing the findings and
judgement reached, identifies problem areas and deficiencies,
informs the manufacturer of requirements and areas for further
product or data development, formulates a comprehensive
recommendation concerning acceptance or rejection of the
submission and provides a scientific rationale for the
conclusions.
Performs a second review of data derived from post-market
surveillance of new drugs or drug applications referred from
other Bureaux, to ensure that new products marketed in Canada
meet the standards for safety and efficacy prescribed in the Food
and Drug Act and Regulations. Assesses reports prepared by junior
evaluators to ensure that data has been properly interpreted and
that recommendations are sound.
Assists in the development of research proposals in problem
areas relating to analytical methodology, drug standards and
other chemical problems identified during the evaluation of drug
submissions to ensure that timely and relevant research is
carried out within the Branch, and that Canadian standards for
drugs are developed when required.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
3
A. Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Division Chief
in terms of assignments involving the scientific appraisal of the
chemistry and pharmaceutical technology data of several new drug
evaluation submissions.
Degree
B. Degree 3 - The work involves the comprehensive evaluation
and assessment of the chemistry and pharmaceutical technology
data in new drug submissions to determine the acceptability of
the drug in meeting standards of safety and efficacy.
Degree 3 - The work involves the evaluation and assessment of
chemistry and pharmaceutical technology data, the review of
manufacturing processes, drug synthesis, stability and
degradation, and the potential formation of toxic impurities, a
critical review of proposed standards and analytical methodology,
and the provision of advice.
Degree 3 - Adapts scientific approaches and methodologies,
and plans, organizes and conducts a broad diversity of studies
and evaluations of the chemistry and pharmaceutical technology
data for a wide variety of new drug submissions.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining information from a
critical review of submitted data, and requesting the development
and submission of specific additional data for new chemical
entities for which there is often no information available in the
scientific literature and no published standards. The only
information available is that supplied by the drug manufacturer
in the submission and requires interpretation and selection to
use.
Degree 3 - The information and data supplied by drug
manufacturers can normally be validated by a critical review of
the chemical data, laboratory based investigations and detailed
literature referencing.
Degree 4 - The information and data contained in
submissions relating to new chemical entities and novel synthetic
routes may include complicated and conflicting analytical data
and ambiguous information on impurities, stereo-isomers and
degradation products. Judgements as to the acceptability of the
data must be made.
Degree 4 - Relationships between the chemistry and
pharmaceutical technology data submitted, synthetic pathways,
reagents, stability and degradation products, and the possible
formation of toxic impurities are complicated and require
critical evaluation and review to resolve conflicts and
interpretation problems.
Degree 3 - The work is frequently affected by the
activities of other scientists and evaluators providing or
requesting additional information on the chemical or
pharmaceutical technology aspects of the submissions.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
the pharmaceutical industry and other agencies to exchange
information, resolve differences or problems and provide
advice.
Degree 3 - The work requires adapting the scientific
approach and methodologies in the evaluation process to suit the
unique requirements and each submission.
Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of
analytical and organic chemistry, as well as spectroscopy and a
good knowledge of medicinal chemistry, physical chemistry and
pharmaceutical technology.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting scientific evaluations
and final recommendations and conclusions are reviewed for
soundness of judgement.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Division Chief or from an appropriate specialist on the
interpretation of ambiguous chemical data or on the resolution of
difficult problems.
Degree
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying problems with
methods of analysis, incomplete, missing or biased data, and
conclusions, and adapting scientific approaches and methodologies
for the evaluation of drug submissions and the resolution of
difficult problems.
Degree 3 - The results and findings of other
scientists in the area of pharmaceutical chemistry as well as
those of junior evaluators are reviewed for appropriateness in
assessing new drug submissions.
Degree 3 - Chemical and pharmaceutical technology
data, results and conclusions are interpreted to determine the
validity and acceptability of data contained in new drug
submissions.
Degree 3 - Advice is given to junior evaluators on
the interpretation of analytical results and to officials in the
pharmaceutical industry on the acceptability of proposed drug
standards.
Management Responsibility
7
Degree 1 - As applicable, work is assigned to non-subordinate
support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies
for own work.
Degree 1 - Limited to the spending of own time and
to the use of equipment and supplies for own work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Division Chief.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 3 - Coordinates the collection of additional
chemistry and pharmaceutical technology information from drug
manufacturers, and investigations and scientific appraisals with
other scientists.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety
procedures established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Results and decisions of scientific appraisals are
used in the administration of the Food and Drugs Act and
Regulations in general, and in the clearance of individual new
drug submissions, as well as in the development of Canadian
standards for drugs.
Degree 3 -
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the regulatory approval and control of drugs and may lead
to economic or technological effects on the pharmaceutical
industry.
No significant impact.
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice, and results of the work
affect the approval of new drugs in Canada and contribute to the
establishment of standards which ensure the continued safety and
efficacy of each lot of new drug sold in Canada.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of the submitted chemistry
and pharmaceutical technology data and the development of
research proposals provide knowledge and improved understanding
of the chemistry of pharmaceuticals.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Bureau of Human Prescription Drugs Chief,
Pharmaceutical Evaluation Division - Manufacturing
Specialist
Conducts varied scientific investigations of on analytically
complex nature covering a broad range of organic chemical
commodities, primarily relating to Customs classification
appeals. Evaluates relevant technical information from sample
documentation or from the scientific literature. Identifies
analytical problems and selects, adapts or develops analytical
techniques according to the requirements of each case to
determine the chemical identify of the sample. Interprets and
evaluates the data from a variety of chemical and instrumental
methods. Prepares reports, explains analytical findings and
provides technical advice on the application of Customs
Legislation.
Maintains expertise specifically in the application and
interpretation of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance analysis, provides
advice and trains chemists in instrument use and interpretation
of data, and ensures the proper use and maintenance of
equipment.
Reviews and evaluates scientific submissions presented in
support of contentious issues or cases under appeal, drafts
briefs for use by Department of Justice attorneys with respect to
appeals and provides testimony as an expert witness.
Leads the section's chemists in the application and
development of analytical procedures and instrumental methods,
provides guidance to and trains junior chemists, and assists them
in the selection of methods, the interpretation of analytical and
scientific information, and in the drafting of reports.
Identifies equipment requirements for the section and prepares
justification and specifications for purchase, lease, or
contracting out for services.
Degree
Specifications
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Section Head in
terms of goals and requirements for investigations or method
development projects.
Degree 3 - The work involves the conduct of comprehensive
chemical investigations of a broad range of organic chemical
commodities to determine the application of Customs
legislation.
Degree 3 - The work involves the analysis of a wide
diversity of organic commodities, the development of analytical
methods, the training and guidance of junior chemists and the
provision of advice relating analytical results to Customs
legislation.
Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development and scientific investigational
work in the area of organic commodity identification for the
purpose of Customs classification.
Complexity of Work
3
A. Degree 3 - The work requires obtaining information and
data for the identification of a broad range of organic chemical
commodities for which background information is limited and
requires investigation and method adaptation.
Degree
B. Degree 4 - The determination of the composition of
diverse mixtures of unknown organic compounds requires difficult
and complex investigations.
Degree 4 - The analysis of new products and unknown materials
produces chemical and physical data with many poorly defined
variables. Judgement is required in interpreting the broadly
based and often conflicting analytical data.
Degree 4 - Relationships between manufacturing processes,
intended or potential uses, claims and opinions of importers and
customs administrators and the chemical and physical parameters
from several analytical techniques are conflicting and require
investigations to resolve conflicts and interpretation
problems.
Degree 3 - The activities of Tariff Administrators submitting
problem cases, changes in the legislation, and the importation of
new products affect the direction of method development and
priority of investigational work.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with officials in the department to
explain results and provide advice concerning the customs
classification of organic chemical commodities, and with crown
attorneys to provide specific technical information for the
defense of appeals.
Degree 3 - The work requires modifying existing and
developing new methods for the identification of a broad range of
organic chemical commodities.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the principles and theories of organic analytical
chemistry, and of the procedures and instrumental techniques used
to identify organic products, a thorough knowledge of Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance analysis, and a sound knowledge of the Customs
legislation relating to classification of organic chemical
commodities.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting investigations and
adapting and developing methods are reviewed by the Section
Head.
Degree 4 - Professional guidance is received from the Section
Head on the resolution of unusual or complex issues of a
contentious nature involving the customs classification of
organic chemical commodities.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical and
customs classification problems and determining approaches for
the resolution of difficult problems.
