![](/web/20071227032148im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/rndl.gif) |
Transportation in Canada 1997 |
![](/web/20071227032148im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/rndr.gif) |
|
|
![Skip all menus (access key: 2)](/web/20071227032148im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/images/18px.gif) |
2. Transportation and the Economy
A solid performance of the Canadian economy, and a dynamic trade
sector, increased both the level of activity and the relative importance
of transportation.
This chapter begins with a comparison of the importance of the transportation
sector in Canada with the sector's importance in other countries. Then it
moves to major influences of recent years on transportation demand, examines
general economic conditions in 1997, and assesses transportation's contribution
to the economy in terms of the sector's gross domestic product, employment
and spending. Finally, the chapter looks at linkages between transportation
and trade.
Canadians are very dependent on transportation. For most, transportation
is key to doing business and for moving from place to place. For many others,
transportation is employment.
Canada's size dictates that people and goods generally travel considerable
distances to reach their destination. Per capita, Canada ranks second in
passenger travel among major industrialized countries, far behind the US.
Canada is significantly higher, (20 per cent), than Western Europe.
Over 90 per cent of all passenger travel is done by automobile in Canada,
compared with 84 per cent for the US and just over 80 per cent for the other
countries. Figure 2-1 illustrates domestic passenger travel in Canada.
In terms of freight transportation, the divergence is even greater. As
shown in Figure 2-2, Canada's per capita tonne-kilometres is more than twice
as high as in Western Europe, but almost 25 per cent lower than in the US.
![](/web/20071227032148im_/http://www.tc.gc.ca/pol/en/report/anre1997/annual97/PC_FILES/FIGS_02/F02_02E.GIF)
Structural Changes and Transportation
Since the early 1960s, Canada's economy has experienced ongoing structural
changes. These changes are evident at the aggregate and industrial levels,
and include changes in transportation services. Figure 2-3 shows the relative
importance of services and goods production over the last 16 years. Some
traditional sectors - primary resources, manufacturing and construction
- are losing ground to the service sector. The production of goods, which
accounted for 35 per cent of total production in 1981, accounts for only
33 per cent now.
Whether they rank low or high on the scale of structural change, some
industries within these aggregates are experiencing more structural changes
than others. In the transportation sector, this trend can be witnessed in
freight transportation services. While total freight transportation went
up by 66 per cent since 1981, trucking increased by 109 per cent, marine
transportation by only 13 per cent, and rail by 42 per cent. These changes
indicate a shift away from rail and marine toward trucking.
Table 2-1 gives a brief overview of how the relative share of each transportation
mode has changed over the last 16 years.
During this period, freight transportation has shifted significantly,
with trucking making the most dramatic gains. There are two main reasons
for this. First, the structural changes to the overall economy have resulted
in a shift in goods production, which in turn means changing freight transportation
needs. For example, the current trend is to keep inventories low, and the
"just-in-time" delivery system now in fashion is best suited to
trucking. Second, transportation prices have had low increases, prompting
shippers to use better quality services, such as door-to-door delivery,
for which the truck mode is well equipped.
Figure 2-4 shows how, over the last 16 years, the three traditional goods-producing
sectors of the economy - manufacturing, primary resources, and construction
and utilities - have seen their relative importance fluctuate.
In 1997, goods production increased by 4.8 per cent, compared with 3.9
per cent for the economy. The sector regained the ground lost during the
1990 - 1991 recession, reaching about 33 per cent of total production in
1997. The service sector, lost slightly from the traditional sectors.
Equally relevant, the type of goods produced is shifting away from raw
materials to finished or semi-finished products. The most significant gain
observed in 1997 was in manufacturing, which rose by over six per cent,
compared with the primary resources sector, which increased by less than
three per cent.
Many industries make products for export, which means business for the
transportation sector. For example, almost 76 per cent of non-electrical
machinery, 89 per cent of electrical equipment and 84 per cent of transportation
equipment are exported. Imports of commodities are also important in terms
of domestic demand for transportation.
Because it touches almost every economic transaction, transportation
is vulnerable to variations in the business cycle, as well as to long-term
structural changes. The transportation sector's performance and prospects
are related to those of the economy.
With its derived demand, transportation grows when the economy grows,
and likewise slows down with the economy during downturns.
Since the 1970s, however, growth in the economy has differed from that
in the transportation sector for two reasons: the increased relative importance
of services; and greater productivity in the transportation sector.
