![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Directive No. 38 Civil Aviation Research and DevelopmentPolicy Objective: To provide a formal structure and strategy for an effective and efficient Civil Aviation research and development program. Background: In 1995, the Government of Canada committed to implementing Results-Based Management (RBM) in all federal departments and agencies. In his 1995 report to Parliament, Strengthening Government Review, the President of the Treasury Board reaffirmed the government’s commitment to a management culture that is “fact-based, results-oriented, open and accountable.” Subsequently, the tabling in March 2000 of Results for Canadians: A Management Framework for the Government of Canada reinforced the government’s commitment to RBM and modern comptrollership, through continuous management improvement and accountability for results. Results-based management is about managing for results. In a government setting, this implies that the expected results to be achieved through a program should be clearly articulated, that measures of success should be selected and that accomplishments achieved be reported in a fair and credible manner. The Civil Aviation Service Line Performance Measurement Model supports this activity. Performance information is used to monitor the progress of a program towards achieving its strategic objective, and test if the program is working well or if adjustments are needed to improve efficiency and effectiveness. This information is essential to effective planning, resource allocation and decision-making for improving management practices and program activities. In the aim of meeting the new departmental R&D framework, Straight Ahead initiatives, and Civil Aviation’s Flight 2005 (and beyond ie: Flight 2010), there is a need to review and implement an R&D framework in Civil Aviation to include modern comptrollership, accountability, and best results for Canadians. The policies and procedures referenced herein will make the most effective use of research dollars utilizing principals from such documents as Flight 2005: A Civil Aviation Safety Framework for Canada and to address the Government of Canada’s management framework Results for Canadians: A Management Framework for the Government of Canada. The International Aviation and Technical Programs Branch has been assigned the Civil Aviation R&D portfolio. The branch has created the Transport Canada Civil Aviation Research and Development (TCCARD) office to assist in the development of a strategic plan, monitor projects and track the allocation of Research & Development funding sources (ie: RDMB, PERD, Climate Change, SARS, S&T action fund, etc.) for the identified and supported projects. Policy Statement: Civil Aviation strategically plans and implements R&D to enhance our objective of continuous improvement in our transportation system. This research is related to, but not limited to, the advancement of technology, innovation, performance measures and data analysis to achieve our mandate. Application: This directive applies to all Civil Aviation employees involved in any R&D work as defined in the TCCA Research and Development Manual (RDIMS Doc No. 728433) regardless of source of funding. Definitions: Project Director (PD) - person assigned to a given R&D project, who has primary responsibility for a Research Project, using his/her authority to direct, control and carry out the objectives and requirements of the project proposal. Project Manager (PM) - person assigned to a given R&D project, with project management responsibility that assists the Project Director of the project by implementing modern comptrollership and accountable practices to achieve the objectives. Project Proposal - The formal justification for funding and detailed objectives for a project, vetted and approved by the sponsoring branch. Sponsoring Branch - The Civil Aviation Branch with the highest interest in a given project proposal and shows support for the project by committing leverage funding in the way of personnel or risk money. Approach: The R&D cycle starts with an overall Civil Aviation R&D strategic plan that is derived by input of respective Branch R&D program plans. These program plans must provide the vision and objectives of required research and development for the next five to 10 years (using Flight 2010 vision). The program plans are reviewed and consolidated by an R&D Technical Advisory Committee and presented to the Civil Aviation Management Executive (CAMX) in the form of a strategic plan for Civil Aviation R&D. Once approved, the plan is used to call for project proposals from all available and interested parties with particular focus on direction and results required by Civil Aviation. To meet this objective, Branch R&D program plans must be developed and reviewed/updated by end of February every year. Once project proposals are accumulated, they are reviewed and prioritized in order of taskings to the strategic activities in Civil Aviation and provided to CAMX for final acceptance on a project level priority. Work plans are then drafted itemizing the tasks for each project in order of priority. Following the RDMB call letter for project proposals, the Civil Aviation listing will be forwarded for funding support. Upon allocation of RDMB funds, TCCARD will monitor and follow-up with Project Directors on all aspects of the research program. Status updates and work plan summaries are an essential part of the monitoring process. When projects are nearing the end of the fiscal year and contracts are resulting in deliverables being submitted, a review of all project results will be conducted by the Civil Aviation R&D Advisory Committee (CARDAC) and program plans will be amended or updated, as required. This complete cycle, as depicted in the Civil Aviation R&D Framework diagram in Annex 1, repeats for the following year. Roles and Responsibilities: The Director, International Aviation and Technical Programs is the accountable executive for the Civil Aviation R&D program. CAMX members are responsible for:
TCCARD is responsible for:
Branch Directors are responsible for:
Project Directors are responsible for:
Project Managers* are responsible for:
* Note: As part of the RDMB funding caveat, TDC project managers are our first choice selection should outside management expertise be required. Financial Setup: At each yearly cycle for submission of proposals for RDMB funding, branch funding in support of the project must be made available to AARJ in the sums specified in the leverage A-Base amounts for their respective projects. These funds will be used only for the R&D travel intended, under control of TCCARD and in coordination with respective PD’s. Monitoring and Reporting: The Director of International Aviation and Technical Programs or his delegate will report regularly to the Director General, Civil Aviation, on the implementation and annual update of the R&D strategic plan. Directorate progress reports will also be provided to department level funding representatives in compliance with funding allocation requirements. Further Information: Robert Shuter Merlin Preuss Effective date: January 31, 2005 Reference Material:
|
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
|
Transport Canada |
Pacific Region |
Prairie & Northern Region |
Ontario Region |
Quebec Region |
Atlantic Region |
About us |
Our offices |
Organization and senior management |
Departmental publications |
Programs and services |
Acts |
Regulations |
[More...] |
Media room |
Advisories |
Contacts |
e-news |
News releases |
Photo gallery |
Reference centre |
Speeches |
Video gallery |
[More...] |
Emergencies |
Emergencies and crises |
Emergency preparedness |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Air |
Our offices |
Passengers |
Pilots |
Flight instructors |
Maintenance technicians |
Commercial airlines |
Security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Marine |
Our offices |
Small commercial vessels |
Large commercial vessels |
Pleasure craft |
Marine security |
Marine infrastructure |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |
Rail |
Our offices |
Safety at railway crossings |
Rail infrastructure |
Rail security |
Transport of dangerous goods |
[More...] |