|
Transportation in Canada 2000 |
|
|
|
|
6
TRANSPORTATION AND
REGIONAL ECONOMIES
For Newfoundland and Prince Edward
Island, marine is the most important transport mode,
compared with trucking for Nova Scotia and New Brunswick. In central
Canada,
commercial transportation accounts for a relatively low share
of
provincial GDP, while the opposite is true in western provinces.
Transportation is an important link in the Canadian economy,
necessary for moving people and goods within provinces, between
provinces, and between provinces and other countries. This chapter
demonstrates the importance of transportation to provincial economies
through the use of two indicators: the value-addedNote 1 of commercial
transportation firmsNote 2 located within provincial boundaries;
and the domestic demandNote 3 for transport-related goods
and services purchased by provincial residents. Within this chapter,
use of these two indicators is based on data taken from Canada's
system of national accounts for 1999, the latest year for which
provincial data are available.
This chapter also provides a socio-economic profile of the
provinces, which describes some key aspects of the population,
geography and economy that influence the relative importance of
transportation to overall provincial economies.
The value-added of commercial transportation will be compared
with provincial gross domestic product (PGDP), the standard measure
of a province's total value of production. Domestic transportation
demand will be compared with a province's final domestic demand
(PFDD), a measure of the total value of sales in the provincial
economy. The two aggregate economic measures are related in that
PGDP is equal to PFDD, plus the trade balance.
A Socio-Economic Profile of Provincial
Economies
The importance of transportation to a provincial economy, and
its predominant modes, is primarily determined by the province's
geography, its economic structure, and to a lesser extent, its
demographics. The factors that influence the supply and demand
for transportation within a provincial economy can be better understood
by taking a socio-economic look at Canada's provinces.
Geographic factors include a province's geographic area, the
relative dispersion of the population, and the existence of natural
barriers to transportation, such as mountains or oceans. For example,
the territories and Quebec have the largest geographic areas in
Canada. The territories, Newfoundland, Manitoba and Saskatchewan
have the lowest population densities. The territories and eastern
provinces have a higher proportion of rural population than that
in the central and western provinces. Areas with the highest elevation
are found in the territories, British Columbia and Alberta, while
Newfoundland and Prince Edward Island are islands.
Another major geographic factor is location relative to major
markets and producing centres. In Canada, the relative proximity
of Ontario to major US markets coincides with the lowest share
of transportation in all provincial economies, while the relative
proximity of Manitoba and New Brunswick to central Canada coincides
with the highest shares of transportation in all provincial economies.
Their adjacent and central locations may make these provinces
good hub locations for transportation moving into and out of central
Canada, thus attracting a higher share of transportation company
operations and head offices.
The size and structure of a province's economy also strongly
influence the relative importance of transportation, particularly
the modal split of transportation activities within the province.
There are two major economic characteristics that come into play
here: the share of primary commodities in a provincial economy;
and the relative importance of trade. As Table 6-1 shows,
Alberta, Saskatchewan and the territories have the highest share
of primary commodities, while Ontario and Quebec have the lowest
share. In terms of trade in 1999, Ontario, New Brunswick and Saskatchewan
have the highest levels of exports, while the four eastern provinces
have the highest levels of imports.
Relative provincial economic growth also influences transportation
industry growth. As Table 6-1 shows, Newfoundland, Nova Scotia
and Ontario experienced the fastest growing economies in 1999.
This growth in Newfoundland and Nova Scotia resulted from new
energy sources, and in Ontario from manufacturing and trade with
the United States. The western provinces, particularly Saskatchewan,
experienced the slowest growth, due to depressed world commodity
prices in 1999 and continuing slow Asian growth.
Finally, a province's demographic make-up can influence the
relative importance of different aspects of transportation - notably
consumer demand for certain types of transportation, such as vacation-related
travel or pick-up trucks. By population, the provinces are uneven
in size, with Ontario and Quebec accounting for over 60 per cent
of the country's total and thereby also accounting for the majority
of transport activity. In general, the provincial populations
have a relatively similar age structure. The northern territories
(Yukon, Northwest Territories and Nunavut), however, are characterized
by a large proportion of people under the age of 15 and a relatively
small proportion of people over 65. Over the last five years,
population growth has been concentrated in Ontario, Alberta and
British Columbia, while Newfoundland has experienced a net decline.
The Value-Added of Commercial Transportation
The relative share of commercial transportation in provincial
economies can be examined in terms of its portion of PGDP.
In the eastern provinces, commercial transportation represents
a high portion of PGDP because of the relatively large distance
from markets in central Canada, the high share of imports, and
the moderate levels of primary commodity production. As New Brunswick
is the closest eastern province to both central Canada and the
United States, it may act as a hub for transport to and from the
eastern provinces. New Brunswick, therefore, has a higher share
of commercial transport than the other eastern Canadian provinces,
and the second highest share, after Manitoba, of all provinces.
The geography of the eastern provinces influences the relative
importance of the modes, notably on the two islands of Newfoundland
and Prince Edward Island, where marine is the most important transport
mode and has the largest share of PGDP of all provinces. Newfoundland
also has the highest share of the air mode of all provinces. Truck
transport is the most important mode in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick,
with trucking in New Brunswick having the largest share of all
provinces.
In central Canada (Ontario and Quebec), commercial transportation
accounts for relatively low shares of PGDP because of the low
share of primary commodities in the economy, the relatively higher
population density, and the proximity to large US markets.Note
4 In both provinces, the most important mode is trucking,
followed by public passenger transit.