Figure 2-5 plots the growth cycles of goods production and freight transportation,
revealing the periods when they are synchronized and when they are not.
The transportation sector is tied more closely to the production of goods
than to total economic activity, with the movement of goods accounting for
about two thirds of all transportation activity. For its part, goods production
is more affected by business cycles than is the service sector. It follows,
therefore, that freight transportation changes are more closely related
to changes in goods production than to total economic activity.
1997 - A Good Year for Transportation
Gross Domestic Product
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the total value of the goods produced and
the services provided in a country in one year, is a key element in understanding
the impact of any one factor on the economy. By comparing the overall economy's
GDP to the transportation sector's GDP, it becomes easier to understand
transportation's role in and contribution to Canada's economy.
Canada's GDP increased by 3.9 per cent in 1997, up dramatically from
1.6 per cent in 1996. The total GDP increase resulted from a 4.4 per cent
rise in domestic demand and a 8.6 per cent increase in exports. This surge
in domestic demand is the strongest since 1988.
Just as Canada's GDP rose in 1997, so did transportation's GDP - by a
significantly higher figure of 5.4 per cent. In fact, during the recovery
and expansion period of 1993 to 1997, transportation services regularly
grew faster than total economic activity, due largely to the strong impetus
of trade in Canada's growth.
Freight modes increased by 8.3 per cent, spread across rail and truck
modes. Passenger transportation increased only in the air sector, by 5.9
per cent. Urban transportation, however, continued to post negative growth
rates, maintaining a downward trend that began in the early 1980s.
Table 2-2 shows Canada's GDP and the transportation sector's GDP in 1997,
as well as giving the change between 1996 and 1997 and the average annual
per cent change over the previous six years, 1991 to 1997.
Trade Activity
Merchandise exports were up by 9.1 per cent in 1997, with strong showings
in manufactured goods, crude oil and natural gas. Among the manufactured
goods, the most notable increases were in paper and allied products; chemicals;
and machinery and equipment, including office equipment.
Fueled by a strong domestic demand, merchandise imports soared by almost
15.9 per cent. Imports of machinery and equipment, primary metals, and petroleum
and coal products increased significantly, followed by automobiles and automobile
parts. Agricultural product import increases were below average.
Expenditures
There were a number of notable showings on the expenditure front. Consumer
spending was up by 3.9 per cent. Likewise, spending on commercial transportation
services by consumers totaled two per cent more. Total transportation spending
(including auto purchases and related expenditures) was up three per cent.
Private fixed investment rose by 14.5 per cent, with its largest component,
machinery and equipment, soaring by close to 20 per cent.
Non-residential construction, which influences freight transportation
activity, posted a hefty 9.1 per cent increase in 1997, the highest in almost
a decade. Residential construction, also an influencing factor, enjoyed
a strong growth rate for the second consecutive year.
In the overall economy, lower interest rates meant lower interest payments
on corporate debt, which saw profits rise by 17 per cent in 1997. Transportation
benefited in particular, being a sector where capital/output ratio is high
and debt servicing is important.
With inflation at 1.6 per cent, transportation prices dropped by 0.5
per cent. In general, transportation prices have shown almost no increase
since 1991.
The lower Canadian dollar helped exports growth, also good news for the
transportation sector. The increase in employment and lower interest rates
helped consumers finance increased spending, including transportation spending.
Transportation's Contribution to the Economy
By moving people and goods, and by generating profits and paying salaries,
transportation contributes to the economic well-being of Canadians. Apart
from its strategic role, the size of the transportation service industry
in terms of GDP is significant. This sector is larger than the agriculture,
fishing and trapping, logging and forestry industries combined.
Transportation accounted for 3.7 per cent of total GDP in 1997. Figure
2-6 charts how transportation's GDP has declined almost continuously over
the last 13 years.
However, strong economic growth in 1997 pulled transportation activity
to a higher level. Compared to 1996, transportation GDP in 1997 increased
by 5.4 per cent in real terms. On a modal basis, truck and rail have shown
the largest increase with 9.3 and 9.0 per cent respectively, followed by
air and marine with 5.9 and 3.2 per cent. Table 2-3 shows how transportation's
GDP has improved.
In many OECD countries, including Canada, the transportation sector has
been growing at a slower rate than total GDP. Overall, the ratio of transportation
GDP to total GDP has fallen, due to higher productivity and lower prices.
