![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Transportation Safety Board of Canada
|
Projects | Priorities |
---|---|
Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) |
|
Alliances, Partnership and Linkages |
|
Inter-Agency Marine Action Group (MAG) |
|
Corporate Video |
|
Official Languages |
|
Human Resources Modernization |
|
Project 1: TIIMS | ||
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor Fred Perkins |
Project Leader Cathy Lalonde |
Resources Allocated $582,380 |
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description To continue building stronger information management practices into TSB investigation activities. TIIMS will improve the linkages to systems throughout the TSB and upgrade the technology and ease of use of TSB's modal databases. |
||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF) Strategic Plan Linkages
Improves the efficiency and effectiveness of TSB products in terms of timeliness and quality, and streamlines data, thus having an impact on what information we need to manage.
Continues building stronger information management practices into TSB investigation activities and will enhance the linkages to systems throughout the TSB by improving TSB's internal information and investigation management capabilities.
Streamlines and refines our data interdependencies, thus strengthening our partnerships with stakeholders.
Builds more effective investigation and information management practices into TSB investigation activities to leverage investigation teams' interactions, thereby improving the dissemination of safety information. MAF Linkages
Builds stronger capacity in support of the governance committees. Will provide an organized way in which to access policies and procedures, ensuring they will be more consistently applied.
Continues to improve the stewardship of, and accountability for, corporate information resources.
Improves internal service by building stronger and more consistent investigation and information management practices to create easy-to-use redesigned support tools for all staff.
The implementation of TIIMS promotes learning and manages linkages throughout the TSB through continuous technology upgrades. It also builds policy and procedural references into the tools, facilitating the adoption and ongoing evolution of the tools. This will reduce the staff training effort and minimize the need for retraining. |
||
Performance Measures
|
||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines |
Phase 1 Implementation & Refinements | All modules built in Phase 1 of TIIMS will be implemented and will need to be refined after the piloting stage. In particular, it is anticipated that the following will be addressed in 2005-2006: 1. Refinement of the advanced search. 2. Refinement of E-mail Filing. 3. Refinement of TSB Work Log. 4. Refinement of Report Production. 5. Refinement of Safety Analysis. 6. Briefcase support providing a subset of off-line documentation capabilities (documents, form, safety analysis support, etc.). 7. Milestone & Workload Management Reports. 8. Document Library refinements. |
October 2005 |
Infonet transition to TIIMS. | Migrating the remainder of Workspaces and Reference Catalogue to TIIMS, thus moving to a single Intranet. | October 2005 |
Redesigned data collection support tools (part 1). |
Redesigning the modal data entry screens. Moving to a single database and migrating legacy data. Redesigning the data extracts we currently provide to stakeholders. Redesigning macro tools and web query to support the new database. |
March 2006 |
Note: The scope of the TIIMS project was limited to the deliverables noted above based upon the resources available for investment at this time. The following deliverables have been identified as the next priorities for investment should additional financial and human resources become available during the course of the 2005-2006 fiscal year. | ||
Redesigned data collection support tools (part 2). | Piloting an automated notification processing solution for Rail with one stakeholder. Examine opportunities for off-line data entry through a Mobile Data Entry Pilot. |
To be determined |
Admin. E-team workspace. | Migration and cleanup of the shared drives and public folders. Refining the file plan. |
To be determined |
Meeting Workbench for governance committees support tools (IMC, OC & EC). | Customizing the TIIMS Meeting Workbench to create three similar workbenches. | To be determined |
Project 2: The use of alliances, partnerships and linkages to advance TSB mission | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Project Sponsor Terry Burtch |
Project Leader Marcel Ayeko |
Resources Allocated $20,000 |
||
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description The objective of this project is to establish a TSB policy on alliances and partnerships. This will be accomplished by:
|
||||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF)
Strategic Plan Linkages
Helps strengthen TSB capabilities for the delivery of our mandate.
Provides a framework to leverage external and internal alliances and partnerships that will enhance TSB effectiveness and productivity without risk to our independence. MAF Linkages
Defines policy and strengthens our ability to deliver our program.
Considers stakeholders' perspectives in developing policy framework.
Builds upon a risk-benefit analysis in establishing the policy framework.
Leverages external and internal alliances and partnerships to make better use of our resources to achieve our objectives.
Integrates TSB and Public Service Values in policy framework.
Explores innovative ways to deliver services in a changing environment of fiscal pressures.
