Canadian Flag Transport Canada / Transports Canada Government of Canada
Common menu bar (access key: M)
Skip to specific page links (access key: 1)
Policy Group
Policy Overview
Transportation in Canada Annual Reports

Table of Contents
Report Highlights
1. Introduction
2. Transportation - The Canadian Economy and Sector Productivity

3. Government Spending on Transportation

4. Transportation and Safety

5. Transportation and Environment

6. Transportation and Energy

7. Transportation and Regional Economies

8. Transportation and Employment
9. Transportation and Trade
10. Transportation and Tourism
11. Transportation and Information Technology
12. Transportation Infrastructure
13. Industry Structure
14. Freight Transportation
15. Passenger Transportation
16. Price, Productivity and Financial Performance in the Transportation Sector
Minister of Transport
List of Tables
List of Figures
 
Skip all menus (access key: 2)


12

Transportation Infrastructure

 

Air Transportation Infrastructure

Air Navigation System

The Canadian Air Navigation System (ANS) consists of seven area control centres (ACC) and over 100 airport control towers and flight service stations. These facilities are supported by a network of 1,400 navigational and landing aids. One of the safest and most extensive networks of air infrastructure in the world, this system delivers air traffic control, flight information, weather briefings, airport advisory services and electronic aids to navigation.

NAV Canada, a private, non-share capital corporation, assumed responsibility for all civil air navigation services in Canada on November 1, 1996. NAV Canada shares responsibility for air navigation safety with the Minister of Transport. The Minister retains the mandate to oversee the safety of NAV Canada's operations by ensuring that the corporation continues to meet all safety and regulatory requirements.

Air Navigation Operations

NAV Canada continued to fine-tune its operations in 1998 by reducing duplication and administrative costs. During the fiscal year, the corporation consolidated its Central and Western Region administrations. It is continuing with additional consolidations in regional offices and area control centres.

The air navigation system supported some 7.6 million aircraft arrivals and departures at Canadian Airports in 1998.

Figure 12-11 shows the distribution of aircraft movements by category of airport from 1993 to 1998.

Figure 12-12 charts the number of aircraft flights per traffic controller from 1994 to 1998.

The data indicates a slight shift from airports with towers to those with flight service stations and other airports. The annual number of controlled flights has risen from 4.9 million in 1994 to 5.5 million in 1998, an increase of 13.2 per cent (see Table 12-23). Flights per air traffic controller have risen slightly more by 13.5 per cent over the five-year period. Note, however, that the latter is a broad indicator only, and that to truly reflect workloads, calculations must be done on a site-by-site basis.

System Improvements

NAV Canada has invested approximately $300 million since November 1996, with many projects coming on stream in the fiscal year 1997/98. These projects include

  • new air traffic control towers in Halifax and Toronto;
  • extensive work on navigational facilities associated with the expansion of Lester B. Pearson International Airport, in conjunction with the Greater Toronto Airport Authority;
  • implementing reduced vertical-separation criteria over the North Atlantic to permit increased traffic flow at the same levels of safety;
  • installing new power systems and computer display technology at all Area Control Centres;
  • installing new Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) at major locations such as Vancouver International Airport;
  • expanding the Technical Systems Centre in Ottawa, now the main focus of NAV Canada's national engineering activities; and
  • making significant progress on a major addition to our Area Control Centre in Montreal, in conjunction with the Department of National Defence.

NAV Canada's major capital project, the Canadian Automated Air Traffic System (CAATS), also reached a milestone. 83 per cent of the CAATS system software has been delivered. Factory acceptance testing will take place early in 1999, with pilot sites in Western Canada to follow. It is expected that once CAATS becomes operational, it will be among the most advanced and comprehensive air traffic control systems in the world.

Financial Performance
Proposed Service Fees

Since November 1998, NAV Canada has been a self-funded organization that charges fees for services provided to its customers. In 1998, the corporation developed:

  • a new billing system;
  • a fee structure in consultation with users and other stakeholders, combined with a new system for charging new terminal and en-route fees beginning March 1998;
  • a pricing policy that permits exemptions, with the vast majority of general aviation users to pay a $60 annual fee;
  • deferral of the implementation of the Phase II fee schedule to March 1, 1999, from November 1998, resulting in an estimated $72 million in savings to the flying public; and
  • a rate-stabilization reserve account to minimize the impact of unforeseen fluctuations in air traffic volumes.

As a not-for-profit corporation, NAV Canada prices its services to recover all costs from users, including any debt-servicing costs. Before the creation of NAV Canada, air navigation services were funded mainly through the Air Transportation Tax (ATT). As of November 1, 1998, NAV Canada must recover its costs through user fees only. During the year, the corporation introduced new user charges for en route and terminal control services and increased existing oceanic and overflight fees. These fees received statutory approval from the Minister of Transport, under the guiding principles of the Civil Air Navigation Services Commercialization Act, and the ATT was repealed. Together, the overflight fee and terminal charges contribute 80 per cent of NAV Canada's revenues.

Figure 12-13 shows the fee sources of NAV Canada in percentage terms for 1998.

