Flag of Canada
Government of Canada - Gouvernement du Canada Government of Canada
 
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Commissioners Board of Referees HRSDC Site
Jurisprudence Library Office of the Umpire Home
    Home > Board of Referees > Quick Reference Tool > Subject Index > Antedate
     

   Quick
    Reference
    Tool

    Table of
       contents




   Policies
    Financial and
       Administrative
       Services

    Policy and
       Administration
    Recording
       Policy

    Training



   Employment
    Insurance -
    Acts and
    Regulations




   Handbook
    Table of
       contents




   Appeals to the
    Board of
    Referees





   Working Tools



   Tribunal
    Proceedings




   Judicial
    Interpretations




   Communica-
    tions




   Chairperson
    Vacancies

    Governor
       in Council
       Appointments


  Quick Reference Tool

Antedate



Questions to Answer
Initial Claim
  • Does claimant qualify on the earlier day?
  • Does claimant have good cause for delay throughout the entire period?
Other Than Initial Claim (See also "Claim Procedure")
  • Did claimant make a claim for benefit within the time prescribed? (by Regulation section 26)
  • Did claimant have good cause for delay throughout the entire period?
References
Act: subsections 10(1), 10(4), 10(5)
Regulations: section 26
Cross Reference: "Claim Procedure"
Legal test
"good cause for delay" - whether the claimant did what a reasonable person in his situation would have done to satisfy himself as to his rights and obligations
ALBRECHT A-172-85
Onus of proof
Claimant must prove they qualify on the earlier date and must show good cause for delay throughout the entire period
Key Case Law
MALITSKY A-205-96:  Qualifying on earlier date and delay. Alleged misinformation.

EHMAN A-360-95:  Delay. Consciously delayed filing at lawyer's request pending resolution of child support issue

LAJEUNESSE A-38-95:  Delay. Hoping to reduce overpayment by not claiming benefits earlier. Made enquiries as to his indebtedness

CARRY A-242-05, BEAUDIN A-341-04,LABRECQUE A-690-94, LAROUCHE A-644-93, CARON A-395-85: Ignorance of the law & good faith vs reasonable effort made to determine requirements. CARON also refers to "exceptional circumstances"

PARK A-706-94:  Delay. Mistaken belief that she did not have enough insured weeks to qualify.

SGRO A-268-94:  Delay. Delayed renewal claim after drawing maternity-parental. Assumed she needed record of employment.

FINGARD A-509-94: Delay. 3 years - waiting for record of employment and wrongful dismissal claim.

ROY A-216-93:  Delay. 6 months. Examination of all the circumstances. "Exceptional circumstances" and illness considered.

LAROUCHE A-644-93:  11 month delay until course completed.

SMITH A-549-92: Conscious delay of 6 months while seeking work.

GAUTHIER A-1789-83:  Conscious delay.

TITERLE CUB 34339:  The delay in applying for special benefits can be more forgivable than regular benefits as the Commission suffers no prejudice.

READ A-371-93:  6-week delay. Antedate requirements considered.

SHEBIB A-24-01: 11 month delay as in receipt of severance monies and legal advice that he would not be entitled during the allocation period.


     
    Printer version
   
Last modified :  2007-06-13 top Important Notices