CBC News
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Arts & Entertainment

Your View

« Previous Topic | Main | Next Topic »

What do you think of the final Harry Potter?

Comments (104)

The final instalment of the seven-part Harry Potter book series went on sale around the world local time at 12:01 a.m. July 21. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows has been flying off shelves at a rate of about three per second, according to Canadian bookseller Chapters/Indigo.

Author J.K. Rowling held a special middle-of-the-night reading at London's Natural History Museum, captivating 500 fans who won a competition to attend.

With a few main characters slated to die in the final book, the internet has been humming with plot spoilers. MORE

What do you think about the buzz on the final Harry Potter book? Are you reading it and what do you think of the book?

« Previous Topic | Main | Next Topic »

This discussion is now Closed. View the Comments.

Comments (104)

CD

Saskatoon

While reading this discussion, I have to ask what makes "great" literature? Books are made to be read. If people - millions of people of all ages in this case - read them, then i would say the story is great. And most authors would say their goal in creating the work was not to create the all time best piece of literature, but to create a story that people will read. Using this definition, the Harry Potter series has to rank up there... whether you've read it or not, the popular masses have spoken...

Posted July 25, 2007 11:49 AM

Karen

I spent the day reading DH yesterday and finished the last 3 chapters this morning.
Loved it...cried like a baby the last few chapters.

Posted July 25, 2007 10:54 AM

ANON

ontario

Love the book and the series. Pure entertainment. I just wish that JK developed the story about Snape and what was going on at Hogwarts while Harry, Hermione, and Ron were gone and left off the 19 years later bit.

Posted July 25, 2007 09:16 AM

Dan

Great Book, some suprises
Still some items to clear up
best of the books,

Posted July 25, 2007 08:08 AM

linda

the term 'instant classic' is an oxymoron.
those who decry that the Harry Potter books are not 'classic literature' are for the time being correct; but, when I read these books to my children, and they read them to theirs, the Harry Potter story will by right sit along side all the other classics.
so there! take that, all you curmudgeonous muggles!

Posted July 25, 2007 03:59 AM

A. Bakker

Canada

My wife and I finished the book at 5:30am Sunday morning. We thoroughly enjoyed it and our 9 year old daughter is reading it now.

We are constantly amazed at JKR's imagination and ability to tell a story that appeals to so many different ages at different levels. While it's a good and entertaining read, I wouldn't put the series at the same level of Tolkein or C.S. Lewis. Nonetheless, it's still a page-turner.

Enjoy it! We did.

Posted July 25, 2007 01:05 AM

Mink

Since last Friday midnight, all around the world, not just western Europe and North America, but all around the world people are reading. How great is that!

Posted July 24, 2007 09:21 PM

Laurie Joseph Gallant

I am impressed and moved by the Harry Potter series and this last book is no disappointment. I am sure that one day we will recognize the true significance behind the series. It transcends what we can only just react to at this time. I believe that this series of books will not only mark a generation of children and adults but will contribute to literally changing our world views on many human and spiritual issues. Harry Potter is a true symbol of our evolving humanity growing into a whole new dimension of life. God bless Rowling and of course Harry Potter and Company.

Posted July 24, 2007 06:57 PM

Peter Broster

HP7 or the deathly hallows was a great book. I have heard of a lot of comments flowing saying things didn't work out here and didn't work out there but essentially it's a damn good and fitting finale worthy of the series. With one huge caveat. The epilogue "19 years later" was ridiculous and completely unnecessary.

Posted July 24, 2007 04:53 PM

Katherine Wall

I've been a Harry Potter fan for years now, and I say DH was amazing - best book in the series, certainly. Rowling writes good characters (the relationships between Harry, Ron, and Hermione and between Harry and Dumbledore are especially good), gripping adventure (I finished the book after 8 hours straight reading), and a fascinating world. The most amazing thing, though, is the online fandom that has been created around the books - a fandom with its own share of epic tales. I've been in the fandom for four or five years, and it's been some of the most fun I've had.

Rowling's a great author, and I expect her books to endure for decades at the least; they're better than Pullman's and even as good as the Chronicles of Narnia. But Rowling is no Tolkien, and I have to say I find the comparison laughable. Tolkien invented a world of vastly more complexity than Rowlings, invented several languages and histories for each of them, and created an epic that is completely timeless. People looking for fun light reading may prefer Rowling; but they may also prefer any number of modern authors to Dickens, and that doesn't make them better than Dickens. There isn't, and will never be, a fantasy writer to equal Tolkien.

Posted July 24, 2007 03:35 PM

jbfreeland

'Tis to laugh. All these so called critic before me who claim that there is nothing but fluff in these HP stories. I am a 70 yr old man and have read all the books and DVD's of all the released movies (with the exception od TOTHP). I can't get enough! They have a special place in my library and I look forward to reading them again and again.

These stories are right up there with the Lord of The Rings and the Chronicals of Narnia (which I have not read).

Jo Rowlings has an exception grasp of teenage angst. She has created memorable situations and plots. She deserves any honours she may get. I hope she keeps writing.

If I enjoyed them, and millions of others have, then the critics have nothing to stand on except their own self importance.

Posted July 24, 2007 03:18 PM

Maite Mezierre

Toronto

Well, I finish the book this morning and I thing the book is absolutly great exept for the last Chapter.
It's not in the same tune as the book. It's too normal, too much like normal live, quiet.
I had rather prefered JK stop before that Chapter and then maybe we will had a next one but here we don't even know exactly what Happen to the survivor exept that they live Happily ever after.

Posted July 24, 2007 03:07 PM

PJM

Toronto

Klimstra - "Mein Kampf" was an epic fantasy ...... and we all know how that played out.

Young impressionable minds of 70 years ago are no different from the young minds of today.

Posted July 24, 2007 01:51 PM

Chris

Saskatchewan

Rowlings did have the entire story planned before penning her first book. The final chapter of the final book has been sitting under lock and key for years now, and she states she always knew there would be seven books. Her decision to release them, as they were completed, in my opinion, was a smart move - the joy of harry Potter was not so much reading the book as discussing it after and guessing with others as to what would come next.

What is "great" writing and literature? In my opinion, its books that people actually want to read. What good is the finest writing if it sits dusty on a library shelf. As someone who has a Masters Degree in English literature, I admit to having read and studied many of the classics. I've read all of the Harry Potter series as well - buying them at midnight for much less than the posted price. The midnight gatheriings are social events more so than book releases - but that's for another topic. My main point here is yes, I've read them. Yes, I enjoyed them. Yes, I'll read them again. And, from my experience, that is what makes good literature.....

By the way - for those of you who are interested, I enjoyed Harry Potter far more than Jane Austin or Shakespeare - neither of which I've read as often as Half-Blood Prince or Goblet of Fire. And I will miss the anticipation of wondering what comes next.

The hype will certainly fade. I have a feeling that the books themselves will not for some time....

Posted July 24, 2007 01:31 PM

Lisa

Edmonton

Books are similar to art; it is all in the eye of the beholder. If you read the Potter series and did not enjoy it, that is fine but I LOVED IT!
To create this much excitement for a release of a book alone is a great accomplishment and speaks louder than words of what a wonderful series J.K. Rowling has created. How often does a book release create midnight release parties all over the world with costumes, with pure excitement and anticipation with an actual countdown to midnight only comparable to a New Year’s countdown? Not in my memory have I heard of so many people planning their whole weekend around reading a book so that they can experience it without the media spoiling it.
Thank you J.K. Rowling for all the fun and excitement, you should be proud!

Posted July 24, 2007 01:12 PM

bobby

It's interesting to read the comments in this topic. For the record, I haven't read the book yet, but I will soon as my oldest child is getting to that age where she will want to read it. So I won't make comparisons to Eddings, Tolkien, Shakespeare, et al.

