|
![](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/18px.gif) |
Publications
|
![Heading Graphic](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/heading.gif)
|
![Horizontal Line](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/h_line450x1.gif) |
2003-04 Business Plan
Transportation Safety Board of Canada
2003-2004 Business Plan
Introduction
In 2001, we initiated the development of a strategic and business planning
framework. This initiative was motivated by three main factors: the requirement
to function under a more structured planning and resource management framework;
the resolve to strengthen internal management practices, consistent with the
government's Modern Comptrollership initiative; and the imperative to define
the appropriate balance between activity levels and the resource base within
which the TSB must operate to successfully achieve of its mandate.
This initiative resulted in the publication of a strategic plan, followed
shortly thereafter by a business plan for fiscal year 2002-2003, the organization's
first-ever business plan. Although recognized as being a "work in progress",
focussed efforts on the plan's priorities produced many excellent results
throughout the year and established a solid foundation for further improvements
in subsequent years. The articulation of a priorities and resource planning
cycle adapted to TSB needs, the execution of a formalized stakeholder needs
analysis, the creation of a performance management framework, focussed training
for investigative staff to improve the quality and timeliness of TSB safety
products, and the integration of workplace and human resource issues into
day-to-day management deliberations are just a few indicators of progress
achieved during the past fiscal year.
Predictably, much of this work was developmental; fiscal year 2002-2003 was
a transitional year. Therefore, although the general focus of the seven priorities
in this plan are essentially the same as the four priorities and three "important
issues" described in last year's document, the business plan for fiscal year
2003-2004 is focussed to a greater degree upon implementation and beginning
the measurement of outcomes. The seven priorities are described briefly in
the following paragraphs. All of them are motivated by the overriding objectives
of finding ways to enhance the TSB's relevancy and contribution to transportation
safety in Canada and internationally and of continuously strengthening the
organization from within.
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priorities for 2003-2004
- To implement the key elements of a planning and resource management
framework.
A fully defined business planning framework will be implemented this year
with activities and milestones timed to coincide with the government's resource
planning cycle. Three new management tools: performance measurement, internal
audit and a risk management framework will be employed for the first time.
Clearly this will be a learning experience for the TSB and adjustments will
be required in fiscal year 2004-2005 and beyond as the framework matures.
We will also focus on developing, in collaboration with the Treasury Board
Secretariat, an assessment of the required balance between allocated resources
and the activities essential for successful achievement of the TSB's mandate
in the future. Furthermore, the TSB will receive short term incremental funds
in the Supplementary Estimates for fiscal year 2003-2004 to address capital
asset rust-out issues. This new funding will enable us to replace key assets
that are essential to enable investigators for the effective delivery of the
TSB mandate.
- To reshape the TSB's product and service mix based upon the results
of the stakeholder needs analysis.
The stakeholder needs analysis conducted in fiscal year 2002-2003 provided
important insights into how key decision makers in the transportation system
perceive the TSB's contribution to the advancement of transportation safety.
The focus of activities under this priority will be to convert that information
into a products/services mix that responds more effectively to the stated
needs of our stakeholders. Current outputs will be modified as necessary,
new ones will be developed, and a strategic communications plan will be developed
along with a more active outreach program.
-
To improve the quality and timeliness of TSB products.
The timeliness of TSB investigations, reports and safety products has always
been recognized as a critical measure of the organization's relevancy and
effectiveness. It has also been acknowledged for some time as being an area
where improvements are required. Reinforcing the case for action, timeliness
has been identified by the Chairman as being an issue of immediate concern
for him. The elements that comprise a vibrant, responsive and technically
sound investigation process and the subsequent transfer of safety information
and knowledge to other parties for action are numerous. Their interrelationship
is often complex. A consistent application of investigative methodologies,
guidelines, policies and practices to achieve high quality TSB safety products
requires constant attention. Training, technical currency, streamlined processes,
and the judicious application of limited resources are essential to success
and are specifically targeted under this priority.
Treasury Board ministers have recently approved the inclusion of short term
funding requests in the Supplementary Estimates of the next two fiscal years
to help the TSB reduce its backlog of investigations in progress. The proposed
investment will enable us to reduce the backlog from approximately 160 investigations
to 100 and to improve the mean time in process by 10% (approximately 60 days)
by the end of fiscal year 2004-2005, with an objective to do even better.
As part of a broader human resources strategy, staff hired with these incremental
resources will be viewed as potential replacements for staff expected to depart
over the next two to three years. These resources will also permit current,
more experienced staff to contribute to a full range of longer-term initiatives
to improve performance in future, which includes training, quality assurance
and development of modern tools and procedures to aid investigative staff.
This investment will also enable us to significantly reduce the backlog of
Class 3 unpublished reports.
-
To establish the TSB as a learning organization.
The success of the TSB depends, in large part, on the dedication and skills
of its employees. The organization cannot be successful without recruiting,
training, developing and retaining highly motivated and qualified individuals.
The core of the TSB business line is very technical, thereby posing a special
challenge in an age of rapidly evolving and expanding technologies. At the
same time, the organization cannot function without a team of knowledgeable
employees in all of the specialty areas such as financial services, human
resources, communications, information technology and management, data analysis,
human performance, and legal services, to name but a few. Therefore, the establishment
of a comprehensive departmental learning plan, encompassing training and development,
is essential and is, once again this year, identified as a stand-alone priority.
Activities this year include implementation of the employee and manager orientation
programs and the development of multi-year learning plans based upon both
organizational and individual requirements. In the longer term, this activity
will be subsumed as an ongoing element within annual human resources planning.
To ensure a responsive workplace atmosphere within the TSB.
