|
It is recommended that either the Word or PDF file be downloaded and used,
located on the left side menu.
|
CONTENTS
|
|
PREFACE
|
CATEGORY DEFINITION
|
GROUP DEFINITION
|
PART I - LEVEL DETERMINANT AND POSITION CLASSIFICATION
PLAN
|
- Introduction
|
- Use of Classification Level Characteristics
|
- Classifying Positions and Incumbents
|
- Glossary of Terms
|
- Classification Structure and Level Determinants
|
PART II - SELECTION PLAN POND EXAMPLE STATEMENT-OF
QUALIFICATIONS'
|
- Introduction
|
- Statement of Qualifications
|
- Selection Standard - Defence Scientific Service Group
|
- Preparation of a Statement of Qualifications
|
- Rating Guide
|
- Assessment Instructions
|
- Example Statement of Qualifications
|
PREFACE
This standard describes the plan to be used in evaluating and
classifying Defence Scientists and Defence Science positions, and
in selecting personnel for appointment to the group and to
positions in the group.
The classification and evaluation plan is a level description
plan against which the relative level of performance and job
responsibility of individual scientists may be judged and
positions classified where applicable. The selection plan
describes the method to be used for determining the
qualifications required of candidates and assessing the
extent to which they possess them.
The standard is designed for the use of classification
officers, staffing officers and line managers.
CATEGORY DEFINITION
Occupational categories were repealed by the Public Service Reform Act (PSRA), effective April 1, 1993. Therefore, the occupational category definitions have been deleted from the classification standards.
GROUP DEFINITION
For occupational group allocation, it is recommended that you use the Occupational Group Definition
Maps, which provide the 1999 group definition and their corresponding inclusion and exclusion statements. The maps explicitly link the relevant parts of the overall 1999 occupational group definition to each classification standard.
PART I
LEVEL DETERMINANT AND POSITION
CLASSIFICATION PLAN
INTRODUCTION
This part of the standard consists of an introduction, a
glossary of terms and level determinants for the group.
The standard is a level determinant standard which
incorporates some important differences from those normally
associated with position classification. It provides levels which
accommodate the wide varieties of duties and responsibilities
characteristic of the activities of defence scientists and the
varying degrees of managerial responsibility associated with
positions in the laboratories and in staff, advisory and liaison
activities.
The work performed within the defence research organizations
requires frequent formulation and dissolution of
multidisciplinary teams of scientists and reassignment of duties
in response to changing departmental priorities and objectives.
To meet this requirement the scientists must be given an
opportunity to acquire broad experience to function at the full
level of their capacity. This standard is intended to assist in
making valid judgments about the worth of scientists even though
the nature of their work may change frequently and they may
develop professionally at varying rates.
Within the particular Research and Development community
covered by this standard, a variety of full time liaison
advisory and evaluation activities are closely associated with
laboratory activities and are manned on a rotational basis by research scientists with relevant knowledge,
experience and capabilities. Although such duties might be
identified and evaluated separately, the rotational nature of the
assignment and their role in career development makes this
inadvisable. In practice candidates are chosen for the
ability to fill a particular need at a point in time and
therefore may move to assignments without an automatic change in
designation.
This standard will be applied as a person oriented system in
which the assessment of the scientist's achievements and such
characteristics as may be required by the responsibilities of the
position will determine the position's level. Classification
specialists in the department are not involved in determining the
classification level for a scientist except on a consultant basis
to Management Committees which have formal responsibility
for this activity. As a consultant, the classification specialist
is required to advise on the relationship of an assignment
to one or more of the classification level characteristics.
Use of Classification Level
Characteristics
As indicated in the group definition, the
duties of members of this group would involve the following kinds of work:
scientific research and development, scientific analysis,
scientific liaison, scientific advice, scientific policy and
evaluation, and scientific information services. The duties of an
individual may involve these kinds of work both concurrently and
consecutively. The degree of complexity and responsibility in all
of these kinds of assignments tend to increase as the employee
matures, i.e., as knowledge and abilities develop with
experience. The assignments and expected performance described
for each classification level include only those features that
are useful in describing a quality distinction for successfully
higher classification levels. It is not intended that each
individual would necessarily contribute in respect of all of
these features; nor does the order in which they are presented
imply relative importance.
Classifying Positions and Incumbents
The correct allocation of an employee or a
position to this occupational group is of fundamental importance
to the management and administration of this group. The method to
be employed is as follows:
a) When an authorized man-year is to be utilized for
employing a defence scientist, a statement is to be prepared by
management in summary form describing the primary purpose
for which the position is established. The summary description
should include the following kinds of information:
(i) a statement of the duties and responsibilities of the job
encompassing responsibility and authority for policy and program
formulation, advice, direction and control; specialist
responsibilities; scientific direction and control of R&D
activities, projects, studies, etc., contracting, consultative or
administrative assignments in relation to both in-house and
contracted R&D and related defence scientific activities
should be included where applicable.