I think it's important to keep in mind that taste in reading is similar to taste in food. Most adolescents don't appreciate a fine caviar or fois gras (especially after they find out what it is!). Most like to start with some macaroni and cheese and develop their palate as they try new things. It seems to me that what Rowlings has done is created a dish that many kids (of all ages) can sink their literary teeth into, and if that gets them started on a lifelong road to reading it can only be a good thing.

For the record, my tastes range from Stephen King (only late at night) to Milan Kundera to Kurt Vonnegut (i.e. from Kraft Dinner to filet mignon).

Posted July 24, 2007 12:24 PM

Lynda

Halifax

Very disappointing. Rowling did a very poor job with this one. I think she should consider writing it again.

Posted July 24, 2007 11:52 AM

Jo

I think that these books are great. Perhaps they are not on level with classic literature, but they have done something that other books have not -- captivated amazing numbers of children and adults alike. The stories are full of interesting and complex characters, and are written in such a way that anyone with an imagination cannot help but be transfixed. J.K. Rowling has found her niche, her place in the literary world. This Muggle thanks her.

Posted July 24, 2007 11:35 AM

MAB

I would like to begin my little polemic by saying that I have read every Harry Potter book. In fact my wife and I have a ritual whereby we read the books aloud to each other.

However, I am sick and tired of the hyperbole surrounding the “franchise” and the now billion plus dollars that J.K. Rowling has made scribbling these inane little “spell-binders”. Much of the Harry Potter mystique (and hence its popularity) can be attributed to crass commercialism and one of the slickest marketing campaigns it has been my misfortune ever to witness.

I don’t care if the books have gotten children reading. Frankly, if you are not able to instil in your child a sense of wonder, appreciation and awe for the written word without resorting to the cheap literary devices in the Potter series then you have failed as a parent. The same goes for the astonishing number of educators who have publicly claimed the use of the Potter books in their classrooms, shame on all of you.

Between releases of the each instalment of the Potter series; I read any number of books of much greater quality and lasting value. It galls me to know that the authors of these books, in almost all cases, will not receive even a millionth of the compensation or recognition that Rowling has been able to gouge out of an apathetic public who now need to be told what their literary tastes are by a bunch of spin doctors.

I am confident however that as public interest wanes and all the ovine consumers out there have moved on to the next great “thing”, interest in Harry Potter will finally disappear forever.

At the end of the day all of us so called “grown ups” who have spent our precious time debating the relative merits of the Potter series will look back at this moment of temporary insanity and ruefully recall that the Harry Potter story was, in hindsight, “a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing”.

Posted July 24, 2007 11:03 AM

Ann Sinyard

Briliant. Excellent. Amazing. Wonderful. Fun. Sad. Exciting. Fast-pace. Action-packed. Funny. And all around, the best of the 7. A perfect way to end.

Posted July 24, 2007 10:41 AM

David Bakody

One valid point that has yet to be mentioned that Harry Potter has allowed everu adult who reads even one of the seriies to joy to chat with children and vice versa on level playing field....hmmm what a wonderful experience!

Posted July 24, 2007 09:30 AM

Claudio

Ontario

Why is it that whenever someone finds the slightest bit of happiness in this world, someone else has to come along and try to ruin it?

It's completely irrelevant whether or not the Harry Potter books are or will ever be considered great literature. It will never change the fact that millions upon millions of people (children and adults alike) have enjoyed the books immensely. To see faces light up when fans of the series talk about it, to see emotions welling up, is what it really is all about.

I still remember the wonderment and awe I felt as I read the works by Tolkien when I was a child. I've gone back to read them as an adult and the magic is still there. It really is wonderful to know that JK Rowling has provided that for this generation and the generations to come.

When someone finds a little bit of joy in this world, let them enjoy it for as long as they can.

Posted July 24, 2007 08:50 AM

Matthew Polk

Oyen

The books are great, but they are still pulp fiction. I loved the books, but to call them 'classic literature' is a stretch, even with the classical mythology references in them. Has she been given a British title yet? Its only a matter of time before the queen reads those books, and makes her a noble.

The final book was the best so far, but if you went back to the first book, its not hard to beat each one successively. I'm glad they're finished, because now I can stop obsessing and get back to work!

Posted July 24, 2007 04:11 AM

Oksana Szulhan

Not interested in the hype; I've been a Harry Potter fan from the start, but what's the big deal ? Great literature ? I think not. Great reading for children to get a literary start - you bet ! Regarding the rest of the spin . . . well, get a grip on reality and draw your own conclusions.

Posted July 24, 2007 04:06 AM

Ian

Calgary

I have not read a word of any Harry Potter books, despite the efforts of everyone else I know. Though I don't doubt their claims that the series are thoroughly enjoyable and the books very well-written, I refuse to read them. JKR is a marketing genius, having sold the rights of HP everywhere. People talk about how great it is that kids are reading, but what about the movie adaptations and video games? I saw HP GUM when I was in Chapters a couple weeks back. HP is slapped on everything. I'm surprised the series isn't still going on, as JK Rowling could make even MORE money!

Posted July 24, 2007 04:04 AM

Tommy Devlin

I read the first, and it was fine. But I'd recommend Terry Pratchett's "DiscWorld" novels as an alternative. Just personal taste.

The one inescapable point is that it got a lot of people, and particularly younger people, reading, which can only be a good thing.

I hope it carries over, and they start reading other books, and the money that was concentrated in Harry Potter gets spread around to many other authors.

Classic literature? No.

Does it matter? No.

Posted July 24, 2007 02:06 AM

Teddii

To those Muggles who are unable (or unwilling) to understand the magic of the Potter series - so sad, too bad - but, 65 million copies sold make this an A list book, by any measuring stick!

For the rest of us, this was the culmination of a saga that has inspired and transfixed each reader. While I usually slowly savour a good book, I read this one in a 14 hour marathon. I couldn't risk learning the ending from the world at large, especially after a 10 year reading investment! It's true that I'm only young at heart, but I share the delights and sorrows of this outstanding series with my children and grandchildren. There isn't anything better than that!!!!

Posted July 24, 2007 01:16 AM

Teri

Vancouver

I am a voracious reader and have read everything from the ancient epics, to the world's classics to modern and contemporary literature. I read because I love to read and despite being in my 40s, I still love to read and revisit not only the children's classics from my own childhood, but the new series and books coming out now for children, teens and young adults.

I started reading the Harry Potter series just before the first movie came out. Prior to that I resisted the urge to read them until a friend of mine encouraged me to. I'm glad she did. I've enjoyed the journey, the hype and the fun of standing with a bunch of strangers, sharing a common interest, even for just an hour or two and then going home to read and absorb a book that I, in the end, paid much less for than a Penguin Classic.

I've enjoyed every one of them. They are not flawless, and I do not consider them high lierature, but they are lovely books and I tip my hat to J.K. Rowling for writing an engaging tale, with memorable characters and who has sparked the imaginations of children and adults everywhere.

I enjoyed the last book. Yes, I thought the epilogue cheesy somewhat, but it didn't disappoint me.

I still read all genres, and any book that catches my fancy, be it beach reading to high literature, to epic poems and translated ancient texts. I love it all. I have enjoyed the Harry Potter series very much and look forward to whatever J.K. Rowling has next to offer us.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:55 PM

Colin Walsh

They aren't everyone's cup of tea, but they've sure brought a lot of value and entertainment to my family. Hundreds of hours worth. They'll forever be a part of our little library.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:42 PM

Maria

NB

It's interesting to see the comments posted by people who make the obvious point, "Its just a book." Have these people read the books? Are they big readers to begin with? I think most book lovers would agree that a good book, a great book is never "just a book."