Degree 3 - Results of other scientists working in the area of
Nuclear Magnetic Reasonance Spectroscopy and analytical chemistry
related to custom classification are reviewed to determine their
application to own work.
Degree 3 - Other Scientists' results, conclusions and
recommendations related to cases under appeal are interpreted to
determine their validity and implications.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in Nuclear
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and other techniques for analysis
of organic commodities is provided to other scientists.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 1 - As applicable, technical instructions or requests
for assistance are given to staff of the technical services
unit.
Degree 2 - Ensures the proper use and maintenance of the
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer.
Degree 3 - Recommends the acquisition of and writes
specifications for the purchase of analytical equipment.
Degree 2 - Recommends on the need for contracted scientific
services.
Degree
Degree 2 - Ensures the safe and proper use and maintenance of
the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrometer.
Degree 2 - Occasionally, must coordinate work with
Tariff Advisors submitting problem cases and with other
scientists working on investigational projects.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Analytical reports and technical
advice with respect to new or unusual organic chemical
commodities or customs classification appeals are used in the
administration of Customs legislation and can set departmental
precedents. Methods and procedures developed are used by other
scientists in the section.
Degree 3 -
Degree 3 - Analytical reports and technical advice are used
to determine the customs classification of organic chemical
commodities often under appeal and have direct economic effects
on related products and industries through the establishment of
precedents.
No significant impact.
No significant impact.
No other significant 'impacts.
C. Degree 3 - Information and results of investigations
contribute to the knowledge of organic chemical commodities
entering Canada. New and improved methods and procedures for the
identification of organic commodities are developed.
Conducts studies and leads project teams to develop, validate
and apply new or improved methods for the analysis and evaluation
of trace inorganic constituents, in a wide range of food
products, to ensure the availability of reliable methods for
laboratory operations and for inclusion in the Branch analytical
Procedures Manual for use by all Branch Laboratories, the
regulated industry in their quality control and product
monitoring programs and as international reference documents.
Investigates the application of automated analysis and
information handling techniques and the applicability of new
scientific processes and techniques.
Provides specialized knowledge and advice, as a member of the
Directorate National Science Committee, in the development of
options for the National Compliance Program in the Food Chemistry
Project area of trace inorganic analysis. Identifies new areas of
concern based on a specialist knowledge of field conditions,
current science and technology and practices in the food
industry. Evaluates and recommends whether existing projects
should be cancelled or revised or new projects developed to
resolve newly identified problems. Defines objectives of new or
revised projects and recommends ways to achieve them.
Provides authoritative advice to officials of the department
and industry in the area of inorganic composition analysis.
Participates as a member of joint inspection teams to investigate
food industry problems. Trains departmental and industry
scientists in the application of methods. Provides expert
testimony in court concerning the reliability and significance of
analytical methods and provides advice to crown attorneys on the
interpretation of analytical data. Develops and implements
procedures and schedules for method and instrument quality
assurance for trace inorganic analysis and develops and
recommends safety guidelines and procedures for trace inorganic
laboratory operations. Evaluates analytical equipment, makes
recommendations for purchase and prepares detailed specifications
and evaluation criteria.
Analyses unusual or difficult samples as an Official Analyst
for the purpose of the enforcement of the regulations and
provisions of the Food and Drugs Act and conducts, and leads
project teams in, special investigations to resolve problems
associated with trace inorganics in foods.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head in terms
of method development project goals and National Science
Committee assignments.
Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations into the trace inorganic analysis of foods for the
purpose of method development and national project planning.
Degree 3 - The work involves the development and
validation of analytical methods for the inorganic analysis of
foods, participation in national program planning, the provision
of expert advice, and the conduct of analysis.
Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development, investigational and problem
solving work in the area of trace inorganics in foods.
Degree
Complexity of Work
3
Degree 3 - Information in terms of new methods is developed
and information for use in program planning is obtained through
investigation, selection and interpretation.
Degree 3 - Information, data and new methods can be
validated by repeating experiments, using alternative procedures
or through literature referencing.
Degree 3 - Information on food industry practices and the
estimated levels of inorganic constituents in food products and
analytical data on actual levels contain several variables
requiring interpretation and are sometimes ambiguous.
Degree 3 - Relationships among variables, and
interferences in trace element analysis and method development
are sometimes conflicting and require investigation and
interpretation to ensure valid results. Relationships between
industry practices and levels of inorganic constituents in foods
require analysis and interpretation for project planning.
Degree 3 - The activities of inspection staff and
compliance officers affect the direction of method development
and priority of investigational work.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with scientists and officials to
participate in cooperative method development and project
planning activities, with industry to resolve problems and
provide advice and training, and with Crown Attorneys to provide
advice on the interpretation of analytical findings.
Degree 3 - The work requires developing new methods and
procedures for the trace inorganic analysis of foods.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the principles and theories of inorganic analytical
chemistry and of the procedures and instrumental techniques used
for the trace inorganic analysis of foods, as well as a good
knowledge of the technologies and practices used in the food
manufacturing industry.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting method development
studies and recommendations concerning National Science Committee
project planning are reviewed by the Unit Head for soundness of
judgement in terms of meeting objectives.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Unit Head on the resolution of difficult analytical or method
development problems.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and determining approaches for the resolution of
difficult problems, and identifying compliance problems and
recommending options for their resolution in the Food Chemistry
Project area of trace inorganic analysis.
Degree 3 - The work of project team members involved in
method development studies or special investigations is reviewed
for completeness and compliance with project guidelines and
quality assurance objectives.
Degree 3 - Work on the National Science Committee
requires the interpretation and evaluation of scientific data on
the levels of trace inorganics in foods as well as methods of
analysis and food industry practices.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in
trace inorganic analysis and related food industry practices is
provided to departmental officials and food industry
representatives.
Degree
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 1 - As applicable, assigns work to project staff.
Degree 2 - Ensures proper use of instruments, supplies
and facilities for trace inorganic analysis.
Degree 3 - Evaluates requirements, prepares detailed
specifications and evaluation criteria for, and recommends the
purchase of, laboratory equipment.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Unit Head.
Degree 3 - Coordinates work with National Science
Committee members and regional inspection and laboratory
staff.
Degree 2 - Develops and recommends safety guidelines and
procedures for trace inorganic work in the laboratory.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
development of national compliance projects, and results of the
work contribute to the availability of reliable methods for use
in on-going laboratory operations.
Degree 3 -
Degree 3 - The identification of violations of the Food and
Drugs Act and Regulations may result in the regulatory control of
commercial food products, and recommendations and advice on the
design and implementation of national compliance projects may
lead to economic or technological effects on the food
industry.
No significant impact.
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the regulatory control of foods containing violative
levels of inorganic constituents.(iv) No other significant
impacts. Degree 3 - The evaluation of information and results
of the work provide information on the levels of inorganic
constituents in the food supply. New methods and procedures for
the analysis of trace inorganics in food are developed.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Food and Drug Laboratory Division
- Head, Food Chemistry Unit
- Specialist, Trace Organic Analysis
*- Specialist, Trace Inorganic Analysis (CH-3)
- Chemists (3)
- Chemists, Development Grade (3)
- Technicians (3)
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 140
Descriptive Title: Chemist, Mass Spectrometry Methodology
Level: 3
Reporting to the Head, Micro contaminants Section:
Conducts studies to develop, validate and apply new or
improved mass-spectral procedures to confirm the identity and
amount of toxic micro contaminants in agricultural products.
Investigates new or modified techniques for the ionization and
fragmentation of molecules, and for their structural elucidation.
Investigates the application of new column technology for the
separation of complex mixtures using various gas and liquid
chromatographic interfaces with mass spectrometry. Writes methods
and procedures and recommends their adoption for ongoing
laboratory operations.
Analyses unusual or difficult samples submitted by the
inspection staff, to assist in the enforcement of the acts and
regulations administered by the Department of Agriculture. Plans
and designs the analytical approach and modifies and adapts
methods. Interprets the significance of analytical
findings, including detailed mass-spectral interpretations of
complex or unusual fragmentation patterns. Prepares detailed
written reports providing and explaining results and
conclusions.