(ii) the nature and scope of the qualifications and defence
scientific expertise required;
(iii) the extent of scientific leadership available to the
incumbent of the position;
(iv) the extent of scientific leadership expected to be
provided by the incumbent;
(v) the relationship of the position to the career
development and rotational assignments of members of this
group.
b) The position may be allocated to this group provided it
satisfies the category and group definition but the
classification level is not formally assigned at this stage.
c) The candidate is appointed by staffing action at a
designated classification level in relation to the
characteristics of the work to be performed and individual
qualifications of the candidate.
d) A matching classification level is formally assigned to
the position. This completes the classification action.
e) When a position incumbent is progressed in his or her-own
position to the next higher classification level, the position
classification will be adjusted to correspond, to ensure
coincidence between incumbent and position level.
f) When a position classified in this group is vacated,
management must reconsider the classification, level and future
utilization of the authorized man-year before the position is
filled.
GLOSSARY*
THE DEFENCE SCIENCES
|
(a) For this group, research and experimental development work
encompasses all of the natural sciences including
the biological sciences - studying the origin, development,
structure, function and interaction of biological materials;
the medical sciences - involving the identification, treatment
and cure of diseases and disabilities;
the physical sciences - the study of the material universe and
its phenomena;
the mathematical sciences - employing logical reasoning in the
theoretical design of methods and systems used to generate data
and in the interpretation of data;
the engineering sciences - generating and applying integrated
scientific and engineering knowledge in the development of
prototypes, systems or processes scaled-up to operational
effectiveness.
Investigations in many subject-matter areas interrelate
combinations of these sciences, and possibly some other
specialties as well, to varying degrees. Furthermore, the
interactions between men and machines, military forces and operational systems and men and their environments (physical
and human) are critically important to military activities and
therefore defence science and technology encompasses some areas
of the human sciences, e.g., investigations, studies, and
research and development in those aspects of psychology, sociology, human performance, operational
research, political science, economics, etc., that are relevant
to defence and military problems.
|
RESEARCH
|
(b) For this Group, no distinction is made between "basic" or
"applied" research in the natural sciences. All aspects of
creative work are included, the primary purposes of which may
range the complete spectrum, i.e., from -
|
* Terms in this Glossary that are not used in
the standard are provided for the sake of consistency in
preparation of summary job descriptions.
(Exploratory)
|
contributing to the accumulated, objective and systematic
knowledge of the inherent properties and interactions of matter,
space, energy, natural phenomena or bio-systems;
|
(Mission-Oriented)
|
utilizing scientific processes, phenomena or methods to
acquire new knowledge, and applying such knowledge to achieve
pre-determined practical or operational objectives.
|
R&D
|
(c) Research and experimental- development (R&D) is
creative work systematically undertaken to add to the existing body of scientific and technological knowledge and to
use such knowledge in new applications. The central characteristic of R&D is an appreciable element of
novelty - new knowledge (new information integrated into existing hypotheses; new hypotheses derived from new
facts; the re-evaluation of known data) or new products or processes are sought.
|
MAKE
|
(d) Mission-oriented R&D that is supplied using the
employees and facilities of the federal government departments.
|
BUY
|
(e) Mission-oriented R&D that is purchased by the
federal government from external sources, i.e., industry, business enterprises or individuals.
|
MAKE OR BUY ANALYSIS
|
(f) A detailed comparison of the advantages/disadvantages
of the Make option with the advantages/disadvantages of the Buy option.
|
AUTHORITY
|
(g) Authority refers to the extent of the powers delegated to the incumbent of a position to enable him to discharge
his responsibilities effectively. Delegated authority carries with it commensurate accountability.
|
SCIENTIFIC AUTHORITY FOR CONTRACTED R&D
|
(h) In the process of contracting R&D, the scientist in
the operating department who has primary responsibility for all scientific and technological matters and for bringing
the contracted R&D project to completion, is the
Scientific Authority. The following are specific responsibilities of-the Scientific Authority:
|
|
- determining the scientific objective, scope of work,
specifications, methods and project description;
- evaluating and advising on Make or Buy Analysis, costing,
publicity aspects, capability of external R&D sources and
proposals for R&D project tenders from external sources;
- monitoring, co-ordinating and controlling the scientific and
technological content of contracted project, and approving
changes in the scope of the work as required, during its
progress;
- interpreting results obtained where the contractor is not
capable of doing so;
- evaluating the scientific results and the overall conduct of
the contract in relation to objectives, specifications and other
prescribed requirements; and
- recommending acceptance or qualified acceptance of the
product and payment for work done ranging from partial to
complete product of the contract.
|
POLICY
|
(i) Policy refers to a declaration of aims and intent
established by legislation or ministerial authority to guide
future courses of action.
|
PROGRAM
|
(j) A program is a major departmental function designed to
achieve general objectives that have been authorized by
Parliament. It is also the level at which Parliament will vote
funds. A program incorporates the general plans designed to
achieve the objectives determined by the department to meet the
aims and intent of policy.
|
ACTIVITY
|
(k) An activity is a major segment of a program.
|
PROJECT/STUDY
|
(l) These are segments of a program or activity for which
specific objectives have been defined; which are circumscribed by
distinct budgetary controls, time limits and resources committed;
and which are subject to periodic progress reviews. A project or
study can be the work of one scientist or a team of scientists
under the leadership of an experienced scientist.