Table 12-24 compares financial results for 1997 and 1998 ending August 31, 1998.

For the year ending August 31, 1998, NAV Canada reported $892 million in revenues and $715 million in operating expenses. Other items, such as a total $171 million in interest payments, depreciation and restructuring expenses, resulted in a net income of $5.9 million.

Compared with the ten-month period in the previous year, revenues increased by 15 per cent, while expenses rose 22 per cent. This resulted in an elevated operating ratio of 80 per cent. Increases in interest and depreciation charges also contributed to a reduction in net income of 55 per cent.

Airports

Canada has approximately 1,800 aerodromes (the generic name for facilities registered with Transport Canada as aircraft landing and take-off sites), of which 631 are certified (as either airports for fixed-wing aircraft, heliports for helicopters, or water-ice bases for float- and ski-planes).Note 10

The majority of certified airports are owned by municipalities, provincial or territorial governments, or the federal government. Most of Canada's commercial aviation activity takes place at certified airports.

The federal government's 1994 National Airports Policy (NAP) announced its intent to commercialize most federally owned airports by March 31, 2000. This policy shifts the costs of operating Canada's airports from all federal taxpayers to only those people who use the facilities.

Under the new policy, the federal government continues to own the airports that make up the National Airport System (NAS), but will divest the airports' operations to not-for-profit airport authorities under long-term leases (with the exception of Yellowknife and Whitehorse, which have been transferred to the territorial governments). Ownership of regional, local and small airports is being transferred to local interests by way of sale. Those remote airportsNote 11 providing year-round access to isolated communities will continue to receive federal assistance.

Figures 12-14, 12-15 and 12-16 show the location of each airport considered under the NAP, the airport's designation (whether NAS, Regional/local, Small, Arctic, or Remote), and its divestiture status as of December 31, 1998.

Table 12-25 illustrates how the airport-divestiture program has evolved. Of the 136 airports designated for divestiture under the NAP, only 39 remain to be transferred at the end of 1998.

In 1998, airports in London, Ontario, and St. John's, Newfoundland, were transferred to Canadian Airport Authorities, bringing the total number of NAS airports transferred to 15. Ninety-five per cent of commercial air travel passes through airports run by independent airport authorities or operators.

Major Developments

Over the past year, airport authorities actively pursued improvements to the infrastructure, operations and customer service at their airports.

  • Vancouver Airport Authority has undertaken extensive renovations to the domestic terminal and has begun work on a major expansion of the international terminal.
  • The Victoria Airport Authority announced plans to expand the airport's cargo capacity.
  • Calgary Airport Authority's 10-year capital expansion program is advancing. Projects currently underway include an extension to parking facilities, the addition of four new aircraft positions, and additional aircraft parking and taxiways. Additional projects are in the design stage.
  • Edmonton Regional Airports Authority commenced work on a new parking facility at the Edmonton International Airport. The facility will be connected by an enclosed walkway to the terminal building's departures level and by covered walkways on the arrivals level.
  • The Winnipeg Airports Authority announced planned improvements ranging from the installation of new elevators and construction of covered walkways to aircraft, to various upgrades at the terminal building. The authority opened a new observation lounge and replaced the previous food and beverage services with nine new concessions throughout the air terminal building.
  • The Greater Toronto Airport Authority is moving forward with a major redevelopment plan that proposes such work as a new terminal, a new infield cargo area, improved de-icing capacity, two additional runways, fuel tank facilities and road improvements. New fire-fighting and fire-training facilities were opened, and additional emergency-response vehicles and fire fighters were added to the airport's Emergency Services department.
  • The Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier International Airport Authority has also completed upgrades to the air terminal building, restaurants, bookstore, newsstand and gift shops. Other work undertaken in 1998 included a new gate to accommodate more passenger jets and a new baggage carousel to increase capacity by 33 per cent.
  • Aéroports de Montréal continued to renovate and improve its facilities at the Dorval Airport.
    A new international concourse is planned.
  • At Moncton, major runway reconstruction work began and will be completed in 1999.
  • Halifax International Airport, the largest of the airports still operated by Transport Canada, is also undergoing major renovations and expansion. This includes centralized and expanded ticket counter space, improved baggage handling areas, and barrier-free access. The work will complement renovations undertaken by the airlines for check-in, second-level departure and covered walkways.
Financial Performance

In 1997/98, Transport Canada spent $227.6 million on the operation of airports, including operating costs, subsidies and capital, while taking in revenues of $84.4 million. It received an additional $69.2 million in rent from the airport authorities. For fiscal year 1998/99, Transport Canada forecasts $179 million in spending, $78.3 million in revenues and $191.1 million in rent.

Airport Authorities Revenues and Expenses

The federal government expects National Airports System (NAS) airports to be financially self-sufficient. Consequently, airport authorities, incorporated as not-for-profit organizations with no equity shareholders, fund their operations and any expansions or improvements with revenues derived from airport users, such as airlines, concessionaires, passengers, and private investors. Rent is paid by the airport authorities to the federal government, as the owner of the airport.