The principal formal mechanism for defining workplace issues within the TSB
was the Public Service Employee Survey conducted in 2002. Participation in
this survey by TSB employees was encouragingly high, identifying a variety
of issues that must be addressed. Many of the issues parallel those identified
across the Public Service while others appear to be unique to the TSB. Follow
up activities in the last quarter of fiscal year 2002-2003 have identified
a number of areas upon which the organization will focus in this year's plan
and in subsequent years. These activities will be characterized by a broader
framework of collaboration and consultation between management, employees
and union representatives in the definition of priorities and the formulation
of solutions.
To implement required changes to the governance structure.
A review of the governance structure of the TSB was undertaken in fiscal
year 2002-2003. The requirement for this review was seen as twofold. The first
desired outcome was to clarify the decision making processes within the TSB.
The second was to equip all TSB managers with the tools they require to successfully
assume their responsibilities and accountabilities within a management model
that delegates to the lowest possible level. The focus of this year's plan
is to finalize and implement the resulting model.
To renew the management of information within the TSB.
The collection, analysis, presentation and transfer of information and knowledge
is the essence of the TSB's mandate. Without sound information practices,
consistently applied across the organization and supported by current business
applications, the organization's full potential and value will not be achieved.
A comprehensive formal assessment of TSB's current capacity in this area over
the past year has clearly made the case for priority activity in the information
management area.
Summary
In 2001, we embarked upon an agenda of change through which we seek to build
upon the TSB's well established values and performance strengths. Significant
advances have been made on a variety of fronts over the past 18 months, accomplished
largely through the internal reallocation of priorities and resources within
the current resource base and much hard work by many. The organization is
clearly on the right path. Nevertheless, the adequacy of TSB's resources,
both financial and human, continues to be a major preoccupation within the
organization. An increase of $1 million to the TSB's budget beginning in fiscal
year 2002-2003 was valuable in contending with several pressing resource issues.
The recent approval of short term financial resource increases over the next
two fiscal years to address specific projects will assist greatly in mitigating
spending pressures that have been building over the last several years. However,
a common understanding of the longer term balance between allocated resources
and the activity levels required to ensure the TSB is successfully achieving
its mandate has not been achieved. The articulation of such a balance remains
a critical element of management's focus in the first half of this fiscal
year.
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Modern Management
Modern Comptrollership
Modern Comptrollership is one of the Government's key priorities focused
on the sound management of public resources and effective decision-making.
It provides for better performance information, sound risk management and
appropriate control systems. Modern Comptrollership also reinforces values
and ethics and improves the Government's accountability to Parliament and
to Canadians.
The first step towards implementing Modern Comptrollership within the TSB
consisted of a self-assessment of our current management practices against
thirty-three criteria of sound organizational management. The report, issued
in March 2002, identified a number of areas of the management framework where
important changes are needed in order to achieve a state of Modern Comptrollership.
This Capacity Assessment report is available on the TSB web site.
Understanding the importance and the value of modernizing management practices
as well as the risks to the organization if strong comptrollership capabilities
are not entrenched in daily operations, the senior management committee identified
Modern Comptrollership as a management priority and integrated Modern Comptrollership
activities and projects in the departmental 2002-2003 Business Plan. The implementation
of Modern Comptrollership will involve a shift in emphasis beyond control
and compliance to more emphasis being placed on attention to results, better
performance measurement and reporting resulting, strong strategic planning
and effective decision-making.
Once again this year Modern Comptrollership activities are fully integrated
in the Business Plan. The following table identifies the Modern Comptrollership
priorities for 2003-2004 as set by the senior management committee as well
as the desired target ratings on a scale of 1 to 5 .
# |
Modern Comptrollership Criteria |
Capacity Assessment Rating |
Target Rating Desired |
Links to Key Initiatives |
1 |
Managerial Commitment |
1.5 |
3.4 |
1, 5.3 |
2 |
Planning |
1 |
3.6 |
1.1, 4.2 |
3 |
Leadership Commitment |
2 |
3.4 |
1, 5.3 |
4 |
Resource Management |
1 |
3.3 |
1.3, 3.4, 3.6, 4.1 |
5 |
Integrated Management Control Framework |
2 |
3.5 |
1.1, 3.5, 6.1 |
6 |
Knowledge Management |
1.5 |
3.3 |
3.1, 3.2, 4.2, 5.3, 7 |
7 |
Clarity of Senior Management Responsibilities
and Organization |
2.5 |
3.5 |
2, 5.2, 6.1 |
8 |
Employee Satisfaction |
2 |
3.5 |
4, 5.1, 5.3 |
9 |
Management Tools and Techniques |
1 |
3 |
1.2, 4.2, 5.2, 5.3 |
10
|
Integrated Departmental Performance Reporting |
1.5 |
3 |
1.2 |
In line with our Modern Comptrollership priorities and with corporate preoccupations,
the TSB is also committed and actively involved in working with other departments
and agencies on modern comptrollership projects. These projects are funded
through the Treasury Board Secretariat Modern Comptrollership Innovation Fund
and therefore have little impact on our own financial resources.
Modernization of Human Resources
The recent tabling in Parliament of legislative changes to modernize the
management of human resources in the Public Service will have a significant
impact on the TSB. Although it is too early to articulate specific departmental
plans on the modernization of human resources, we are currently reviewing
the potential implications in order to prepare for the development of an action
plan soon after the new legislation is approved by Parliament.
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
2003-2004 Resource Allocation
The senior management team recognizes the importance of timely resource allocation.
Special efforts were therefore made to arrive at key decisions based on the
organizational priorities, the integration of various planning activities
and an element of risk management. Budgets for fiscal year 2003-2004 were
approved by the Senior Management Committee on February 26, 2003. Approved
allocations are shown in the following table.