Indeed, Harry Potter is a fictional character living in a fictional world. However, Rowling has done what every good author should and that is getting people to talk about her books. While books can be read soley for pleasure, intelligent books such as the Potter series are able to open up discussion on important issues. Anyone who has read the series understands the themes found throughout the book are not there simply for childish delight: feminism, racism, politics, the power of the media, slavery, human rights, just to name a few. These are very real and contemporary issues which are mirrored in Rowling's books.

So to those who criticize Potter, I'll say what I tell my English students: Books are meant to be critiqued. Just READ the book FIRST, then tell me why you don't like it. Don't just say, "it's hype" or "it's stupid."

On a final note regarding the quality of Harry Potter versus "great" literature... There is just as much value in the Potter series than there in the "great classics." Unfortunately, schools don't always have the resources to keep up with the fantastic literature that is being written today, leaving students to read sometimes seemingly irrelevent plays written 400 years ago. Complaints are often made about young people not reading. Well, Rowling got non-readers reading. And if Harry Potter is good enough to be taught in universities (entire courses are offered on Harry Potter!), its good enough to be taught to younger students as well.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:37 PM

Carla J. Silver

Brilliant. And it's making kids READ!!! What a miracle. For anyone who wants to criticize Rowling, I am reminded of the story of Gershwin meeting Stravinsky. When Gershwin asked Stravinsky for a lesson in composition, Stravinsky asked, "How much money did you make last year?" "$100,000." "In that case," replied Stravinsky, "I should be taking lessons from you!" If you don't like Rowling's writing, I am sure she is crying all the way to the bank. I teach English and Etymology. What she has done with language alone is very clever, not to mention all the literary, mythological, biblical and historical allusions she has drawn upon. She is an exceptionally well-read woman. I found the ending utterly unpredictable, heroism where I least expected it.

Posted July 23, 2007 10:54 PM

Louise

Alberta

I have loved the Harry Potter series for years now. I started reading them in my late 30s; I heard all the hype and decided to find out for myself if it was warranted. It was. It is.
People are asking if these books can stand the test of time...well, it's been 10 years since the first one and they haven't lost their magic.
These books are meant for anyone who enjoys good writing, great characters, entertaining stories and a hell of story.
I find it interesting that so many of the people who are criticizing the books can't even get the author's name right. It's Rowling, not Rowlands.
Me thinks you haven't even read the books if you can't get her name right...so your opinion really means nothing.
I find it sad that there really are Dursleys in this world, they wouldn't have liked these books either!

Posted July 23, 2007 10:30 PM

Freddy

Ottawa

That we've lowered our standards so much as to call the books 'classics' is shameful. They have value for kids and are certainly better than alternatives like Grand Theft Auto or Avril Lavigne CDs, but they're still stories for kids. Can't wait to see the movie!

Posted July 23, 2007 10:22 PM

Burke

Toronto

Defending Coolidge's Dogs Playing Poker. Beneath the comical surface of this 1903 painting there is a brilliant idea: the playing of poker by dogs - animals famous for being incapable of hiding their emotions. A dog could never have a good poker face: a good paw of cards would translate into a wagging tale, a bad paw - a long face. Is it 'fine art"? Are the Harry Potter books 'great literature'? It is quite possible that these arguments will outlast our obsession with such categories. However, I would argue that Dogs Playing Poker is more original than Harry Potter. The Potter books are successful because they are not original: they re-tell well established stories and myths in a clever and hospitable manner that is (obviously) very popular with today's audiences. The New Testament Bible (Bible: The Sequel, B2, The Life Of Christ...whatever you want to call it) and Star Wars did similar magic - they fused a multitude of popular stories and legends into one action packed storyline. So kudos to J.K. Rowling, George Lucas, Luke, Mark, Matthew and John, you have all written stories that have developed a deeply religious following.

Posted July 23, 2007 08:18 PM

Mel Machine

Chilliwack

This is the best book I've ever heard of. Why? Simple: I haven't heard a peep from my little sister since I bought her the book!

Posted July 23, 2007 08:13 PM

Cory Barnes

It's quite an accomplishment to get people excited about any kind of book in this day and age. There will always people who begrudge art for entertainment's sake. It's nice to see people still use their imagination to entertain and tell stories.

Posted July 23, 2007 07:53 PM

Brian

Ontario

Who cares? I agree with B. Kelly...the books are on the level of the true romances or the Hardy Boys. This is not great literature and hardly up to Tolkien or Asimov.

Posted July 23, 2007 07:46 PM

john bodner

A successful book in terms of wrapping up the increasingly complex plot elements but oddly cold and sometimes downright callous surrounding the death of key characters. What made the others rich (and at times cumbersom) was the character's complex responses to the events in their lives. In the final one we have bodies dropping every 50 pages and narry a broken main character. I call this callous and a bit fascistic since its cloaked in the 'necessity of war' haze that grippes the final chapters of the book. I didn't expect such a sterile conclusion to the tale but when so much effort is devoted to wrapping up this plot I guess there was little room for anything else. Oh and note to all authors--don't ever write an epilogue like this one... ever.

Posted July 23, 2007 07:03 PM

Gene Bonvie

Halifax

I'm glad people are enjoying this book. The only issue I have is the airs people are taking on, placing the 7 books with "The Lord of The Rings". Tolkien had a complete picture of what he was finishing (from the Hobbit) when he wrote "The Rings" in the '50s. The "Harry Potter Septolgy" was written one book at at time, in repeated response to rampant consumerism. Good job - great entertainment - lovely for the kids - but hardly classic literature. This is the McHappy Meal toy of year.

Posted July 23, 2007 07:02 PM

Alex

Toronto

The Chronicles of Narnia were much more interesting than Harry Potter.

It's a shame most don't realize there were 7 books in total...not just "The Lion, Witch, and The Wardrobe."

A poor man's Narnia!

Posted July 23, 2007 06:24 PM

David Bakody

I was hooked on the first book and every movie, and now reading the most interesting yet.

My Mother who is 99 years old next month told me she has has a book in her hand ever since she first learned to read and has used the local library to it's full potential. She has read Harry Potter and reads MacLeans from cover to cover weekly and the daily paper. Mum also told me when you get a good book read slowly and digest the book to the point of putting it down to think about what you have read. Harry Potter and the Deadly Hollows is just such a book.

Posted July 23, 2007 05:53 PM

Samantha

Do you hear that?? No?? Good - that's the 'sound' of millions of children and adults over the world, sitting silently, completely engrossed in a BOOK! Its not the sound of clattering computer keyboard keys, nor the brain-numbing screech of a video game. I dont think there are enough words to express the joy I received from watching my teenage daughter's face as her eyes hungrily gobbled up each page, word by enjoyable word. I can only imagine the incredible journey her mind was taken on for those two days as she sat reading, with the television turned off and her cellphone on voicemail. I am thankful I was able to share in her joy as she eagerly told me about the book's events, and in her sorrow when I held her when she cried openly over the death of her favorite character. You can call it hype, or whatever else you want, but I call it a blessed modern-day literary escape! Thank you, JK Rowling, for giving not only my daughter, but millions of others, a gift that speaks volumes!

Posted July 23, 2007 05:42 PM

Cheera Crow

Victoria

I've just started reading Deathly Hallows and am savoring every word. Joanne Rowling has created a magical world peopled with fascinating characters like no other. I am amazed at what she has achieved, starting in her early twenties, and hope she will continue to write now that she has completed the Harry Potter series.

I am puzzled by the number of people who make negative comments about the books, yet have not read them. What a sour bunch of trolls.

I'm 60 years old and have read the first six books twice. Better than sex!

Posted July 23, 2007 05:33 PM

rusty shackleford

Montreal

Who cares...So much stupid hype for just another fad (flavour) of the month...All this Potty crap will be history soon enough...move on...life goes on!!