Wages, profits, interest payments and rent in transportation have increased
at a slower rate than the average increase in the economy. This has translated
into a relative decline in the overall cost of transportation, compared
with costs in the economy. Consequently, transportation's share of the economy
has declined.
Table 2-4 compares how much transportation has contributed to the overall
economy, or the ratio of transportation GDP to total GDP, for Canada and
selected major industrialized countries over the last 15 years.
Transportation as an Employer
In 1997, transportation employed approximately 472,000 people, with twice
as many people in road than in all other modes combined. At least that many
more people are also indirectly dependent on the transportation sector for
employment. In fact, transportation accounts for 3.4 per cent of all jobs
in Canada. Trucking is the biggest employer, with 158,000 jobs, and marine
is the smallest, with 31,000.
Since 1992, changes in the number of jobs in transportation have varied
greatly between the modes. Total employment increased by 63,000 jobs. The
largest increase, in both relative and absolute terms since 1992, occurred
in trucking - an increase of 45,000 jobs. Air employment increased by 12,000
and water by 8,000. Streamlining of rail operations has cut 10,000 jobs
over the last five years.
Table 2-5 displays the growth and decline in employment in the transportation
sector, mode by mode.
Investment
Investment in transportation includes government spending on transportation
infrastructure, such as building roads; and business and government spending
on machinery and equipment, such as cars and trucks. In transportation,
investment usually occurs at irregular intervals and involves large sums
of money.
From 1992 to 1995, transportation investment accounted for 18.9 per cent
of total investment in the economy in an average year, with equipment accounting
for
12.2 per cent and infrastructure for 6.7 per cent. Significantly, road
dominates investment in transportation, accounting for 16.5 of the 18.9
per cent, while all other modes accounted for less than one per cent each.
Table 2-6 compares investment in transportation to investment in the economy
(less residential construction, which is considered a non-productive investment).
Transportation Demand
In 1996, the domestic demand for transportation represented 17 per cent
of Canadians' total domestic demand, an increase from the 15.7 per cent
in 1991, reflecting an annual growth rate of 4.5 per cent (Table 2-7). This
rate exceeded the growth rate for overall demand, which explains transportation's
increasing share of total domestic demand. If total indirect taxes and fees
are subtracted from government expenditures, aggregate domestic spending
on transportation in 1996 would represent 15.6 per cent of total domestic
demand, compared to 14.2 per cent in 1991.
Domestic demand for transportation is composed of many segments, the
largest being private transportation sales, which accounted for 10.5 per
cent of total domestic demand in 1996. The largest component of private
transportation sales - retail vehicle sales - accounted for 6.5 per cent
of overall demand, while the other components - gasoline service stations,
retail vehicle parts and repairs, and rental agencies - accounted for two,
1.5 and 0.3 per cent, respectively.
The second largest segment of domestic demand in 1996 was for-hire carriers,
representing 4.5 per cent of overall demand. Trucking was the most significant
sub-segment, at 1.5 per cent, followed by air at 1.2 per cent, while all
other modes were less than one per cent each. Except for rental agencies,
the components of private transportation sales were larger than or equal
to any individual mode in the for-hire carriers group.
The demand for urban transit is declining steadily, reflecting the ongoing
trend of using private vehicles.
Government accounted for the smallest segment of domestic demand for
transportation, at two per cent of total domestic demand in 1996. The largest
sub-segments were road construction and maintenance, at 1.4 per cent, with
urban transit subsidies and other subsidies and administration at 0.3 per
cent each.
Household Spending on Transportation
The dependence of the average Canadian consumer on transportation is
another indicator of the sector's importance. In 1997, the average household
spent 15.2 per cent of its budget on transportation, of which over 80 per
cent was put towards buying and using an automobile. The average Canadian
household also spent 12.6 per cent of its transportation budget on public
transportation. Air dominated this spending, accounting for 68.9 per cent
of the budget. Table 2-8 itemizes the transportation budget for the average
household, including the item purchased, the cost, and what percentage of
the total budget the item accounts for.
Transportation and Trade
The transportation system plays a critical role in Canada's trade, both
domestically and internationally. As an open economy, Canada relies on transportation
to get goods to foreign markets.
Transportation is also important for domestic trade. In addition to trade
within each province, trade between provinces is vital to regional economies.