RC |
Salaries |
Overtime |
O+M |
Total |
Executive |
$ 1,087,247 |
|
$ 250,400 |
$ 1,337,647 |
Corporate Services |
$ 1,513,474 |
$ 30,000 |
$ 864,900 |
$ 2,408,374 |
ISAD |
$ 2,946,334 |
$ 82,000 |
$ 1,007,459 |
$ 4,035,793 |
DGIO + Regional Admin |
$ 982,462 |
$ 8,000 |
$ 306,000 |
$ 1,296,462 |
Engineering |
$ 1,608,974 |
$ 60,000 |
$ 594,000 |
$ 2,262,974 |
Air |
$ 4,596,110 |
$ 310,000 |
$ 1,245,000 |
$ 6,151,110 |
Marine |
$ 1,835,902 |
$ 240,000 |
$ 324,400 |
$ 2,400,302 |
Rail |
$ 1,829,804 |
$ 250,000 |
$ 300,000 |
$ 2,379,804 |
Total
|
$ 16,400,307 |
$ 980,000 |
$ 4,892,159 |
$ 22,272,466 |
Business Plan Projects |
|
|
$ 695,000 |
$ 695,000 |
Capital Asset Replacement |
|
|
$ 494,425 |
$ 494,425 |
IT Utility Box |
|
|
$ 758,000 |
$ 758,000 |
IMSC Projects |
|
|
$ 67,000 |
$ 67,000 |
Swissair III Investigation |
$ 8,853 |
$ 72,900 |
$ 267,708 |
$ 349,461 |
Other Projects |
|
|
$ 123,550 |
$ 123,550 |
Grand Total
|
$ 16,409,160 |
$ 1,052,900 |
$ 7,297,842 |
$ 24,759,902 |
Funding from the TSB base budget has been specifically set aside for the
various projects described in this Business Plan. Short term funding in the
amount of $2,863,000 was also recently obtained from Treasury Board for specific
Business Plan projects. More specifically, additional funding was approved
for the replacement of capital assets, the reduction of the backlog of investigations
in progress, and the improvement of information management. Approved allocations
for Business Plan activities are shown in the following table.
Business Plan |
Priorities |
Base Budget |
Short Term TB Funding |
Total |
Planning and Resource Management Framework |
$ 152,000 |
$ 885,000 |
$ 1,037,000 |
Reshaping Products and Services |
$ 95,000 |
|
$ 95,000 |
Quality and Timeliness |
$ 145,000 |
$ 1,602,000 |
$ 1,747,000 |
Learning |
$ 148,000 |
|
$ 148,000 |
Responsive Workplace |
$ 95,000 |
|
$ 95,000 |
Governance |
$ 60,000 |
|
$ 60,000 |
Information Management Renewal |
|
$ 376,000 |
$ 376,000 |
Total |
$ 695,000 |
$ 2,863,000 |
$ 3,558,000 |
In the budget allocations, funding has also been set aside for other specific
purposes. These approved allocations are shown in the following table.
Other Specific Allocations |
Description |
Amount |
Capital Asset Replacement |
|
Laboratory Equipment |
$ 50,000 |
Vehicles |
$ 50,000 |
Office Furniture and Equipment |
$ 50,000 |
IT Hardware and Software |
$ 300,425 |
Other Equipment |
$ 44,000 |
TOTAL |
$ 494,425 |
IT Utility Box |
|
Telecommunications |
$ 203,400 |
Common IT Services |
$ 215,100 |
Enterprise Software Agreements |
$ 262,500 |
Repairs and Supplies |
$ 77,000 |
TOTAL |
$ 758,000 |
IMSC Projects |
|
ASIS/MARSIS/RODS/PODS Maintenance |
$ 67,000 |
Swissair III Investigation |
|
Air Branch |
$ 206,526 |
Information Management |
$ 23,600 |
Communications |
$ 54,600 |
Informatics |
$ 13,700 |
Finance/Admin |
$ 51,035 |
TOTAL |
$ 349,461 |
Other Projects (carried forward from last year) |
|
Modern Comptrollership |
$ 75,000 |
IM / IT |
$ 21,800 |
Vehicle Replacement |
$ 26,750 |
TOTAL |
$ 123,550 |
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Challenges
Last year, the TSB embarked upon a significant renewal agenda which seeks
to effect changes in a relatively short time span. The experience of 2002-2003
confirmed that there are not only budgetary limitations but also limited human
capacity to manage the changes. Effecting good solutions and making them sustainable
requires solid planning and constant attention. This places a premium on choosing
the right priorities and acknowledging that we can't do everything at once.
The primary challenge is to balance the work required to strengthen our management
framework with the work required to ensure successful achievement of the day-to-day
mandate. There is, of necessity, an impact on daily operations in order to
create both financial and human resources to oversee the change agenda. Difficult
choices and compromises were made by senior management to arrive at this Business
Plan and resource allocation. As a result, once again some activities will
be curtailed or deferred and certain things will not be done. The Senior Management
Committee has considered and accepted the impacts and the risks arising from
these decisions. Senior management also commits to managing activities and
resources in such a way as to minimize those risks while ensuring that we
do not deviate from our renewal agenda.
Another important preoccupation for the TSB is communication at all levels.
The results of the Public Service Employee Survey clearly demonstrate the
challenge associated with internal communication amongst managers and employees.
Although effective internal communications can be challenging at any time,
they become even more important and difficult during a period of adjustment
or change. Managers at all levels are currently faced with an important challenge
as they attempt to stay informed and to keep their employees informed. Without
proper communication and understanding, energies risk not being focussed and
staying with the agenda will be that much more difficult. With respect to
external communication, the absence of an agreed upon strategic communications
approach also presents a significant challenge for the TSB. There are risks
that communications activities will not be planned and delivered in a holistic
manner with the appropriate linkages to ensure that strategic objectives are
achieved in the most efficient manner.