Posted July 23, 2007 04:45 PM

Andrew

Markham

The books have been great! I have loved them since I started reading them in high school. Perfect? No, but we can criticize many aspects of other novels too.

I do not understand the argument "but the books are children's books". Firstly, they captivate an audience of all ages, and secondly...why can't adults enjoy a book that involves magical things?! I'm sorry to those of you who see an age limit...please enjoy your Shakespeare and other light reading that can emphasize your literary superiority.

Sometimes you have to kick back and relax a little.

Posted July 23, 2007 04:44 PM

Stephen

Montreal

I have to agree with Ann Sherwood, who are we, the first readers, to say what is great litterature... let's see what happens in 20 years. I'd love to see a kid read Hemmingway on the bus, but that's not going to happen. If university students throughout Canada read the Harry Potter series in 10 years, then and only then, will we see that Rowling has created great litterature.

p.s. Dogs Playing Poker is still around...

Posted July 23, 2007 04:42 PM

Andrew

Markham

The books have been great! I have loved them since I started reading them in high school. Perfect? No, but we can criticize many aspects of other novels too.

I do not understand the argument "but the books are children's books". Firstly, they captivate an audience of all ages, and secondly...why can't adults enjoy a book that involves magical things?! I'm sorry to those of you who see an age limit...please enjoy your Shakespeare and other light reading that clearly shows your literary superiority.

Sometimes you have to kick back and relax a little.

Posted July 23, 2007 04:42 PM

joe

ontario

It is just a book. I think the whole thing is silly

Posted July 23, 2007 04:38 PM

Alison

Toronto

I thought the last book was great, but much more than that it has given our whole family a set of books that everyone reads from grandparent to grandchild. I have read many of the other authors that have been mentioned as "great" by others on this page. I agree they were great books, but I would argue this is a great series for the pure reason that kids(and adults) are reading!! This may well lead them to read some of those other authors as well. It is a shame that some feel the need to belittle what others read. When children or others choose to pick up a book instead of a video game it is something to be celebrated not denigrated.

Posted July 23, 2007 04:21 PM

Lauren H

Guelph

I thoroughly enjoyed the book. I spent an entire day on the beach reading it...one of the best days of my summer so far! I thought the ending neatly tied up all the loose ends that I was wondering about, which was great for me!

To those who are against it...to each their own, but why do you feel that your opinion is more justified, and more important than any other?

You are more than welcome to have your say, just like I am, but don't expect the world to agree, and do not try to argue us down until we agree with you. Everybody is entitled to THEIR OWN opinion...not yours.

Posted July 23, 2007 04:19 PM

Seema Sandhu

I think we forget that these books were made for children to enjoy and therefore the book may not be that great to you but it is to the child who is reading it. At the end of the day that is what counts. The Harry Potter series have encouraged kids to read and not just sit and watch TV or play video games. This is what we need more of.

Posted July 23, 2007 04:09 PM

Beth

The HP books have a huge online community who I believe would be repulsed to read that HP is any less of a literary piece of a work than Dickens.

You have to read the books to understand the pull they generate. Just like C.S. Lewis, JK Rowling gave not only children, but adults an opportunity to enter a world that was so magical you dreamed about being able to be apart of it - EVEN as an adult!

When such a novel generates a love for literature, why are we seeking to find negatives in it? Be happy for what it has been - a tool for children to learn to read better and appreciate books!

Posted July 23, 2007 03:42 PM

Dizzle

Ottawa

I am glad that it is finally over....
no more hype, no more spending crazy amounts of money on these books....

Posted July 23, 2007 03:42 PM

Gerry

Gloucester

My daughter had the 3 box set of the 1st books. I ignored them. The movie HP & The Philosopher’s Stone came out and took the girls to see it. When I got home, I immediately set to reading the 1st three. Luckily, I had then a small wait for Book 4. Books 5, 6 and 7 were all pre-ordered so they would arrive on publishing day. Deathly Hallows was brilliant. The epilogue? Well, it did close off the series didn’t it? I did not read it for secret meanings, moral messages or any of a number of things some expert reviewers look for. I was looking for a jolly-good read and to be entertained whilst reading it – I was; When I re-read it – I will be again. Thank you JK. Oh and I’ve never bothered to buy the books with the “Adult’s” cover. We started with the “Children’s Cover” (Thank-you Raincoast for using the Bloomsbury Covers throughout) and never cared who thought I was reading a ‘kids’ book on the bus.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:41 PM

Carol

London

What is fine literature really? Get off your literary high horses and appreciate the wonder of Harry Potter. In todays society children usually prefer to spend their time on the computer or in front of the TV instead of reading a book. J. K. Rowling does not have a captive audience like in Tolkien or Lewis's day yet she has managed to create a story so wonderful that millions and millions of children and adults around the world can't wait to pick up her new book. The story teaches children about morality in so many ways. I think that Harry and friends are great role models for my children and I am thrilled that my children have spent the past 48 hours reading Potter instead of playing mindless X-Box games!

Posted July 23, 2007 03:38 PM

Robert

Montreal

These books are entertainment. Like movies that are hyped--and which we choose to see or not--these books have been hyped. But beyond the hype is a story that was very well thought and organized. Sure, it is not "great literature" from the snobby English Major point-of-view, but it is a compelling saga that was fun to read. While I agree with one comment that this was a better edited book, I would have liked one thing to stay that I suspect was edited out. I think there might have been one last mention of the Dursleys to let readers know they had made it through ok. I know, minor quibble, but really to me they were the only people who did not get closure to their story line. However minor, they could have been given one last paragraph or something? Maybe an owl post message to Harry from Dudley? You get my point I am sure.

I think what I liked most in this was the vindication of Severus Snape; not that I ever liked him, but it was nice to see he was perhaps less of a curmudgeon after all.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:35 PM

amanda

Some people take themselves too seriously. I've read Harry Potter as an adult and thoroughly enjoyed the story. I admit that I am generally a snob when it comes to what I read,(the other book I'm reading now is War and Peace) but JKR is a story teller. I don't think she set out to produce great literature but something her daughter would want to read someday. Harry Potter can appeal to all people if they would just set aside some of their pretensions and enjoy it for what it is...a truly great story.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:32 PM

Patrick

Windsor

It may not be the greatest literature according to scholars or critics in comparsion to classical literature but if it gets kids reading, it IS great literature.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:26 PM

D. Korpan

It never fails to astound me how people can take something as innocent as a book and turn it into some personal crusade for God. The Harry Potter series is with fictional characters you know make believe. Harry Potter is a book for generations and introduces kids to the wonders of the written word. While Harry Potter could be considered a children's series some of the themes are anything but childish. While this series is fantastic I still prefer David Eddings and J.R. Tolkien as well as R.A. Salvatore. Fantasy writing has come a long way and writers like J.K Rowling bring hope that this genre is just beginning to grow. It is my hope that the genre continue to grow and talented writers such as Rowling continue to emerge.
P.S. Comparing a fantasy novel to classic literature is very droll and doesn't quite work. Fantasy is supposed to be an adventure not a Intellectually stimulating piece of work . If you want stimulating go reread something by Mark Twain or Charles Dickens I'll wait.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:25 PM

HP No.1 Fan

london

The Harry Potter books are the best non -fiction or fiction books ever. I am eleven years old and I have read all the books 3 times and anyone who says they don't deserve the amount of attention they get is crazy. The Deathly Hallows was fantastic. I think it was the perfect ending to the story.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:23 PM

Balkar

Toronto

What do I think of the Harry Potter Book?
Well actually I don't think of it at all. Seems like a lot of 'news' organizations are manufacturing the hype - and then turning around and reporting the hype that was artificial to begin with.
Does he live or does he die? Who cares. It's a FICTIONAL book.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:11 PM

Paul Klimstra

PJM:

Rowlands has created an epic fantasy; some would say the book you worship is just another epic fantasy.

