Flag of Canada
Government of Canada - Gouvernement du Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Commissioners Board of Referees HRSDC Site
Jurisprudence Library Office of the Umpire Home
    Home > Board of Referees > Tribunal Proceedings > Administrative Justice and Tribunal Progeedings
     

  Introduction to
  Administrative
  Justice


  Foreword -
  Tribunal
  Proceedings


  Table of
  Contents


  Chapter 1
  Administrative
  Justice and
  Tribunal
  Proceedings


  Chapter 2
  The Hearing


  Chapter 3
  Evidence


  Chapter 4
  Interpreting
   the Act
  and the
  Regulations


  Chapter 5
  Deliberations
  and Decision


  Conclusion

  Appendix

  Index

  End notes

  Synoptic
  Tables


  Canadian
  Human Rights
  Tribunal


  Tribunal Proceeding

CHAPTER 1

ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE AND TRIBUNAL PROCEEDINGS

 

1.2 Characteristics of Tribunal Proceedings in Employment Insurance Cases

1.2.3 Social and Economic Objective of the Act

The Board of Referees is an administrative tribunal involved in the application of important legislation of a socio-economic nature. It acts to decide disputes between the Commission, which is a government agency, and claimants under the employment insurance scheme or employers. The Employment Insurance Act is not an insurance statute like others; it provides protection against a social risk that is not like the events or accidents normally covered by various insurance policies; furthermore it contemplates social benefits that go beyond the strict limits of unemployment. A long line of authority has confirmed the purpose of this legislation.279

The philosophy that seems to provide a basis for the members of this administrative tribunal may result implicitly from s. A. 49, which provides that the Commission shall give claimants the benefit of the doubt in determining whether there are circumstances or conditions that have the effect of making the claimant ineligible for benefit if the evidence adduced on both sides is equivalent.280 The Court of Appeal has stated that between two acceptable interpretations, that which is more favourable to the claimant must be accepted.281 In many situations, such as dismissal for misconduct, benefit of the doubt is given to the claimant.282

 

[  previous  |  table of contents  |  next  ]

     
    Printer version
   
Last modified :  2007-06-13 top Important Notices