Senior management also recognizes that the TSB faces many other challenges
over the coming year. All of these challenges could have a negative impact
on the TSB. However, prudent and sensible management of financial, human and
material resources can go a long way towards mitigating these risks as the
organization implements its renewal plan. Senior management expects that managers
at all levels within the organization will contribute to effectively minimizing
these risks through the sound management and periodic re-allocation of their
allotted resources.
Throughout this period of change the TSB will ensure that it fulfills its
obligations as a federal government agency in the areas of official languages,
employment equity, access to information and privacy, information management,
as well as occupational health and safety. Current government priorities and
initiatives will also be implemented to the extent that resources permit and
that they can be integrated into the TSB renewal plan. Senior management will
ensure that the right balance is maintained between the government-wide agenda
and the TSB's own legislated mandate and internal agenda so that maximum progress
can be achieved towards the TSB's stated outcomes.
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Detailed Action Plans for 2003-2004
Priority # 1: Planning and Resource Management
SMC Champion: David Kinsman
Link to Strategic Plan: By implementing a strong planning
and management framework, the TSB will:
- ensure effective organizational performance (Objective #3); and
- optimize alliances, partnerships and linkages to advance the TSB
mission (Objective #4).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- the TSB business planning cycle is mature, including a "roll
up" dimension, with the plan and allocations for fiscal year 2004-2005
being published at least two months before the beginning of the
fiscal year;
- the TSB business planning cycle is in line with the federal
government's financial resources planning schedule;
- a departmental assessment has been completed in which the balance
between resources available and capacity are clearly described
and reflected in planning and resource allocation/reallocation;
- the departmental assessment has been presented to the Treasury
Board and their evaluation is obtained; and
- performance measurement has begun to play an integral role in
management decisions.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
provides the following links to the modern management priorities, as identified
by the Senior Management Committee for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- builds leadership and management commitment to modern management;
- strengthens the planning, resource management, integrated
management control framework, management tools and techniques,
and integrated performance reporting priorities; and
- demonstrates the TSB strategy of incorporating the concepts
of modern management (modern comptrollership) into the processes
and practices of its day to day operations.
Key Initiative
1.1: Implement the resource planning and management framework
developed during fiscal year 2002-2003. |
Goals & Objectives:
- The integrated planning framework is synchronized with the government-wide
planning cycle.
- The accountability for each element of the framework is defined
and understood by managers at all levels.
- Risk management is integrated into planning, decision-making and
monitoring of TSB activities.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Publish and communicate the new integrated planning framework and
its elements (critical milestones/dates, processes, etc.). |
Guide to planning within the TSB is widely distributed within the TSB
and available on Infonet. |
C. Courchesne |
April 2003 |
$1K |
b) Develop and implement a comprehensive risk management framework. |
Corporate risk profile, internal audit plan, and guidelines for risk
management within the TSB |
E. Taylor |
September 2003 |
$15K
work group |
c) Plan and coordinate annual conference of Managers and Administrative
officers |
Annual managers' conference |
C. Courchesne |
October 2003 |
$30K
work group |
d) Review and update individual plans and components that are part of
the new planning framework. |
Relevant and pertinent plans that "roll up" into the organizational
plans. |
Functional Managers |
December 2003 |
|
Key Initiative 1.2: Implement
the integrated performance management framework developed during the past
fiscal year. |
Goals & Objectives:
- Managers have a clear understanding of standards and expected
levels of performance
- Useful information is available to decision-makers and leads to
better decisions and improved results.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Publish and communicate the balanced scorecard performance indicators. |
Performance management framework is widely distributed within the TSB
and available on Infonet. |
J. Laporte & M. Ayeko
|
May 2003 |
$1K |
b) Identify and acquire data collection and reporting tools. |
Manual and automated systems to collect, compile and report on the indicators. |
J. Laporte & M. Ayeko |
July 2003 |
$50K
work group |
c) Validation/re-evaluation of the performance management framework
and its tools, through focus groups. |
Revised performance indicators and tools. |
J. Laporte & M. Ayeko |
June 2004 |
focus groups |
d) Redefine the Time Accounting requirements, identify and implement
an appropriate automated tool. |
New and/or improved time accounting system |
E. Taylor |
December 2003 |
$25K
work group |
Other Commitments:
- Effort to link performance information with relevant financial information
to support improved decision-making, sound management of resources
and the achievement of results.
- Since this is a first attempt at having an integrated management
framework, the tools and the performance framework will be reviewed
and improvements will be identified for refinement and improvement
in future years.
|
Key Initiative
1.3: Finalize the development of a multi-year resourcing strategy
for the Transportation Safety Board. |
Goals & Objectives:
- Develop a long term resourcing strategy for implementation starting
in 2004-2005 in which priorities are clearly defined, capacities
are articulated and resources are allocated or reallocated as a
consequence.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Implement multi-year capital asset replacement plan using short term
funding received from Treasury Board |
Partial catch up on capital asset rust-out |
D. Hould |
Mars 2004 |
$860K |
b) Organizational capacity review including an assessment of:
permanent in-house or non-permanent expertise;
- the interrelationships between organizational independence and cooperative
arrangements;
- possible partnerships with third parties; and
- existing infrastructure.