Establishes clear strategic direction within the policy, procedures and practices. |
||||
Performance Measures
|
||||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines | ||
Establish project team. |
|
End May 2005 | ||
Engage external assistance. |
|
End July 2005 | ||
Identification of areas and activities involving all TSB functional managers, including a cursory review of existing MOU and agreements. |
|
End September 2005 | ||
Consultation with potential external partners. |
|
End November 2005 | ||
Presentation to TSB management. |
|
End January 2006 |
Project 3: Inter-Agency Marine Action Group (MAG) | ||
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor John Mein |
Project Leader Raymond Mathew |
Resources Allocated $10,000 |
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description
|
||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF) Strategic Plan Linkages
Optimizes the use of alliances, partnerships and linkages to promote transportation safety to the fishing community.
Increases awareness of the TSB and its products through direct interaction with the community. MAF Linkages
Improves communication and service delivery through the promotion of safety awareness and the provision of safety education to families. |
||
Performance Measures
|
||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines |
Planned visits and safety-related presentations to coastal fishing communities. These include Aboriginal, Vietnamese and possibly Chinese fishers. | Presentations to fishing communities, including the use of various scale models of vessels as teaching aids to impart basic safety principles (vessel stability, cold water survival, personal protective equipment and life-saving equipment). | April 2005-March 2006. The timing of these presentations will be designed to coincide with fishery openings to ensure good attendance. |
Participate with other MAG members at venues where shared kiosks can be set up (e.g. at various fishery exhibitions/expos and other gatherings) to promote MAG and solicit opportunities to make safety-related presentations. | Kiosks and presentations, as opportunities arise. It is important to involve the immediate families of fishers, who will ultimately assist in promoting safety awareness. | April 2005-March 2006. |
With the aid of local Vietnamese fishing groups, identify vital safety-related brochures and pamphlets related to the fishing industry, and translate them into Vietnamese. Some have already been prepared and are in the system. | Key safety information, brochures and pamphlets translated into Vietnamese (e.g. use of radio telephone in distress situations intended for those with a limited command of the English language). | April 2004-March 2006 |
Initiate talks with
principals in the commercial small towing vessel community to evaluate
if it is possible to include the industry in the MAG safety awareness
initiative. Also update the MAG work plan and identify new safety presentations. |
Similar to those listed above. | April 2004-March 2006 Timing would vary according to the state of the industry and time of year. |
Project 4: TSB Corporate Video | ||
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor Conrad Bellehumeur |
Project Leader Dominique Tremblay |
Resources Allocated $15,000 |
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description To produce an updated TSB corporate video to be used to:
|
||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF)
Strategic Plan Linkages
Strengthens public and industry awareness of who we are, what we do and how we contribute to transportation safety. MAF Linkages
Reinforces awareness of the TSB and its activities by presenting a broader view of the technical and human aspects of TSB investigations and the importance of identifying safety deficiencies. |
||
Performance Measures
|
||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines |
Final scriptwriting and shooting. | Convert beta version of the corporate video on DVD. | April-May 2005 |
Approval of draft version of DVD. | Approved DVD. | June 2005 |
Translation. | French text. | July 2005 |
French editing. | French text. | August 2005 |
Communication plan for distribution. | Approved communication plan. | August 2005 |
Production of the DVD and packaging. | Blanket cover + case + copies of DVD. | September 2005 |
Distribution of the DVD. | Distributed DVD. | October 2005 |
Project 5: Official Languages | ||
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor Louise Henry |
Project Leader André Lewis |
Resources Allocated $40,000 |
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description
|
||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF)
Strategic Plan Linkages
This project is directly linked to the continuous improvement objective, as it will help ensure that the TSB is effective in responding to the needs of stakeholders and employees.
The official languages survey creates an opportunity to connect with stakeholders and increase awareness of our basic mandate. MAF Linkages
Ensures responsive service delivery according to the linguistic preferences of stakeholders. |
||
Performance Measures
|
||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines |
Complete the mandatory survey of stakeholders on their choice of official languages. | Valid survey results. | August 2005 |
Develop, seek PSHRMAC approval and implement an action plan to respond to stakeholder linguistic preferences. | Action plan. Implementation.
