Prehistory of Great Bear Lake
Donald W. Clarke
Canadian Museum of Civilization
Illustrated by David Laverie
Great Bear Lake, the largest lake in North America outside of the Great
Lakes (click here to see a map locating Great Bear
Lake), is situated in an area inhabited by a few hundred Athapaskan (Dene)
people. This unique place is at the northern edge of the immense boreal
forest where the subarctic and arctic regions meet. Since the early 1950s
archaeologists from the National Museum of Man have been going to the lake
and surrounding country to look for the remains of ancient campsites of
early hunters who passed that way at the end of the last Ice Age and to
discover evidence for more recent occupations.
Formation of Great Bear Lake
By the end of the Ice Age, about 11,000 years ago, the climate was only
a little colder than it is today. Streams of meltwater slipped across the
dirt-strewn ice cap, plunged into crevasses and gushed forth at the edge
of the cracking ice to form Great Bear Lake. With the opening of the Great
Bear River outlet through the wastage of the ice cap, the water level drastically
fell and over the decades ring after ring of unvegetated rocky beach ridges
formed on the western shore of the lake.
Early Migrations
During the Ice Age, most of Canada was beneath a huge ice mass. However,
the land in what is now interior Alaska and adjacent parts of Siberia and
the Yukon Territory was not glaciated. This area is called Beringia. Although
the climate was harsh, game animals roamed freely across the land bridge
which then connected Asia and North America. Hunters travelling eastward
from Asia in pursuit of their prey had arrived in North America at least
11,500 years ago, possibly earlier. As lands opened in the northwestern
subarctic area with the melting of the glaciers, people moved there from
Beringia. Similarly, as new lands in the south of Canada opened up they
were inhabited by ancestral Indians from the mid-continent region who had
already migrated southward to North America by a westerly route. Although
both these groups originated in Asia; they had, through separation, developed
different languages and lifeways. II is believed that they met, intermarried
and probably fought too, in the Mackenzie River drainage region about 11,000
years ago when the ice disappeared. Although traces of their campsites
have not yet been found, their descendants could have been the first persons
to reach Great Bear Lake.
Ancien Lifeways
The possibilities for living off the land in the Great Bear Lake region
probably did not vary much from earliest times until the arrival of the
fur traders. The people of the area hunted mainly caribou. Caribou not
only provided food, but also skins for shelter coverings, boats, clothing
and bags; warm hides for winter clothing and bed rolls; and even sinew
for thread. There were also fish, small game like hare, and beaver. Blueberries
and low bush cranberries were stored and eaten. Later, perhaps only recently,
moose spread into the area and became an important resource.
Wood was important for construction of shelters, for tepee poles, possibly
for fish traps, for caribou fences, and for canoes, and for fuel. Soon
after the Ice Age, the forests spread down the Mackenzie Valley making
the task of gathering wood an easier one.
5000 B.C. to 4000 B.C.
The First-Known Inhabitants
Tools of the first-known people at Great Bear Lake, referred to as Acasta
people, were found in the eastern and northern parts of the lake, and east
of the lake at Acasta Lake Implements include widely known types of stone
tools such as knives, distinctive lobate-stemmed spear points and a peculiar
form of scraper called a burinated flake (click here
to see examples). The flake was shaped by craftsmen who cleaved off the
whole tool edge in a single blow. It is not known what happened to the
Acasta people.
4000 B.C. to 1400 B.C.
A Poorly Understood Period
Archaeological evidence of the next 3,000 years of prehistory at Great
Bear Lake is fragmentary, and it is impossible to piece together a complete
picture. However, many people spent busy seasons at the outlet of the lake,
judging from the large numbers of manufacturing tools and knives recovered
from ancient encampments. Here, where people could fish, hunt and meet
travellers coming in from around the lake, stone implements, 3,500 to 5,000
years old, have been found (the Franklin Tanks and Great Bear River sites).
These implements consist of spear points, knives, choppers and scrapers,
and especially end-scrapers, which were intended to be mounted at the end
of handles. Also discovered was a quantity of fused rock prized for making
flaked tools. This material, unique to the Keel River area, must have been
brought by travellers from the west. Perhaps they were planning to trade
some of it to people from the east.
During this period, some of the people who lived around the lake made
an interesting type of tool. It was a tiny, narrow, sharp, perfectly straight
flake, like an injector razor blade in appearance (click
here to see examples). Archaeologists refer to these tools and the
ancient Indian groups who ma dethem as Northwest Microblade tradition.
“Tradition” means a way of doing things or a style lasting a long time,
presumably handed down among related peoples. Microblades were hafted to
form various tools. The special techniques for making them spread from
Asia to Alaska about 11,000 years ago. Microblades had reached the Mackenzie
Valley by about 4,000 years ago and soon after they spread to Great Bear
Lake. Perhaps they were brought in by new people from the west. However,
they are found no farther eastward among the interior Indians. The migration
stopped or these tools simply went out of style before people living farther
east became interested in them.