|
Key planning assumptions are validated and a common understanding of
TSB internal capacity requirements to successfully deliver on its mandate
is established. |
SMC |
June 2003 |
$25K |
c) Conduct branch capacity checks. |
Branch capacity issues and options are identified. |
J. Laporte, G. Hunter & T. Burtch
|
July 2003 |
Branch management teams |
d) Conduct a study of regional multi-modal support services and implement
appropriate changes |
Resolution of issues identified by regional managers and staff |
T. Burtch |
June 2003 |
$30K |
e) Roll-up of information and resource requirements for the retained
options. |
Consolidated costing of options |
Y. Tellier |
August 2003 |
|
f) Presentation of multi-year resourcing options to TSB Chairman and
TBS. |
Multi-year resourcing options |
D. Kinsman |
September 2003 |
|
g) Selection of a multi-year resourcing strategy for implementation
effective with the beginning of the 2004-2005 fiscal year. |
Multi-year resourcing strategy communicated widely throughout the TSB |
D. Kinsman |
October 2003 |
|
Other Commitments:
- Continued on-going dialogue with TB officials on TSB resourcing
issues.
|
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority # 2: Reshape our Products and Services in Response to Client
Needs
SMC Champion: Greg Hunter
Link to Strategic Plan: By implementing changes to its products
and services and adapting its communications approach, based on the results
of the stakeholder needs analysis, the TSB will:
- ensure that its products are developed in a manner that maximizes
their potential to advance transportation safety and meets the needs
of clients and the system as a whole (Objective #1);
- get a better assessment of how it is viewed and enable it to achieve
the required profile and awareness of the Agency, and its products
(Objective #5); and
- increase the awareness of safety issues and to foster a safety
culture in the transportation community (Strategy #6).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- stakeholders are satisfied with the revised TSB products and
services;
- there is broader public awareness of the TSB and its products
and services;
- mechanisms are in place to seek stakeholder feedback and to
use this information in future decision-making on TSB products
and services; and
- we see improvements in our ability to influence safety change
agents to eliminate safety deficiencies.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
provides the following link to the modern management priorities chosen by
the Senior Management Committee for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- it clarifies the organizational responsibilities in light
of external client/stakeholder needs and requirements.
Key Initiative
2.1: Develop a stakeholder needs analysis action plan, including
consultation with external stakeholders. |
Goals & Objectives:
- To complete the work begun with the Stakeholder Needs Analysis
Project, by implementing the selected products and services mix,
along with the required communications support.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Develop an action plan to implement the option chosen from the Stakeholder
Needs Analysis Business Case. |
Operational action plan including organizational impact, costs, change
management considerations and internal and external communications strategies. |
M. Hill |
June 2003 |
$20K - consultant |
b) Complete a communications Business Case to address the selected product
service mix option |
A scalable resourcing for Communications that addresses the new products/services
mix |
K. Pottier |
June 2003 |
$5K
consultant |
Key Initiative
2.2: Pilot an approach to expanded stakeholder and public outreach. |
Goals & Objectives:
- Capitalize on the role and profile of the Chairman and Board members
to advance transportation safety.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Raise national awareness of the TSB and its mandate in the post SR111
report release period. |
A strategic and operational plan and support for presentations by the
Chairman at a variety of locations across Canada to discuss function/role
of TSB/Board. |
K. Pottier |
Strategic and operational plan by July 2003 |
$70K |
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority # 3: Improve Quality and Timeliness
SMC Champion: Terry Burtch
Link to Strategic Plan: By improving quality and timeliness
the TSB will:
- improve the organizational effectiveness by fostering continuous
improvement of TSB processes and the skills set of employees (Objective
#3);
- increase the awareness of safety issues and foster a safety culture
in the transportation community (Strategy #6);
- enhance its national and international reputation through the
reduction of its backlog of investigations in process and wrap-up
of the Swissair 111 investigation (Objective #5); and
- be in a better position to identify and communicate safety deficiencies
in the marine, pipeline, rail and air transportation systems (Objective
#2).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- all investigators have received core-competency training;
- the Integrated Safety Investigation Methodology is fully utilized
by investigators for all investigations;
- the number of investigations in progress at year-end is not
higher than the number of new cases undertaken during the year;
- the average time in process has been reduced by 10% based on
the December 2002 data;
- all investigation standards and manuals are current;
- class 3 reports are published within a reasonable time after
Board approval;
- key bottlenecks in the investigation process have been identified
and eliminated; and
- the Board, senior management and staff have established a common
understanding of the criteria for investigation decisions and
of future directions for investigation reports.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
will advance the following elements of the modern management priorities, as
identified by the Senior Management Committee for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- it will strengthen knowledge management ensuring investigators
are well trained and have access to current operations manuals;
and
- it will enhance TSB's internal management controls and make
better use of resources at hand.
Key Initiative
3.1: Maintain currency of standards & Manual of Investigation
(MOI) Operations |
Goals & Objectives:
- To provide managers and investigators with up-to-date and user-friendly
MOI and Standards.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs
& $ ) |
a) Develop and maintain MOI updates including Modal Safety Communication
Standards |
Up-to-date version of MOI Vol.1, 2 and 4.