Provides authoritative advice based on expertise in
mass-spectral analyses to colleagues and officials in the
department, other government agencies and the agricultural
industry. Advises program officers on the feasibility of new
initiatives and sampling requirements for toxic micro
contaminants. Recommends and prepares detailed specifications for
the purchase of complete mass spectrometer systems, components
and accessories. Establishes computer libraries and improves
search procedures for compounds of interest. Develops and
implements performance tests and guidelines for the operation of
combined gas chromatograph - mass spectrometers. Diagnoses
equipment malfunction and arranges for repairs. Provides training
to colleagues in the use of mass spectrometers.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the supervisor in terms
of requirements for methodology studies or investigative project
goals.
Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations within the specialized subject area of
mass-spectral analysis.
Degree 3 - The work requires investigations into the
mass-spectral analysis of a wide range of agricultural products,
fully using all the capabilities of both high and low resolution
mass spectrometry, investigating new technological applications,
solving difficult problems, and providing advice.
Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development and investigational problems
solving work in the area of mass spectrometry.
Complexity of Work
3
A. Degree 3 - Information in terms of new methods is
developed and mass-spectral data are obtained through
investigation, selection and interpretation.
Degree
B. Degree 3 - Mass-spectral data and information can be
validated by repeating experiments, using alternative procedures,
or through literature referencing.
Degree 3 - Mass-spectral data including fragmentation
patterns obtained through experiment and investigation contain
several variables requiring interpretation and are sometimes
ambiguous.
Degree 3 - Experimental data derived from changes to mass
spectrometer systems and operating conditions involve variables
and relationships which are sometimes conflicting and require
investigation and interpretation.
Degree 3 - The activities of inspection staff and program
officers affect the direction of method development and problem
solving work.
Degree 3 - Contacts are with inspectors and program officers,
and other scientists to exchange information, solve problems,
plan joint projects and provide advice.
Degree 4 - The work requires investigating new technological
developments for applicability and modifying existing and
developing new methods and techniques using novel instrumental
approaches, for the mass-spectral analysis of micro
contaminants.
Degree 3 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of mass
spectrometry to the analysis of microcontaminants.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to method development studies and
problem solving investigations, and results in terms of final
methods and conclusions are reviewed by the Section Head.
Degree 4 - Scientific guidance of a general nature is
available from the Section Head. The work requires the resolution
of difficult problems within the area of mass-spectral analysis
but guidance is received from other specialists in the resolution
of unusual or complex problems.
Degree 3 - The work requires defining objectives of method
development studies, identifying problems in the analysis of
difficult samples and determining approaches for the resolution
of difficult problems in the area of mass-spectral analysis.
Degree 3 - Results of other scientists working in the area of
mass spectrometry are reviewed to determine their application to
own work.
Degree 3 - Complex scientific data and results of own work
are interpreted to produce meaningful conclusions, and the
scientific literature and results of other scientists in the area
of mass spectrometry are reviewed and interpreted to determine
implications on method development studies.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in the
mass-spectral analysis of agricultural products is provided to
departmental officials and other scientists.
Management Responsibility
2
Degree 1 - As applicable, work is assigned to non subordinate
support staff.
Degree 3 - Controls the maintenance of the mass spectrometers
and sets operational guidelines for their use.
Degree 3 - Recommends the acquisition of and writes
specifications for complete mass spectrometer systems, components
and accessories.
Degree 1 - Assistance, when required, is requested from the
Section Head.
Degree 2 - Ensures the safe and proper use and maintenance of
the mass spectrometers.
Degree 2 - Occasionally must coordinate own work with the
activities of inspectors and other laboratory staff when
providing mass spectrometry services.
Degree
G. Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety
procedures established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Results of the work contribute methods used in
ongoing laboratory activities and to the development of
regulations and standards for microcontaminantsb in agricultural
products.
Degree 3 -
Degree 3 - Analytical results are used as a basis for
regulatory control of commercial agricultural products.
No significant impact.
Degree 2 - Results of the work contribute to the regulatory
control of toxic microcontaminants in agricultural products,
pesticides, and meat products.
No other significant impact.
C. Degree 3 - New methods and techniques for the
mass-spectral analysis of agricultural products are developed,
and results of the work contribute knowledge and improved
understanding on the occurrence of micro contaminants in
agricultural products.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Associate Director, Pesticide Division
- Head, Micro contaminants Section
- Research Scientist, Method Development
*- Chemist, Mass Spectrometry Methodology CH-3
- Chemist, Mass Spectral Analysis (2)
*Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 15
Descriptive Title: Specialist, Drug Analysis
Level: 3
Reporting to the Head, Drug Analysis Unit:
Conducts studies and leads project teams to develop, validate
and apply new or improved methods for the chemical analysis of a
wide variety of abused drugs and associated chemicals to ensure
the availability of reliable methods for laboratory operations.
Investigates the application of automated analysis and
information handling techniques and the applicability of new
scientific procedures and techniques.
Provides authoritative advice and assistance to police
agencies, crown prosecutors, defence counsel and departmental
officials in the investigation of clandestine laboratories
engaged in the synthesis of drugs of abuse. Participates in
on-site police investigations to identify materials, equipment,
literature, notes and residues which might be pertinent to
confirming illicit drug manufacture or trafficking and which
should be seized, and to identify potential hazards of materials
and chemical reactions in progress and ensure the safe shut-down
of reactions in progress. Evaluates seized scientific literature,
notes and taped telephone conversations, and analyses and
assesses chemical intermediates and products to postulate
methods, synthetic pathways and final products. Advises police
and crown attorneys and testifies in court as an expert witness
to explain the principles of analysis, reliability of analytical
methods, significance of results, and results of clandestine
laboratory investigations.
Provides specialized knowledge and advice as a member of the
Directorate National Science Committee in the development of the
National Drug Analysis Service Program. Identifies new areas of
concern based on a specialist knowledge of field conditions,
current science and technology, and practices and trends in the
illegal drug trade. Evaluates and recommends whether existing
projects in the Drug Analysis Service Project area should be
cancelled or revised or new projects developed to resolve newly
identified problems. Defines objectives of new or revised
projects and recommends ways to achieve them.
Produces scientifically valid qualitative and quantitative
analyses of unusual or difficult unknown illicit drug exhibits
for use in court to aid in the enforcement of the Narcotic
Control Act and the Food and Drugs Act. Interprets results and
issues certificates of analysis for use as prima facie evidence
in court. Provides expert testimony in court.
Develops and implements procedures and schedules for method
and instrument quality assurance and develops and recommends
safety guidelines and procedures for the laboratory. Acts as
custodian for narcotic, controlled and restricted drugs used as
reference standards. Evaluates analytical equipment, makes
recommendations for purchase and prepares detailed specifications
and evaluations criteria.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
3
Degree 3 - Objectives are defined by the Unit Head in terms
of method development project goals, National Science Committee
assignments and clandestine laboratory investigations.
Degree 3 - The work involves comprehensive studies and
investigations into illicit drug analysis for the purpose of
method development and national program planning as well as
comprehensive investigations into clandestine laboratory
operations.
Degree
Degree 4 - The work involves the development and validation
of analytical methods for illicit drug analysis, participation in
national program planning, the provision of expert advice and the
conduct of analyses and comprehensive clandestine laboratory
investigations.
Degree 3 - Plans and conducts a broad diversity of
analytical, method development, clandestine laboratory
investigational and problem solving work in the area of illicit
drugs.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - Information on the identity of illicit drugs and
products of clandestine laboratories is difficult to obtain and
requires intensive investigation. Methods and reference standards
are often not available.
Degree 3 - Information, data and new methods can be
validated by repeating experiments, using alternative procedures
or through literature referencing.
Degree 4 - Information and data on the operations of
clandestine laboratories and the identity of materials and
products, as well as the identity of illicit drugs, related
chemicals, impurities and cutting agents involve many variables
with high variability, are difficult to interpret, and require
judgement to use.
Degree 4 - The relationships between the evidence
obtained in clandestine laboratory operations and the synthetic
pathway and probable products requires in-depth investigations to
understand and interpret.
Degree 4 - The activities of police agencies, crown
attorneys and courts affect the priority and conduct of the work
and the direction of method development studies.
Degree 4 - Contacts are with police agencies to provide
expert advice and training and to participate in clandestine
laboratory investigations, with crown attorneys, defence counsel
and the courts to provide testimony as an expert witness and to
explain and defend, often under critical cross-examination,
results and interpretation of findings, and with officials of the
department to participate in program planning and provide advice
based on a recognized expertise in clandestine laboratory
investigations and illicit drug analysis.
Degree 3 - The work requires developing new methods and
procedures for illicit drug analysis.
Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of
forensic drug analysis as well as a thorough knowledge of
synthetic chemistry as applied to clandestine drug manufacture;
and a good knowledge of the trends in illicit drug production,
distribution and use.
Professional Responsibility
3
Degree 3 - Approaches to conducting method development
studies, clandestine laboratory investigations and
recommendations concerning National Science Committee project
planning, are reviewed by the Unit Head for soundness of
judgement in terms of meeting objectives.
Degree 3 - Professional guidance is received from the
Unit Head on the resolution of difficult analytical or method
development projects.
Degree 3 - The work requires identifying analytical
problems and determining approaches for the resolution of
difficult problems, and identifying new areas of concern in the
illicit drug analysis area and recommending options for their
resolution.
Degree
Degree 3 - The work of project team members involved in
method development studies is reviewed for completeness and
compliance with project guidelines and quality assurance
objectives.
Degree 3 - Documents, notes and other evidence seized in
clandestine laboratory investigations are interpreted and
evaluated to postulate synthetic pathways and final drug
products. Work on the National Science Committee requires the
interpretation and evaluation of scientific data on trends in
illicit drug manufacture, distribution and use.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in
clandestine laboratory investigation and illicit drug analysis is
provided to department officials and to crown attorneys, defence
counsel, police agencies and the courts.
Management Responsibility
3
Degree 1 - As applicable, assigns work to project staff.
Degree 3 - Ensures proper use of instruments, and
supplies for illicit drug analysis and controls access to
narcotic, controlled and restricted drugs used as reference
standards.
Degree 3 - Evaluates requirements, and prepares detailed
specifications and evaluation criteria for, and recommends the
purchase of laboratory equipment.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Unit Head.
Degree 3 - Implements quality assurance procedures for
illicit drug analysis.
Degree 3 - Coordinates work with National Science
Committee members, police forces, crown attorneys and the
courts.
Degree 2 - Develops and recommends safety guidelines and
procedures for illicit drug analysis work in the laboratory.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
3
Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to the
development of the National Drug Analysis Service Program and
results of the work contribute to the availability of reliable
methods for use in on-going laboratory operations.
Degree 3 -
No significant impact.
No significant impact.
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
affect the regulatory control of illicit drugs harmful to human
health.
Degree 3 - Recommendations, advice and results of the work
contribute to the administration of criminal law respecting
illicit drugs and can lead to the incarceration, or the
imposition of fines to individuals.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of information and results of
the work provide knowledge and improved understanding of the
clandestine manufacture, occurrence and purity of illicit drugs
in Canada. New methods and procedures for the analysis of illicit
drugs are developed.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Chief, Drug Laboratories Division
- Head, Pharmaceutical Analysis Unit (3)
- Head, Drug Analysis Service Unit (2)
- Head, Drug Analysis Services Unit
* - Specialist, Drug Analysis (CH-3)
- Chemists (2)
- Chemist, Development Grade (1)
- Technicians (4)
- Clerk
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 16
Descriptive Title: Chemistry Specialist, Drug Evaluation
Level: 4
Reporting to the Chief, Pharmaceutical Evaluation
Division:
Acts as a consulting specialist on all complex chemical
matters relating to the scientific evaluation of new drugs
arising in, or referred to the Division, to ensure that policies,
advice and decisions are based on the most up-to-date and
authoritative information and knowledge available.
Conducts detailed scientific evaluations to interpret spectral
and other chemical data to solve problems relating to the
stereochemistry of structurally complex new drug entities,
resolve questions of reaction mechanisms, elucidate the mechanism
of chemical degradation of drugs and predict possible impurities
from the synthetic process.
Studies the chemical and physical structure of new drug
entities, using the techniques of Quantitative Structure Analysis
Relationships to predict pharmacological action and toxicity and
alerts biologists and medical officers of potential toxicity
problems with new drugs, metabolites and degradation
products.
Plans and conducts scientific evaluations of the chemical and
pharmaceutical data continued in new drug submissions for
structurally complex drugs to determine acceptability of the drug
in meeting standards of safety and efficacy. Reviews all aspects
of the synthesis, manufacturing process, stability and
degradation products, analytical methods and standards proposed
by the drug manufacturers to ensure that safety and efficacy
issues are identified and addressed. Requests additional
information or studies from industry to meet deficiencies or
resolve problems with the submissions.
Meets with scientists and officials of the Pharmaceutical
industry to defend questions raised and scientific positions
taken on contentious issues and to influence changes in industry
policy which are in conflict with Branch policy.
Prepares a detailed report summarizing the findings and
judgments reached, identifies problem areas and deficiencies,
makes a final recommendation to the Division Chief on the
disposition of the submission and provides a scientific rationale
for the conclusions.
Develops specific research proposals for implementation in the
Branch to resolve identified problems in methodology and
chemistry and leading to the development of new Canadian
standards for drugs and coordinates the progress of these
projects.
Conducts a continual review of new and revised international
standards for drug substances and dosage forms, identifies and
documents discrepancies and deficiencies, and recommends changes
for improving these international standards. Compares these
standards with those approved in new drug submissions, and when
significant differences are identified, notifies manufacturers of
cleared new drugs, requesting changes or updating.
Recommends changes in drug evaluation policies as new
information and technology becomes available, and contributes to
the development of industry guidelines and standards relating to
the chemistry requirements of the Food and Drugs Act
Regulations.
Trains professional staff in drug evaluation, assigns
submissions for review, provides guidance on the approach and
methodologies to be used, and reviews and evaluates the final
report and recommendations.
Provides advice based on a recognized expertise in the
chemical and pharmaceutical evaluation of drugs to other
evaluators and scientists and officials in the pharmaceutical
industry on the interpretation of scientific data.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
4
Degree 4 - Objectives are stated as requiring the ongoing
provision of scientific advice and consultation relating to the
scientific evaluation of new drugs, the conduct of studies into
the chemistry of structurally complex new drug entities and the
scientific appraisal of complex new drug submissions.
Degree 4 - The work involves studies, investigations and
the provision of advice in the area of new drug evaluation, and
includes work in organic, physical, analytical and medicinal
chemistry, spectroscopy, pharmaceutical technology and drug
structure activity relationships.
Degree 4 - Activities include the provision of specialist
advice, the conduct of detailed studies into the chemistry of new
drug entities, the scientific appraisal of complex new drug
submissions, the development and coordination of research
proposals, the provision of guidance and functional direction to
drug evaluators and the development of standards and industry
guidelines.
Degree 4 - Plans and conducts complex studies into the
chemistry of new drug entities and the scientific evaluation of
complex new drug submissions, exercising high degree of freedom
and latitude in selecting approaches and methodologies.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining information from a
critical review of submitted data, and requesting the development
and submission of specific additional data for new chemical
entities for which there is often no information available in the
scientific literature and no published standards. The only
information available is that supplied by the drug manufacturer
in the submission and requires interpretation and selection to
use.
Degree 4 - The information and data relating to complex
chemical problems and structurally complex new drug entities can
be validated only by a detailed critical evaluation or through
the initiation of research projects.
Degree 5 - The information and data relating to
structurally complex new drug entities, novel and complicated
synthetic pathways and the structure activity relationships
involve many variables with high variability, ambiguity and
require ingenuity and highly selective judgement to use.
Degree 5 - The relationships between the chemical and
physical data, synthetic routes, impurities, degradation
products, structure, functional groups and stereochemistry, and
the biological activity of complex new drug entities are often
conflicting and difficult to define and measure.
Degree 4 - The work is normally affected by the
activities of scientists and officials in the pharmaceutical
industry or in international standards organizations and require
consideration of their impact on drug evaluation decisions and
current drug standards.
Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
the pharmaceutical industry to explain and defend scientific
positions on contentious issues and provide advice based on a
recognized expertise in the chemical evaluation of drugs. Contact
is also with international standards organizations and other
agencies to review and establish standards.
Degree
Degree 4 - The work requires the development of approaches
for the resolution of unique problems in drug evaluations where
generally there is a lack of precedents, and the initiation,
conduct and coordination of research into drug chemistry problems
and leading to the development of new drug standards.
Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an
advanced knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of
analytical and organic chemistry, as well as spectroscopy, and a
good knowledge of medicinal chemistry, physical chemistry,
pharmaceutical technology and drug structure activity
relationships.