|
PROJECT LEADER
|
(m) A project leader plans and organizes work; and
co-ordinates the work activities of other employees, the use of
facilities and the selection and application of methods required
to achieve results that are consistent with project objectives. A project leader is responsible for
quality and quantity of work output but has limited authority for
the administration of other employees.
|
MANAGER
|
(n) A manager controls an organization, and is accountable for
achieving the objectives set for the organization and for
administering the financial, personnel and material resources
committed. The manager plans, organizes and allocates these
resources; advises and consults with superiors as to the policies, priorities and objectives;
negotiates contracts for the provision of supplies or services;
and evaluates the output of the organization, and of individuals
in the organization, for effectiveness of contribution toward
achievement of objectives. The manager is also the intermediary for all influences affecting
the organization from the outside. One or more project leaders
normally report to a manager.
|
MANAGERIAL CONTROL
|
(o) The superior-subordinate relationship in an organization:
The following terms describe the spectrum of control received
ranging from the least to the greatest degree of individual
freedom. Under Supervision describes the control received by an
academically qualified but inexperienced employee during the
initial learning stages; an overview that involves appropriate
assessments of the work while in progress. The employee's assignments, objectives, work plan and tasks are
prescribed by the supervisor but the employee is responsible for
proficient and timely execution of his/her assignments. The work results will be reviewed at
intervals during execution and on completion in terms of quality,
quantity, timeliness and conformity with the supervisor's
guidance and advice.
|
|
Under General Supervision describes the control received by an
employee during the learning process; an overview that does not
intimately bear upon the details of the work. The employee is
responsible for accomplishing prescribed objectives within
prescribed timeframes, with freedom from overview by superiors while work is in process
except at his own request. The employee is expected to solve most
problems of detail but to refer any unusual problems to the
superior. The work results are reviewed by superiors at critical
stages and on completion for scientific validity, and for
compliance with such general instructions as are inherent in the
work plans for the project(s) and the relevant operating
procedures of the organization.
Under Direction describes control received by an employee who
is responsible for achieving agreed-upon objectives within
agreed-upon timeframes. Organizing the work and determining the
methods of producing the desired results are the employee's
responsibility. He is expected to overcome all scientific and
technical problems and to solve other problems through selection
and application of guidelines and relevant operating procedures of the organization. On
general problems of wider scope he is expected to consult with
colleagues and to seek advice and decisions from superiors.
Although making no decisions that directly affect a departmental
program, there may be a requirement to make recommendations that
affect program planning as it relates to the organization of area
of work. Project leaders and managers below the senior officer
level normally work under direction.
|
|
Under General Direction describes a kind of broad control
received that takes the form of consultation and discussion with
other senior officers on general management matters. The employee
is responsible for decisions normally involving allocation and
expenditure of substantial sums of money and for the effective
planning and conduct of the overall program. Contributions to
policy formulation and depart mental program strategies are
normally expected.
|
SURVEY
|
(p) The systematic accumulation of scientific
observations, specimens or samples by known or standardized methods of observations, analysis or sampling.
|
TEST
|
(q) The evaluation, comparison or screening of a series of materials, products, processes, methods of phenomena using
known defining characteristics and known or
-standardized techniques.
|
SPECIALIST
|
(r) A specialist is an experienced individual who,
regardless of his managerial abilities, is recognized by his
superiors and peers as an authority in a scientific field or subject-matter area.
|
CONSULTATIONS
|
(s) Responsiveness by a specialist to the needs of the
program in a consultative capacity, often external to the employing organization. The expertise of the specialist
is applied to provide interpretations and advice ranging from the scientific aspects of government policy issues
to specific scientific problems. Routine monitoring or surveillance is not included.
|
TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER
|
(t) A terminal phase of a R&D project to assure
effective operational, industrial or commercial application, and understanding by clients, of the products and processes
that have been derived from the proven in principle through R&D efforts.
|
CLASSIFICATION STRUCTURE AND |
LEVEL DETERMINANTS |
DS-1 |
DS-2 |
DS-3 |
DS-4 |
DS-5 |
DS-6 |
DS-7 |
DS-8 |
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 1
General Characteristics
This is the recruiting and learning level for members of the
group who possess a bachelor's degree or a bachelor's degree and limited
experience. The work is done under supervision either as a member
of R&D teams or as an assistant to more senior members of the
group. The level is also used for term appointments of university
graduate students who demonstrate an interest in continuing
employment within the group on completion of their graduate
studies.
Characteristic Duties and Responsibilities
Participates in research and development projects and studies,
feasibility studies, field trials, tests and experiments; in
operational research and scientific analysis projects and
studies; in scientific and technological evaluation of foreign
military activities, capabilities and equipment; in the
identification, location, and selective acquisition of scientific
and technological information from classified and propriety
sources.