C.S. Lewis, a God fearing Christian, wrote "The Chronicles of Narnia", which would certainly shape young minds. Care to denigrate that as well?

Posted July 23, 2007 03:03 PM

Alan

Kitchener

Who cares. There are alot more interesting current issues than Harry Potter.
Just another big media hype to squeeze our pocket books. I know people who preordered the book and were heading out to pick it up at midnight. What a joke. I walked into a Walmart the next day and they had a skid full of the book to purchase.

Posted July 23, 2007 02:38 PM

Tadd

Toronto

End of an era and I'll be sad to see them go.
I'm not claiming Potter was groundbreaking literature, but it did what many people claimed was impossible in the internet era: it got people of every age group, notably younger children excited about reading. That in and of itself is a feat that definitely deserves some recognition.

Posted July 23, 2007 02:32 PM

PTJG

Toronto

Of course this series of books are not truly great literature ... and good thing they are not. If they were than likely less than one percent of the people in over 200 countries who read the series would otherwise not have. Sit back, read-em and enjoy!!!

Posted July 23, 2007 02:24 PM

Erica

BC

No matter how popular the Harry Potter books are... it in no way can compare to other sci-fi/fantasy series such as Dune by Herbert, Lord of the Rings by Tolkein, or Wheel of Time by Robert Jordan (11+ books). Not to mention the Elvenbane books.

True, Harry Potter is intended more for kids to young adult, but any comparison to other incredible sci-fi or fantasy series is unjustified.

Oh, and reading any Shakespear does not make one well-read. He should not be considered at the top of the pile in regards to literature. There are so many authors, past and present which write incredible things.

Posted July 23, 2007 02:14 PM

An adult fan

Ottawa

I will admit that I read the book in one sitting and I enjoyed it (though I found the ending an easy way out - but that is another topic for discussion). My only regret is that I had to read it so quickly. Why? Because this would be the only time I could read something and guess how it turned out without beign able to check if I was right. It was a true surprise, somethign I have rarely found in literature or movies. I enjoyed having 50 pages left and being able to discuss with my husband what happenned and how it might end. There were no blurbs, no summaries,no reviews out there to spoil it. How often in life does a surprise like that ever happen?

Posted July 23, 2007 01:57 PM

Elena Zovatto

I started reading the books shortly before Goblet of Fire was released. I got so fed up with all the hype and comparisons to Dahl and Lewis that I decided to read the first book in paperback and see for myself.

The weekend after I read Philospher's Stone, I bought all the books in hardcover.

I have to take issue with the literary snobs and their comments about velvet paintings of dogs playing poker. To quote Sturgeon, the best science fiction/fantasy is as good as the best literary fiction. I sense that, like Vernon Dursley, these curmudgeons don't approve of imagination on general principle.

While both Goblet of Fire and Order of the Phoenix would have benefited from more stringent editing, Half-Blood Prince and Deathly Hallows are very tight writing.

The plotting was exceptional, the characterization wonderful, the imagery powerful - a brilliant summation to the series, and one which I anticipate re-reading several times over the years, as I have done with the other books.

Comparisons to Dahl and Lewis are justified, in my opinion.

Posted July 23, 2007 01:17 PM

Brian

Alberta

As a novelist still stuck in the magical world of the "unpublished", my spin on the Harry Potter phenom is to wonder just what goes on in the heads of all the publishers who rejected HP. How can an earnest author expect fair appraisal of his work when those who are paid to know, obviously don't even recognize a global hit like HP when they see it. What chance for the rest of us? Not to worry, book publishers' cousins, the record companies, didn't want a loser band called The Beatles, either. JKR is still only one perceptive publisher away from still being on welfare. If the final HP made you sad, think about that.

Posted July 23, 2007 12:45 PM

R McIntyre

Ottawa

With the high-school dropout rate at 25% in some cities and kids becoming addicted to video games, I think its great that kids are willing to read hundreds of pages in a book. Its nice to hear that kids are excitedly talking about reading a book.

My only hope is that they do not stop now that this series is over and continue their love for reading by going to their local library (where books are free) and reading truly great works of literature like Jane Austen, Dickens, Shakespeare and many, many more.

Posted July 23, 2007 12:17 PM

Ann Sherwood

Calgary

The test to be called 'great literature' is the test of time. The Harry Potter books are decent reading at this point. But, it's good to see kids excited about reading period. The question is : will it continue?

Posted July 23, 2007 12:05 PM

Brenda Law

Ottawa

As someone who started reading the series as an adult, I am somewhat amused at all the comments that these are "children's books" and therefore unworthy of adult attention. I'm even more amused at those of you who insist on how bad the books are without even reading them.

They are escapist, in a sense. There are no magic wands, house elves, or spells that heal in this world. Children know this as much as adults do. But there is love, courage, and hard choices. There is always the inner battle between doing that which is easy and that which is right. These are the things that I found "real" in these books.

The books themselves are not perfect, but I must confess I enjoyed the ending and felt a nice sense of satisfaction. Are they the best pieces of fiction I have ever read? No. But that doesn't make them unworthy of an adult's time. I got my book yesterday, and I'm not ashamed of it!

Posted July 23, 2007 12:01 PM

bob mackenzie

clearwater

When I was eight years old, a family friend gave me a christmas present. It was "The Hobbit", a new book by a "new" author, J.R.R. Tolkien. When they became available, he gave me the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy. That led to my becoming a voracious and eclectic reader. I'm certain that Ms. Rowling's influence on thousands of children in this generation will be the same as Professor Tolkien's was in mine.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:54 AM

Wayne

Toronto

I take issue with B. Kelley's assessment of "Dogs Playing Poker" as second-rate art. The only way to improve it would be to set in on a velvet background. The same goes for Harry Potter. I say velvet dust jackets, please!

Posted July 23, 2007 11:26 AM

Pearl Williamson

Hamilton

I don't have my copy yet, but I have enjoyed the rest of them so far and think it is a wonderful thing to see children as well as grown ups taking the time to read. Any book that can capture the attention of children like the Harry Potter books is a wonderful thing.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:26 AM

L. Ariadne

Charlottetown

For those who have commented and have not read the book, my suggestion would be do your homework before making a comment. If you haven't read the book, your opinion really can't count for much.

I enjoyed the books very much. Although I am an adult, I often read well written children's books. Sometimes I just don't want to see the foul language, emotional baggage and disfunctional relationships that abound in books aimed at adults. I come across that enough in my daily life and when I read a book I want something different and magical.
And the Harry Potter books do that for me.

Posted July 23, 2007 11:12 AM

frandsen

Anything that gets people of any age to start reading for entertainment is a good thing. More readers = more authors = more books.

I like to read for entertainment & although I haven't yet read any Harry Potter books, I've seen a couple of the movies and I like the whole idea of teens & magic & heroes & villians. Takes me back to my own kidhood when I used to daydream about similar worlds.

Who cares if it's great literature? It's fun. That's the point.

The only thing that I find irritating is some adults who are now calling themselves "muggles". I suppose, if you think of yourself as a muggle, then that's what you are, but I wish you'd keep it to yourself.

Posted July 23, 2007 10:10 AM

Vern

victoria

Kudos' to you Keith for resisting the temptation to read a series of children's books despite the pleasure you received from your Hardy Boys. I would like to point out that I did use the term covet not acquire. There is currently over 450 holds at our local library to read the latest edition of the book which indicates that not all Canadian children are as spoiled as you seem to believe. The appeal of this book is hardly the quality of the writers work, although I have not read them, I have been assured by my own child that they are hardly in the realm of classic literature, like Wilde or Dickens, but the appeal stems from the fact that these are the books, much like your Hardy Boys of this generation. Its a community appeal!