1400 B.C. to 800 B.C.
Ancestral Eskimos Move Inlands
Different faces appeared and words of another language were heard across
the entire barren grounds about 1400 B.C. The Palaeo-Eskimos had moved
southward. These people were related to others in Alaska believed to be
the ancestors of the Eskimos. Their highly distinctive, carefully flaked,
small stone tools have earned them the designation Arctic Small Tool tradition,
in Canada also known as the Pre-Dorset culture (click
here to see examples). The Pre-Dorset people may have been forced out
of the arctic islands by a change in climate, but this is not certain.
Indian inhabitants of the barren grounds and northern edge of the forest
withdrew to the south at the same time, or were expelled by the newcomers.
In the west the Palaeo-Eskimos moved south to Great Bear Lake. About
their activities in this region there are still many unanswered questions.
Did they come to the lake only for late summer caribou hunting, or did
they live here all year? Did they encounter Indians, share the land and
trade with them? At their camp sites around Great Bear Lake, the very few
stone tools they left were scattered close to the fire-cracked rocks of
a hearth or roasting pit, suggesting that they did not stay long before
moving to another camp.
700 B.C. to A.D. 1800
Taltheilei People
The Arctic Small Tool people disappeared from Great Bear Lake about
800 B.C. For the next 600 years, the archaeological evidence in the region
is difficult to interpret. But by about 100 B.C. people of the Taltheilei
culture (found elsewhere as early as 700 B.C.) were firmly established
on the eastern shores of the lake. These people were part of a single long-lasting
culture who occupied the central Mackenzie District and the interior of
the District of Keewatin from about 700 B.C. to the establishment of the
first trading posts. They were named after a place on Great Slave Lake,
where important remains of their culture have been found.
The Taltheilei craftsmen of Great Bear Lake made distinctive styles
of spear and arrow points, some of which changed through the passage of
time-scrapers, large and small knives, large adze bits that served in place
of axes (click here to see an example), whetstones,
stone drills, and small native copper knives and awls. Most bone implements
and items of wood, antler, hide and fur have not survived in the soil.
Historic Period
When traders reached Great Bear Lake, about A.D. 1800, bands from several
tribes were living around the lake and in its hinterlands. These people,
including some of the Dogrib, Yellowknife, Hare, Slavey, and possibly the
Mountain Indians, all spoke dialects of the same Athapaskan language and
were related, as they are today. The Taltheilei people were ancestors of
the Yellowknives and perhaps the Dogribs..
Archaeological evidence from this period tells us that the shift from
native technology to imported goods was gradual. The people used wooden
shelters, brush lean-tos, tepees, or conical tents, and ancient hunting
aids, such as caribou fences, until the beginning of the present century
(click here to see the remains of a caribou fence).
Traders wrote that in the early 1800s those Indians who had not trapped
enough furs to buy pots continued to cook by dropping heated stones into
waterproof baskets containing meat and water-a method called stone boiling.
A few early trade goods such as glass beads have been found, but musket
balls and gun flints are totally lacking from archaeological collections.
Late in the last century families from the various tribes-especially
Dogrib, Slavey, and Hare-whose territories touched the shores of Great
Bear Lake came together in a single community. Today these people are referred
to as Bear Lake Indians, or Satudene.
As this brief account has revealed, the story of the peoples of Great
Bear Lake is still emerging. National Museum of Man archaeologists will
continue to search for clues to provide us with a clearer picture of this
remote but interesting region.
Cultural Chronology at Great Bear Lake
Suggested Reading
Clark, Donald, W. Archaeological Reconnaissance in
Northern Interior District of Mackenzie, 1969, 1970 and 1972. National
Museum of Man Mercury Series, Archaeological Survey of Canada, Paper no.27.
Ottawa: 1975.
Clark, Donald, W. "Archaeological Survey of Great Bear
Lake, 1976." In Problems in Prehisotory of the North American Subarctic:
The Athapaskan Question, edited by J.W. Helmer, S. Van Dyke and E J.
Kense, 55-64. Calgary: The Archaeological Association of the University
of Calgary.
Clark, Donald, W. "The Vanishing Edge of Today in the
Northern District of Mackenzie: A View from Field Archaeology." Canadian
Journal of Anthropology 2, no.2 (1982): 107-128.
Harp, Elmer, Jr. "Prehistory in the Dismal Lake Area,
N.W.T., Canada."
Arctic 11, no.4 (1958): 219-249.
MacNeish, Richard S. Two Archaeological Sites on Great
Bear Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada. National Museum of Canada
Bulletin 136, p.54-84. Ottawa: 1955.
Noble, William C. "Prehistory of the Great Slave Lake
and Great Bear Lake Region." In Handbook of North American Indians,
Vol.6: Subarctic, edited by June Helm (volume) and W.C. Sturtevant
(general), 97-106. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1981.
Morris, Margaret W. "Great Bear Lake Indians: A Historical
Demography and Human Ecology. Part 1: The Situation Prior to European Contact."
The Musk-Ox 11(1972): 3-27.
Morris, Margaret W. "Great Bear Lake Indians: A Historical
Demography and Human Ecology. Part 2: European Influences." The Musk-Ox
12 (1973): 58-80.
Back to the Oracles Index
Back to the A&H; homepage
|