Professional Responsibility
4
Degree 4 - The work requires the ongoing provision of
specialist advice, consultations and recommendations, which are
reviewed for effectiveness in supporting drug evaluation
activities. Final recommendations and conclusions on complex new
drug submissions are reviewed by the Division Chief.
Degree 4 - Professional guidance is received from the
Division Chief on the resolution of contentious issues or unusual
and precedent setting new drug evaluations.
Degree 4 - The work requires developing specific research
proposals to resolve problems in drug evaluation, identifying
problems with the interpretation and assessment of complex
chemical data and determining approaches and methodologies for
their resolution.
Degree 4 - Reviews and evaluates the final reports and
recommendations of drug evaluators and reviews studies and
proposals from other scientists working in the area of
pharmaceutical chemistry and international drug standards.
Degree 4 - Results of studies and investigations into the
chemistry of structurally complex new drugs, the results of
research projects, and reports from international drug standards
organizations are interpreted to determine the implications on
Canadian drug standards and drug evaluation decisions.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in the
chemical evaluation of drugs is provided to scientists and
officials in the department, industry, international standards
organizations and other agencies.
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - As applicable, work is assigned to non-subordinate
support staff.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
Degree 1 - Limited to spending of own time and to the
use of equipment and supplies for own work.
Degree 1 - Outside assistance, when required, is
requested from the Division Chief.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 3 - Coordinates the collection of additional
chemical and pharmaceutical technology information from drug
manufacturers, investigations and scientific appraisals with
other scientists and research projects conducted in the
Branch.
Degree 1 - Follows administrative and safety procedures
established for the work.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
4
A. Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations
contribute to the development of drug evaluation policies and to
the development of industry guidelines, Canadian drug standards
and chemistry requirements of the Food and Drugs Act and
Regulations.
Degree
Degree 4 -
Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations result
in the establishment of standards for the pharmaceutical
industry, drug evaluation policies, and revisions to industry
guidelines which have economic and technological effects on the
pharmaceutical industry.
No significant impact.
Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and consultations
contribute to the development of standards and regulations for
drugs, and decisions and recommendations affect the regulatory
approval and use of drugs in Canada.(iv) No other significant
impacts.
C. Degree 3 - The evaluation of submitted chemistry and
pharmaceutical technology data and the development of research
proposals provide knowledge and improved understanding of the
chemistry of pharmaceuticals.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Bureau of Human Prescription Drugs
-Chief, Pharmaceutical Evaluation Division
- Manufacturing Specialist, Drug Evaluation
- Pharmaceutics Specialist, Drug Evaluation
*- Chemistry Specialist, Drug Evaluation CH-4
- Drug Evaluators (4)
- Junior Drug Evaluators (2)
* Bench-mark position
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 17Descriptive Title: Environmental
Chemistry Advisor Fish Habitat
Level: 4
Reporting to the Chief, Fish Habitat Division, Gulf
Region:
Serves as the senior regional specialist and advisor in the
area of environmental chemistry of fish habitats. Provides advice
and authoritative recommendations on the chemistry aspects of
fisheries programs in the region.
Plans, organizes and coordinates a variety of chemical studies
and projects to investigate and resolve environmental and marine
and freshwater fish habitat problems. Analyses problems, selects
critical factors for investigation, and devises experiments to
provide information and data used to identify trends,
implications and cumulative impacts. Coordinates the development
of detailed investigative study proposals and submissions for
consideration by senior management. Develops project objectives,
resource requirements and strategies and serves as project leader
for cooperative study teams.
Provides guidance to, and coordinates the work of, consultants
and contractors engaged in investigative projects and
studies.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
4
Degree 4 - Objectives are stated as requiring the ongoing
provision of professional advice, and the conduct of
investigations, in the broad area of environmental chemistry
relating to fish habitats.
Degree 4 - The work involves studies and investigations
and the provision of advice in the environmental chemistry of
fish habitats, and includes work in chemical oceanography and
limnology, biochemistry, inorganic and organic chemistry.
Degree 4 - Activities include the conduct, coordination
and interpretation of complete investigations in environmental
chemistry of fish habitats, providing functional direction to
investigative teams, and providing specialist advice.
Degree 4 - Investigative studies and projects are
planned, and experiments are devised to ensure that the
information necessary to solve problems and to provide advice is
obtained.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - Environmental chemical information and data
relating to fish habitats are obtained by detailed investigative
studies. Experiments and tests are devised and surveys are
planned and coordinated to obtain information from obscure
sources.
Degree 4 - Information and data are of a non-recurring
field nature and can be validated only through significant repeat
investigations.
Degree 4 - Environmental chemistry data and information
is highly variable and require careful interpretation and
judgement in its use.
Degree
Degree 4 - The many chemical parameters and fish habitat
effects have complicated relationships and require intensive
investigation to understand.
Degree 4 - The work is conducted within a matrix type
organization with many joint investigative projects.
Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of
the department, provincial departments, industry and contractors
and consultants to plan and coordinate joint investigations and
for providing specialist advice.
Degree 4 - The work requires the development of
approaches for the resolution of unique fish habitat problems
where in many cases there is a lack of precedents.
Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a
thorough knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of
environmental chemistry, particularly as applied to marine and
freshwater fish habitats, as well as knowledge of chemical
oceanography, chemical limnology and biochemistry.
Professional Responsibility
4
Degree 4 - The work requires the ongoing provision of
specialist advice and recommendations which are periodically
reviewed for their effectiveness in supporting Fish Habitat
management objectives.
Degree 5 - The work involves the provision of senior
specialist advice in Environmental Chemistry to non-chemistry
scientists. Program and policy guidance is received from the
Chief, but professional guidance in the field of environmental
chemistry must be obtained elsewhere.
Degree 4 - The work requires planning and organizing
investigations and devising experiments to produce information
and resolve problems in environmental chemistry.
Degree 4 - The work requires the review of
recommendations and conclusions of scientists and consultants to
determine their applicability to the study of the environmental
chemistry of fish habitats.
Degree 4 - Results of the work of other scientists,
consultants and investigation teams are interpreted to develop
solutions to environmental chemistry problems offish
habitats.
Degree 5 - Authoritative advice on all aspects of the
environmental chemistry offish habitats is provided to scientists
and senior managers of the department and affects the region's
long term fisheries plans and programs.
Management Responsibility
1
Degree 1 - As applicable, provides advice and instructions to
investigative project teams.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for
own work.
Degree 2 - Identifies the materials, equipment and
outside services required for investigative studies.
Degree 2 - Identifies and recommends suitable sources of
outside assistance for cooperative investigations.
Degree 1 - Complies with administrative procedures,
directives and guidelines established for the work.
Degree 3 - Coordinates investigative studies in
environmental chemistry with other federal and provincial
scientists.
Degree 1 - Follows straightforward office and field
administrative procedures.
Degree
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
4
Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice affect
the overall fisheries management and habitat plans and programs
of the region.
Degree 4
Degree 4 - Recommendations and advice affect the long-term
fisheries management plans of the region and have direct economic
effects on the commercial fishery.
Degree 3 - Recommendations and advice contribute to
maintaining an environmentally acceptable fish habitat.
No significant impact.
No other significant impacts.
C. Degree 4 - The development of approaches to solve problems
and the initiation and coordination of investigations contributes
to the knowledge and improved understanding of the environmental
chemistry of fish habitats.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director, Research Branch
- Chief, Fish Habitat Division, Gulf Region
*-Environmental Chemistry Advisor CH-4
-Ecological Advisor
-Environmental Engineering Advisor
-Head, Habitat Investigations Section
*Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 18
Descriptive Title: Head, Organic Residues Laboratory Unit
Level: 4
Reporting to the Chief, Food Laboratory Division:
Plans the activities of the Organic Residues Laboratory Unit,
specializing in the trace analysis of organic residues in food,
to ensure the achievement of program commitments and objectives.
Coordinates the implementation of a number of analytical projects
including continuing projects to monitor product quality and
safety and to provide analytical data on which to base standards
and regulations; investigational projects to provide data and
scientific evaluations which form the basis for regulatory
action; and development projects to provide new and improved
methods and procedures. Negotiates analytical commitments with
national project officers and with regional inspection staff.
Assesses resource and equipment requirements and develops and
recommends to the Chief, a detailed operational plan for the
laboratory unit.
