Citation: | Bousquet v. Barmish Inc., [1993] 1 F.C. null |
Date: | January 19, 1993 |
Docket: | A-958-91 |
![Printer-Friendly Page](/web/20071121052307im_/http://recueil.cmf.gc.ca/images/imprimante.gif)
Bousquet v. Barmish Inc.
A-958-91
Mahoney J.A.
19/1/93
4 pp.Appeal from Trial Division decision (37 C.P.R. (3d) 516) refusing to expunge respondent's trade mark "Cacharel" -- Trial Judge finding no evidence establishing significant public reputation for Jean Cacharel in Canada -- No error in law by Trial Judge in reaching conclusions of fact -- Decisions in MacDonald et al. v. Vapour Canada Ltd., [1977] 2 S.C.R. 134 and Asbjorn Horgard A/S v. Gibbs/Nortac Industries Ltd., [1987] 3 F.C. 544 (C.A.), misunderstood by Trial Judge in McCabe v. Yamamoto & Co. (America) Inc. (1989), (3d) 498 (F.C.T.D.) -- Appeal dismissed -- Trade-marks Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. T-13, ss. 7, 9, 18.