Posted July 23, 2007 10:06 AM

K J Trainor

Charlottetown

Thought it was excellent - hated to see the end of the book and the series but it ended well. JK Rowling is, quite simply, amazing! We will miss Harry Potter in our house!

Posted July 23, 2007 09:46 AM

C McCoy

Edmonton

Only having read the first book in the series, (and thought it was good), I am no authority to comment. However any author who can so captivate young people that they put aside the electronic toys and read for real, that author has done a real service to humanity.

Posted July 23, 2007 09:23 AM

Peter

Toronto

I was a skeptic of the whole Harry Potter phenomenon until I actually decided to try reading the books. Despite clearly being aimed at kids, the books are surprisingly engaging for adults as well. They are based in themes that kids can understand and that resonate with people of all ages: the bonds of family, friendship, loyalty, courage, and love.

Even in a genre as frequently mined as fantasy and magical fiction, Rowling has introduced a lot of creativity while using age-old icons and themes. The most appealing thing about these books, however, is that it treats its characters, stories, and its readers with a degree of seriousness and respect. They are easy to read but not trite, and I believe that many readers will have a lifetime of reading these books over again.

I like how Harry is supposedly a "chosen one" (what fantasy series isn't about a chosen one?) and yet it is not some unexplained power within him that makes him unstoppable. Instead, it is his own nerve, courage, and the frienship and love of people around him that help to pull him through against the odds. I feel that kids and adults alike can relate to that a lot more than some kind of messianic powers granted through some mysterious prophecy.

The books are far from perfect. This final book in particular I thought was quite uneven, although enjoyable overall. I feel that Rowling is a bit too maudlin with some of her characters, and Harry's pre-ball Cinderella-like life living with cruel relatives was a source of my initial skepticism. Thankfully, her maudlin tendancies do not overwhelm the series, and it remains enjoyable for all.

Posted July 23, 2007 09:15 AM

HLC

Oakville

I think it was a fantastic ending. The final lesson to not pity the dead but to pity those who cannot love in life is brilliant. It was a journey for our beloved main characters, and heart wrenching to lose those that became causalities of the war.

As well learning to forgive and feel for a character that became so disliked throughout each books, the Prince’s Tale was a story of loss and regret, and learning that every character that seemed so simple became more complex and more human.

I also believe people are being far too harsh on the epilogue that was provided by Rowling. It's important to remember that these are HER characters, and she obviously wanted to ensure that her fans knew what she knew about whom they married, their children and that the peace still existed 19 years later. I think it was a beautiful endnote to add to the series even if it is considered a bit cheesy, we must remember it is children's literature in the end... plus, it was every fangirls dream that things ended so happily.

I first started to read the books 7 years ago when I was 14, and growing through my years I have used Harry Potter to escape into a world which was always enchanting, and where the greater good was fighting the darkness of the world and where there was always comfort in familiar characters.

Posted July 23, 2007 09:08 AM

Danielle

NL

I wish the media would give people time to actually read the book before they start talking about it!!

Posted July 23, 2007 09:05 AM

Joe

Halifax

While I do enjoy the generalized genre and would never begrudge anyone a decent summer fluff read, these are still children’s books after all. Books like the Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe for example, were great during grade school but there is far more to be gained and enjoyed from literature actually intended for adult audiences.

I don't find much comfort in the "at least people are reading" argument either. There is a huge difference between a Harry Potter book and the works of Hemmingway or Twain (among hundreds of others) for example and there are many more things to be gained from any number of writings both historic/classic as well as modern than there are from what is essentially fantasy aimed at children and young teenagers.

The Harry Potter books are certainly popular and I would buy them for a young reader in a second but they really cannot be considered “great” literature at all and I would expect that even 18 year olds would crave something a bit meatier to wrap their heads around.

Posted July 23, 2007 08:47 AM

Leeanne

Halifax

While it has been fun to watch all the hype, the midnight book releases, the costumes, the movie premieres,in the end, twenty years from now, we will still be reading these books, because they are good books, destined to be classics of children's literature in the same way as C.S. Lewis and Tolkein. Rowling genuinely gets the emotions of these young people, the joy and sadness, frustration, jealousy, fear and love. These books are well-written, funny, smart - the last one made me laugh and cry. J.K. has managed to keep the quality consistent through the entire series, a daunting task considering the complexity of the plot - she can pick up a fact dropped as an aside in an early book and make it a major turning point later on. I look forward to sharing these books with my grandchildren in years to come. If nothing else, she has managed to drag a generation of children away from the TV and computer long enough to actually read a book!

Posted July 23, 2007 08:17 AM

mt

Ottawa

B. Kelley, I'm with you. This series is written for children ...
I think it is wonderfull, and a little astonishing, to see children lined up outside a *bookstore* at midnight - especially considering that each installment of the series is of considerable length. And given that the vast majority of other 'midnight line-ups' are for the latest video game, the Potter series is certainly doing society a favour.
But none of this changes the fact that these books are written for children!

Posted July 23, 2007 07:54 AM

Martin McCann

London

I think various reviewers miss the point of the epilogue. It cuts away the chance of spin off further books. Rowling had to find her freedom.The epilogue gives her that far more effectively than Holmes fall at the Reichenbach Falls.

Posted July 23, 2007 06:50 AM

PJM

Toronto

I have not read the latest or any of the other books in the Harry Potter series. I have no intention of doing so. They represent the fantasy world of today. Our childrens minds have again been led into a make believe world of nonsense.
Rowlands has a particular writing skill. She avoids the Creator of man and all things, and substitutes with how a world of magic and sorcery is the real foundation of life. Her world reveals the darkness of failing to acknowledge the presence of Almighty God.
It's pure fiction nourishing impressionable minds

Posted July 23, 2007 06:31 AM

John

Vancouver

Hey guys, those books really sucked. It lacked character development, original plot, and good writing. I suggest you pick up some Douglas Coupland if you want some pickings that aren't as dull (albeit, good stuff) as the ones you read in school.

Posted July 23, 2007 03:03 AM

J Hartford

I have yet to read the final book, but I could not resist going on Wikipedia to at least see what the ending was. I know, I know, it's kinda cheating- but frankly I just could not wait. I was afraid if I did not know the ending (or at least the most important figures of the death count), I would race through the book and not enjoy it. The best part of a story is the journey, not the ending, so I don't think I spoiled it for myself too much.
There is little about the Harry Potter series that I could say that hasn't already been said, but to all those that accuse the series (as well as other Speculative fiction titles) of being too "escapist": Everything in the media has an element of escaptism to it, the fantasies with elves and dragons are no different to the cheap romance novels or fast paced action movies that are enjoyed by similar masses. They all transport us into worlds that we sometimes want to be apart of.
For me, that is the true magic of J.K Rowling's series: creating a world that is obvious fantastic, yet so familiar to us all, we embrace it to the point that we inject a part of ourselves into the world.

Posted July 23, 2007 12:50 AM

Jim Julal

I just finished the book and I'm somewhere between a sense of completeness and a sense of loss. The book was absolutely smashing folks and no spoilers will be given by me. At the end of this journey though, there seems to be a loss much like leaving camp, leaving school, leaving good friends behind and traveling alone. I whole-heartedly wish to thank J.K., the fans and especially the Mugglenet group for their continual love of the series. Although the final book has been read and the journey almost over, I have the sense of choosing to remember all that is good in the Harry Potter world and it makes me happy and has enriched my life. To those that have yet to read the book, happy reading. You will not be disappointed!
Much love and happiness,
Jim

Posted July 22, 2007 10:06 PM

Anita

I just wanted to mention that many children have read this just because they wanted to. I have a child that discovered Harry before he became popular and continued to enjoy the series through the fandemonium.
Yes, it is also true that some kids read this because "so and so" did. If that's the reason that a child starts to read, does it really matter? I watched some of those children decide that they would read the rest of the books because they enjoyed the first one.
I've read each of the books, too. Finished the last one at 9 last night. It was a satifying read but it's sad to think that the series, as far as Harry goes, is at an end. Hopefully, there will be something in store for others. I'm looking forward to whatever else J.K. Rowling chooses to give us. Although she certainly won't need to do it to make a living.