Organizes, directs, controls and evaluates the work of the
laboratory unit staffed with one analytical specialist, three
chemists and four technicians, to ensure effective use of
resources, achievement of the operational plan, the development
and maintenance of quality assurance standards, and the rapid
response to health hazard crisis situations. Defines objectives
for the laboratory unit and allocates work, equipment and
facilities. Monitors and evaluates program achievement in
relation to time commitments and quality and quantity standards
and makes required adjustments to the operational plan or
resource allocations. Directs the development and implementation
of a laboratory equipment maintenance plan. Assesses analytical
data, reconciles discrepancies and resolves abnormal difficulties
by proposing alternative approaches to resolve problems
encountered by the staff.
Directs method development projects in the organic residues
project areas to ensure the availability of reliable methods for
laboratory operations and for inclusion in the Branch analytical
Procedures Manual for use by all Branch Laboratories, the
regulated industry in their quality control and product
monitoring programs, and as international reference documents.
Develops proposals for complete investigations, detailing the
purpose, approach and required resources, and participates in
national committee meetings to review and prioritize project
proposals. Assigns method development projects to the analytical
specialist or other staff, defines objectives of the study and
provides guidance on experimental design and the resolution of
unusual or difficult problems.
Provides advice on analytical methods, statistical sampling
plans and the provisions and regulations of the Food and Drugs
Act to departmental and provincial officials, food manufacturers
and importers, private laboratories and to the Department of
Justice representing the Branch in court prosecutions under the
Food and Drugs Act. Participates in joint inspections and
investigations of food manufacturing plants and acts as a
scientific advisor to the Food Inspection Division in formal
hearings with industry representatives and their legal
counsel.
Provides recommendations and advice on the development of new
compliance or data gathering projects. Identifies deficiencies in
operational and administrative procedures, recommends changes and
ensures their implementation. Directs the preparation of detailed
specifications, the evaluation of equipment and suppliers'
proposals and makes recommendations on the purchase of major
equipment.
Develops and implements an Occupational Health and Safety
program for the laboratory unit.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
4
Degree 4 - Objectives of the work are stated by the Division
Chief in terms of developing and implementing an operational plan
for the provision of analytical services, professional advice and
method development in the area of organic residues n foods.
Degree 4 - The work involves the planning and direction of an
operational unit involved in the trace organic analysis of foods
for a wide variety of industrial environmental and agricultural
chemicals, method development and national project planning.
Degree 4 - Activities include planning, organizing,
controlling and supervising the work of staff engaged in trace
organic analysis, investigations and method development; planning
and controlling the use of facilities, equipment and resources;
providing advice; and coordinating the work with inspection staff
in own and other regions.
Degree 4 - The work requires planning, organizing and
assigning work for analysis, investigations and studies to ensure
that operational goals are achieved within resource
limitations.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining information on the
identity and trace levels of a wide variety of organic residues
in a broad range of domestic and imported foods for which prior
chemical exposure is unknown. The presence of interferences
necessitates careful interpretation of the data.
Degree 3 - The identity, once determined, and levels of
organic contaminants in foods can be validated by a combination
of alternative chemical and instrumental techniques, and
literature referencing.
Degree 4 - The wide variety of trace organic contaminants and
food product combinations for which chemical exposure is unknown,
results in many variables with high variability, are difficult to
interpret and require judgement to use.
Degree 3 - The relationships between instrumental responses
and the identity and levels of trace organic residues in foods
are sometimes conflicting and require investigation and
interpretation for each residue/food commodity combination.
Degree 4 - The work is normally affected by the activities of
inspection staff and requires adjustment to the laboratory unit's
priorities to meet changing requirements and to respond to health
hazard crisis situations.
Degree 4 - Contacts are with departmental officials to
negotiate and plan the analytical program, with scientists to
plan and conduct joint investigations and method development
projects, and with scientists and officials of industry, other
federal and provincial agencies and the Department of Justice to
provide advice based on a recognized expertise in organic residue
analysis.
Degree 4 - The work involves managing and directing method
development studies for the trace organic analysis of foods,
developing detailed proposals, defining objectives and providing
guidance on experimental design; and on the resolution of unusual
or difficult problems.
Degree 4 - The work requires the application of a thorough
knowledge of the principles and theories of organic and
analytical chemistry, and of the procedures and instrumental
techniques used for trace organic analysis of foods, as well as a
good knowledge of related food industry practices, statistical
sampling procedures, relevant legislation, and management
practices.
Degree
Professional Responsibility
4
Degree 4 - The work requires the management of an organic
residue laboratory unit which is periodically reviewed for
attainment of overall objectives and achievement of the
operational plan.
Degree 4 - Scientific guidance of a general nature is
available from the Division Chief. The work requires the
resolution of difficult or unusual problems in the area of
organic residue analysis of foods, and specific guidance may be
obtained from other specialists in the Branch.
Degree 4 - The work requires defining the objectives of
analytical investigations and method development studies, and
proposing alternative approaches to resolve unusual or difficult
problems in the trace organic analysis of foods.
Degree 4 - The approaches to conducting method
development studies, and recommendations concerning Science
Committee project planning of the analytical specialist are
reviewed for soundness of judgement. Method development proposals
and recommendations of the Science Committee in the area of
organic residue analysis are reviewed for acceptability.
Degree 3 - Organic residue data and results, conclusion
and recommendations of own staff are interpreted to determine
compliance of food samples with the provisions and regulations of
the Food and Drugs Act and to provide meaningful information for
use in developing standards and regulations.
Degree 4 - Advice based on a recognized expertise in
trace organic residue sampling and analysis of foods and of
relevant legislation is provided to scientists and officials of
the department, other federal and provincial agencies and to the
food industry.
Management Responsibility
4
Degree 4 - The work requires the operational management of
professional staff including one analytical specialist, and three
chemists as well as four technicians.
Degree 4 - Allocates the use of equipment supplies and
facilities for the trace organic residue laboratory unit.
Degree 4 - Assesses the resource and equipment
requirements for the work and develops and recommends a detailed
operational plan.
Degree 4 - Selects and negotiates for outside analytical
services relating costs to benefits and makes recommendations to
the Division Chief.
Degree 4 - Controls and coordinates project schedules,
establishes quality assurance, quantity, timeliness and safety
standards and directs assignments to meet priorities and
objectives.
Degree 4 - Coordinates the provision of analytical
services, special investigations, Science Committee work and the
provision of advice with the work of national compliance officers
and inspection and laboratory staff in own and other
regions.
Degree 4 - Develops and implements Occupational Health
and Safety directives and guidelines for the laboratory unit.
Identifies deficiencies in operational and administrative
procedures, recommends changes, and ensures their
implementation.
Degree
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
4
Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and decisions have a
direct impact on the quality of organic residue analysis, methods
development and the outcome of investigations as well as on the
development of standards and regulations and the effectiveness of
regulatory programs.
Degree 4
Degree 3 - The identification of violations of the Food and
Drugs Act may result in the regulatory control of commercial food
products, and recommendations and advice on the design and
implementation of national compliance projects may lead to
economic or technological effects on the food industry.
No significant impact.
Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice or consultations
contribute to the development of standards and regulations for
organic residues in food, and decisions and recommendations
affect the regulatory control of foods containing violative
levels of organic contaminants.
No other significant impact.
C. Degree 4 - Development of approaches and the management and
direction of method development projects, as well as the
interpretation and evaluation of analytical data contribute
knowledge and improved understanding of the levels of organic
contaminants in the Canadian food supply and of the methods for
their analyses.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Regional Director, Ontario Region
- Educational Services Consultant
- Chief, Finance and Administration Division
- Chief, Food Inspection Division
- Chief, Drugs and Environmental Health
Inspection Division
- Chief, Drug Laboratory Division
- Chief, Food Laboratory Division
- Head, Food and Canning Microbiology Laboratory
Unit
- Head, Drugs, Cosmetics and Medical Devices
Microbiology Laboratory Unit
- Head, Food Chemistry Laboratory Unit
* - Head, Organic Residues Laboratory Unit
CH-4
- Analytical Specialist CH-3
- Chemists (2) CH-2
- Chemist, Development Grade CH-1
- Technicians (4)
* Bench-mark Position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 19
Descriptive Title: Senior Program Advisor
Level: 5
Reporting to the Branch Director:
Acts as the Branch senior chemical authority and advisor on
the impact of chemical pollutants on the environment and on
related matters relating to the enforcement of regulations.