In recent years, AIFs have become an important and growing source of funds for major airport improvements. Vancouver was the only airport to have charged the AIF for all of 1997.

The Calgary and Winnipeg airport authorities have reached agreements with the Air Transportation Association of Canada whereby the airlines include the AIFs in their ticket prices. The other airport authorities use a different process, collecting the fees directly from passengers as they leave the terminal.

Table 12-27 lists the airports having AIFs, when they were started and the amount collected in 1997.

The divested NAS airports that issued annual reports for a full year in 1998 included Calgary, Edmonton, Montreal, Toronto (Pearson), Vancouver and Winnipeg. The Ottawa Airport Authority also issued an annual report, but one that covered only 11 months.

In 1997, these seven airport authorities generated total revenues of $755.5 million, with total expenses (before interest) of $594.8 million. The operating ratio of the group as a whole was 78.7 per cent, with individual ratios ranging from 66.4 to 89.1 per cent. Revenues from aeronautical sources of $336.9 million represented 44.6 per cent of their total revenues as a group. Individually, the percentage of total revenues generated from aeronautical sources ranged from 33.2 to 55.9 per cent.

Non-aeronautical revenues (excluding airport improvement fees) totaled $349.5 million, or 46.3 per cent of all revenues generated by these airport authorities. On a site-by-site basis, the percentages ranged from 37.0 per cent in Edmonton to 56.2 per cent in Montreal.

Airport improvement fees (AIFs) generated $69.1 million, or 9.2 per cent of total revenues in 1997, with Vancouver contributing 75 per cent of the AIF total.

The seven airport authorities spent $1.2 billion in 1997 on the acquisition of capital assets. The Greater Toronto Airports Authority represented 77 per cent of this total, which includes the purchase of Terminal 3 at Lester B. Pearson International Airport. Other major expansion projects continued at Montreal, Calgary and Edmonton. Vancouver Airport Authority invested mainly in airport infrastructure, renovating facilities, enhancing the level of service and expanding the existing facilities to meet increasing demand.

With 64.6 million enplaned/ deplaned passengers in total, these airport authorities generated on average $11.70 per passenger in revenues and incurred expenses of $9.21 per passenger.

Table 12-26 summarizes these airports' financial results for the calendar year 1997, the latest year for which figures are currently available.

Review of Airport Authority Leases

Transport Canada is presently conducting a comprehensive five-year review of the first four Local Airport Authorities (LAAs): Vancouver, Montreal (Dorval and Mirabel), Calgary and Edmonton. As public institutions, the LAAs are held to a high standard of public accountability, and the review will assess the extent to which the public interest is being served and protected. The review is expected to be completed in 1999.

Airport Capital Assistance Program

An integral part of the National Airports Policy is the Airport Capital Assistance Program (ACAP). Transport Canada established this contribution program in April 1995 to help eligible airports finance capital projects related to safety, asset protection and operating-cost reduction. To be eligible, the airports must receive a minimum of 1,000 regularly scheduled passengers annually, meet airport certification requirements and not be owned by the federal government.

In 1998, 36 projects at 25 airports were approved for funding. The total approved funding for 1998 was $20.9 million. Approved projects included the rehabilitation of runway, taxiway and apron pavements; the purchase of mobile equipment, such as runway sweepers and snow blowers; the purchase and installation of visual aids; and the installation of security fencing.

Table 12-28 lists the projects receiving funding approval under the Airport Capital Assistance Program, by site and province, in 1998.

A total of $32.3 million has been spent since the program's inception, with 55 per cent being spent at Ontario sites up to 1997/98.

Transport Canada is evaluating the ACAP to meet the Treasury Board's requirement to assess and report on the program's performance.

Table 12-29 summarizes ACAP expenditures in each of the last three fiscal years by province. (Appendix 12-1 provides additional site-specific information for the latter period.)

 

Transportation Infrastructure

Rail Transportation Infrastructure

Highway Transportation Infrastructure

Marine Transportation Infrastructure

Air Transportation Infrastructure

Annex 12-1 Airports Capital Assistance Program, Expenditures by Site and Province

Freight Forwarders

Warehouses

 

NOTES:

10 This represents the latest count for 1998. Figures for the number of certified airports in Canada are dynamic due to the changes or clarification in the criteria for certified airports as established in the Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR), Part III - Aerodromes and Airports (October 1996). Application of the new regulations has resulted in a decline of certified airports due to the elimination of the criteria "main base for flight training unit" while the number increases due in part to a clarification of the criteria "within a built-up area" premise and the new criteria where the Minister determines that an airport certificate would be in the public interest and for safety reasons.

11 The 1997 report mistakenly indicated 12 remote airports. There are 13. They are Sandspit, B.C.; Fort Chipewyan, Alta.; Churchill, Man.; Norway House, Man.; Moosonee, Ont.; Iles-de-la-Madeleine, Que.; Lourdes-de-Blanc-Sablon, Que.; Kuujjuaq, Que.; Waskaganish, Que.; Chevery, Que.; Wemindji, Que.; Schefferville, Que.; Eastmain River, Que.


Last updated: Top of Page Important Notices