Skip to main content   Symbol of the Government of Canada
 
Search
Home
News
Observatory Updates
Newsletters
Conference Dispatches
Canadian Culture and Digital Technology Forum, October 26-27, 2007
Symposium 2007 Preserving Aboriginal Heritage: Technical and Traditional Approaches, September 24 - 28, 2007
Max Valiquette, September 12, 2007
The Couchiching Summer Conference 2007
Metropolis Presents: Second Generation Youth in Canada
Canadians and Their Pasts: A New Research Project, April 17, 2007
Ignite: Youth Arts Forum, June 12-13, 2007, Toronto, Ontario
Multiculturalism Speakers Series, June 27th, 2007
The Independent Film and Television Alliance Production Conference, June 15th, 2007
CFTPA Prime Time Ottawa Conference
Interactive Screen: Cultural policy dispatches from Banff
Interactive Screen: Digital art dispatches from Banff
Cultural Policy Reporting from Vienna
Events
Research Themes
In Focus
Arts and Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Focus on Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Youth Marginalization in Context
Youth Arts Programming – Effects and Outcomes
Keys to Success – Best Practices
Lessons to be learned? International approaches to policy and funding for youth arts
All Resources
Cultural Policy 101 Series
Socio-economic Conditions of Visible Minorities in Canada: 1967-2017
Community Arts in Rural Settings
Commentary: Community Arts in Rural Settings
The Arts and Heritage in Rural Communities
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
Three Big Questions
Culture: The Fourth Pillar of Sustainability
Cultural Elements
Facts and Figures
Definitions
Conferences
All Resources (Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness In Focus)
To Save a Butterfly, Must One Kill It? The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
Sustaining Butterflies: Methodology and Approach
From Cocoon to Flight: Transformations and Challenges
Challenges
Conclusion
All Resources
Digital Transformations
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
The Arts and Health I: Artists on the Wards
March 2007
The Arts and Health II:
Use of the Arts in Health Professional Education
April 2007
Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Canadian Arts and Health
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Section 2: The Evolution of Federal Cultural Support
Section 3: Developing and Sustaining Cultural Expression and Shelf Space
Section 4: On the Horizon
Section 5: All Resources
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 1 & 2
Current Topic
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 3
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 4
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 5
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: On the Horizon
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Conclusions
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: All Resources
Indigenous Knowledge
February 2006
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Rethinking Copyright
October 2004
La Francophonie
August 2004
Creative Cities
June 2004
Cities & Communities
Citizenship & Identity
Cultural Policy
Advocacy
Arts Education
Cultural Diversity & Multiculturalism
Cultural Employment Data
Cultural Policy Timelines
Cultural Value Chain
Development
Domestic Intergovernmental Relations
Equity Issues
Impacts of Culture
Indicators/Frameworks for Measurement
International & Multilateral Relations
Trade
Culture & Technology
Convergence
Copyright & Intellectual Property
Cultural Information Management
Digital/Information Society
Media Technology
Heritage & History
Industries & Disciplines
Sport & Recreation
A - Z Index
Directories
Legislation & Regulation
Funding & Training Programs
HR/Management Resources for Artists and Administrators
Organizations Directory
Government Programs
Culturescope Groups
About Us

Home Research Themes In Focus Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006

Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 1 & 2

The absence of a cultural ministry indicates that the United States does not value culture and does not take it seriously.

The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is the de facto Ministry of Culture.
  
    
NAIM.jpg
North American Indian Museum, Washington DC
Table of Contents

Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
Introduction
Myth 1: The absence of a cultural ministry indicates that the United States does not value culture and does not take it seriously.
Constitutional Values and Identity
Myth 2: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is the de facto Ministry of Culture.
Myth 3: The United States does not have national cultural policies.
The Federal Framework: Fostering Partnerships & Diversity
Cultural Policy at the State and Local Levels
Myth 4: Private and foundation investments in arts and culture are the prime source of income for the arts and cultural sector and are more than a sufficient source of support.
Myth 5: Exported cultural products represent American cultural values and international cultural policy priorities.
Exporting Culture
International Priorities
On the Horizon
Changing Demographics & Participation
Creative Sector
Conclusions
Disadvantages
Advantages
All Resources


Myth 1: The absence of a cultural ministry indicates that the United States does not value culture and does not take it seriously.


Contrary to the belief that the absence of a federal cultural department or ministry signals that the U.S. does not value culture, the decentralized system reflects a high regard for the integrity of culture and the importance of preventing government from interfering in an arena considered private. Americans have a historic mistrust of government interference in private life and many of the most controversial and politically divisive issues within the United States, such as stem cell research, media consolidation, prayer in schools, abortion, gay marriage, and immigration, have cultural implications and are fundamentally a discussion about the proper balance between government and citizens’ rights.

