| Issue: | Sub-Issue1 | Sub-Issue2 | Sub-Issue3 | | week of unemployment | farming | self-employed |
Summary: The FCA found no reviewable error on the part of the Umpire. The facts support the conclusion that the claimant was an investor and not self-employed within the meaning of the Reg. Case distinguishable from Caron Bernier (A-0136.96).**NOTE: For more information on the facts, refer to CUB 37627. |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue1 | Sub-Issue2 | Sub-Issue3 | | earnings | farming | allocation of earnings |
Summary: The FCA found no reviewable error on the part of the Umpire. The facts support the conclusion that the claimant was an investor and not self-employed within the meaning of the Reg. Case distinguishable from Caron Bernier (A-0136.96).**NOTE: For more information on the facts, refer to CUB 37627. |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue1 | Sub-Issue2 | Sub-Issue3 | | earnings | farming | definition |
Summary: The FCA found no reviewable error on the part of the Umpire. The facts support the conclusion that the claimant was an investor and not self-employed within the meaning of the Reg. Case distinguishable from Caron Bernier (A-0136.96).**NOTE: For more information on the facts, refer to CUB 37627. |