One Hard Copy for each Branch and Region. |
M. Ayeko |
October 2003 |
$25K
Project Team |
b) Information management review of the MOIs |
MOI are verified for linkages and integration |
T. Allen |
October 2003 |
$20K |
c) Publish electronic version and establish strategy to maintain currency
of Standards and MOIs. |
Web Browser version of the MOI on InfoNet. |
M. Ayeko |
February 2004 |
|
d) Develop standards and procedures for the Engineering Branch operations. |
Manual of Engineering standards and procedures |
Director, Engineering |
March 2004 |
$25K
Project Team |
Key Initiative
3.2: Continue core-competency training for Investigators and
Managers |
Goals & Objectives:
- To provide the Managers and investigators with core competency
skills and knowledge
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs
& $ ) |
a) Develop investigation management training for managers & IICs. |
Training delivered to IO
management and Investigators |
N. Stoss |
June 2003 |
$10K |
b) Develop and deliver report-writing workshops. |
Workshop/training delivered. |
|
ongoing |
$5K
Project Team |
c) Deliver Confidential Draft Review process workshops. |
Workshop/training delivered. |
|
ongoing |
$5K |
d) Deliver "Essentials of Act, Regs, MOI, MOU, and external relations." |
Workshop/training delivered. |
M. Ayeko |
August 2003 |
$15K
Project Team |
e) Upgrade and deliver ISIM refresher training to all investigators. |
Workshop/training delivered. |
|
March 2004 |
$15K
Project Team |
Other Commitments:
- ISIM initial training and other standard courses to be delivered
to new investigators within 2-3 months of employment at TSB.
|
Key Initiative 3.3: Process
Improvements |
Goals & Objectives:
- To provide client/stakeholders with timely safety information
necessary for implementing corrective actions.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs
& $ ) |
a) Obtain Board approval for investigation report standard "cycle time". |
Board-SMC agreed report cycle time. |
T. Burtch |
June 2003 |
|
b) Review Occurrence Classification Policy with a view to establishing
a common understanding, among the Board, SMC and the staff, of the criteria
for "investigation decisions." (e.g NOK factor, Risk potential) |
Common Understanding of the intent of the Board's Classification Policy.
|
T. Burtch |
November 2003 |
|
c) Confirm critical "decision points" in the investigation process to
improve management of scope and depth of investigations (part of MOI Vol.
2). |
Written procedure on managing investigations with critical management
"decision points" |
T. Burtch |
September 2003 |
DOIs |
d) Establish common-understanding of focus on the timely identification
and communication of Safety Deficiencies among managers and investigators. |
General Direction and Intent (written Policy) on the "Focus" of TSB
investigation reports. |
M. Ayeko |
August 2003 |
DOIs + Clients |
e) Implement "Quick Hits" identified at June 2002 Managers Conference. |
List of "Quick Hits" for implementation. |
M. Ayeko |
June 2003 |
Project Team |
f) Establish multi-year priorities and plan for continued Improvement,
including "Best Practices" list identified at June 2002 Conference. |
Multi-year plan for quality & timeliness, including thorough analysis
of work processes. |
T. Burtch |
March 2004 |
Project Team |
Other Commitments:
- Achieve full integration of ISIM in daily investigation operations.
- Continue ISIM support system through coaching and GO-Team concept.
- Incorporate ISIM implementation in managers and investigators performance
objectives.
|
Key Initiative
3.4: Develop and implement a strategy to reduce report back-logs. |
Goals & Objectives:
- To significantly reduce the backlog of investigations in progress
and of unpublished class 3 reports.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs
& $ ) |
a) Reduce backlog of investigations progress using Treasury Board short-term
funding |
- Backlog reduced to approximately 100 investigations in progress
- Mean time in-process reduced by 10%
|
T. Burtch |
March 2005 |
12 FTEs
$1,105M |
b) Eliminate backlog of unpublished Class 3 reports |
Zero backlog |
K. Pottier |
March 2005 |
1 FTE
$447K |
Key Initiative
3.5: Evaluate residual risks and the status of safety deficiencies
identified in Board reports that have not been addressed to "Fully Satisfactory"
level. |
Goals & Objectives:
- To achieve implementation of safety actions on all Board recommendations.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs
& $ ) |
a) Take accurate inventory of Board's assessment and re-assessment of
responses to recommendations |
List of Board's assessments and updated staff's re-assessments. |
D. Verreault, I. Naish, F. Perkins
|
May 2003 |
|
b) Assess residual risks |
Completed risk assessment |
D. Verreault, I. Naish, F. Perkins
|
June 2003 |
|
c) Identify issues / safety deficiencies with residual risks not acceptable
by the Board. |
List of safety deficiencies with unacceptable residual risks. |
D. Verreault, I. Naish, F. Perkins
|
August 2003 |
|
d) Develop follow-up strategy. |
Follow-up strategy |
D. Verreault, I. Naish, F. Perkins
|
September 2003 |
|
e) Submit for Board's approval / decision |
Board approved strategy for "follow-up" actions. |
T. Burtch |
October 2003 |
|
Key Initiative
3.6: Wrap-Up of the SR111 Investigation |
Goals & Objectives:
- Wind down the SR111 investigation, evaluate the project and reintegrate
team members in other TSB activities.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Time lines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Dispose of wreckage and close the Shearwater facilities. |
Disposal of all material with no long term value to the TSB. Material
to be retained will be moved to the Engineering Lab. |
V. Gerden |
June 2003 |
$25K |
b) Reintegrate SR111 team members within the on-going operations. |
Return to normal activities and ensure employees have well adjusted
to their regular work environment from a professional and psychological
perspective. |
T. Burtch |
June 2003 |
|
c) Conduct a lessons learned exercise and evaluate the results achieved
for Canadians. |
Input for performance reporting to TBS and Parliament.
Documented lessons learned for business process improvement. |
D. Kinsman |
September 2003
December 2003 |
$50K |
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority # 4: Learning
SMC Champion: Daniel Verreault
Link to Strategic Plan: By transforming the TSB into a learning
organization, the TSB will:
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- employees will have received essential training;
- every employee has a personal learning plan providing opportunities
for personal growth and development; and
- multi-year training & development plans are in place to
meet current and future work expectations along with the requisite
funding.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
will further many modern management elements identified as priorities by the
SMC:
- employee satisfaction by ensuring employees are given learning
opportunities;
- better planning and management of resources;
- knowledge management - ensuring that knowledge and skills
to carry out the work of the TSB are kept current; and
- provide management tools to help in decision-making.