Responsibilities are restricted in scope, complexity and
requirement for independent interpretation. Supervisory
responsibilities are limited to guidance and supervision of
technical or support staff.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence in comparison with established
standards of competence for scientists of similar academic
background and experience, and evidence of promise of
professional development.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 2
General Characteristics
This is the recruiting and developmental level
for those with a master's degree or for members of the group with
a bachelor's degree and research experience relevant to defence
science. The work is done under general supervision either as a
member of R&D teams, or as an assistant to more senior
members of the group.
Characteristic Duties and
Responsibilities
Participates in research and development projects and studies,
feasibility studies, field trials, tests and experiments; in
operational research and scientific analysis projects and
studies; in scientific and technological evaluation of foreign
military activities, capabilities and equipment; in the
identification, location and selective acquisition of scientific
and technological information from classified and propriety
sources.
Responsibilities are restricted either in scope, complexity or
requirement for independent interpretation. Supervisory
responsibilities are limited to guidance and supervision of
technical or support staff.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence, comparison with established standards
of competence for scientists with similar relevant experience,
evidence of promise of professional development.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 3
General Characteristics
This is a junior working level for those with
the experience and expertise needed to undertake independent work
in defence science and technology. It is the entrance level for those with a
doctorate degree and developmental level for those with a
bachelor's or master's degree and experience directly related to
the field of employment. Work will normally be done under general
supervision and often as a member/of a team.
Characteristic Duties and Responsibilities
Plans, organizes and conducts research,
development, investigations, studies, evaluations, field trials
and experiments requiring specialized knowledge in a professional discipline, of defence
science and technology or of military operations and defence
problem areas. Plans and conducts evaluations of foreign science
and technology and work in the area of scientific
information.
Responsibilities include accountability for evaluation,
interpretation and reporting of results and for judgments made in
the conduct of work; for providing professional advice to
scientific and military colleagues involved in the work. May be
responsible for coordination of technical activities with
internal and external elements and for responding in timely
fashion to external requests for consultation and
problem-solving. May represent the department on scientific and
technological issues.
Responsibilities may include general supervision of junior
professionals and technical support staff.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence and capabilities,
comparison with established standards of competence for
scientists with similar relevant experience, evidence of promise
of professional development.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 4
General Characteristics
This is the working level for experienced officers who have
demonstrated the ability to accept responsibility for and conduct
successfully specific projects and investigations in specialized
areas of defence science and technology and who may be required
to plan and coordinate the work of project teams internally and
with external organizations. Work will be under general
supervision or under direction depending on the individual's
demonstrated ability.
Characteristic Duties and Responsibilities
In scientific research and development and scientific analysis
plans, organizes and conducts investigative activities requiring
current specialized knowledge of defence science and technology;
accepts responsibility and accountability for the evaluation,
interpretation and reporting-of results; formulates solutions for
and provides advice on operational and equipment problems of the
Canadian Forces; supervises technical and junior professional
staff. In scientific liaison, maintains contacts and exchanges
information with colleagues in defence organizations in other
countries, represents the department as technical expert in
limited fields or as a junior member of an official liaison
element in other countries. Duties in scientific advice,
scientific planning and evaluation are normally limited in scope
and outputs are intended for use within the department.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence and capabilities, depth and scope of
work being done and of achievements, estimated potential for
further advancement and comparison with group members with
similar relevant experience.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 5
General Characteristics
This is the senior working level for mature
experienced officers who have established a recognized reputation
and professional competency and leadership
in a complex area of science and defence
technology. They must have consistently demonstrated the ability
to work under direction, to generate original and novel solutions
to problems, and to meet scientific and technological objectives
that are defined in broad terms, subject only to policy,
budgetary or other general managerial or military
limitations.
Characteristic Duties and
Responsibilities
In scientific research and development and
scientific analysis plans, organizes, conducts and controls
projects, studies, etc., that demand leadership and direction of
work of considerable scientific and technological scope and often
involve several different aspects of the R&D spectrum. Work
may require supervision of personnel and direction of
multi-disciplinary matrix-management type projects.
In scientific liaison maintains contacts with
national and international science communities and represents
national and organizational scientific and technological
interests at national and international meetings. In scientific
advice provides comprehensive scientific and technical
evaluations and advice and in scientific planning and evaluation
formulates and develops proposals on scientific and technological
policies and research and development programs and provides
comprehensive assessments and evaluation of existing R&D
programs and activities. Duties in relation to the evaluation of
foreign science and military technology and in scientific
information activities are comprehensive and varied.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence and capabilities, depth
and scope of work being done and of achievements, evidence of
continued professional growth and development, estimated
potential for further advancement and comparison with group
members with similar relevant experience.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 6
General Characteristics
This is the select level of those who have consistently
demonstrated exceptional scientific leadership and ability in
highly complex and significant fields of defence science and
technology and scientific analysis, and/or in directing and managing the work of multi-disciplinary groups of R&D
personnel. This level is also associated with senior staff
positions in headquarters and foreign offices which require broad
experience and exceptional ability to provide authoritative
advice on the policy, planning, evaluation, coordination,
technology transfer, foreign liaison, intelligence and
information aspects of major national, international, and
departmental programs and issues in defence research and
development. Wide latitude is provided for the application of
independent scientific and technological judgment.