|
September-December 2005 December 2005-March 2006 |
Review language requirements of all TSB positions in light of new official languages policies. | Revised and up-to-date linguistic profiles for all TSB positions as well as a framework to help managers determine the language requirements of new or revised positions in future. | September-December 2005 |
Develop action plan to implement revised linguistic profiles, including employee language training plans where required. | Action plan. Employee language training plans. |
December 2005 March 2006 |
Project 6: Implementation of the Modernization of HR Management | ||
---|---|---|
Project Sponsor Louise Henry |
Project Leader Benoit Clement |
Resources Allocated $130,000 |
Project Goals & Objectives / Activity Description
|
||
Link to Business Plan Priorities
|
||
Link to Strategic Plan and Management Accountability Framework (MAF)
Strategic Plan Linkages
Provides a modern HRM framework in which managers will have increased delegation powers and flexibility. MAF Linkages
Provides for enhanced dialogue between management and employees.
Provides the TSB with a more efficient staffing process, and meets the legal obligations of the employer under the new HRM modernization initiative.
Reviews and updates policies and accountability framework, as well as delegation instruments.
New policies will be based on TSB and Public Service Values.
New accountability frameworks will better enable the measurement of results and enable performance reporting.
Change management will be implemented to ensure a smooth transition. This includes learning plans for managers and HR staff. |
||
Performance Measures
Note: TSB work plan timelines are dependent on progress and milestones identified by the government-wide working groups. |
||
Action Items | Deliverables | Timelines |
Public Service Modernization Act implementation strategic activities | ||
|
|
January/February 2005 |
|
|
Spring 2005-December 2005 |
|
Spring 2005-December 2005 | |
New FAA and PSLRA regime | ||
|
|
February 2006 |
|
|
April/May 2005 |
|
|
April/May 2005 |
|
|
April/May 2005 |
|
|
April 2005 ongoing |
Implement provisions of the new Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) | ||
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
May-December 2005 |
|
|
December 2005 |
In addition to corporate priorities, individual DGs, Directors and managers have established Branch and Division priorities for their areas of responsibility. This section outlines the priorities for each Branch and Division. These priorities are extracted from the Operational Work Plans of each area and directly link to the individual work objectives of managers. These are not the only priorities of managers, but they are the key ones that will contribute to the achievement of our Strategic Outcome. For more details, please consult the Operational Work Plans.
During the coming year, the Executive Director will focus his attention on two key areas. Particular attention will be placed on evaluating how the new governance structure is functioning. Emphasis will also be placed on the implementation of TIIMS and the implementation of the Public Service Modernization Act while ensuring that the other critical dimensions of TSB operations are not ignored.
During fiscal year 2004-2005, a Corporate Communications Strategy was approved that is essentially a road map for how the Communications Division, in collaboration with its modal and corporate clients, will improve the communications functions at the TSB over the next three years. Our priorities include making the media relations function more proactive and using the media to make the TSB's contribution to transportation safety more visible to the Canadian public. To this end, we will issue approximately 35 news releases related to investigation operations. We will strengthen the government relations function and formalize its process, and continue to build on the success of our Public Awareness Program by participating in approximately 10 events with a focus on industry change agents. Priorities also include the development and introduction of a TSB Speakers Bureau to assist managers and employees who have been invited by our stakeholders to speak on behalf of the TSB, and the completion of a new corporate video.
In 2005-2006, in addition to ongoing management, particular attention will be paid to the following key items. The first is the effective roll-out and implementation of the tools and products developed under the TIIMS environment. This includes an Operations Manager role, funded through internal reallocation. The second is to improve the timeliness and quality of safety products (reports, advisories, communications), building on the efforts over the past two years. This will include publication of Board assessments of responses to recommendations on the Internet and through other means.
The main priority will be to continue to strengthen the capabilities of the Air Branch to ensure that results of investigation activities satisfy the Board's objectives for professional, timely, accurate and objective reports and safety communications. Investigator and manager training is an important component of this priority, and a key indicator will be our ability to start up to 60 investigations and maintain an equivalent level of report completion.
The Branch will also develop and sustain professional relationships with other organizations within and outside the TSB. This will include development of investigation policies, standards and procedures, and establishing and exploiting informal and formal partnerships with industry, regulators and other investigative agencies.
The Branch will continue to implement effective management of the investigation process, particularly through Operations Managers' focus on managing and communicating workflows, communicating decisions on the scope and objective of investigations, identifying safety deficiencies, and managing the content and preparation of reports.
The Branch will consolidate Board marine recommendations, safety concerns, and national and international information in order to determine residual risks and identify safety issues that will influence future investigative decisions and priorities.