Key Initiative
4.1: Competencies and Learning |
Goals & Objectives:
- Define required competencies and appropriate training standards
for various occupational groups.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Develop competency profiles for all remaining TSB occupational groups
using the methodology and work done for the investigator group. |
Competency profiles developed for all occupational groups |
L. Henry |
October 2003 |
$29K |
b) Develop learning standards to support each competency profile. |
Detailed learning standards developed for every occupational group. |
L. Henry |
October 2003 |
$29K |
Key Initiative
4.2: Identify the learning needs to satisfy corporate requirements
and to respond to employees' career goals. |
Goals & Objectives:
- Develop multi-year learning plans to ensure that employees are
provided with the required training and development to meet current
and future work expectations.
- Provide employees with opportunities for personal growth and development
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Assess employee and manager competencies against appropriate competency
profiles and identify gaps. |
List of gaps in existing competencies |
B. Cl�ment |
December 2003 |
$30K |
b) Conduct a survey of employees' and managers' training, development
and learning needs. |
Documentation of employee and manager learning and development needs
and interests |
B. Cl�ment |
December 2003 |
$25K |
c) Provide reference tools and materials to enable managers to develop
annual organizational learning plans |
Guides and templates provided to managers |
L. Henry |
March 2004 |
$35K |
d) Review and update the TSB training and learning policies and procedures. |
Revised policies and procedures |
L. Henry |
March 2004 |
|
Other Commitments:
- Promote knowledge sharing and communication between employees.
- Continue to provide essential/requisite training as identified in
2002-2003 pending the completion of individual employee learning plans.
|
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority # 5: Responsive Workplace
SMC Champion: Jean L. Laporte
Links to Strategic Plan: By providing a responsive workplace
for employees, the TSB will:
- improve organizational effectiveness in terms of leadership in
the conduct of TSB activities (Objective #3); and
- achieve effective organizational performance (Strategy #5).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- employees at all levels openly provide feedback to management;
- individual employee performance objectives are linked to the
TSB strategic objectives and business plan;
- employees are provided with regular feedback on their performance;
- managers feel comfortable and properly equipped to fulfil their
responsibilities;
- employees are well informed about management decisions and on-going
priorities / activities; and
- employees concerns are dealt with on a timely basis.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
directly links to the following modern Comptrollership priorities, as identified
by Senior Management Committee for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- achieving a responsive workplace status would ensure a high
degree of employee satisfaction; and
- managerial commitment, leadership commitment, knowledge
management, clarity of senior management responsibilities
and organization, as well as management tools and techniques.
Key Initiative
5.1: Public Service Employee Survey Follow-Up |
Goals & Objectives:
- Using the employee survey results, identify priority areas for
action and implement concrete actions to improve the TSB work environment
and employee satisfaction.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Time lines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Publish the corporate and branch / directorate action plans on the
Infonet. |
Employees have a clear picture of actions to be taken. |
J. L. Laporte |
April 2003 |
|
b) Implementation of action plans. |
Concrete actions to improve the work environment and employee satisfaction. |
SMC |
March 2004 |
$25K |
c) Periodic reporting to SMC of progress against action plans. |
Regular progress reports to ensure plans are effectively implemented |
J. L. Laporte |
bi-monthly throughout the year |
|
Other Commitments:
- Action plans and progress reports will be available to all employees
on the Infonet.
|
Key Initiative
5.2: Improving Internal Communications |
Goals & Objectives:
- Improve internal communications within the TSB so that employees
and managers at all levels are fully informed on the Business Plan
and progress made on the key initiatives, as well as on other major
activities.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Time lines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Develop and implement an internal communications plan with respect
to the Business Plan. |
Detailed action plan (tool) to assist managers in ensuring good communication
with staff and to capture feedback for senior management. |
D. Kinsman |
June 2003 |
$10K |
b) Implement the employee / manager orientation program. |
Provide new employees with the required knowledge to effectively integrate
into the TSB. |
L. Henry |
April 2003 |
|
c) Implement a revised employee exit feedback process. |
Effective means of capturing and analysing employee feedback. |
B. Cl�ment |
May 2003 |
$15K |
d) Review, update and implement a revised performance discussion / evaluation
process. |
Effective performance evaluation process for managers and employees
which is linked to the corporate performance management framework. |
B. Cl�ment |
December 2003 |
$15K |
Other Commitments:
- Increased use of the employee recognition program to recognize employee
achievements and promote excellence.
|
Key Initiative
5.3: Improving the Work Environment |
Goals & Objectives:
- Provide managers and employees with appropriate tools and support
services to enable them to function effectively and contribute fully
to the achievement of the TSB mandate.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Resolve outstanding staff relations grievances. |
Improved staff relations between management and staff. |
D. Kinsman |
April 2003 |
|
b) Provide investigators with a complete and comprehensive response
to their concerns with respect to classification and compensation issues. |
Investigator satisfaction that management has addressed their concerns
to the full extent possible. |
T. Burtch |
June 2003 |
|
c) Review and update the human resources delegations of authority. |
Optimization of delegation to managers at all levels. |
L. Henry |
September 2003 |
|
d) Promote the various flexible work arrangement options for employees. |
Increased awareness by employees of flexible work arrangements. |
B. Cl�ment |
June 2003 |
|
e) Provide training to managers on communication skills, team-building
and conflict resolution. |
Improved abilities of managers to better deal with workplace issues. |
L. Henry |
October 2003 |
$30K |
Other Commitments:
- Increase employee consultation and participation in the decision-making
processes.
- Review and update Corporate Services policies and procedures to
reflect modern management practices.
- Provide client oriented (flexible) internal support services (Finance,
Admin, HR, IM and IT) to satisfy business needs.
