RSV 2010 - 2001 Update
|
![Skip all menus (access key: 2)](/web/20071225081932im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/18px.gif) |
International Comparisons
Why do some countries consistently rank at or near the top of all statistics used to make international comparisons of road safety?
Certainly, diverse characteristics - country size, population density, economic conditions, road infrastructure, public transport usage,
culture, travel patterns and climate - all contribute in varying degrees to the level of safety on a country’s roads. But the large
majority of the world’s "safest" countries have developed national initiatives that focus on very similar road safety problems.
These national road safety plans, as well as the degree to which the general population embraces the range of strategies that support
them, must also play an important role in determining why these countries consistently have better road safety records than others.
|
|
Demographic factors
as well as the level of a nation’s commitment to make its roads safer
are major determinants of a country’s international ranking.
Most countries with top-ranked road safety records have adopted ambitious
long-term targets to spearhead road safety intervention efforts. |
|
Like most other highly developed countries, Canada dramatically improved its level of road safety from the
early 1970s until the late 1990s. And although progress in Canada and the rest of the world’s safest
countries has slowed somewhat in recent years, the Canadian public continues to travel on roads that are
becoming increasingly safe. Twenty-five years ago, Canada’s traffic fatality rate
(based on population) was 30% worse than the median fatality rate among Organization for Economic Cooperation
and Development (OECD) member countries. Today the Canadian rate is slightly better than the
OECD median figure.
Canadians are among the most mobile people in the world. More than seven of
every ten driver-age citizens own a vehicle and more than eight of every ten
persons of legal driving age possess a valid driver’s licence. This high level
of mobility, combined with far-reaching boundaries and an extremely low
population density, has made personal vehicle use in Canada among the highest in
the world.
For this reason, comparing fatality rates per kilometre of travel is
the most appropriate and valid measure available to compare Canada’s level of road
safety with rates in the world’s other safest nations. In 2000, Canada ranked 5th among OECD member
countries, with a death rate of 9.37 per billion kilometres travelled. This ranking represents a substantial
improvement over 1999, when Canada ranked 7th. The Canadian road safety community is certainly moving in the right
direction; but the world’s leading country, Great Britain, still has a fatality rate that is more than 20%
lower than Canada’s. Continued efforts must be made to promote successful existing strategies
and introduce targeted initiatives. |
|
Although the pace of improvement has
slowed somewhat in recent years, Canada’s level of road safety continues
to compare favourably with the rest of the world.
In 2000, Canada's fatality rate was 5th lowest among OECD member countries. |
|
Top
Tables and Graphs
Principal Road Safety Strategies/Initiatives
Among
Leading OECD Member Countries |
Strategy/Initiative |
GB |
S |
FIN |
NL |
CDN |
USA |
AUS |
N |
CH |
D |
J |
Road Safety Vision |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
National Road Safety Targets |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
Impaired driving Measures |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
Occupant Protection Initiatives |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
Traffic Calming Measures |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
Vulnerable Road User Initiatives |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
Speed-Related Measures |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
Community-Based Programs |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
Infrastructure Initiatives |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Intelligent Transportation Systems |
|
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Safer Vehicle Design |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
Targeted Research Programs |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Encouragement of Alternatives to Motor
Vehicle Use |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
Increased/Enhanced Enforcement |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Driver Training/Testing |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Public Education Initiatives |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
Note: GB = Great Britain; S =
Sweden; FIN = Finland; NL = the Netherlands; CDN = Canada; USA = the
United States; AUS = Australia; N = Norway; CH = Switzerland; D =
Germany; and J = Japan |
Traffic Fatality Rate Per 100,000 Population - Canada
Versus Other OECD Member Countries
![Graph - Fatality Rate (per 100,000 population)](/web/20071225081932im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/vision/2001/images/graphe2.jpg) |
Road Users Killed Per Billion Vehicle Kilometres Travelled -
Selected OECD Member Countries, 2000
![Graph - Killed/Billion Vehicle Kilometres Travelled](/web/20071225081932im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/roadsafety/vision/2001/images/graphe3.jpg) |
Top
Long-standing Obstacles to Safer Travel
Canada, like many advanced countries, has made precipitous gains
in road safety during the past 30 years. These improvements were achieved as a result of initiatives that addressed the most obvious
problem areas - non-use of seat belts or child restraints, drinking and driving, and other high-risk behaviour such as speeding and aggressive
driving. |
|
Drinking and driving,
non-use of seat belts and excessive or unsafe speed - these continue to be the
main factors that contribute to deaths and injuries on our roadways. |
|
Notwithstanding the success of these initiatives, many of the problems that were present when Canada’s fatality rate was at or near
its peak are still evident today. Although 90% of the population uses restraint systems, almost 40% of vehicle occupants killed in crashes
are still unrestrained. Many of these same individuals had been drinking, as alcohol was cited as a contributing
factor among one-third of all fatally injured drivers.
Excess or unsafe speeds continue to be cited as a contributing factor among more than 15% of fatally
injured road users. Crashes at intersections, which involve a combination of factors - including a growing
number of drivers who disobey traffic signals - contribute to 25% of fatalities annually. And while
the large majority of Canada’s population lives in urban areas, approximately half of all fatalities
still occur on undivided rural roads. Many of the factors cited above, as well as road design, higher posted
speed limits and emergency medical response time, often contribute to serious casualties on
rural roads.
The above-mentioned problem areas are the main reasons why more than 2,900 people died in crashes on Canadian roads
in 2000. Until all forms of high-risk road user behaviour become unacceptable to Canadians, progress toward our
Road Safety Vision 2010 objectives will be difficult.
|