Advises the Branch Director and Director General on program
strategies and options, on the environmental impact of chemical
pollutants, on methods of chemical pollution abatement,
decontamination and control of chemical spills, and on the
effectiveness of existing and proposed policy, regulatory changes
and monitoring measures originating in the department or other
federal, provincial or international agencies; and, ensures
required liaison.
Plans, organizes and coordinates the laboratory component
function within a national environmental pollution control
program and involving six regional laboratories. Develops
projects, objectives and control measures; determines priorities;
assigns projects; and, evaluates the effectiveness of the
program. Directs the implementation of a training plan to ensure
the required scientific and technical capability of the Branch's
resources.
Forecasts requirements and recommends plans for the Branch
laboratory component operations and for the use of resources to
ensure that the laboratory activities and projects are carried
out in an efficient and effective manner and meets priorities and
objectives.
Co-ordinates the collection of information and data, and
reviews and studies the scientific information obtained from the
regional laboratories, or investigation study results,
conclusions and recommendations from other sources on
contaminants entering the environment, to identify trends and
potential problems and determine the impact of the activities and
findings on the Branch's pollution control programs and
objectives.
Recommends new or improvements to policies and regulations;
defines objectives; establishes scientific guidelines and
develops procedures for use by the regional laboratories and
field staff; to ensure consistency in the implementation of
environmental pollution control programs and achievement of the
objectives of the laboratory component.
Degree
Specifications
Kind of Assignments
5
Degree 5 - Objectives are stated in terms of providing
authoritative advice on the enforcement of environmental
pollution regulations and planning and coordinating the
laboratory component of a national environmental pollution
control program.
Degree 5 - The work involves the provision of authoritative
advice on all aspects of the enforcement of regulations to
protect the environment dependant on the identification, analysis
and assessment of the impact of chemical pollutants.
Degree
Degree 5 - Activities involve providing authoritative advice
on the enforcement of regulations to protect the environment, on
program strategies and options, on the effectiveness of proposed
policy and regulatory changes and on the impact of chemicals on
the environment; planning, coordinating and guiding the
laboratory component of a national environmental pollution
control program, and planning the use of laboratory
resources.
Degree 5 - The work requires planning, organizing,
advising and coordinating the laboratory component of a national
environmental pollution control program, contributing to the
formulation of policies, and recommending and advising on the
impact of policy and regulatory changes, in the area of
environmental protection.
Complexity of Work
4
Degree 4 - Information and data on the identification and
analysis of chemical pollutants in the environment and
determination of their impacts are obtained by detailed
investigative studies. Data concerning new chemicals are often
difficult to obtain, interpret and select.
Degree 4 - Information and data are of a non-recurring field
nature and can be validated only through complex or significant
repeat investigations.
Degree 4 - Environmental chemistry data or information is
highly variable and requires careful interpretation of the many
variables, and judgement in its use.
Degree 4 - The many chemical parameters and environmental
effects have complicated relationships and require intensive
investigation to harmonize, understand and interpret.
Degree 5 - The work is affected by the activities and
findings of other scientists and officials involved in
environmental monitoring, and requires consideration of their
impact on the Branch's pollution control programs and on the
laboratory component work.
Degree 4 - Contacts are with scientists and officials of the
department to plan and coordinate investigations and studies and
for providing authoritative advice, and with scientists and
officials of other federal, provincial and international agencies
for arranging co-operative projects, establishing standards,
implementing regulations and for providing advice on
environmental chemical pollutants.
Degree 4 - The work requires developing and implementing
improved approaches and procedures for the identification and
analysis of environmental chemical pollutants and for assessing
and dealing with their impact.
Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an advanced
knowledge of the principles, theories and practices of
Environmental Chemistry as applied to the identification and
analysis of environmental pollutants and the determination of
their impacts on the environment.
Professional Responsibility
5
Degree 5 - Results are evaluated in terms of the
effectiveness of the advice provided in supporting enforcement of
regulations to protect the environment and achievement of the
laboratory component of the national environmental pollution
control program.
Degree 5 - Program and policy guidance is received from the
Director, but professional guidance in the field of Environmental
Chemistry must be obtained from other scientific authorities in
other organizations.
Degree
Degree 5 - The work requires defining objectives, developing
conceptual approaches to resolve problems and establishing
scientific guidelines for the laboratory component of a national
environmental pollution control program.
Degree 5 - The work of the six regional laboratories is
evaluated in terms of effectiveness in meeting program policy,
directives and objectives within resource limitations.
Degree 5 - Scientific information obtained from the regional
laboratories and from other sources is analyzed and evaluated to
identify environmental pollution trends and problems and to
determine the impact on the Branch's environmental pollution
control programs.
Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations are
provided to senior managers of the department on all aspects
relating to the enforcement of regulations to protect the
environment dependant on the identification and analysis of
chemical pollutants, the assessment of their impact and on the
decontamination and control of chemical spills.
Management Responsibility
4
Degree 1 - As applicable, provides assignment related
instructions to non-subordinate staff of regional
laboratories.
Degree 1 - Plans the use of equipment and supplies for own
work.
Degree 4 - Forecasts and assesses requirements and develops
and recommends plans for the acquisition and the use of Branch
resources for the laboratory component operations to ensure that
projects are carried out in an efficient and effective manner and
meets priorities and objectives.
Degree 4 - When required, selects and negotiates for outside
analytical and monitoring services.
Degree 4 - Determines priorities and assigns projects for
ongoing laboratory work, and develops procedures and technical
guidelines to ensure consistent approaches and conduct of
environmental pollution control projects or investigative
studies.
Degree 4 - Coordinates the laboratory component functions
within a national environmental pollution control program and
involving six regional laboratories.
Degree 4 - Develops and recommends safety and administrative
procedures and management guidelines for the six regional
laboratories.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
5
Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and
advice affect the development and application of departmental
policies and regulations to protect the environment, and
decisions affect the conduct of the laboratory component of a
national environmental pollution control program.
Degree 5
Degree 4 - Recommendations, advice and decisions on the
enforcement of regulations to protect the environment have
economic or technological effects on polluting industries.
Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice on the
development of policies and regulations to protect the
environment substantially affect the state of the
environment.
Degree 2 - Information and results of the work may be used by
health officials to identify and control potentially hazardous
chemicals.
No other significant impacts.
Degree
C. Degree 4 - The development of objectives and
approaches for the identification and analysis of environmental
pollutants and the analysis of the information and data
contribute knowledge and improved understanding of the effects of
chemicals on the environment.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director General
- Branch Director
*- Senior Program Advisor CH-5
- Regional Laboratory Directors (6)
* Bench-mark position.
BENCH-MARK POSITION DESCRIPTION
Bench-mark Position Number: 20
Descriptive Title: Chief, Food and Drug Laboratories Division,
Atlantic Region
Level: 5
Reporting to the Regional Director, Atlantic Region:
Negotiates with other Regional and Headquarter Chiefs, on
behalf of the Regional Director the Laboratory Division
commitments and defines objectives, reviews requirements and
priorities, and prepares and recommends for approval an
operational plan and budget to achieve the goals established by
the Regional Director for the Laboratory Division for the
provision of scientific advice and science based analytical services and evaluation of marketed domestic and imported
foods, drugs, cosmetics and medical devices for chemical and
microbiological hazards and chemical composition to ensure that
these products are safe and effective and the public is protected
from injury to health and fraud.
Coordinates the activities of the three Units of the
Laboratory and directs and controls through the Unit Heads, the
activities and the utilization of the resources assigned to
provide analytical services and scientific evaluation and advice
to the Inspection Division and for providing negotiated
analytical services to other program directorates of the Branch
for use in the development of standards and regulations to
address new and emerging health issues, to other departments and
agencies in the region including Consumer and Corporate Affairs
in support of their programs directed toward the control of
economic fraud associated with food and other regulated products,
and to law enforcement agencies in the Atlantic Provinces
requiring analytical service of drugs subject to abuse, expert
testimony and scientific data evaluation and advice for
intelligence and evidence for prosecution.
As a member of the Directorate Planning Board, comprised of
all Regional Chiefs and two Headquarter Directors, reviews and
assesses Science Committee reports, program evaluation results,
Branch and Departmental strategic documents and other relevant
data and information as well as available resources to develop,
on behalf of the Directorate a program plan detailed for the
upcoming year, and including a 3-5 year projection, and to
identify for consideration by the Executive Committee, comprised
of the Director General and Headquarter and Regional Directors,
long-term strategic issues, new initiatives, resource shifts, and
needs for policy development or legislative changes to ensure
that new areas of health hazard concern are addressed in national
and regional strategic and operational planning.
