Skip to main content   Symbol of the Government of Canada
 
Search
Home
News
Observatory Updates
Newsletters
Conference Dispatches
Events
Archives
Research Themes
In Focus
Religious Diversity in Canada: Research Forum
February 2008
In Focus - Cultural Policy 101: European Perspective
Focus on Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Cultural Policy 101 Series
Arts and Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Community Arts in Rural Settings
Commentary: Community Arts in Rural Settings
Socio-economic Conditions of Visible Minorities in Canada: 1967-2017
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
To Save a Butterfly, Must One Kill It? The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Arts and Heritage in Rural Communities
Digital Transformations
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
The Arts and Health I: Artists on the Wards
March 2007
The Arts and Health II:
Use of the Arts in Health Professional Education
April 2007
Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Canadian Arts and Health
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 1 & 2
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 3
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 4
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 5
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: On the Horizon
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Conclusions
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: All Resources
Indigenous Knowledge
February 2006
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Rethinking Copyright
October 2004
La Francophonie
August 2004
Creative Cities
June 2004
Cities & Communities
Citizenship & Identity
Cultural Policy
Advocacy
Arts Education
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Cultural Diversity & Multiculturalism
Cultural Employment Data
Cultural Value Chain
Cultural Policy Timelines
Development
Domestic Intergovernmental Relations
Equity Issues
Impacts of Culture
Indicators/Frameworks for Measurement
Accounting for Culture: Examining the Building Blocks of Cultural Citizenship (Audio Files)
International & Multilateral Relations
Trade
Current Topic
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture & Technology
Heritage & History
Industries & Disciplines
Sport & Recreation
A - Z Index
Directories
Legislation & Regulation
Funding & Training Programs
HR/Management Resources for Artists and Administrators
Organizations Directory
Government Programs
Culturescope Groups
Archived Member Profiles
Benefits
Create Your Group - Step-by-step Instructions
Create Your Group Guidelines
Projects & Initiatives
About Us
FAQ
In Focus Speakers' Series 2007/2008 Season
Contact Us
Help
General Information for Site Users
Important Notices
Partners

Home Research Themes Cultural Policy Trade

Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How much (or how little) does contingent valuation tell us?

"What does (Contingent valuation methods) CVM tell us about the value of cultural goods and services, and what does it leave out?"
  
    
Prev Studies & Reports 17 of 23 Next
"It is important at the outset to remember that CVM is predicated on a model of an economy comprised of individual decision makers who behave rationally in striving to maximise their own utility in the face of known constraints. It is assumed that preference systems between goods are well behaved, that individuals are the best judges of their own welfare, that each individual carries equal weight in the aggregation of preferences, and that the social welfare function contains no arguments other than the welfare of the individuals of which society is composed. In this model the distinction between private goods, over which property rights can be asserted, and public goods (or external effects) where property rights are ill-defined or non-existent, is fundamental, as is the assertion that exchanging rights through market processes is the appropriate way to lead towards a welfare-maximising allocation of resources."

Le texte suivant provient d'un organisme qui n'est pas assujetti à la Loi sur les langues officielles et il est mis à la disposition du public dans la langue d'origine.

The following material originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.

Creator(s) David Throsby, University of Chicago
Source Location Canada
Date Published
2001
Language English
URL http://culturalpolicy.uchicago ...
Copyright Holder University of Chicago


 

Also Related

    

GROUPS

GROUPS

Username
Password
May 2008
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
1
There are event(s) on this day.
2
no event(s)
3
no event(s)
4
no event(s)
5
There are event(s) on this day.
6
no event(s)
7
There are event(s) on this day.
8
no event(s)
9
There are event(s) on this day.
10
no event(s)
11
no event(s)
12
no event(s)
13
no event(s)
14
There are event(s) on this day.
15
no event(s)
16
no event(s)
17
no event(s)
18
no event(s)
19
no event(s)
20
no event(s)
21
no event(s)
22
There are event(s) on this day.
23
no event(s)
24
no event(s)
25
no event(s)
26
no event(s)
27
no event(s)
28
There are event(s) on this day.
29
no event(s)
30
no event(s)
31
There are event(s) on this day.
Culturescope.ca is a service of the Canadian Cultural Observatory and its partners.
The Canadian Cultural Observatory and Culturescope.ca do not endorse and are not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in a new window.

Some of the material available in the resource collection originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
ID: 7303 | Date Added: 2005-04-05 | Date Modified: 2006-05-19 Important Notices