The focus of Rail/Pipeline Branch activities will continue to be on the quality and timeliness of investigation reports. Investigations will be completed as soon as possible with no investigation taking more than two years to complete. At the same time, the Branch will be working with Public Affairs to optimize communication of the safety lessons learned in each investigation.
The Branch aims to improve the timeliness and quality of its products, including reducing the mean completion time of Engineering projects by 20% from the previous year, cross-training of personnel, and optimizing the use of alliances and partnerships.
The Branch will also support the identification and communication of safety deficiencies in the marine, pipeline, rail and air transportation systems by producing professional Engineering reports that are conducive to the identification of safety deficiencies, and by improving the frequency and quality of internal communications with investigators and managers.
The Division will produce all TSB public documents in a timely and efficient manner and will continuously review and track performance. The team will strive to reduce the current backlog of about 60 investigation reports to a backlog of no more than 20 reports by the end of the fiscal year, while publishing approximately 100 final investigation reports.
In addition to ongoing data analysis and reporting, the Division will help to ensure the implementation of the reinvigorated "safety issues investigation" activity by developing and delivering a related training program on appropriate methodologies.
The Division also manages the TSB Research Committee, and will complete up to four new research projects over the year.
In addition to identification of human factor safety deficiencies in transportation occurrences, the Division will focus on the implementation of the recurrent training plan developed in fiscal year 2004-2005. The training program will provide guidance as to what information needs to be collected in the early stages of an investigation to validate human performance factors, and will develop further skills in the conduct of interviews relating to human performance issues. The training plan will include greater opportunities for working one on one with investigators through workshops, regional visits and other activities.
The Corporate Services Branch priorities for 2005-2006 will be largely driven by the Treasury Board's government-wide agenda. The impact of TB decisions on the TSB will be evaluated, and implementation plans will be developed to ensure compliance to TB directives while maintaining the continuity of operations. We will also continue to provide input into TB reviews and studies (e.g. shared services) in an attempt to influence decision-making in such a way as to minimize the impact on the TSB operations.
Finance and Administration will review and streamline its processes and practices for the tracking and management of departmental assets (capital assets and attractive items). The implementation of the Travel Modernization project will continue with the rollout of various tools (on-line booking, electronic authority and travel claim). This year we will also implement the government's procurement reform and the new Government of Canada Marketplace (GOCM) electronic procurement tools.
For the last few years, official languages has been a federal government priority anchored in the 2003 Action Plan on Official Languages. New official languages policies concerning service to the Canadian public were also promulgated in 2004 by the PSHRMAC. This year the Human Resources Division will focus its efforts on the implementation of the new policies. Providing the best service in both official languages requires an adequate internal capacity, which begins with the proper identification of the language profile of each position.
This year, the IM Division's priorities will be to continue its training and awareness activities, with particular emphasis on how employees' responsibilities will evolve with the introduction of new IM tools as part of the TIIMS project; and to continue its work on the development of updated file classification plans focussing on TSB corporate and common services related, for example, to the IM, IT and communications functions.
The primary IT priority will be to develop and implement transition plans and activities to ensure effective informatics support for the operationalization of TIIMS and to prepare for the TSB's adoption of Government of Canada IT shared services. This will include defining changes in support roles, processes, organization, service levels and training requirements.
This year the corporate planning and reporting section will focus on the completion and implementation of our Balanced Scorecard. The Balanced Scorecard will be used to measure our organizational performance and will serve as the foundation upon which our Departmental Performance Report will be based.
Budgets for fiscal year 2005-2006 were approved by the Executive Committee on April 1, 2005. Approved allocations are shown in the following table.
RC | Salaries ($) |
Overtime ($) |
O+M/Capital ($) |
Total ($) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Executive | 1,542,253 | 15,000 | 420,416 | 1,977,669 |
Corporate Services | 3,229,630 | 35,800 | 2,023,379 | 5,288,809 |
Investigation Operations | 13,458,856 | 825,867 | 3,321,718 | 17,606,441 |
Total | 18,230,739 | 876,667 | 5,765,513 | 24,872,919 |
Business Plan Projects | 383,527 | 5,000 | 408,853 | 797,380 |
Capital Asset Replacement | - | - | 389,946 | 389,946 |
MK Airlines Investigations | - | 50,000 | 113,000 | 163,000 |
Grand Total | 18,614,266 | 931,667 | 6,677,312 | 26,223,245 |
The table below shows the allocation of resources by major organizational unit within the Investigation Operations Directorate.