Characteristic Duties and Responsibilities
In scientific research and development and scientific analysis
and normally under direction on the objectives of the work,
conducts and manages major projects and scientific investigations
requiring outstanding leadership abilities and performance in
major complex areas of defence science, technology, military
operations and policies. In scientific liaison represents the
department on major issues of defence science and technology both
nationally and internationally and provides support to
national political and military representatives in foreign
countries over the whole spectrum of defence science and
technology. Provides advice to senior departmental personnel by
the analysis, assessment and review of highly complex and
advanced fields of defence science and technology and of
departmental research and development programs and activities. In
the areas of foreign science and military technology and
acquisition of scientific and technological information
determines thrust, scope and depth of activities within the
prescribed broad policy and resource limitations.
Other Level Determinants
Demonstrated competence and capabilities, depth and scope of
work being done, of achievements, and of associated
responsibilities, evidence of continued professional growth and
development, evidence of development of managerial and similar
skills and abilities, estimated potential for further advancement
and comparison with other members at this level.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 7
General Characteristics
This level is primarily for those who have
demonstrated exceptional ability to manage the R&D activities of defence research and
development and scientific analysis organizations and the
resources - personnel, facilities, and operating funds -
allocated to those organizations and/or the coordination of
R&D programs or activities including determining the nature
and priority of objectives within such organizations. Scientists with an
exceptional record of achievements and scientific advisors in
very senior advisory roles may also attain this level.
Duties and Responsibilities
The management of defence research
establishments and the coordination of major R&D programs and
activities.
The direction and conduct of research and
development at an exceptionally high level of achievement.
The provision of defence scientific and
technological advice to the executive levels of the
department.
DEFENCE SCIENTIST LEVEL 8
General Characteristics
This level is reserved for defence research positions with
responsibilities for program development and activities at the
very senior level.
PART II
SELECTION PLAN
INTRODUCTION
The Selection Plan includes the Selection Standard for this
Group, developed pursuant to Section 12 of the Public Service
Employment Act, with instructions for adapting it to the
requirements of individual positions in the form of a Statement
of Qualifications.
Section 6 of the Public Service Employment
Regulations requires that a Statement of Qualifications be prepared for each position to which an
appointment is to be made. Each Statement of Qualifications is to
specify and differentiate between those qualifications that are
essential and those qualifications, if any, that are desirable for the performance of the duties
and responsibilities of a position.
Qualifications refer to any training, ability, knowledge,
accomplishment or personal attribute that is essential or
desirable for performance of the duties and responsibilities of a
position.
Qualifications vary with the job content
requirements of individual positions.
They must be identified for each position for which staffing
action is intended. They are to be based on the duties and
responsibilities of the position concerned and expressed in the
form of a Statement of Qualifications. These qualifications then
become the criteria against which selections are made for that
staffing action.
The following pages contain an explanation of the various
parts of a Statement of Qualifications, a description of
qualifications for positions in this Group, a Rating Guide, a
description of the methods to be used in assessing the
qualifications of candidates for these positions, and two Example
Statements of Qualifications.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
Structure
The basic structure of a Statement of Qualifications is as
follows:
ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
- Occupational Certification Factor
- Productivity or Recognition Factor
- Language Requirement Factor
- Experience Factor
RATED REQUIREMENTS
- Knowledge Factor
- Abilities Factor
- Personal Suitability Factor
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
- (Individual qualifications that are desirable, if any)
Definitions
A Statement of Qualifications consists of two components:
ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS - This component provides for
the inclusion of qualifications which a person must possess
in order to adequately perform the duties and responsibilities of
a position. It consists of two sub-components.
BASIC REQUIREMENTS - This sub-component provides for the
inclusion of those essential qualifications that are used for
initial screening purposes. Applicants must meet the Basic
Requirements before consideration can be given to their other
qualifications. Basic Requirements are minimum criteria and are
not rated by degree. Basic Requirements include the following
five Selection Factors:
Education - (a) Refers to a background in academic,
vocational or technical studies and training which is recognized
through the actual or imminent conferring of a degree, diploma,
certificate or other official document by an approved educational
institution or agency.
(b) Acceptable performance on tests prescribed by the Public
Service Commission may be an alternative, when specified.
Occupational Certification - Refers to the possession
of or eligibility for occupational credentials in the form of a
licence, certificate, registration, letter, papers or other
documents which constitute official recognition of occupational
competence.
Productivity or Recognition - Refers to achievement in
the form of authorship of published or unpublished reports,
papers or other communications resulting from; research,
experimental development, tasking associated with operational
equipment and problems; operational research and scientific
analysis; planning, analysis and evaluation of national and
foreign programs in research and development, assessment and
evaluation of policies affecting the planning, implementation and
utilization of defence research. Includes developmental work
leading to the issue of patents or the creation of improved
varieties or designs; and recognition of research achievement by
the scientific community.
Language Requirement - Refers to the need for a
knowledge of either the English language, the French language,
either one or the other, or both in relation to the performance
of the duties and responsibilities of a position.