It is the rationale that a centralized government department would ultimately censor freedom and expression that has prevented the U.S. from creating such an institution although the debate over the need for a “cultural ministry” does resurface periodically. Additionally, the United States does not sponsor a national cultural portal or a cultural observatory. However, the United States government does invest in the arts and culture through other mechanisms and models with a focus on partnerships and diversity. Thus, American cultural policy is made at the federal, state and local level and the ecosystem represents multiple collaborations between the government, academia, civil society, foundations and the private sector. In the years between 1989-1992 this system was questioned with the eruption of bitter “Culture Wars” where debates over “obscene art” resulted in calls for the National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities (NEA & NEH) to be dismantled. Today the most prominent public policies relating to culture concern arts education, the creative sector, demographic change, immigration, intellectual property, media consolidation, and public diplomacy.

Constitutional Values & Identity

The United States has none of the traditional nation-state characteristics such as an official national culture, ethnicity, language or religion. American citizens and residents, despite a Puritanical and individualistic legacy, a common language of English and a primarily Protestant faith, are not bound by a shared culture but rather by shared ideals. America was founded on the principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the desire for freedom and democratic participation, and the separation of church and state. Its national ideals are built around the idea that the U.S. is a “nation of immigrants” where in theory there is “liberty and justice for all.” The U.S. now has the third largest population in the world with over 300 million people, of which 36 million (12%) are foreign born, who speak over 322 languages.

The 1787 Constitution, amended 27 times, establishes a separation of powers between the Executive, Legislative and Judiciary branches and is the guiding document for all legislation and laws. All powers not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved to the people and the states through the Tenth Amendment. The Constitution itself includes copyright protection for creators but subsequent amendments have also had a significant impact on cultural expression and cultural life in the U.S. In particular, it is the First Amendment that articulates the cornerstones of American cultural values and rights but several other amendments listed below also affect cultural rights and citizen participation.

  • First Amendment - Freedom of religion, press, assembly and right to petition grievances (1791)
  • Thirteenth Amendment - Abolishment of slavery (1865)
  • Fifteenth Amendment – Voting rights are granted to all male citizens regardless of race (1870)
  • Nineteenth Amendment - Women's suffrage. (1920)


  • Myth 2: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is the de facto Ministry of Culture.

    In comparison to other cultural policy systems, it is difficult to identify a primary American representative. In practice it is often the well-known National Endowment of the Arts (NEA) that is perceived as the de facto U.S. federal government department/ministry of culture. The NEA, like its sister the NEH, was created in 1965 not as a federal department but as a semi-autonomous agency reinforcing the British tradition of an “arms length” federal approach to investment and management of the arts and culture. While the NEA and its Chairman do often represent the U.S. internationally so do representatives from other cultural agencies and institutions, such as the Library of Congress. The NEA cannot be equated to a ministry or minister of culture because the agency’s purview is not as broad and proportionally its budget is the smallest of all the U.S. cultural agencies. Management of culture at the national level is interwoven between numerous federal independent agencies and Cabinet Departments responsible for over 200 initiatives and programs that support the arts and culture. Priorities and programs are guided by federally enacted legislation and challenges are interpreted through the court system. A chart of major federal departments, agencies, and bodies who implement arts and cultural programs is available by clicking here.

    Previous Section
    Next Section
    All Resources


        

    GROUPS

    GROUPS

    Username
    Password
    February 2008
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    1
    There are event(s) on this day.
    2
    no event(s)
    3
    no event(s)
    4
    no event(s)
    5
    no event(s)
    6
    no event(s)
    7
    no event(s)
    8
    no event(s)
    9
    no event(s)
    10
    no event(s)
    11
    no event(s)
    12
    no event(s)
    13
    There are event(s) on this day.
    14
    no event(s)
    15
    There are event(s) on this day.
    16
    no event(s)
    17
    no event(s)
    18
    no event(s)
    19
    no event(s)
    20
    There are event(s) on this day.
    21
    no event(s)
    22
    no event(s)
    23
    no event(s)
    24
    no event(s)
    25
    no event(s)
    26
    no event(s)
    27
    no event(s)
    28
    There are event(s) on this day.
    29
    There are event(s) on this day.
    no event(s)
    no event(s)
    Culturescope.ca is a service of the Canadian Cultural Observatory and its partners.
    The Canadian Cultural Observatory and Culturescope.ca do not endorse and are not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in a new window.

    Some of the material available in the resource collection originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.
    GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
    GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
    ID: 12535 | Date Added: 2006-11-20 | Date Modified: 2007-08-20 Important Notices