Salaries ($) |
Overtime ($) |
O + M / Capital ($) |
Total ($) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Engineering | 1,968,381 | 29,600 | 673,253 | 2,671,234 |
Air | 5,195,252 | 310,695 | 1,203,793 | 6,709,740 |
Marine | 1,892,077 | 227,750 | 334,939 | 2,454,766 |
Rail/Pipeline | 1,960,251 | 241,022 | 236,000 | 2,437,273 |
Other RCs | 2,442,895 | 16,800 | 873,733 | 3,333,428 |
Total Investigation Operations | 13,458,856 | 825,867 | 3,321,718 | 17,606,441 |
Funding from the 2005-2006 base budget has been specifically set aside for the various Business Plan projects. Approved allocations for Business Plan priorities and key initiatives are shown in the following table.
Priorities | Key Initiatives | Resources Allocated ($) |
---|---|---|
1. Continuous Improvement of Products and Services | 1.1 Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) | 50,000 |
Subtotal | 50,000 | |
2. Sustainable Human Resources | 2.1 Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) | 60,000 |
2.2 Human Resources Modernization | 130,000 | |
Subtotal | 190,000 | |
3. Organizational Continuous Improvement Process | 3.1 Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) | 407,380 |
3.2 Official Languages | 20,000 | |
Subtotal | 427,380 | |
4. Awareness of the TSB and its Activities | 4.1 Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) | 30,000 |
4.2 Corporate Video | 15,000 | |
4.3 Inter-Agency Marine Action Group (MAG) | 5,000 | |
4.4 Official Languages | 20,000 | |
Subtotal | 70,000 | |
5. Developing Partnerships | 5.1 Transportation Investigation Information Management System (TIIMS) | 35,000 |
5.2 Alliances, Partnerships and Linkages | 20,000 | |
5.3 Inter-Agency Marine Action Group (MAG) | 5,000 | |
Subtotal | 60,000 | |
Total | 797,380 |
For a plan to be useful it must be measurable. This is important so that feedback can be provided to decision-makers, and any necessary follow-up action can be taken to update or better manage activities. The ability to measure and communicate results focusses managers and employees on the critical drivers and enables us to align our indicators and action plans throughout the entire organization.
The TSB employs the Balanced Scorecard methodology to measure organizational performance and track progress in achieving our strategic outcome. This Scorecard will provide information from four different perspectives: financial; client/stakeholder; internal business processes; and learning and growth.
The financial perspective makes linkages between operational and financial results. Financial analysis will be used to evaluate the cost of investigations. Financial results will be benchmarked between modes and with other safety investigation organizations.
The client/stakeholder perspective will measure TSB performance through stakeholder feedback and stakeholder action. First, stakeholder awareness and satisfaction will be measured through formal and informal processes. Then, stakeholder action based on the TSB's work will be measured by tracking responses to TSB recommendations and safety actions taken. Finally, the TSB will continue to measure transportation occurrence rates as an ultimate measure of achievement of its strategic outcome.
Through the internal business processes perspective, the TSB will measure its results with the use of productivity ratio analysis and benchmarking of results internally, as well as with other safety investigation organizations.
Under the learning and growth perspective, the TSB will measure employee satisfaction, investments in employee training and employee attrition rates. The TSB will also assess its progress on the implementation of the Human Resources modernization agenda. Finally, the TSB will assess its management capacity against the Treasury Board's Management Accountability Framework (MAF).
The figure below graphically illustrates the TSB's Balanced Scorecard. The Balanced Scorecard helps us focus on our strategic measures and their targets. The Scorecard outlines the measures that will be used to assess our results in order to demonstrate that our program is providing value for Canadians. This realistic and logical approach is characterized by measuring progress toward the results that are sought, having the flexibility to be able to adjust our activities to better meet these expectations, and reporting on the results accomplished. This directly links what our employees are doing and their immediate products.
![]() |
Figure 1. |
TSB's Balanced Scorecard |
The following table summarizes the key performance indicators included in the Scorecard with appropriate links to the current year's priorities.