Each province is unique in its economic makeup, with its own specific industrial
structure. Where one may be dominated by natural resources, the other may
be dominated by specific manufacturing activities, making transportation
a crucial link.
In recent years, the flow of commodities has altered significantly. For
the purposes of comparison, it is useful to look at domestic trade flows
versus international trade flows. Total flows increased by 40 per cent between
1988 and 1996. During the same period, the total output of goods (intra-regional
and inter-regional flows plus exports) increased by 30 per cent, while domestic
demand (intra-regional and inter-regional flows plus imports) increased
by 27 per cent.
Domestic flows saw an increase of eight per cent between 1988 and 1996,
the result of an 11 per cent increase in intra-regional traffic and a five
per cent decrease in inter-regional movements of goods. Clearly, domestic
transportation activities have not benefited from the increases registered
in domestic production and demand. The gains have come mainly from international
trade. Table 2-9 shows the flow of trade between 1989 and 1996.
Since 1988, Canada's exports of goods to the US have increased by 114
per cent, while exports to the rest of the world have increased by 33 per
cent. Similarly, Canada's imports of goods from the US have risen by 85
per cent, while imports from the rest of the world have increased by 67
per cent.
Canada's trade traffic with the US is the most significant. In 1988,
Canada's export business to the US represented 15 per cent of all goods
moved in Canada - today, that figure is at 23 per cent. Similarly, our import
business from the US has risen from 13 to 17 per cent of total traffic.
Table 2-10 illustrates these trade levels. Between 1988 and 1996, Canada
moved fewer goods within regions, and the share of intra-regional trade
fell from 47 to 37 per cent of total trade activity. Likewise, the share
of trade movements between regions also declined, from eleven to eight per
cent of the total.
Relative importance of trade can be measured in terms of domestic production,
that is, domestic flows plus exports to the US and the rest of the world.
The share of intra-regional trade dropped from 59 to 51 per cent of Canadian
production of goods, while inter-regional traffic fell from 14 to ten per
cent of production. While overseas exports maintained their share at seven
per cent, US exports rose from 19 to 32 per cent. Table 2-11 shows these
traffic shares of total output.
Canada exports close to 40 per cent of what it produces, and imports
slightly less than it exports. Over the past decade, these proportions have
almost doubled, which demonstrates that growth of the Canadian economy is
directly related to our participation in the global economy.
Since 1988, total exports have increased by 8.8 per cent per year in
current dollars. Exports to the US more than doubled. Table 2-12 illustrates
these changes in Canada's exports.
During the same period, imports grew at 8.4 per cent per year. Notably,
imports from countries other than the US, the European Economic Community
and Japan more than doubled. Table 2-13 illustrates these changes in Canada's
imports.
The US is by far Canada's major trading partner. Trade with the US features
access to the world's largest market. For this trade, shippers, receivers
and business people can benefit from the two countries' increasingly integrated
transportation systems.
In 1997, the US alone received 83 per cent of Canada's merchandise exports,
compared to 73 per cent just ten years earlier. Over the same period, the
share of Canadian imports from Europe and Japan dropped, benefiting the
US and the rest of the world. In 1997, over two thirds of our imported goods
came from the US. Table 2-14 charts Canada's merchandise trade.
Almost half of Canada's exports were shipped by road. Rail accounts for
20 per cent, followed by water at 17 per cent and air at six per cent. For
imports, road is by far the most used method of shipping, at 62 per cent,
followed by water and air with 17 and 13 per cent respectively. Table 2-15
shows by which mode Canada's trade was moved.
For exports, transportation equipment is the largest commodity group.
Within that group, automobiles are the single most important export good,
followed by fabricated materials and electrical equipment. Most of the goods
were shipped by road, although rail moved about 26 per cent, mostly transportation
equipment and fabricated materials. Table 2-16 shows Canada's exports to
the US and Mexico by major commodity grouping and mode.
For imports, transportation equipment is again the largest commodity
grouping at 32 per cent. Almost 80 per cent of imports enter Canada by road
and less than ten per cent by rail. Table 2-17 shows Canada's imports from
the US and Mexico by major commodity grouping and mode.
The two largest provinces, Ontario and Quebec, dominate provincial trade
with our NAFTA partners, the US and Mexico, and account for almost 75 per
cent of exports and 83 per cent of imports. Because foreign trade is so
critical to Canada's economic growth, an efficient, affordable transportation
system is essential to help Canada compete globally. In fact, without its
transportation system, Canada would not have undergone the growth it has
experienced in recent years. Table 2-18 shows Canada's merchandise exports
to and imports from the US and Mexico by province in 1996.