Experience - Refers to actual
participation or practice in activities related to the duties and
responsibilities of a position. It means the acquisition or
exercise of knowledge or abilities in vocational or a vocational
circumstances including voluntary work; and it is conditioned by
the achievement realized during its acquisition and by the environment in which it is gained.
Experience requirements must not be expressed in terms of a
specific number of years.
NOTE: Pre-employment medical examination requirements are to
be in accordance with Appendix 13 of the Staffing Manual, and are
not to be included in the Statement of Qualifications.
RATED REQUIREMENTS - This sub-component provides for the
inclusion of those essential qualifications which are used for
the rating and ranking of candidates who have met the Basic
Requirements. Rated Requirements include the following three
Selection Factors:
Knowledge - Refers to information
concerning facts, theories, systems, practices, regulations and
other subject-matter relevant to the performance of the duties
and responsibilities of a position.
Abilities - Refers to competence in the use of tools,
materials,
and equipment or the application of methods,
systems, techniques, practices, policies, regulations and other
subject-matter relevant to the performance of the duties and
responsibilities of a position.
Personal Suitability - Refers to personal traits or
characteristics which condition the utilization of knowledge and
abilities in the performance of the duties and responsibilities
of a position.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS - This component provides for
the inclusion of qualifications which, although not
essential, may further contribute to or enhance a candidate's
performance of the duties and responsibilities of a position. The
use of Desirable Qualifications is optional, but they must not be
used for screening purposes. When they are applicable, they are
to be included in the Statement of Qualifications at the same time as the Essential
Qualifications are specified, and they are to be assessed only as
part of the rating and ranking of candidates who have met both
the Basic Requirements and Rated Requirements for the position.
Any job-related qualifications other than knowledge of a second
official language may be used as Desirable Qualifications, but
they should be used sparingly, if at all.
SELECTION STANDARD - DEFENCE SCIENTIFIC
SERVICE GROUP
Qualifications applicable to positions in the Defence
Scientific Service Group are as follows:
ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
Education Factor
This factor is applicable to all positions in this Group.
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position, include
in the Statement of Qualifications a description of the Education
considered necessary.
- Graduation with an acceptable degree from a recognized
university with specialization in engineering, chemistry,
physics, biology, economics, sociology or some other specialty
relevant to the position is the minimum educational qualification
for the Defence Scientific Service Group.
For positions at classification level 1, the minimum
educational qualification is:
- Graduation with an acceptable bachelor's degree from a
recognized university with specialization in engineering,
chemistry, physics, biology, economics, sociology or some other
specialty relevant to the position.
For positions at classification level 2, the minimum
educational qualifications are:
- Graduation with an acceptable master's degree from a
recognized university with specialization in engineering,
chemistry, physics, biology, economics, sociology or some other
specialty relevant to the position; or graduation with an
acceptable bachelor's degree from a recognized university with
specialization in engineering, chemistry, physics, biology,
economics, sociology or some other specialty relevant to the
position coupled with experience as specified under the heading
Experience.
For positions at classification level 3, the minimum
educational qualifications are:
- Graduation with an acceptable doctoral degree from a
recognized university with specialization in engineering,
chemistry, physics, biology, economics, sociology or some other
specialty relevant to the position; or graduation with an
acceptable master's degree or an acceptable bachelor's degree
from a recognized university with specialization in engineering,
chemistry, physics, biology, economics, sociology or some other
specialty relevant to the position coupled with experience as
specified under the heading
Experience.
NOTE: Employees who were "grand fathered" into this Group
under the provisions of the paragraph entitled "Minimum
Qualifications" on page (v) of this Standard will be deemed to
have met the minimum qualifications for appointment to other
positions classified in this Group requiring the same minimum
qualifications as those which served as the basis for the initial
grand fathering.
Productivity or Recognition Factor
This factor is applicable to positions in this group in which
there is a requirement for evidence of authorship of research
reports or papers, developmental work or scientific recognition.
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position, include
in the statement of qualifications a description of applicable
productivity or recognition requirements. Following is an example
of a Productivity or Recognition qualification:
"Productivity or Recognition - Recognition in the
international defence community as an effective contributor to
research and development in one or more of the following
technologies: electronics, telecommunications, radar or signal
processing."
Language Requirement
Factor
This factor is applicable to all positions in
this Group.
From the qualifications listed below, determine which one is
applicable to the position to be staffed.
- A knowledge of the English language is essential for this
position.
- A knowledge of the French language is essential for this
position.
- A knowledge of either the English language or the French
language is essential for this position.
- A knowledge of both the English language and the French
language is essential for this position.
Experience Factor
This factor is applicable to positions in this Group for which
it is necessary to have had previous experience related to the
duties and responsibilities involved. Based on the duties and
responsibilities of the position include in the Statement of
Qualifications a description of the Experience considered
necessary. Following is an example of an Experience
qualifications:
"Experience - Experience in the conduct of applied
research or development in the physical or social sciences.
NOTE: (a) To raise Basic Requirements for positions in this
Group above the minima prescribed, special permission must be
obtained from the Public Service Commission.
(b) When used in regard to Basic Requirements, terms such as
"recognized", eligibility", "approved", "acceptable",
"accredited", or "equivalent" refer to acceptability for staffing
purposes as regulated by the Public Service Commission through
the PSC Staffing Program concerned.