- Information sessions on topics related to employee well-being such
as: stress management, leading a healthy life, etc.
- Provide employees with opportunities to purchase various products
bearing the TSB logo.
|
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority # 6: Governance
SMC Champion: David Kinsman
Link to Strategic Plan: By establishing an effective governance
structure, the TSB will:
- improve organizational effectiveness in terms of leadership in
the conduct of its activities (Objective #3); and
- increase organizational performance by adopting a framework that
optimizes overall functionality (Strategies #1+ 5).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- a formal decision-making hierarchy is in place that everybody
understands and conforms with;
- managers are making well informed decisions based upon organizational
priorities and objectives;
- decision-making bodies deal only with those issues that are
within their mandate;
- meetings are run efficiently with decisions being reached through
focussed dialogue;
- decisions are formally recorded and readily available to interested
parties; and
- information that has traditionally remained within 'silos' is
available to those who need it, when they need it; and timely
reactions and decisions are facilitated.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
addresses two of the modern management (modern comptrollership) priorities
established by the SMC for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- by strengthening the integrated management control framework
and
- providing clarity to senior management responsibilities
and organization.
Key Initiative
6.1: Finalize any issues of governance structure remaining
at the end of fiscal year 2002-2003, including organizational structure
modification if required, and fully integrate the model during fiscal
year 2003-2004. |
Goals & Objectives:
- Clarify the decision making process within the TSB and equip all
TSB managers with the necessary tools to enable them to assume their
roles and responsibilities within a management model that delegates
to the lowest possible level.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Finalize and implement the selected governance model. |
- An effective decision making hierarchy is in place, communicated,
understood and operating effectively.
|
D. Kinsman |
December 2003 |
$20K |
b) Define, document and provide guidance on business practices for decision-making,
internal consultation, record keeping and managing meetings |
- Business practices available on InfoNet
- Procedures for formally recording decisions and follow-up actions
are universally applied.
|
D. Kinsman |
December 2003 |
$10K |
c) Stock the InfoNet with management decision records and organizational
policies. |
Central repository for information |
C. Courchesne |
March 2004 |
$30K |
d) Establish policy development / program coordination capacity within
TSB. |
Appropriate resources and organizational structure are in place to support
on-going policy development and program coordination. |
D. Kinsman |
March 2004 |
Project Team - SMC members |
Other Commitments:
- Review Branch management structures to respond most efficiently
with the governance structure, once the latter is established.
|
![Back to top](/web/20071116045423im_/http://www.tsb.gc.ca/images/clf_up.gif)
Priority #7: Renew the Management of Information
SMC Champion: Fred Perkins
Link to Strategic Plan: By renewing and modernizing the
management of information, the TSB will:
- Improve organizational effectiveness in terms of leadership by
providing tools and mechanisms to make valued business information
easy to create, store, retrieve, analyse, share and use (Objective
#3); and
- enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of TSB products in terms
of timeliness and quality (Objective #1).
Performance Measurements: We will know we have succeeded
when:
- employees can create, store, retrieve, analyse, share and use
information efficiently and effectively;
- files contain supportive information for the investigations
and can be easily located;
- files contain all administrative information required for the
ongoing business of the TSB and can be easily located; and
- all employees are familiar with the applicable requirements
of ATIP, other acts and regulations.
Link to the Modern Management Priorities: This priority
furthers the following modern management priority previously established by
the SMC for fiscal year 2003-2004:
- making better use of departmental information, thus improving
knowledge management.
Key Initiative
7.1: Refocus Library Services |
Goals & Objectives:
- Define library services to better meet the needs of employees.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Develop a renewed concept of operations for library services. |
A costed business case developed |
T. Allen |
August 2003 |
$5K
Library user committee |
b) Develop an action plan to complete the contracting or staffing to
support the renewed library service. |
Support action plan developed for a new library service. |
T. Allen |
October 2003 |
Library user committee |
Key Initiative 7.2: Improve
the handling of departmental information |
Goals & Objectives:
- Improve file management to meet current business needs
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timelines / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Produce e-mail management guidelines. |
Increased awareness and understanding of Information Management tools
and practices. |
T. Allen |
June 2003 |
|
b) Upgrade departmental records system. |
An improved file classification system |
T. Allen |
September 2003 |
$68K |
c) Provide ATIP training sessions to all employees. |
Increased awareness and understanding of ATIP |
T. Allen |
March 2004 |
|
Other Commitments:
- Provide on an ongoing basis, record-keeping helpful hints, coaching,
and awareness sessions.
- Continuous improvement to the filing system to better meet TSB requirements.
|
Key Initiative
7.3: Develop the next generation business application |
Goals & Objectives:
- Prepare a clear definition of scope and client needs, through
consultation and prototyping. Includes consideration of next generation
milestone tracking, time accounting, electronic records management
and the modal systems.
|
Action Items |
Deliverables |
Project Leader |
Timeliness / Milestones |
Estimated Resources (FTEs & $ ) |
a) Conduct focus group on lessons learned from existing set of business
applications. |
- Documented lessons learned
- An articulated TSB common business rationale for modal systems.
|
M. Hill |
June 2003 |
|
b) Develop prototype. |
A workable system prototype. |
C. Lalonde |
September 2003 |
1 FTE
$252K
Project Team |
c) Produce a multi-year plan, including
costing and business case. |
A multi-year plan, including a costing and business case. |
C. Lalonde |
October 2003 |
|
d) Develop project charter. |
A project charter. |
C. Lalonde |
November 2003 |
|
e) Develop statement of functional specs and architecture definition. |
A statement of functional specs and architecture definition. |
C. Lalonde |
March 2004 |
$51K |
|