Internal Audit
The mandate of Justice Canada’s internal audit function is to help Justice Canada achieve its strategic outcomes by using a systematic and disciplined approach to assess and contribute to the continuous improvement of its risk management, internal control, and governance processes.
Index of Internal Audit Reports
The results of Justice Canada's audits are posted on our Web site to promote public accountability and transparency.
- Audit Reports 2022
- Audit Reports 2021
- Audit Reports 2019
- Audit Reports 2018
- Audit Reports 2017
- Audit Reports 2016
- Audit Reports 2015
- Audit Reports 2014
- Audit Reports 2013
- Audit Reports 2012
- Audit Reports 2011
- Audit Reports 2010
- Audit Reports 2009
- Audit Reports 2008
To access the 2007, 2006, 2005 Audit reports, please visit Library and Archives Canada.
Key Compliance Attributes of Internal Audit
Pursuant to the Treasury Board Directive on Internal Audit, departments must meet public reporting requirements as prescribed by the Comptroller General of Canada and using Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat prescribed platforms, including the performance results for the internal audit function.
The objective of publishing departmental internal audit performance results, in the form of key compliance attributes, is to provide pertinent information to stakeholders (Canadians, parliamentarians) regarding the professionalism, performance and impact of the internal audit function in departments. Rationale behind publishing these attributes can be found in OCG webpage.
Level of Professionalization of the Internal Audit FunctionTable note 1
% of internal audit staff with an internal audit or accounting designation (CIA, CPA) | 36% |
---|---|
% of internal audit staff with an internal audit or accounting designation (CIA, CPA) in progress | 54% |
% of internal audit staff holding other designations (CGAP, CISA, etc.) | 27% |
Conformance with the International Standards for the Profession of Internal Audit
Date of last comprehensive briefingTable note 2 to the Departmental Audit Committee on the internal processes, tools, and information considered necessary to evaluate conformance with the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) Code of Ethics and the Standards and the results of the quality assurance and improvement program (QAIP) | October 2021 |
---|---|
Date of last external assessmentTable note 3 | October 2021 |
Risk-based Audit Plan and Related InformationTable note 4
Internal Audit Title | Internal Audit Status | Report approved date | Report published date | Original planned MAP completion date | Implementation Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow-up Audit of Information Technology Security | Approved | May 2, 2019 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Policy Development Process – Consulting Engagement | Approved | October 26, 2020 | N/A | Q4 2020-2021 | 67% |
Procurement Contracting Practices –– Consulting Engagement | Approved | June 1, 2021 | N/A | Q1 2022-2023 | 40% |
Audit of Legal Knowledge Management | Approved | June 1, 2021 | September 29, 2021 | Q4 2022-2023 | 0% |
Audit of Recruiting and Staffing Processes | Approved | June 1, 2021 | September 29, 2021 | Q2 2022-23 | 0% |
Teleworking Readiness Assessment – Consulting Engagement | Approved | October 21, 2021 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
IT Security of Classified Information – Consulting Engagement | Approved | October 21, 2021 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Audit of the LP-01 Training and Development Program | Approved | March 4, 2022 | N/A | Q4 2022-23 | N/A |
Cloud Implementation / LSU Connectivity – Consulting Engagement | Approved | March 1, 2022 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Implementation Review of the Directive on Civil Litigation involving Indigenous Peoples Consulting Engagement | In Progress | ||||
Early Advice on UNDRIP Governance Arrangements Consulting Engagement | In Progress | ||||
Audit of Recruitment | In Progress | ||||
Risk and Control Assessment of LSU Advisory Services Consulting Engagement | Planned | ||||
Audit of Communication Services | Planned | ||||
Artificial Intelligence Readiness Assessment Consulting Engagement | Planned |
Strategic Value of the Internal Audit FunctionTable note 5
Overall usefulness rating from senior management of areas audited |
---|
100% of respondents provided a rating of ‘excellent’, ‘good’, or ‘fair’, with the majority rated ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. |
Report a problem on this page
- Date modified: