The Health Canada Policy Toolkit for Public Involvement in Decision
Making
Level 3 Technique:
Nominal Group Process
What Is It?
A nominal group process is a structured group interaction technique
designed to generate a prioritized list of high-quality ideas within
two hours or less. Contact between participants is restricted to
specific steps in the process, so that individuals have sufficient
opportunity to come up with their own ideas. The process makes
it possible to assess individual participants' knowledge of an
issue, monitor the similarity of ideas coming from different participants
and encourage innovation.
How It Works
A nominal group generally involves eight to 12 participants and
a facilitator, who must be very familiar and comfortable with the
technique in order for it to work. Participants receive advance
background information on the discussion topic or theme. The facilitator
opens the session with an open-ended problem statement, along the
lines of "The most important concern in (topic area) is..." or "The
best way to increase public trust in HPB is..." The problem statement
must not include any specific details that would direct or limit
participants' responses.
From this starting point, the group goes through the following
steps:
- Silent idea generation, in which participants write
down their ideas on cards
- Round-robin sharing of ideas, in which each participant explains
one idea at a time and the facilitator notes each idea on a flipchart
- Discussion and clarification, to allow participants
to contrast, clarify and justify the ideas on the flipchart without
passing judgement on any of the ideas
- Prioritizing the ideas, usually through a point-rating
system
- Reassessing the ideas, based on group discussion of
why the ideas were graded as they were, after which the group
selects its top five priorities using a similar point-rating
system
- Measuring of revised judgements, in which points are
tallied and the final, prioritized list is recorded. This mechanism
provides closure for the entire process.
A wide variety of participants can be invited to take part in
a nominal group process, although the small numbers involved usually
mean restricting groups to local participants. All ideas belong
to the individuals who put them forward and are given equal opportunity
to be critiqued. While the process is designed primarily for information
sharing, it can also be used to gather background data in support
of an action plan or strategy.
When Is It Most Useful?
The nominal group process is used to:
- set goals
- identify obstacles
- gauge opinions on specific issues
- assemble a variety of creative responses to a particular question
- find solutions and recommendations in response to specific
issues.
Logistics and Limits
This technique can be used to address only one theme or issue
at a time and participants must receive sufficient background information
in advance. No more than eight to 12 participants can be included
in a single group.
Cost Implications
Direct costs for the nominal group process include standard supplies,
such as paper, pencils, pens, photocopies, postage and faxes. (Some
advance costs may be reduced or eliminated if participants have
convenient access to email.) Other cost factors could include travel
for out-of-town participants and fees for facilitation and recording.
It may be possible to absorb some costs by working with in-house
personnel.
Expectation for Feedback or Follow-Up
Participants may ask for a final report on the process and for
information on the sponsoring organization's response to their
findings. The process may inspire some participants to take a longer-term
interest in the issue.
Timelines
A nominal group can be assembled within two or four weeks, unless
extensive advance research is required to identify participants.
Charges for space rental and distribution of background information
may be lower if a planning period is available.
Potential Pitfalls
The short time frame for a nominal group process may leave some
participants dissatisfied with the amount of time they received
to air their views. It may be impossible to fully clarify issues
or problems, and the results of the process may suffer as a result.
|