(c) The assessment of Basic Requirements is to be based on
performance demonstrations including the use of tests or
examinations, educational or occupational credentials, or other
evidence available at the time of the screening process.
RATED REQUIREMENTS
Knowledge
Factor
This factor is applicable to all positions in this Group
except those used for developing inexperienced personnel.
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position,
include in
the Statement of Qualifications a description of the Knowledge
considered necessary. Following is an example of a Knowledge
qualification:
"Knowledge - Knowledge of the principles and practices
of scientific investigation."
Abilities Factor
This factor is applicable to all positions in this Group
except those used for developing inexperienced personnel.
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position,
include in the Statement of Qualifications a description of the
Abilities considered necessary. Following is an example of a an
Abilities qualification:
"Abilities -Ability to conduct briefings and meetings
and prepare scientific reports, technical papers and
correspondence."
Personal Suitability Factor
This factor is applicable to all positions in this Group.
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position,
include in the Statement of Qualifications a description of the
Personal Suitability considered necessary. Following is an
example of a Personal Suitability qualification:
"Personal Suitability - Work effectively under the
pressure of deadlines."
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position,
include in the Statement of Qualifications a description of those
qualifications considered desirable, if any. Following is an
example of a Desirable Qualification:
"-Experience in administration, or completion of an approved
course in management."
PREPARATION OF A STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
The steps involved in preparing a Statement of Qualifications
are as follows:
1. Gain a thorough understanding of the duties and
responsibilities for the position to be staffed.
2. Review the Selection Plan carefully.
3. Examine the examples of Statements of Qualifications
presented on pages II-15 and II-17 in order to become familiar
with the format and sorts of qualifications required for
positions in this Group.
4. Based on the duties and responsibilities of the position,
describe the qualifications required for the position under the
appropriate
Component, Sub-Component, and Selection Factor headings.
NOTE: The examples of Statements of Qualifications provided in
this Standard are for illustrative purposes only. It is not
necessary, therefore, to adhere to the qualifications specified
in the examples when staffing positions of a similar nature. For
other positions, a suitable Statement of Qualifications must be
prepared.
In determining which qualifications are to be included in the
Statement of Qualifications, the prime considerations are:
(a) their relevancy to the duties and responsibilities of the
position;
(b) their assess ability for selection purposes;
and
(c) their value in differentiating between candidates.
In arranging qualifications within each Selection Factor they
should be laid out in a style and in patterns that:
(a) combine closely-related qualifications;
(b) obviate unnecessary duplication and verbiage;
(c)
emphasize salient features; and
(d) facilitate assessment and selection.
Defence Scientific Research
The completed Statement of Qualifications specifies the
qualifications for staffing the position, and the contents are to
be used as a basis for:
(a) advertising notices;
(b) initial screening of applicants;
(c) developing a selection rating guide; and (d) rating and
ranking of candidates.
RATING GUIDE
In assessing the qualifications of candidates for a position,
a narrative or numerical rating plan may be used.
Following is an illustration of a format for a selection
rating” guide using qualifications contained in the Example
of a Statement of Qualifications presented on pages II-17 and
II-18. Basic Requirements are not included in the rating guide,
since, as minimum criteria, they will have been taken into
account during the initial screening to determine which
applicants were qualified for further consideration. The ranking
of the remaining candidates is accomplished through rating them
on the Rated Requirements, and the Desirable Qualifications, if
any, that are specified in the Statement of Qualifications for
the position being staffed.
Suggested Format
|
ALLOTTED
RATING
|
PASS
RATING
|
MAXIMUM
RATING
|
A. RATED REQUIREMENTS
|
|
|
|
Knowledge Factor
Knowledge of:
1. The organizations and activities of the international science community, particularly in
relation to electronic technology.
2. The organization structure, policies and functions of NDHQ, CRAD branch
and its Defence Research Establishments.
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOTTED
RATING
|
PASS
RATING
|
MAXIMUM
RATING
|
3. Current technology applicable to the activities of the Defence Electronics Division.
4. Budget preparation and control.
5. Personnel administration.
|
|
|
|
Total Knowledge Factor
|
|
|
|
Abilities Factor
Ability to:
1. Plan for, organize, co-ordinate and control a defence science research program.
2. Schedule and assign work, set priorities, resolve work problems, train staff, and
assess staff performance.
3. Conduct briefings and meetings, and prepare scientific reports, technical papers and corre
spondence.
|
|
|
|
Total Abilities Factor
|
|
|
|
Personal Suitability Factor
1. Effective interpersonal relation ships, particularly in dealing with members of the international
scientific community or senior military personnel.
|
|
|
|
2. Thoroughness, reliability, tact and persuasiveness.
3. Work effectively under the pressure of deadlines or peak work loads.
|
ALLOTTED
RATING
|
PASS
RATING
|
MAXIMUM
RATING
|
Total Rated Requirements
|
|
|
|
B. DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
1. Experience in administration, or completion of an approved course in management.
|
|
N/A
|
|
Total Desirable Qualifications
|
|
|
|
Rating for:
Rated Requirements Desirable Qualifications
|
|
|
|
COMBINED RATING
|
|
|
|
ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS ESSENTIAL
QUALIFICATIONS
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
Basic Requirements are assessed as minimum criteria on a
pass/fail basis and are not to be rated by degree. Applicants
must meet at least the minimum standard required for each
applicable Selection Factor, or they are eliminated from further
consideration.