Posted July 22, 2007 08:30 PM

Erica

BC

While I enjoyed the movies as an adult, I did find them all awfully dark and predictable. (The acting and effects were well done btw.)

But I do shake my head when I see stories of people lining outside bookshops 'dying' to get a copy of the new book. Then I saw the price of the new hard cover and I nearly fell over. But I guess people are gullible enough and brainwashed enough to pay that much.

I will admit I am curious to find out what happens in the final book, but you know what, I can wait. And guess what? My life has gone on without being among the first.

My children are too young to watch or follow the story of Harry Potter yet. I sincerely hope that when they are older, they are not brainwashed into thinking they need to be among the first buy anything the second it's available at any cost.

I am making sure that they become interested in reading, that is extremely important to me. And I am glad that the Harry Potter books has renewed many kids interest in reading out there. But the 3-ring-circus that has been the final book's release is pathetic.

Posted July 22, 2007 05:26 PM

Brie Cifu

Wow, 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows' was phenomenal. Before I read the final book I was thinking about which of the main characters would die, and after finishing the book, I believe that J.K. Rowling did a wonderful job in balancing the happiness and sadness the conclusion of the Harry Potter series brought. The ending of the book had me in tears, actually the whole book did, but not all of my tears were shed in anguish. Also, I enjoyed the different sides of characters that were revealed, especially those characters that I was sure I had figured out! J.K. Rowling has created a timeless classic not only in the 7th book, but with the entire Harry Potter series. I truly honor not only her cunning imagination and writing techniques, but also her ability to capture the interest of millions of people by inventing a story that contains a perfect blend of love, war, and an complicated and clear plot, filled with characters that portray various traits that we, as readers, can certainly compare ourselves to. I, personally, will be able to read the Harry Potter series over and over for years to come, and I have marked all of the books early on as favorites that I will always look upon with awe and respect. J.K. Rowling, I thank you for your inspiring novels, or as I believe, classic pieces of literature.

Posted July 22, 2007 04:21 PM

Allan Eizinas

Simcoe

I retired over 7 years ago and have read every book (to date) in the series. When the Harry Potter phenomena first began, I felt that to be able to comment on it that I should read the work. I found it very readable and enjoyable and allowed me the insight into the younger generation’s discussions of “Death Eaters” et al.

I have enjoyed every Potter novel since and my separated collection is somewhere in transit between other adult members of my extended family.

There are those who study literature, there are those who read these books for their “anti-religious” biases and then there are those who read “Animal Farm: A Fairy Story” as a pleasant tale of a farm.

Each to his own.

But then again - this is an opinion of just a Muggle.

Posted July 22, 2007 01:56 PM

Jennifer K

Even across the world, on vacation from my home country Canada, I refused to wait for the final installement to the Harry Potter series! I'd first gone out friday night at 10 expecting insane masses of people, but when we got there and there was no one we realised we were hoaxed by the internet!Reaching home dissapointed and hard broken at not being able to stay awake reading, I stayed awake waiting till I could return to the store saturday morning, we'd left so early that I was the first one trogh the door and the first one out with a book and ever so pleased I triumphantly walked trough the streets waving my Bloomsbury Harry Potter bag. The second I got home, I was sucked into the book's world and 15 hours later, I was done. And I couldn't be dissapointed! Despite the sappy epilogue that I hadn't been excpecting and some of the characters I was sad to see die, I aboslutely adored the book and found it a show of just how spectacular an authoress J.K. Rowling really is! Reading the book was so excited, I couldn't put it down! Now I just can't wait to go home, sit down and read all 7 one right after the other, and I'm comforted by the thought that I'll always have the permission to re-enter the magical world of Harry Potter!

Posted July 22, 2007 01:12 PM

Derek Strelioff

Having now read the entire series, I can say that Rowling shows great skill at weaving minor or trivial facts or events from earlier books into later ones.

I think that Rowling has shown amazing literary skill: she either had a master plan for the series at the very beginning, or has tremendous ingenuity at incorporating throwaway remarks and peripheral characters into a larger narrative. Perhaps it was a combination of the two.

I see this depth as a positive sign in today's increasingly bite-sized media. When I look at the popularity of the Harry Potter series, alongside complicated serialized TV programs, like Lost, Jericho, Doctor Who, and Battlestar Galactica, I can see hope for more meaningful and intelligent entertainment. I think it's great that young people can watch shows and read books (which seems to be increasingly difficult), rather than another vapid sitcom, reality show or sappy romantic novel.

Posted July 22, 2007 11:47 AM

Keith

Toronto

Relax Vern! I remember growing up with the Hardy Boys and such from an era gone by. At least people are reading. If you chose to sell out to all the gimmicks that are marketed with things today - that's a choice. My parents didn't succumb to that pressure and we did not always get what was on the store shelves. We turned out ok. The only person to blame for spoiling the child is... well, the parent.
No - I have not read or will read Harry Potter or see the movies. I just haven't done it. Bravo to J.K. Rowling on a job well done!

Posted July 22, 2007 10:36 AM

Craig O

London

I thouroughly enjoyed the book. Read it all in one day and I couldn't have been happier with the way Rowling managed to bring it all together. Yes, it is quite complicated, but that was expected considering the events of the sixth book. The novel was as good as I believe she could have made it. My only real objection is with the epilogue, which I found too much at odds with the rest of the book and largely unnecessary.

To B. Kelly: I feel you're entirely missing the point of the Harry Potter series. It isn't meant to be traditional great literature, it's meant to be modern great literature. True, there are several flaws in the writing that anyone with a basic understanding of literature could point out. However, the books are exactly what they make themselves out to be - easy to read, with a complex and interesting storyline. They're books that most people just can't put down. The target audience is and always has been young adults; teenagers who've become so disillusioned from the books that get thrown at them in school that they've just stopped reading at all. Please remember that not everyone likes fine art - Dogs Playing Poker has its merits too.

Posted July 22, 2007 09:05 AM

Stacy Dooks

'He knew everything about literature except how to enjoy it' -Joseph Heller, Catch-22

I first encountered the Harry Potter books while taking a class in Fantasy literature at Dalhousie University. My initial response to the Potter phenomenon was negative; it seemed to be the literary equivalent of the various 'Pokemeon'-style fads carried over to a series of books and given a wizardly sheen. It was only when I was mandated for my grade to read Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone that I actually purchased the book and read it. . .in a single sitting. Since then I've done my best to snag each copy of the Potter books as they've been released, and have taken the journey not only with Rowling and her characters, but the community of readers that has arisen around the story of the Boy Who Lived.

Rowling has said she will never write anything quite as popular as this tale of coming of age amidst the growing battle between good and evil. I'm not sure if that's true or not, but what I am sure of is that to millions of people worldwide the Harry Potter books have been a source of entertainment, of enjoyment, and also maybe a source of inspiration. We none of us can hop on a broomstick and fly, but we have had friends, we have had enemies, we have made assumptions and judged by appearances and learned (sometimes to our chagrin) that what we see is rarely what we get.

Are the books perfect? Of course not. All art is never completed, only abandoned as the saying goes. But what we have is a story well told, with a beginning, middle, and an ending. And that countless readers young and young at heart have discovered the books, bonded over the books, laughed and cried over these stories that have committed the cardinal sin of literature and been--gasp and choke-- popular. In a world that seems to be coming apart at the seams, anything that brings us together in shared joy should be treasured.

