Flag of Canada
Service Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Home        
   
Services for you


  

About the Index


  

How to use the Index


  

Issues Search


  

Last Fifty Cases Posted


  

Case Search


  

Judge Search


  

Claimant Search


  

Digest


  

Jurisprudence Library

 

THE INDEX OF JURISPRUDENCE
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE DIGEST OF BENEFIT ENTITLEMENT PRINCIPLES


Case Number: Claimant: Judge: Language: Decision date:
Decision 43373 Secord J. Bayne  Teitelbaum  English 1/26/99 
Decision Appealed: Appellant: Corresponding Case:
Dismissed  No Claimant   

Issue:Sub-Issue1Sub-Issue2Sub-Issue3
week of unemployment farming self-employed 

Summary:

Claimant admits to owning the farm, on a 50% basis with his son and it is the claimant's 50% partner who decides on how the farm is operated and the claimant benefited from this operation. He states that one cannot be self-employed if one has no knowledge or control. Umpire concluded that one can be self-employed and not have control or knowledge of the business. The claimant being self-employed allowed his son to control the operation of the business. The income received by the claimant from the farm operation is income pursuant to the Act.

Issue:Sub-Issue1Sub-Issue2Sub-Issue3
earnings farming definition 

Summary:

Claimant admits to owning the farm, on a 50% basis with his son and it is the claimant's 50% partner who decides on how the farm is operated and the claimant benefited from this operation. He states that one cannot be self-employed if one has no knowledge or control. Umpire concluded that one can be self-employed and not have control or knowledge of the business. The claimant being self-employed allowed his son to control the operation of the business. The income received by the claimant from the farm operation is income pursuant to the Act.

     
   
Last modified :  2005-11-24 top Important Notices