Skip to main content   Symbol of the Government of Canada
 
Search
Home
News
Observatory Updates
Newsletters
Knowledge Centre, Department of Canadian Heritage, New Acquisition List
Observatory eNewsletter
Conference Dispatches
Events
Research Themes
In Focus
Religious Diversity in Canada: Research Forum
February 2008
In Focus - Cultural Policy 101: European Perspective
Focus on Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Youth Marginalization in Context
Youth Arts Programming – Effects and Outcomes
Keys to Success – Best Practices
Lessons to be learned? International approaches to policy and funding for youth arts
All Resources
Cultural Policy 101 Series
Arts and Youth: Canadian Youth Arts Programming and Policy
Community Arts in Rural Settings
Commentary: Community Arts in Rural Settings
Socio-economic Conditions of Visible Minorities in Canada: 1967-2017
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
To Save a Butterfly, Must One Kill It? The Historic Places Initiative in a Rural Context
The Arts and Heritage in Rural Communities
Digital Transformations
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
A Crossroads in the History of the Record Industry
The Apple Revolution
Musical Cyber-Commerce
New Tools of the Trade
Conclusion
All Resources
The Arts and Health I: Artists on the Wards
March 2007
Growing Support for the Arts in Healthcare
Artists on the Wards
Conclusion
All Resources
The Arts and Health II:
Use of the Arts in Health Professional Education
April 2007
Opportunities and Challenges in the Development of Canadian Arts and Health
Canadian Cultural Policy 101
September 2006
Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
December 2006
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 1 & 2
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 3
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 4
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Myth 5
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: On the Horizon
Current Topic
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: Conclusions
Demystifying the US Ecosystem: All Resources
Indigenous Knowledge
February 2006
Culture and Trade
April 2005
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Rethinking Copyright
October 2004
Copyright Today - Canada (In Focus)
Copyright Today - International (In Focus)
The Digital Environment (Copyright In Focus)
La Francophonie
August 2004
Creative Cities
June 2004
Cities & Communities
Cultural Infrastructure
Cultural Policy, Planning & Management
Sustainability
Sustainable Communities: Culture, Creativity and Inclusiveness
October 2005
Creative Cities
June 2004
Citizenship & Identity
Aboriginal Peoples
Food, Culture & Identity
Language
La Francophonie
August 2004
Participation
Social Cohesion
Volunteerism
Cultural Policy
Culture & Technology
Convergence
Copyright & Intellectual Property
Cultural Information Management
Digital/Information Society
Media Technology
Heritage & History
Intangible Heritage
Libraries & Archives
Museums
Parks
Tangible Heritage
Industries & Disciplines
Aboriginal Arts
Architecture & Design
Broadcasting
Cultural Tourism
Culture and Tourism
August 2005
Film & Video
Media Arts
Performing Arts
Publishing
Digital Tranformations I:
Digital Evolution and New Publishing Models
January 2007
Sound Recording
Digital Transformations II:
Toward a New Form of Musical Culture
February 2007
Visual Arts/Crafts
Sport & Recreation
A - Z Index
Directories
Legislation & Regulation
Funding & Training Programs
HR/Management Resources for Artists and Administrators
Organizations Directory
Government Programs
Culturescope Groups
About Us
FAQ
In Focus Speakers' Series 2007/2008 Season
Contact Us
Help
General Information for Site Users
Important Notices
Partners

  
    
Louisiana.jpg
New Orleans Mardi Gras Parade, Photo: Louisiana Office of Tourism
Table of Contents

Cultural Policy 101: Demystifying the US Ecosystem
Introduction
Myth 1: The absence of a cultural ministry indicates that the United States does not value culture and does not take it seriously.
Constitutional Values and Identity
Myth 2: The National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) is the de facto Ministry of Culture.
Myth 3: The United States does not have national cultural policies.
The Federal Framework: Fostering Partnerships & Diversity
Cultural Policy at the State and Local Levels
Myth 4: Private and foundation investments in arts and culture are the prime source of income for the arts and cultural sector and provide more than a sufficient source of support.
Myth 5: Exported cultural products represent American cultural values and international cultural policy priorities.
Exporting Culture
International Priorities
On the Horizon
Changing Demographics & Participation
Creative Sector
Conclusions
Disadvantages
Advantages
All Resources



On the Horizon

Changing Demographics and Participation

Changes in demographics are likely to provoke a renewed debate on language policies and citizenship rights as American communities become more diverse and the United States considers its current policies on immigration. The U.S. continues to accept more legal immigrants than the rest of the countries of the world combined, however, traditional immigration gateways and demographics are changing. As a result of globalization (and technology) many individuals are embracing both their own culture(s) as well as choosing to participate in artistic disciplines and consume goods and services not of their own heritage. The previous dominant diversity paradigm of a “melting pot” has gradually been replaced by the idea of “multiculturalism” or a “mosaic.” However, all of these perspectives limit both the individual sense of identity and a thoughtful response that government will have to take in reconsidering how Americans live together.

In parallel to the identity changes fostered by increased diversity and globalization are the combined effects, along with new technologies, on arts participation. The U.S. takes a market-based approach to the consumption of culture, and new technologies as well as the Internet are allowing many creators and consumers to bypass traditional gate-keepers. Within the past few years, there have been several studies released (2002 NEA Survey on Arts Participation, Reggae to Rachmaninoff, Arts Participation: Steps to Stronger Cultural and Community Life, U.S. Cultural Policy—Its Politics of Participation its Creative Potential) that have examined cultural participation and audiences beyond traditional formats to include more community and commercial based types of participation and consumption.

Creative Sector

Technological and demographic change and the implications of a viable creative sector, as traditional jobs are exported, have sparked a debate about how to foster creativity and innovation for new generations. Arts education is seen as essential both for these reasons and to foster arts appreciation amongst youth. Higher education academic institutions are now considering both their role in educating cultural workers and the benefits of creative campus communities, an initiative spearheaded by the Association of Performing Arts Presenters (APAP.) New strategies will continue to link arts and culture not only to education and creativity but to health initiatives as the cultural sector becomes more interdisciplinary in order to survive.

Previous Section
Next Section
All Resources


    

GROUPS

GROUPS

Username
Password
May 2008
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
no event(s)
1
There are event(s) on this day.
2
no event(s)
3
no event(s)
4
no event(s)
5
There are event(s) on this day.
6
no event(s)
7
There are event(s) on this day.
8
no event(s)
9
There are event(s) on this day.
10
no event(s)
11
no event(s)
12
no event(s)
13
no event(s)
14
There are event(s) on this day.
15
no event(s)
16
no event(s)
17
no event(s)
18
no event(s)
19
no event(s)
20
no event(s)
21
no event(s)
22
There are event(s) on this day.
23
no event(s)
24
no event(s)
25
no event(s)
26
no event(s)
27
no event(s)
28
There are event(s) on this day.
29
no event(s)
30
no event(s)
31
There are event(s) on this day.
Culturescope.ca is a service of the Canadian Cultural Observatory and its partners.
The Canadian Cultural Observatory and Culturescope.ca do not endorse and are not responsible for the content of external sites. Links will open in a new window.

Some of the material available in the resource collection originates with an organization not subject to the Official Languages Act and is available on this site in the language in which it was written.
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
GTEC Gold Medal Winner: Innovative E-Government Pilot Projects (2004)
ID: 12540 | Date Added: 2006-11-20 | Date Modified: 2007-08-20 Important Notices