In the western provinces, commercial transportation accounts
for relatively higher levels of PGDP because of the reliance on
primary commodity production, the lower population density, and
the larger distance from markets relative to central Canada. Manitoba
has the highest commercial carrier share of all provinces, possibly
due to its location as a hub for western traffic coming into and
out of central Canada. British Columbia is similar to Manitoba
in that it is a hub for transport to the Pacific Rim countries,
which, combined with its difficult geography, also generates a
relatively high share of commercial transportation. Saskatchewan
also has a relatively high level of commercial transportation,
while Alberta has the lowest share of the western provinces.Note
5 The territories also exhibit a relatively high share
of commercial transportation, due to the dispersion of population
and the distance from southern Canada.
The main modal characteristic of the western provinces is the
higher importance of rail transport. Rail is the most important
mode in Saskatchewan, which has the highest share of rail as a
percentage of PGDP of all provinces. In Manitoba, Alberta and
British Columbia, trucking is the largest mode, followed by rail
in Manitoba and Alberta, while marine is second to trucking in
British Columbia. The share of air in the territories is higher
than for all provinces. Table 6-2 shows the relative share of
commercial transportation in provincial economies in 1999.
Table 6-3 illustrates annual growth in commercial transportation
in 1999. In the eastern provinces, commercial transportation growth
lagged behind PGDP growth in all provinces except New Brunswick.
The fastest growing modes were rail and truck freight, while declines
were posted by water and air transport in Prince Edward Island
and air transport in Nova Scotia.
Commercial transport growth exceeded PGDP growth in Ontario
but lagged PGDP growth in Quebec. The highest growth rates were
for trucking in Ontario and rail in Quebec, with air transport
posting declines in both provinces, along with marine in Ontario.
In all western provinces, commercial transport growth exceeded
or equalled PGDP growth, though not in the territories. Truck
transport led growth in all provinces, while Manitoba, Saskatchewan,
British Columbia and the territories posted declines for air.
Public passenger transit was the leading growth mode in the territories.
Domestic Transport-Related Demand
Domestic transportation demand refers to a broader definition
of transport, which includes 1) consumer expenditures on transportation
(e.g. automobiles), 2) investment by government and business
in transportation equipment and infrastructure, and 3) government
expenditures on transportNote 6 (e.g. highway maintenance).
Transportation demand refers to the direct expenditures on transport-related
goods and services by consumers, businesses and governments located
within the province. Domestic transport demand can be compared
with provincial final domestic demand (PFDD), the total value
of all goods and services sold within the provincial economies.
Domestic transportation demand can be examined as the relative
proportion of provincial final domestic demand. The most interesting
observation is the predominance of personal expenditures, which
form the largest segment of domestic transportation demand in
all provinces and territories. The largest component of personal
expenditures in all provinces, except Prince Edward Island
and the territories, is new and used transportation equipment.
In Prince Edward Island, the largest component is fuel and lubricants,
while in the territories it is purchased commercial transportation.
The second largest component of transportation demand in all provinces,
but not in the territories, is transportation investment. The
largest component of investment is in transportation equipment
in all provinces, except Prince Edward Island and the territories,
where infrastructure investment, such as roads and airport runways,
is larger. Government spending on transportation forms the smallest
component of total transportation demand in all provinces, but
is larger than the investment component in the territories.
In 1999, New Brunswick had the highest level of domestic transportation
demand of all provinces, generated by a relatively high level
of consumer and business demand for transportation equipment,
as well as a high level of infrastructure investment. Ontario
and Quebec were next, due largely to high levels of personal expenditures
on transportation equipment. The lowest levels were in the territories,
Saskatchewan, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia.
Table 6-4 indicates the relative proportion of domestic transportation
demand as a portion of provincial final domestic demand in 1999.
Table 6-5 shows the annual growth in domestic transportation
demand in 1999. In Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, Quebec,
Ontario and British Columbia, growth in transportation demand
exceeded growth in provincial final domestic demand. The highest
growth was in Newfoundland and Ontario, fuelled by increased equipment
purchases by consumers and businesses. Declines in growth in transportation
demand in Saskatchewan and the territories are consistent with
declines in total provincial domestic demand and result primarily
from declines in equipment purchases by consumers in Saskatchewan,
and from declines in purchased commercial transportation in the
territories.
NOTES:
1
Value-added refers to the payments (e.g. wages, profits) made
to the principal factors - labour and capital - employed in production
throughout the provincial economy. As value-added is determined
by the payments to labour and capital, using this concept means
that the importance of transport to provincial economies is determined
by the location of the workers and capital employed by commercial
carriers. Value-added is a measure of the production or supply
of transport.
2
Commercial transportation can be defined as industries that transport
goods and/or passengers for a fee.
3
Domestic transportation demand measures direct transport-related
expenditures by consumers, businesses and governments located
within the province. It underestimates the value of commercial
transportation to provincial economies because it does not take
into account indirect transportation used by industry to produce
non-transport-related goods and services (e.g. shoes or apples).
4
It is also possible that the central provinces are served by a
higher proportion of transportation firms located in other countries,
thus reducing the relative importance of the value-added of domestic
commercial transportation firms located within those provinces.
5
The commercial carrier share of the provincial economies in Alberta
principally, but also Saskatchewan, will considerably underestimate
the importance of transportation to these provinces, as the principal
and most valuable primary commodities produced (oil, natural gas)
are generally transported by pipeline. Pipelines are currently
not considered transportation by Transport Canada, but will be
in 2001 with the advent of the North American Industrial Classification
System.
6
Government expenditures consist primarily of highway maintenance
and urban transit subsidies; they do not include government investment
in roads, which forms the principal component of infrastructure
investment.
|