Skip to main content   Symbol of the Government of Canada
 
Search
Home
News
Events
Research Themes
In Focus
Arts and Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Focus on Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Youth Marginalization in Context
Youth Arts Programming – Effects and Outcomes
Keys to Success – Best Practices
Current Topic
Lessons to be learned? International approaches to policy and funding for youth arts
All Resources
Cultural Policy 101 Series
Community Arts in Rural Settings
Commentary: Community Arts in Rural Settings
Socio-economic Conditions of Visible Minorities in Canada: 1967-2017
To Save a Butterfly, Must One Kill It? The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Arts and Heritage in Rural Communities
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
The Arts and Health I: Artists on the Wards
March 2007
The Arts and Health II:
Use of the Arts in Health Professional Education
April 2007
Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Canadian Arts and Health
Digital Transformations
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Section 2: The Evolution of Federal Cultural Support
Section 3: Developing and Sustaining Cultural Expression and Shelf Space
Section 4: On the Horizon
Section 5: All Resources
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Indigenous Knowledge
February 2006
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Rethinking Copyright
October 2004
La Francophonie
August 2004
Creative Cities
June 2004
Cities & Communities
Citizenship & Identity
Cultural Policy
Culture & Technology
Convergence
Copyright & Intellectual Property
Cultural Information Management
Digital/Information Society
Media Technology
Heritage & History
Industries & Disciplines
Aboriginal Arts
Architecture & Design
Broadcasting
Satellite Radio Decision: A Selection of Background Information
Cultural Tourism
Film & Video
Media Arts
Performing Arts
Publishing
Sound Recording
Visual Arts/Crafts
Sport & Recreation
A - Z Index
Directories
Culturescope Groups
About Us

  
    
Youth-observing-art.jpg
Art Observers YFC Benefit Art Show - Photo: inhisgrace, Creative Commons Attribution Licence 2.0
Table of Contents

Introduction

Youth Marginalization in Context

Youth Arts Programming – Effects and Outcomes

Best Practices

Funding Support

Lessons to be learned? International approaches to policy and funding for youth arts

Conclusion

All Resources




Keys to Success – Best Practices

Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre engages youth from the Regent Park neighbourhood of Toronto to operate Catch da Flava Newspaper, Catch da Flava Radio, E.Y.E. Video, Regent Park Television, Music Recording Studio and a Photography Arts program. In 2004/2005, Regent Park Focus had a total of 163 members, aged mostly 12-19, from 26 different countries and speaking at least 17 different languages at home. In addition to participants contributing to the program through becoming youth instructors themselves, many have continued on to college and university programs ranging from media production to engineering and political science, as well as to careers in film, television, radio design, telecommunications, journalism, youth outreach and municipal politics (Regent Park Focus 2007).

Saskatoon Community Youth Arts Programming (SCYAP) has been widely recognized for their Urban Canvas project, now in its 7th year. Urban Canvas runs full time Monday to Friday for 39 weeks and is designed to equip local marginalized youth with commercial arts skills training, practical experience and a portfolio through participation in community arts projects that include public murals and art exhibitions. The program incorporates social services as well as artistic and cultural elements through providing life skills training, mentoring, crisis intervention and employment and/or education transition support. SCYAP reports that 50% of past participants found immediate employment and 40% returned to formal education (Lechman 2007, SCYAP 2007).

An illustrative, though not exhaustive, list of other local youth arts organizations from across Canada includes Urban Arts, Sketch, beatz to da streetz, FYI, REMIX Project, Common Weal, Arts Umbrella, Broadway Youth Resource Centre Art and Media Gallery, 4 Unity Productions, and iHuman Youth Society.

