![SARS](/web/20071212051017im_/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sars-sras/gfx/sars1.gif)
![General Information](/web/20071212051017im_/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sars-sras/gfx/sars2.gif)
![For Health Professionals](/web/20071212051017im_/http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/sars-sras/gfx/sars3.gif)
|
|
SARS Epidemiologic Summaries:
April 26, 2003
SARS Among Ontario Health Care Workers
Transmission of SARS in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) is believed to have
begun with a travel-related index case in February 2003. Her family contacts,
after becoming ill with symptoms compatible with SARS, were treated at a hospital
within the GTA and subsequently transmitted the illness to hospital workers
and other patients at that hospital. More than 100 hospital workers at three
GTA hospitals have since become ill. Initial descriptive epidemiology suggests
that transmission occurred in association with the care of patients who were
not diagnosed with SARS and were not in isolation precautions, as well as
ill family members visiting in hospital.
Disease control strategies included implementation of strict infection control
precautions in institutional settings, isolation of cases and symptomatic
contacts, as well as quarantining asymptomatic close contacts. Initially,
SARS cases were isolated in hospital in negative pressure rooms. However,
by early April there was a critical shortage of standard airborne isolation
beds within the GTA. In response, SARS negative pressure units were created
within some GTA hospitals to increase capacity to care for SARS patients in
controlled circumstances.
Since implementation of these control strategies, transmission of SARS to
hospital workers has decreased substantially. However, transmission has continued
to occur in both high and low risk hospital settings within the GTA despite
these measures. High risk procedures have been identified which include intubation,
suction, nebulized aerosol therapy, and positive pressure non-invasive ventilation.
Transmission of SARS to hospital staff during difficult intubations of SARS
patients has occurred in 3 different hospitals. In two, undiagnosed patients
were identified as the source of transmission for 7 hospital staff. Although
infection control precautions were in place, compliance may not have been
complete. In the third, a SARS patient was identified as the source of infection
for 7 hospital staff; an additional 6 remain under investigation. Although
staff were reportedly compliant with infection control precautions, one break
in technique in one caregiver was identified (a face shield was accidentally
dislodged). Transmission of SARS to 10-11 hospital staff has also been identified
in lower risk settings. Affected staff include physicians, nurses, and service
assistants (eg porter/housekeeper) working in 4 different low-risk SARS units
and one community hospital. Initial investigation suggests that transmission
has occurred while staff were wearing required personal protective equipment
and following all recommended infection control precautions.
In response to the continued transmission of SARS to hospital workers, Health
Canada is leading an urgent investigation in collaboration with the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Province of Ontario, and Toronto
Public Health. The investigation will include descriptive epidemiology, case
control studies, air ventilation studies, as well as surface contamination
studies. In addition, an infection control directive specifically for SARS
Units is being developed.
|