The legacy of Sputnik
Comments (5)
Friday, September 28, 2007 | 02:30 PM ETBy quirks
By Bob McDonald, host of the science radio program Quirks & Quarks.
The entire Space Age has happened within my lifetime, which could be interpreted as, either I’m really old, or the Space Age is remarkably young. I prefer the latter.
I remember, as a six-year-old, seeing the bold headline on the front page of the newspaper, “Russians Send Artificial Satellite Into Outer Space”, or something like that. Beneath it was a large diagram, showing the Earth surrounded by a big circular arrow with a round metallic sphere at the point of the arrow. I was old enough to appreciate that something important had happened, not fully understanding what impact Sputnik would have on the world.
Actually, few people at the time had any idea how much the dawn of the Space Age would change our way of thinking, and more importantly, how differently we would see ourselves from the high perspective of space. No one could imagine that humans would step on the Moon less than 12 years later; and as I watched the space race develop, I wondered if I would be the first to step on Mars.
It’s amazing how far we’ve come in space in the last 50 years, and it’s amazing how far we haven’t.
Today, standing on Mars is still science fiction. The dreams and promises of going to the Moon and beyond have not happened because the original incentive for going there has evaporated. Sputnik was not about science or space exploration - it was about weapons of mass destruction, an arms race that was taken into space.
Sputnik itself was just a simple radio transmitter inside a shiny ball, half a metre across. Its sole purpose was to make itself known to the world, which it did very successfully. But the rocket that boosted it into orbit was the real story. The R-7 Vostok Intercontinental Ballistic Missile was bigger, more powerful, and faster than anything the United States had at the time. To lift an object above the Earth’s atmosphere and park it in orbit is the ultimate military high ground. From there, you can drop a nuclear weapon anywhere on the planet. No one is out of your sight. Of course, in weaponry, size matters. So Sputnik 2, launched less than a month later, weighed half a metric tonne and carried a dog. Not only could the Soviets put a weapon in orbit, they could put a big one up there.
The reaction to that threat, with a one-upmanship race to the Moon, spurred the most astonishing technical achievement in the history of humanity.
Fortunately, it also spun off a manned space program. Considering the unknowns - the risks of flying new technology into very hostile environments - it’s amazing we got away with it. But once that small step was taken on the lunar surface, the race was over and the open chequebooks, which the rocket scientists had become used to, were closed. Since then, the space program has struggled to keep the momentum going without that cold war mentality driving it.
As a child of the Space Age, it has been an incredible journey, watching humanity leave the planet. As a kid, I learned the language of space … orbital rendezvous, trans lunar injection, atmospheric re-entry. I stayed up and watched the live transmissions from the Moon, all of them, not just the first one.
Then later, as a journalist, I’ve had the privilege of meeting some of the people who’ve been there: Buzz Aldrin, who was on the first Moon landing; Harrison Schmidt, the only scientist to work there; Gene Cernan, the last man on the Moon. But one of the more interesting astronauts was Bill Anders, who flew on Apollo 8. It didn’t land but it was the first mission to leave planet Earth altogether and circle the Moon. Bill told me about taking the now famous Earthrise picture when they first emerged from the far side of the Moon. That iconic image of the blue marble, floating in the blackness above an alien horizon, struck a deep chord - not only with the astronauts, who hadn’t even planned to take that shot, but with all of us on Earth who got the first self-portrait from a distant world.
It’s no co-incidence that the entire environmental movement started after that picture was taken in 1968. We saw our planet as a single living organism, floating in a very large dark space. We are one.
Since the six Moon landings, the human space program returned to Earth and stayed there, developing even more expensive ways to go around and around the planet a few hundred kilometres up. Fortunately for science, there has been a parallel space program that has followed the footsteps of Sputnik, the fleet of robots that have explored the rest of the solar system.
While a lot of attention was focused on the Russian’s ability to put dogs and humans into space, they were also the first to send robots to Mars and Venus. The Americans followed suit with an unmanned program, but the big difference was how the scientists from both countries co-operated, rather than competed with each other, to explore the planets. It’s a tradition of openness that continues today, producing a tremendous wealth of new knowledge about the worlds around us. Now we see the Earth in its full environmental context of the solar system.
Today, there’s talk of sending people back to the Moon, maybe to Mars - but at what cost?
Each flight of the space shuttle is now about a billion dollars, which is a lot to go only 400 km up. The next 50 years will likely see a move away from expensive, government-funded space flight and over to the private sector. There’s even a new competition to spur the industry. The X-Prize Foundation, which put up $10 million for the first privately built passenger spaceship, is now offering $30 million for the first private robot mission to the Moon.
Entrepreneurs and industrialists will find cheaper ways to reach space, while space tourists pay for it. The science and true exploration will come from robots, which will continue to go where no human can go.
