Skip to main content   Symbol of the Government of Canada
 
Search
Home
News
Events
Research Themes
In Focus
Religious Diversity in Canada: Research Forum
February 2008
In Focus - Cultural Policy 101: European Perspective
Focus on Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Cultural Policy 101 Series
Arts and Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Community Arts in Rural Settings
Commentary: Community Arts in Rural Settings
Socio-economic Conditions of Visible Minorities in Canada: 1967-2017
To Save a Butterfly, Must One Kill It? The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
Current Topic
Sustaining Butterflies: Methodology and Approach
From Cocoon to Flight: Transformations and Challenges
Challenges
Conclusion
All Resources
The Arts and Heritage in Rural Communities
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
Three Big Questions
Facts and Figures
Definitions
Conferences
All Resources (Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness In Focus)
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
The Arts and Health I: Artists on the Wards
March 2007
The Arts and Health II:
Use of the Arts in Health Professional Education
April 2007
Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Canadian Arts and Health
Digital Transformations
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 1 & 2
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 3
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 4
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 5
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: On the Horizon
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Conclusions
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: All Resources
Indigenous Knowledge
February 2006
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Rethinking Copyright
October 2004
La Francophonie
August 2004
Creative Cities
June 2004
Cities & Communities
Citizenship & Identity
Cultural Policy
Advocacy
Arts Education
Cultural Diversity & Multiculturalism
Cultural Employment Data
Cultural Policy Timelines
Cultural Value Chain
Production/Creation
Distribution/Touring
Consumption/Participation
Conservation/Preservation
Development
Domestic Intergovernmental Relations
Equity Issues
Impacts of Culture
Indicators/Frameworks for Measurement
International & Multilateral Relations
Trade
Culture & Technology
Heritage & History
Industries & Disciplines
Sport & Recreation
A - Z Index
Directories
Legislation & Regulation
Funding & Training Programs
HR/Management Resources for Artists and Administrators
Organizations Directory
Government Programs
Culturescope Groups
About Us

  
    
Locks.jpg
Ha Nguyen
To Save A Butterfly Must One Kill It?

Table of Contents

Introduction

Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Rideau Heritage Initiative: A Case Study

Sustaining Butterflies: Methodology and Approach
Community Engagement
Identifying Community Capacity



From Cocoon to Flight: Transformations to Challenges
Transformations
Four Municipality Models of Heritage Stewardship


Challenges
Understanding the Historic Places Initiative
Scepticism about the Benefits of Heritage Designation
Municipal Heritage Committees-Essential Capacity Building Blocks
Linking Heritage and Economic Development: A Double-Edged Sword


Conclusion


All Resources


The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context

With its launch in 2001, the Historic Places Initiative aimed to transform the discourse around heritage conservation in Canada — whether of historic buildings or cultural landscapes — and to put to rest the perception that heritage conservation was a backward-looking and antiquated concept. The Historic Places Initiative is a rare model of a shared federal–provincial–territorial partnership. Furthermore, by acknowledging that all levels of government and all Canadians share responsibility for the management of heritage resources, Historic Places Initiative has changed the profile of heritage conservation and awakened support within public and private sectors.

At the heart of the Historic Places Initiative is the Canadian Register of Historic Places (CRHP), the first Canadian online registry that catalogues all historic places designated by federal, provincial, territorial, or municipal jurisdictions. The Canadian Register collects information about designated historic properties and communicates how local communities understand and value their heritage. In order for a historic property to be listed on the Canadian Register, a Statement of Significance (SoS) is required. This narrative profile provides a description, the heritage value and character defining elements for each historic place.

However, this national register is not an end in itself. The Canadian Register aims to raise the profile of heritage on the local and national stage and then harness this awareness to achieve two long-term goals:

1. Build heritage stewardship capacity in local communities;
2. Engage all sectors in the conservation of these places

The Canadian Register served as the Rideau Heritage Initiative pilot project’s centre-piece.

The Rideau Heritage Initiative: A Case Study

In 2006, spurred by the 175th anniversary of the Rideau Canal and its UNESCO World Heritage nomination, the Ontario Ministry of Culture’s (MCL) Historic Places Initiative and Carleton University’s School of Canadian Studies collaborated on a ground breaking four-month summer pilot project. This pilot project, the Rideau Heritage Initiative, was implemented by a team of six Canadian Studies graduate students — Stephen Irving, Andrew Jeanes, Francesco Manganiello, Ha Nguyen, Rebecca Sciarra, and Christopher Wiebe — with Professor Herb Stovel as technical supervisor.

The purpose of the Rideau Heritage Initiative was to facilitate the work of the Historic Places Initiative in 12 municipalities of the Rideau Canal Corridor: Ottawa, Kingston, Perth, North Grenville, Rideau Lakes, Merrickville, Smiths Falls, Westport, South Frontenac, Montague, Drummond-North Elmsley, and Tay Valley. All of these municipalities, except for Kingston and Ottawa, are considered “rural” by Statistics Canada. The primary goal was to help these communities nominate their heritage properties to the Canadian Register and to help build their heritage management capacity, where appropriate.

With a research area strung over 202 km, the Rideau Heritage Initiative team worked with over 50 community members — councilors, municipal staff, heritage planners, property owners, local historians, residents and volunteers — to craft Statements of Significance and subsequently nominate 137 municipally designated heritage properties to the Canadian Register. The team also visited municipal councils, Municipal Heritage Committees (MHCs), historical societies, town halls and community centres to raise awareness and provide support for heritage stewardship. On average, the team collectively spent over 440 hours in these communities, largely dictated by the availability of identified community members, and the needs and opportunities for building community capacity in heritage stewardship.

Previous Section
Next Section
All Resources


    

GROUPS

GROUPS

Username
Password
May 2008
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
1
There are event(s) on this day.
2
no event(s)
3
no event(s)
4
no event(s)
5
There are event(s) on this day.
6
no event(s)
7
There are event(s) on this day.
8
no event(s)
9
There are event(s) on this day.
10
no event(s)
11
no event(s)
12
no event(s)
13
no event(s)
14
There are event(s) on this day.
15
no event(s)
16
no event(s)
17
no event(s)
18
no event(s)
19
no event(s)
20
no event(s)
21
no event(s)
22
There are event(s) on this day.
23
no event(s)
24
no event(s)
25
no event(s)
26
no event(s)
27
no event(s)
28
There are event(s) on this day.
29
no event(s)
30
no event(s)
31
There are event(s) on this day.
Culturescope.ca is a service of the Canadian Cultural Observatory and its partners.
The Canadian Cultural Observatory and Culturescope.ca do not endorse and are not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in a new window.

Some of the material available in the resource collection originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
ID: 13747 | Date Added: 2007-06-18 | Date Modified: 2007-09-25 Important Notices