International Transportation Initiatives |
Canada is one of 18 member economies of the Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation
(APEC) Forum, formed in 1989 to promote open trade, investment and technical
co-operation in the Asia Pacific region. While it is not a negotiating forum,
APEC supports the work of the World Trade Organization. A unique aspect
of APEC is its emphasis on private sector participation.
For Canada, 1997 was a banner year. In November, Canada chaired the APEC
Forum in Vancouver, British Columbia. In addition to hosting the Trade and
Foreign Ministers' Meeting and the APEC Leaders' Meeting, Canada hosted
five sectoral Ministerial Meetings, including one on transportation.
Canada is active in the APEC Transportation Working Group. This group
supports regional economic growth by promoting an effective, integrated
region-wide transportation system. In June 1997, Canada hosted the second
APEC Transportation Ministerial in Victoria, British Columbia. Seventeen
APEC partners participated, sending 500 official delegates, including some
180 senior business and industry representatives.
APEC Initiatives Completed in 1997
At the June meeting, the collective Ministers of Transport accepted the
Report of the Group of Experts on Aviation Safety and Assistance
(GEASA), including the civil aviation safety recommendations. The Ministers
also signed the Declaration of Principles, which supports the harmonization
of Civil Aviation Safety Rules with International Civil Aviation Organization
(ICAO) standards. The APEC region's unprecedented growth and the globalization
of air transportation may lead to civil aviation safety issues, which the
GEASA report addresses. With Canada taking the lead for its development,
the GEASA report was based on a survey, review and prioritization of safety
issues. It includes specific recommendations related to air travel safety
in all APEC economies.
In addition, the Ministers endorsed the Joint Policy Statement on Satellite
Navigation and Communications Systems, which calls for a series of co-operative
actions to implement communications systems, and establishes an Advisory
Committee to monitor those actions. Spearheaded by Canada, the policy statement
grew out of a comprehensive study of integrated satellite-based navigation
and communication systems, in order to facilitate their implementation in
both the air and marine modes within the APEC region. A complement to the
work of the ICAO and International Marine Organization (IMO), the study
consisted of a technology review, an inventory of plans and issues, an economic
assessment and policy recommendations.
The Australian-led Model Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA) for Automotive
Products was endorsed by the Ministers. A tool to facilitate trade, the
MRA promotes bilateral or multilateral agreements between APEC members.
It is a component of the Road Transport Harmonization project, a multi-phased
initiative that promotes harmonized standards within APEC.
The Ministers signed off on the Best Practices Manual and Technical
Report, Volumes 1 and 2, for eliminating traffic congestion points.
Led by the US, the report represents the third and final phase of the Transportation
Congestion Points Study undertaken by the APEC Transportation Working Group.
The study researched the location and nature of transportation bottlenecks
at airports, seaports and land access points in the APEC Region caused by
increasing demands placed upon existing infrastructure. It also included
solutions and best practices to resolve those bottlenecks.
Finally, the Ministers endorsed the Options Paper on More Competitive
Air Services with Fair and Equitable Opportunity. The paper identified options
for future action and directed that a comprehensive final report be submitted
to Ministers by mid-1998.
APEC Initiatives Launched in 1997 under Ministerial Request
The Canadian-led Transportation Working Group established the Maritime
Safety Experts Group. The group will develop programs and mechanisms to
promote the implementation of, and compliance with, existing international
rules and standards adopted by these organizations. Ministers also urged
APEC members to work closely with international maritime safety experts,
such as the IMO.
The APEC Transportation Working Group also set up the Road Safety Experts
Group as a first step toward enhancing road safety in the APEC Region.
In addition, a Maritime Initiative was established to promote an efficient,
safe and competitive operating environment for maritime transportation.
The first project will take an inventory of restrictive and discriminatory
measures in the international maritime sector.
The Transportation Working Group will also set up a framework of standards
for the initial application of Intelligent Transportation Systems for vehicle
identification, safety, location and tolling.
And finally, building upon identified best practices from the Transportation
Congestion Points Study, an Intermodal Task Force was set up to provide
guidelines, standards and provisional options associated with an integrated
transportation system. |
|