So, while the reasons for going into space have changed since Sputnik, my childhood dream of going there myself may actually come true. Except I won’t be going to explore the great unknown or prove how powerful my country is. I’ll be going there just for the fun of it.
- Bob McDonald
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Quirks & Quarks »
About the program
Quirks & Quarks is heard on Saturdays on CBC Radio One from 12:06–1pm in Canada, on shortwave and also by satellite. The show is hosted by Bob McDonald.
Recent Posts
- Biofuel Bind
- quirks
- Wednesday, October 3, 2007
- The legacy of Sputnik
- quirks
- Friday, September 28, 2007
- It happened in Peru; it will happen again
- quirks
- Friday, September 21, 2007
- Mars or bust?
- quirks
- Thursday, September 20, 2007
- 30 Years and a Day
- quirks
- Thursday, September 6, 2007
- Subscribe to this blog
Recent Comments
- I remember Sptunik and at the same time, in Atlantic Can...
- The legacy of Sputnik
- A golden celebration - 1 generation reminisces while anot...
- The legacy of Sputnik
- Bob is always spot on with his style of writing. Ea...
- The legacy of Sputnik
- Great article, but you didn't mention the date Sputnik wa...
- The legacy of Sputnik
- Bob's recollection of watching the US lunar missions unfo...
- The legacy of Sputnik
Archives
- October 2007
- (1 postings)
- September 2007
- (4 postings)
- June 2007
- (3 postings)
- May 2007
- (4 postings)
- April 2007
- (1 postings)
- March 2007
- (5 postings)
- February 2007
- (2 postings)
- January 2007
- (2 postings)
- December 2006
- (3 postings)
- November 2006
- (9 postings)
- October 2006
- (8 postings)
- September 2006
- (15 postings)
- August 2006
- (3 postings)
Comments (5)
Victor Radujko
Ottawa
Bob's recollection of watching the US lunar missions unfold brought back fond memories of rising early (I lived in Edmonton at the time) to watch the thunderous launches, the suspenseful landings and the enthralling lunar excursions brought to us by the Apollo program.
I agree that government-led, NASA-style approaches to the human exploration of space hasn't worked that well since the lunar program ended. The prospect of human space exploration carried out with the help of the enlightened investors of the X Prize variety does look promising, but we'll have to wait a few more years before it will be clear that that promise will be fulfilled.
One thing I wonder about is why such a big deal is made of investing tens of billions of dollars in human space development when governments in Washington, Moscow, Beijing and, yes, Ottawa, spend huge sums every year on military equipment and personnel, and tens of billions more on open-ended foreign interventions in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. Estimates I've seen of the Iraq War suggest a total price tag for the United States of more than one trillion dollars...
Then again, what do I know? After all, I guess I'm still a ten-year-old dreamer at heart.
Thanks for your thought-provoking writing, Bob.
Posted October 1, 2007 06:39 PM
Graham Strong
Great article, but you didn't mention the date Sputnik was launched - October 4, 1957. I'm not quite old enough to be able to claim being alive for the whole space race, but as you implied yourself, that's not always a bad thing...
I too am disappointed about is that things haven't moved too far forward since the invention of the space shuttle almost 30 years ago. Sure, we have the ISS under construction (not exactly awe-inspiring compared to moon bases and trips to Mars) and the sometimes-working Hubble to show us more of the universe. But the romance and excitement of "Space, the Final Frontier" seems to be in a permanent stall. Even the Viking wannabes fell short of the original Mars missions -- how is it that we did it better in the '70s? "Travelling to space" one of the few technologies that is actually moving backwards.
Perhaps space tourism will pick up, perhaps "space mining" and other related activities will come to pass. But it was those first 20 years that in my mind was the real Space Age.
~Graham
Posted October 1, 2007 08:22 PM
tim
Totonto
Bob is always spot on with his style of writing.
Easy to understand and always witty and warm.
Thanks Bob
Posted October 4, 2007 10:57 AM
Tahir Merali
A golden celebration - 1 generation reminisces while another generation reaffirms a commitment. As a more pluralistic society we are able to understand the incredible benefits that have and will continue to arise from humankind’s space program. May it be the next generation of tele-robotic medicine or the undiscovered resources on our closest celestial neighbours; we are evolving into a space-faring race inevitably due to our inherent curiosity. Granted financial cost estimates are incredible at this moment – but similar to the first airliners and cruise ships, over time contests and races spurned industries which subsequently brought the affordable services to the masses. The importance of science and technology cannot be denied nor can its historic development be forgotten. Thank you for continuing to inspire those who pursue dreams larger than life and be sure to celebrate with the World our unified commitment to the exploration of space.
Posted October 4, 2007 01:18 PM
Oneil Ouellet
I remember Sptunik and at the same time, in Atlantic Canada, CN introduces the self propelled passanger cars(BuddCar)which was nickname the Sputnik as well as the Newfoundland passanger train the Bullet which was renamed the Sputnik.
Posted October 5, 2007 03:24 PM