Provides authoritative advice on the various aspects of the
Laboratory divisions programs to senior officials of the
department, other federal and provincial agencies and the
regulated industry. Provides assistance to the Inspection
Division and the industry in evaluating unusual scientific
problems relating to manufacturing practices and product quality
control and to resolve disputes or differences in the
interpretation of analytical data.
Maintains an effective laboratory scientific support
capability to deal with emerging problems, new needs and ensures
the provision of the scientific based support services. Assesses
trends, new developments and resource development needs and
ensure organizational flexibility to provide required support for
the management of crisis situations.
Approves acquisition of resources and expenditure of funds
allocated to the Laboratory by the Regional Director, and
authorizes payment for goods and services within limits of
signing authority delegated to the position under the Financial
Administration Act. Develops and recommends capital acquisition
plans for the Laboratory and participates with other Regional
Laboratory Chiefs in developing the Directorate capital
acquisition plan for scientific equipment to meet both short- and
long-term program objectives.
Participates as a member of the Regional Management Committee
providing advice on significant program, operational and
technological matters and assisting in the development of
regional policies, directives and guidelines.
Plans in collaboration with other Laboratory Division Chiefs,
the implementation and evaluation of analytical methods and
procedures for inclusion in the Branch Analytical Methods Manual
for use by the Branch laboratories, the regulated industries, and
as international reference documents.
Ensures that Occupational Health and Safety policies and other
departmental and central agency policies, directives and
guidelines are applied in the Laboratory Division, and approves
and implements Divisional administrative, management and quality
assurance procedures, directives and guidelines.
Specifications
Degree
Kind of Assignments
5
Degree 5 - Objectives of the work are stated by the Regional
Director in terms of goals for the Regional Laboratory component
of a National Food, Drug, Cosmetic and Medical Device Safety
Program.
Degree 5 - The work is performed within the several
specialized areas comprising the total regional laboratory
program involving a large number of projects in the chemistry,
microbiology and forensic drug analysis subject areas.
Degree 5 - Activities involve a wide range of scientific,
administrative and managerial duties including managing a
regional food and drug laboratory program, participating in
national strategic and operational planning, providing
authoritative advice and guidance, and evaluating studies and
recommending changes to policies, legislation and
regulations.
Degree 5 - The work requires the overall planning,
coordination, and implementation of a regional food and drug
laboratory program, and contributing to the formulation of
policies and regulations.
Complexity of Work
5
Degree 4 - The work requires obtaining through subordinate
staff, information and data on a wide range of chemical and
microbiological contaminants in foods, illicit drug identity, and
information required for program planning which may require
intensive investigations, and which are often difficult to
obtain, interpret and select.
Degree 4 - Information and data required for compliance
action, particularly relating to trace chemical contaminants in
foods, new or unusual microbiological entities, or the identity
of illicit drugs can normally be validated only by difficult or
complex investigations.
Degree 5 - Information and data on the wide variety of
chemical and microbiological constituents of food and the
identity of illicit drugs involve many variables with high
variability, ambiguity and require ingenuity and highly selective
judgement to use.
Degree 5 - The many chemical and microbiological parameters
measured in the Laboratory Division, their relationships with
industry practices, and overall effect on the direction and
priorities of the laboratory program are often conflicting and
difficult to define and measure.
Degree
Degree 5 - The work of the Regional Laboratory Division is
directly affected by the activities of senior officials in
responding to national health hazards and by the activities of
inspection staff and the regulated industries, and requires
consideration of the findings and conclusion of scientists and
officials in provincial and other federal agencies.
Degree 5 - Contacts are with senior officials and
scientists in the department to negotiate and plan the Regional
Laboratory Program, and with scientists and senior officials of
other federal and provincial agencies, and senior officials and
scientists of the regulated industries to resolve disputes or
differences in the interpretation of analytical data and to
evaluate manufacturing and product quality problems.
Degree 5 - The work requires planning operational method
development, directing the implementation and evaluation of
method development projects assigned to the Division; and
evaluating, developing and recommending strategies, approaches
and procedures to ensure that new areas of health hazard concern
are addressed.
Degree 5 - The work requires the application of an advanced
knowledge of illicit drug identification, of the chemical and
microbiological analysis and evaluation of foods for health
hazard concerns, and of the existing and new instrumental
techniques used, as well as a thorough knowledge of the
scientific and technical aspects of the relevant legislation and
a good knowledge of management practices.
Professional Responsibility
5
Degree 5 - Results are evaluated by the Regional Director in
terms of achievement of Regional Laboratory Division objectives
and operational plans within policy and resource
limitations.
Degree 5 - As this is the senior laboratory position in
the region, guidance is received from the Regional Director on
policy intent and program implications and professional guidance
may be received from other scientific authorities in the
Department.
Degree 5 - The work requires developing objectives for
each laboratory unit; defining conceptual approaches to solve
complex analytical, investigational, or method development
problems; and establishing scientific guidelines for the Regional
Food and Drug Laboratory program.
Degree 5 - Recommendations and conclusions of subordinate
unit heads are reviewed in terms of effectiveness in meeting
objectives within policy and resource limitations.
Degree 5 - As a member of the Directorate Program
Planning Board, reviews, evaluates and interprets studies,
conclusions and recommendations of Science Committees another
reports to determine implications on national and regional
laboratory programs.
Degree 5 - Authoritative advice and recommendations on
the various aspects of the regional laboratory operations and
affecting regional and national programs, as well as the
development of standards and regulations are provided to
scientists and senior officials of the department. Scientific and
technical advice is provided to officials of industry and other
federal and provincial departments and agencies.
Management Responsibility
5
A. Degree 5 - The work requires the management and human
resources planning through subordinate supervisors of a Regional
Laboratory Division consisting of a staff of twelve professionals
including specialists, and five technicians.
Degree
B. Degree 5 - The work requires planning, directing and
controlling a multi-disciplinary regional laboratory facility
including laboratories, scientific equipment and supplies.
C. Degree 5 - The work requires exercising delegated
authority under the Financial Administration Act for the
acquisition of resources and the expenditure of funds.
Degree 5 - The work requires approving the expenditure of
funds for outside laboratory services.
Degree 5 - Prepares budgets and operational plans for the
regional laboratory division. Plans and implements the Laboratory
Division's Occupational Health and Safety and quality assurance
programs. Recommends objectives and priorities for the Regional
Laboratory component of the National Food, Drug, Cosmetic and
Medical Device Safety Program.
Degree 5 - Coordinates the overall regional laboratory
program with inspection staffing own and other regions, involving
differing interests and conflicting priorities.
Degree 5 - Approves the Laboratory Division's
administrative, safety and management directives and guidelines
and ensures the correct and consistent application of
departmental and central agency policy, directives and
guidelines, including Canada Labour Code Part IV requirements, in
the Laboratory Division.
Impact of Recommendations and Activities
5
Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice affect
the development of departmental compliance policies, and national
and regional data gathering and compliance programs.
Degree 5
Degree 4 - Recommendations on compliance programs and advice
to industry concerning the resolution of manufacturing problems
or product quality control programs have economic and
technological effects on the food manufacturing industry.
No significant impact.
Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice have a
substantial effect on food and drug safety compliance policies
and decisions and recommendations substantially affect the
control of potentially harmful food and drugs in the four
Atlantic provinces.
Degree 5 - Authoritative recommendations and advice have a
substantial effect on national policies related to the provision
of analytical services for drugs subject to abuse and the
provision of expert testimony and advice to law enforcement
agencies. The management of the provision of the services in the
Atlantic Region contributes to the administration of criminal law
in the four Atlantic provinces.
C. Degree 5 - Decisions and recommendations affect the
development of strategies and approaches to ensure the regulatory
compliance of foods, drugs, cosmetics and medical devices, the
development of methods and scientific procedures, and to improved
knowledge of the chemical and microbiological hazards in food and
drugs.
LINEAR ORGANIZATION CHART
Director General, Field Operations Directorate
Regional Director, Atlantic Region
- Chief, Finance and Administration
Division
- Chief, Food and Drug Inspection Division
* - Chief, Food and Drug Laboratory Division
CH-5
- Head, Food Chemistry Laboratory Unit
CH-4 (9 PY's)
- Head, Microbiology Laboratory Unit BI-3
(4 PY's)
- Head, Drug Analysis Laboratory Unit
CH-3 (4 PY's)