Perspective | Performance Indicators | Link to Priorities |
---|---|---|
Financial | Cost of investigations | 3 |
Cost of Business Plan projects | All 5 priorities | |
Client/Stakeholder | Stakeholder awareness | 1 + 4 |
Stakeholder satisfaction (quality + timeliness) | 1 + 4 | |
Responsiveness to TSB recommendations | 1 + 4 | |
Timely safety actions taken per investigation | 1 + 4 | |
Occurrence rates | 1 | |
Safety outputs issued | 1 + 3 | |
Internal Business Processes | Number of investigations in process | 3 |
Average time in process | 3 | |
Posting of reports on web site | 3 | |
Investigations started and completed per investigator | 3 | |
Learning & Growth | Employee satisfaction | 2 |
Investment in training per person | 2 | |
Employee attrition rates | 2 | |
Effective use of partnerships | 3 + 5 | |
Human Resources modernization deliverables | 2 + 3 | |
Management Accountability Framework implementation | 3 |
In order to demonstrate how our activities and outputs are expected to lead to the achievement of our strategic outcome, we have developed a basic Results Chain. The Results Chain, shown below, provides an organizational "road map" for the TSB, helping to ensure we clearly link our resources, activities and outputs to our strategic outcome. It enables us to connect our appropriations from Parliament to the ultimate result we strive to achieve as an organization.
![]() |
Figure 2. |
The basic Results Chain |
The key elements of performance measurement are defined below to ensure a common understanding.
Activities: actions used to produce outputs and results.
Outputs: products or services provided to stakeholders.
Expected Results: accomplishments of value to Canadians.
Performance Indicators: measures of what will be tracked over time.
Performance Measures: yardsticks used to judge how well we have done (includes target, data source, frequency of measure).
By combining our approved Program Activity Architecture, the Results Chain and our Balanced Scorecard, we can build a detailed performance information table. The figure below illustrates these linkages.
![]() |
Figure 3. |
Program Activity Architecture |
The following performance information table is a work in progress. It constitutes a first attempt at structured performance measurement. Thus, as we progress we will need to evaluate whether we are measuring the right elements in the right manner, so that we can modify and adjust our indicators and measure for future cycles. For 2005-2006, this performance information table will be used as the foundation upon which performance data will be collected, consolidated and reported in the annual Departmental Performance Report. This performance information will also be used to assess progress against our Strategic Plan and to inform management decisions.
Indicator | Measures | ||
---|---|---|---|
Target* | Data Source(s) / Collection Method | Frequency / Time Frame | |
Cost of Business Plan
projects
|
Within specified budget | Financial system project reports | Quarterly |
Cost of investigations
|
Financial system project reports | Quarterly | |
Other operating costs | Financial system reports | Ongoing collection & then annual reporting | |
Stakeholder & client
awareness of TSB profile & impact
|
Conduct formal survey IT logs Work plans & activity logs of Communications & directors Communications log Communications & ATIP |
Every 5 to 10 years Quarterly Annual Annual Annual |
|
Stakeholder satisfaction
|
Conduct formal survey of stakeholders Modes collect qualitative information Modes collect qualitative information |
Every 5 to 10 years Annual Annual |
|
Timely availability of safety
information on the web (time lag between initial distribution of
finished products & when they are posted)
|
Report Production Division | Annual | |
Timely availability of other
TSB information on the web (time lag between initial distribution of
finished products & when they are posted)
|
Report Production Division | Annual | |
Timely safety actions taken
|
Modes collect qualitative information | Ongoing collection & then annual reporting | |
Responsiveness to TSB
recommendations & advisories
|
Log kept by each mode recording responses to recommendations & advisories | Annual | |
Safety outputs issued
|
Report Production &
Macro-Analysis divisions Report Production & Macro-Analysis divisions |
Quarterly Quarterly |
|
Number of investigations in process | Macro-Analysis | Quarterly | |
Average time in process | Macro-Analysis | Quarterly | |
Investigations completed per investigator | Determine ratio of the number of investigations completed to the number of investigators in each mode | Quarterly | |
Employee job satisfaction
|
Conduct employee survey Managers Human Resources |
Every 5 years Continuous with annual summation Annual |
|
Investment in training per
person
|
Financial system | Quarterly | |
Employee attrition rates
|
Human Resources Information System | Annual | |
Effective use of partnerships
|
Legal counsel & directors Modes |
Annual Annual |
|
Human Resources modernization deliverables | Complete implementation as per plan | Details are included in Project 6 in Section 4.0 | Annual |
Management Accountability Framework | As per Treasury Board template | Annual |
* For most indicators, targets have yet to be defined by management, given that baseline data are not readily available. Specific targets will be defined during the course of the year.
![]() |
![]() |
|