Canadian Flag Transport Canada / Transports Canada Government of Canada
Common menu bar (access key: M)
Skip to specific page links (access key: 1)
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
Table of Contents
Foreword
Record of Amendments
Introduction
Definitions
Acronyms
Examiner Accreditation and Responsibilities
Principles of Evaluation
Conducting the Flight Test
Pilot Permit - Ultra-light - Aeroplane
Pilot Permit - Recreational - Aeroplane
Private Pilot Licence - Aeroplane
Commercial Pilot Licence - Aeroplane
Private and Commercial - Helicopter
Multi-Engine - Aeroplane
Instrument Rating
Skip all menus (access key: 2)

As indicated in Exercise 16, ensure that the simulated conditions you specify will clearly indicate to the candidate the type of landing to be used.

Make every effort possible to utilize a runway where a crosswind condition exists in order to assess one of the landings. If you are at a busy airport, it may be possible to go to a nearby airport to carry out crosswind landings.

The recommended approach to landing airspeed may be corrected for actual weights as depicted in available POH/AFM performance charts or tables or, in their absence, in accordance with Airworthiness Manual Chapter 523 section 523.73 Reference Landing Approach Speed.

The candidate should maintain an approach profile that will result in airspeed at 50 feet AGL of 1.3 Vso, or the minimum safe speed for existing conditions. If the wind conditions dictate an increased speed or thermal lift is encountered over the runway some aircraft may exhibit a tendency to float in ground effect. In these cases, the candidate should not be assessed “Below Standard” for exceeding the touch-down distance parameter in the criterion, up to a maximum of double the specified distance, if correct and timely approach and landing techniques are used.

In assessing the candidate's ability to land within a pre-determined touchdown zone, it is not intended that examiners turn this item into a spot landing exercise. The main aim of the item is to determine that correct procedures and techniques are used in addition to achieving some accuracy. Should the candidate realize that the short-field landing in the intended touchdown zone couldn’t be achieved, an overshoot, initiated prior to commencing the flare, for a second attempt is acceptable but not ideal (3 or less). Rough technique and hard landings in an attempt to “plant” the aeroplane into the touchdown zone are unacceptable.

“Touch and go” landings are not to be used for evaluating the candidate’s performance of the required landings and takeoffs.

The overshoot (18C) may be assessed from any of the landing approaches, the forced landing approach or the precautionary landing.

Previous Page

Next Page


Last updated: Top of Page Important Notices