Key themes emerge from the literature and interviews with local youth arts practitioners to identify best practices for local youth arts practice as including:

  • A high level of youth involvement; programming must be youth-focused and, where possible, youth-led. Youth need to be consulted and preferably participate in the articulation of issues facing the community, defining program objectives, as well as the design, implementation and evaluation of the programs;
  • Active local youth recruitment and outreach strategies that includes removing barriers to participation such as providing transportation, food, and offering programs in a safe location;
  • Programming that is culturally relevant to the participants, and locally based in meeting community needs;
  • Leaders and mentors who are demographically representative of the local youth population, preferably drawn from within the local community;
  • A focus on artistic excellence, employing artists who receive training and support in working with local youth populations;
  • Structured programs with clear stages and measurable goals for the participants, while maintaining enough flexibility to adapt as required;
  • The support of community leaders and champions from the policy and stakeholder communities;
  • An established, trusted relationship with the local youth community. This means a sustained community presence, programs that run for an extended period of time, with sufficient resources for long term planning, staffing, professional development and program evaluation.

    Funding support

    Funding support for youth arts in Canada comes from a mix of public and private stakeholders in health, social services, crime prevention, employment/job training, community development and cultural sectors. While a diversity of funders helps to mitigate organizational vulnerability which can stem from over-reliance on one source of funding, an analysis of the existing funding practices for local youth arts in Canada indicates the current framework contains three characteristics that function to inhibit, rather than facilitate, the continued success or growth of the sector.

    First, many funding programs within the arts and cultural sector have criteria that make them inaccessible to youth arts organizations. A focus on professional artists and emphasis on traditional art forms may restrict both the types of programming that can be funded, such as hip hop or graffiti, as well as the ability for local youth arts organization to draw from local community resources or former graduates as sources of expertise.

    Second, funding from partners supporting youth arts is largely project based. This constrains the ability of practitioners to establish long term planning goals, and may have the effect of shaping programming to meet the objectives of the funders rather than the community. Project based funding rarely includes sufficient resources for program evaluation, which has implications for the collection of meaningful data on the long term effects of local youth arts programming and subsequently, political and funding support. Finding project based funding from multiple sources puts significant administrative strain on limited staff resources, and often does not provide for ongoing professional development for practitioners. The lack of organizational stability that results from project based funding also results in low-wage, precarious employment conditions for staff and contributes to high turnover and staff burnout (Hessenius, 2007). A lack of core funding also leaves organizations extremely vulnerable to shifts in the political climate.

    Third, despite the emergence of a cross-sectoral body of evidence of the value of local youth arts practices in addressing the complex needs of marginalized youth in Canada, the absence of a coordinated, comprehensive policy framework for the youth arts sector limits the ability of policy and funding partners to network with respect to innovative approaches, objectives, funding structures, research, evaluation techniques and best practices.

    Previous Section
    Next Section
    References and Resources


  •     

    GROUPS

    GROUPS

    Username
    Password
    February 2008
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    1
    There are event(s) on this day.
    2
    no event(s)
    3
    no event(s)
    4
    no event(s)
    5
    no event(s)
    6
    no event(s)
    7
    no event(s)
    8
    no event(s)
    9
    no event(s)
    10
    no event(s)
    11
    no event(s)
    12
    no event(s)
    13
    There are event(s) on this day.
    14
    no event(s)
    15
    There are event(s) on this day.
    16
    no event(s)
    17
    no event(s)
    18
    no event(s)
    19
    no event(s)
    20
    There are event(s) on this day.
    21
    no event(s)
    22
    no event(s)
    23
    no event(s)
    24
    no event(s)
    25
    no event(s)
    26
    no event(s)
    27
    no event(s)
    28
    There are event(s) on this day.
    29
    There are event(s) on this day.
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    Culturescope.ca is a service of the Canadian Cultural Observatory and its partners.
    The Canadian Cultural Observatory and Culturescope.ca do not endorse and are not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in a new window.

    Some of the material available in the resource collection originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.
    GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
    GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
    ID: 14610 | Date Added: 2007-10-16 | Date Modified: 2007-11-08 Important Notices