RATED REQUIREMENTS
The relative importance of Selection Factors and
Qualifications related to the duties and responsibilities of the
position being staffed is determined by those administering the
selection process. The weightings which may be applied to
Selection Factors and Qualifications in the case of a
numerical rating plan, and the differences in emphasis which may
be assigned to Selection Factors and Qualifications when a
narrative rating plan is used, must be applied consistently
throughout the assessment process.
In assessing Rated Requirements candidates must achieve an
overall pass rating on the aggregate of Qualifications contained
within each Selection Factor. Where a numerical rating plan is
used candidates must achieve a pass mark of at least sixty per
cent on each applicable Selection Factor. In the case of a
narrative rating plan candidates must meet at least the minimum
degree of Qualifications required for each applicable Selection
Factor. Candidates who fail to gain an overall pass rating on
each applicable Selection Factor are eliminated from further
consideration.
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
Once candidates have met the Rated Requirements, any credit
given for Desirable Qualifications specified in the Statement of
Qualifications is to be added to the rating for Rated
Requirements to reach a composite assessment. As credit given for
Desirable Qualifications has an effect on the ranking of
individuals, Desirable Qualifications must be assessed with the
same care and consistency as that given to Rated
Requirements.
The total maximum marks allowed for Desirable Qualifications
must not exceed ten percent of the total maximum marks allowed
for Rated Requirements. This percentage may also serve as a guide
in establishing the degree of emphasis that may be given to
Desirable Qualifications when a narrative rating plan is
used.
EXAMPLE OF A
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
FOR DEFENCE SCIENCE RESEARCH OFFICER (DS-2)
ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT GROUP
ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS
BASIC REQUIREMENTS
|
|
Education
|
- Graduation with an acceptable master's degree from a recognized university with
specialization in engineering or physics or some other specialty relevant to the
position; or graduation with an acceptable bachelor's degree from a. recognized university with
specialization in engineering or physics or some other specialty
relevant to the position coupled with experience as
specified under the heading Experience.
|
Language Requirement
|
- A knowledge of the English language is essential for this position.
|
Experience
|
- Experience in the conduct of applied research or development in the physical
or social sciences.
|
RATED REQUIREMENTS
|
|
Knowledge
|
- Knowledge of the principles and practices of scientific investigation.
|
Abilities
|
- Ability to plan and conduct original research.
- Ability to perceive problems.
- Ability to prepare a scientific report or a technical paper.
|
Personal Suitability
|
- cooperativeness, thoroughness, dependability and
initiative.
- Work effectively under the pressure of deadlines.
|
EXAMPLE OF A
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS FOR
DIRECTOR DEFENCE ELECTRONICS DIVISION
(DS-6)
DEFENCE RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT,
OTTAWA
ESSENTIAL QUALIFICATIONS
BASIC REQUIREMENT
|
|
Education
|
- Graduation with an acceptable degree from a recognized university with specialization in electrical
engineering, physics or some other specialty relevant to the
position.
|
Productivity or Recognition
|
- Recognition in the international defence community as an effective contributor to
research and development in one or more of the following technologies: electronics,
telecommunications, radar, or signal processing.
|
Language Requirement
|
- A knowledge of both the English language and the French language is essential for
this position.
|
Experience
|
- Experience in the development and management of R and D
projects or programs.
|
RATED REQUIREMENTS
|
|
Knowledge
|
- Knowledge of the organizations and activities of the international science community, particularly in relation to
electronic technology.
- Knowledge of the organization structure, policies and functions of NDHQ, CRAD Branch
and its Defence Research Establishments.
|
|
- Knowledge of current technology applicable to the
activities of the Defence Electronics Division.
- Knowledge of budget preparation and control.
- Knowledge of personnel administration.
|
Abilities
|
- Ability to plan for, organize, co-ordinate and control a defence science research
program.
- Ability to schedule and assign work, set priorities, resolve work problems, train
staff, and assess staff performance.
- Ability to conduct briefings and meetings, and prepare scientific reports, technical
papers and correspondence.
|
Personal Suitability
|
- Effective interpersonal relationships, particularly in dealing with members of
the international scientific community or senior military personnel.
- Thoroughness, reliability, tact and persuasiveness.
- Work effectively under the pressure of deadlines or peak work loads.
|
|
DESIRABLE QUALIFICATIONS
- Experience in administration, or completion of an approved course in management.
|
Classification and Selection Standard - Norme
de classification et de sélection Defence Scientific
Service - Services scientifiques de la défense
RECORDS OF AMENDMENT - REGISTRE DES
MODIFICATIONS
Amendment No./ o I Modification n
|
Date
|
Inserted by Faite par
|
Remarks/Remarques
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|