|
|
Collision with Tower
On April 22, 2001, a Cessna 150
collided with a very high communication tower on Mont-Carmel, near Shawinigan, Quebec.
The flight was conducted under visual flight rules (VFR). Around 9:15, witnesses near
the accident scene heard the noise of an aircraft engine, followed by an impact noise.
The pilot, alone on board, was killed. The weather conditions cleared up at around
11:00, allowing the rescuers to locate the aircraft, which was embedded in the metallic
tower structure at about 950 ft AGL. The collision caused structural damage to the
tower, and rescuers were unable to reach the wreckage. Consequently, the aircraft and
the pilot were not recovered until a few days later, when the local authorities were
forced to destroy the tower.
The aircraft took off from Mascouche airport en route to Lac-à-la-Tortue airport.
It would seem that unfavourable meteorological conditions played a role in this
accident. It was reported that fog was covering the region and that only the first
300 ft of the tower were visible. The tower was 1085 ft AGL, or 1660 ft
ASL. The VFR navigational chart of the area depicted the towers location, height
and altitude, and the four stroboscopic lights were operational. The pilot did not
communicate with NAV CANADA before or during the flight, and the aircraft was not seen
by the Mirabel or Dorval radars.
Shortly prior to takeoff from Mascouche, a witness near Shawinigan (five statute
miles east of the tower) informed the pilot by phone that fog was covering the region
and suggested that the pilot cancel the takeoff. The pilot decided to go and see
anyway, with the intention of coming back if the weather deteriorated. The pilot held
an instrument rating, and there was a global positioning system (GPS) unit on board.
The extent to which these two factors played a role in the accident is not known;
furthermore, it could not be determined if the pilot was using a VFR map.
Several lessons can be drawn from this accident, particularly concerning pre-flight
planning, VFR flight into deteriorating weather, and pilot decision making (PDM). VFR
navigation flight requires an exhaustive review of the weather conditions and of the
planned route on the appropriate VFR navigation charts. We need to identify all
significant obstacles along the route and all the maximum elevation figures (MEF).
These are shown in quadrangles bounded by dashed lines of latitude and longitude, and
they indicate the highest terrain elevation plus 328 ft (100 m) or
the highest known obstruction elevation, whichever is higher. Therefore, current and
forecast weather conditions should always allow you to fly in VFR conditions above all
the MEFs along your route. Finally, this accident may be an appropriate case study for
your next PDM class.
|