|
Great Lakes activities
Other activities
Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
In summer 2005, the governments of Canada and the United States asked the International Joint Commission (IJC) to seek the public's views on how well the GLWQA has worked so far and how effective it has been. The IJC held public meetings in 14 Great Lakes and St. Lawrence cities in the fall and wrapped up its consultations with an innovative Web Dialogue. It also received comments from more than 4000 individuals and organizations by hand, mail, fax, phone, e-mail and online. The IJC has released a report synthesizing the views it heard. See www.ijc.org/glconsultations.
The IJC also provided a Special Report in August 2006 with its advice to the Governments of the United States and Canada on their review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. In preparing the Special Report, the IJC benefitted from the views expressed by experts, stakeholders and members of the public at large during its consultation process in 2005. In large measure, however, the Special Report is based on research, analysis and advice by its standing Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement advisory boards.
Activities under Annex 2 of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
Nearly a decade after the revised 1978 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was signed by Canada and the United States, the two nations agreed that the worst areas would be given priority attention. Subsequently, 43 such areas were designated as Areas of Concern because they contained contaminated sediment, inadequately treated wastewater, nonpoint source pollution, inland contaminated sites or degraded habitat to a greater degree than the rest of the Great Lakes. Twenty-six of these are solely in the United States, 10 are solely in Canada, and five are binational waterways.
Review of the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River Orders of Approval
It has been 50 years since a comprehensive assessment was performed of water levels and flows regulation in the Lake Ontario-St. Lawrence River system. On May 31, 2006, the IJC received the final report from the Board it set up in 2000 to study it. Now the Commission, which is considering making changes to its Orders of Approval for the project at Cornwall (Ontario) and Massena (New York), has opened a 60-day public comment period on the Board’s final report.
The Lake Ontario – St. Lawrence River Study Board
The Lake Ontario - St. Lawrence River Study Board has now completed its five-year study which the International Joint Commission (IJC) will use to assess and evaluate the current criteria used for regulating water levels on Lake Ontario and in the St. Lawrence River; the report will be released in the spring. The Study Team engaged by the IJC was a bi-national group of diverse experts from government, academia, native communities, and interest groups representing the geographical, scientific and community concerns of the Lake Ontario - St. Lawrence River system. Visit the board's web site at
www.losl.org
Watershed Initiative
Visit the Watershed Initiative web site
The IJC continues to support the establishment of ecosystem-focused watershed boards, in accordance with a 1998 request from the U.S. and Canadian governments. Core elements of the concept include recognizing local expertise and initiatives and coordinating among numerous organizations within the watershed -- including the IJC's board -- for mutual benefit, while respecting differing responsibilities. The IJC's fundamental interest in promoting the watershed board concept is to more effectively meet its mandate of peventing and resolving transboundary water disputes and not to replace existing basin authorities or organizations.
Canada–United States Air Quality Agreement
In 1991, Canada and the United States signed a bilateral Air Quality Agreement (view Agreement) to provide a practical and flexible instrument to deal with shared problems of transboundary air pollution. The United States-Canada Air Quality Committee issues a report every two years on progress in implementing the Agreement. In addition, Article IX of the Agreement directs the International Joint Commission (IJC) to invite public comment on each progress report, to prepare a synthesis of the comments received, and to release the synthesis to the public after submitting it to the two governments.
Grand Coulee Dam
Request from the Canadian Columbia River Inter-Tribal River Fisheries Commission concerning Grand Coulee Dam
The IJC has extended the deadline for parties to submit their views to December 31, 2005.
View correspondence concerning CCRIFC's request that the IJC issue an order with respect to the 1941 Order of Approval for Grand Coulee dam and reservoir.
Last update:
|