Posted July 22, 2007 05:24 AM

Sarjit

How wonderful that not only did these books give children countless hours of enjoyment, these children, our future readers and authors will continue to enjoy other books and pass on the enjoyment of reading for generations to come.
What an accomplishment for the author J.K. Rowling !! Way to go !!!!

Posted July 21, 2007 11:35 PM

Tomm

Canada

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a good piece of summer escapism.

I too have noticed that the writing has been a touch spotty, but the strength of the history of the story (6 previous books) will certainly be more than enough to cause me to finish the series.

Posted July 21, 2007 03:12 PM

Vern

Victoria

I have witnessed this, not as a reader, but as a parent of a potter fan. It has occurred to me that this generation has been successfully marketed to for their whole brief lives and the potter books are a prime example of that. The items they covet such as these books and cell phones and i-pods are really filling in for the lack of community we have in our modern western society. Our modern lifestyle sadly lacks the tight communal ties that for most of time were the norm. These children are rigidly managed through education and daycare while their parents are busy working to foot the bills. Religion and other community based socialization are scanty at best and the large extended family is old news. In order to feel a part of the greater society these kids hold on tight to the items that pull them together. I am not saying it is wrong or sad in any way particularly considering that they are pushing the arts and reading at the kids. The series is fine and if we are lucky perhaps some of them will continue to read and explore other books and stick to the fiction genre, which definitely could use the economic encouragement which could come as these youngsters grow up and become adults.

Posted July 21, 2007 12:25 PM

B. Kelley

No, I'm not reading it. I have read two of the previous Potter books and, frankly, I found them to be somewhat sophmoric and predictable, which I suppose is understandable given the target consumer.

I know that this will offend the true Potter believers who have turned this "pablum for the masses" into something of a religious cult offering, but the product does not even approach the quality of the truly great writings and novels that history has given us.

Labelling the Harry Potter series as great literature is like calling Dogs Playing Poker fine art. It just isn't so.

Posted July 21, 2007 11:28 AM

« Previous Topic | Main | Next Topic »

Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

Obama, Huckabee win Iowa caucuses
Democratic Illinois Senator Barack Obama and former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee have been declared the winners of their presidential caucuses in Iowa, the first test in the race for the White House.
January 3, 2008 | 9:36 PM EST
Kenyan protesters set to march again Friday
Kenya's opposition party said it will try again Friday to hold a banned anti-government rally in the country's capital, after hundreds of protesters at Thursday's planned march were met with tear gas and water cannons.
January 3, 2008 | 10:24 AM EST
Musharraf not 'fully satisfied' with Pakistani probe of Bhutto's death
Pervez Musharraf denied accusations the military or intelligence services were involved in the killing of Benazir Bhutto, but said he was not satisfied with Pakistan's probe into her death.
January 3, 2008 | 7:39 PM EST
more »

Canada »

Police ID 14-year-old victim of Toronto's first 2008 homicide
A 14-year-old-girl killed on New Year's Day has been identified by Toronto police as Stefanie Rengel, the daughter and stepdaughter of two veteran Toronto police officers.
January 3, 2008 | 5:53 PM EST
Atlantic Canada digs out from latest storm
The East Coast was digging out Thursday after the latest in a series of winter storms ? but there were few places to put all the white stuff.
January 3, 2008 | 8:42 AM EST
Attacker dies in botched home invasion east of Calgary
A violent home invasion east of Calgary ended with one of the attackers dead and a second suffering serious stab wounds early Thursday morning.
January 3, 2008 | 8:15 PM EST
more »

Health »

Massive survey examining health, toxic chemical levels of Canadians to begin
A groundbreaking national health survey to discover what kinds of toxic chemicals are in Canadians' bodies, as well as examining other health issues such as obesity, will begin in B.C. in the coming days.
January 3, 2008 | 3:15 PM EST
Brisk walking regime can alleviate stress in menopausal women
Menopausal women who suffer from stress, anxiety or depression can benefit from undertaking a regular walking routine, new research suggests.
January 3, 2008 | 1:41 PM EST
Cocaine vaccine in development in U.S.
Two U.S. researchers in Houston are working on a cocaine vaccine they hope will become the first-ever medication to treat people hooked on the drug.
January 3, 2008 | 10:42 AM EST
more »

Arts & Entertainment»

Stinky Cheese man named U.S. kids' books ambassador
Jon Scieszka, author of such bestselling picture books as The Stinky Cheese Man and The True Story of the Three Little Pigs, has been named the ambassador for children's books in the U.S.
January 3, 2008 | 4:45 PM EST
Expect pickets at Golden Globes, striking writers say
The Writers Guild of America is saying no deal to Golden Globe Awards organizers, who had hoped to negotiate a ceremony without a picket line.
January 3, 2008 | 11:11 AM EST
Sean Penn to head Cannes festival jury
American actor and director Sean Penn will head the awards jury at the Cannes Film Festival this year, organizers announced Thursday.
January 3, 2008 | 9:09 AM EST
more »

Technology & Science »

Insects contributed to dinosaur's demise, book says
The rise of insects was a factor in the downfall of dinosaurs, according to new book, What Bugged the Dinosaurs? Insects, Disease and Death in the Cretaceous.
January 3, 2008 | 3:03 PM EST
Wikia Search nears launch
Wikia Search, a search engine that will use human input to answer queries, will get a test launch Jan. 7.
January 3, 2008 | 2:03 PM EST
Nature, man jointly cook Arctic: report
There's more to the recent dramatic and alarming thawing of the Arctic region than can be explained by man-made global warming alone, a new study found.
January 3, 2008 | 9:56 AM EST
more »

Money »

Chrysler takes over number two spot in Canadian car market
Chrysler Canada has overtaken Ford as the second-biggest vehicle seller in the country, bumping Ford out of the position it has held for decades.
January 3, 2008 | 5:58 PM EST
Toyota outdrives Ford in 2007 in U.S. market
Toyota Motor Corp. moved into second spot in the U.S. market last year as it broke Ford's grip behind General Motors.
January 3, 2008 | 3:43 PM EST
Gold reaches another new high
The price of gold hit new record levels on Thursday as it reached an intraday trading high of $871.20 US an ounce on the New York Mercantile Exchange.
January 3, 2008 | 12:47 PM EST
more »

Consumer Life »

Florida cold snap didn't harm orange crops, say growers
A blast of unusually cold weather doesn't appear to have damaged Florida's multibillion-dollar citrus crop, an industry spokesperson said Thursday.
January 3, 2008 | 3:59 PM EST
Drug makers spend more on marketing than research: study
U.S. drug companies spend almost twice as much on marketing and promoting medications than on research and development, a new Canadian study says.
January 3, 2008 | 10:15 AM EST
Kids' stomach remedies contaminated with microbes: Health Canada
Health Canada is advising consumers not to use two natural health products to treat digestive upset in children because of contamination.
January 3, 2008 | 9:57 AM EST
more »

Sports »

Scores: CFL MLB MLS

Penguins go indoors to face Leafs
Fresh off a dramatic victory in the outdoor Winter Classic on New Year's Day, the Pittsburgh Penguins return to the friendly confines of the Igloo Thursday to host the Toronto Maple Leafs (7:30 p.m. ET).
January 3, 2008 | 12:13 PM EST
Canada's Mason to start semifinal
Canada will stick with Steve Mason in goal for Friday's semifinal game against the United States at the world junior hockey championship in the Czech Republic, Canadian coach Craig Hartsburg said Thursday.
January 3, 2008 | 12:28 PM EST
Clemens speaks to 60 Minutes
Roger Clemens said former trainer Brian McNamee injected him with the painkiller lidocaine and the vitamin B-12, according to the first excerpts released from the pitcher's interview with CBS's 60 Minutes.
January 3, 2008 | 8:07 PM EST
more »