Canadian Flag Canadian Heritage Symbol of the Government of Canada
FrançaisContact UsHelpSearchCanada Site
Title Decorative image
  Minister's page | Minister of State (Sport) | Minister of State (Multiculturalism)
  Location: Home - International Relations and Policy Development - International Relations and Policy Development - International Instrument on Cultural Diversity 2006/01/28  




New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity (NIICD)


Mandate for Canadian Action

"…develop a new approach internationally to support the diversity of cultural expression in countries around the world." (Speech from the Throne, October 999)

The Government of Canada committed, in October 1999, to pursuing an New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity (NIICD) which would set out clear ground rules to enable Canada and other countries to maintain policies that promote their culture, while respecting the rules governing the international trading system and securing markets for cultural exports. It would also recognize the importance of cultural diversity issues to international social and economic development.

Top of page

A New International Approach

The recognition and importance of cultural diversity to social and economic development is not a new item on the international political agenda. It was highlighted in 1995 in the UNESCO Report of the World Commission on Culture and Development, Our Creative Diversity. In 1998, UNESCO's Stockholm Action Plan identified "cultural policy as one of the key components of endogenous and sustainable development." In addition to its recognition in traditional cultural fora, the concept of cultural diversity has been raised in non-cultural fora such as the G-8, the World Bank and La Francophonie as an important component to quality of life, conflict resolution and human security.

However, despite a host of statements and communiqués, existing international agreements address only some aspects of cultural diversity, are often declaratory in nature, do not adequately address the needs of developing countries or communities at the sub-national level, and provide no direction for concerted action. Given the importance of cultural diversity and the increasing pressure to address cultural diversity issues in the context of globalization, there is a need for a new international instrument that would set the context and define the conditions necessary to fairly and equitably realize the opportunities and benefits of cultural diversity within and among countries.

Top of page

A New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity: A Canadian Policy Approach

Canada's cultural policies have evolved over time, adapting to the changing dynamics of the domestic and international environments. But global trends increasingly exert pressure on domestic culture and cultural policies. Specifically, the policy challenges for the Canadian cultural sector include:

  • Ensuring a place for Canadian stories in the domestic and global marketplaces;
  • Supporting business and investment opportunities while ensuring consumer choice and a diversity of voices and opinions; and
  • Providing Canadian creators and entrepreneurs with the skills they need to be successful both at home and abroad.

New technologies combined with industry convergence and consolidation (mega-mergers) and the globalization of the economy are increasingly exerting pressure on cultural policies that have served to create a strong diverse Canadian culture. These trends are blurring definitions in international trade agreements and can limit the impact of the traditional exemption approach Canada and other countries have taken regarding cultural industries (e.g. by negotiating cultural exemptions, such as in the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) and North-American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), or by not assuming obligations on cultural industries as in the World Trade Organization (WTO) / General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). The challenge for Canada is to achieve a balance between domestic cultural policy objectives and our international trade obligations.

Recognizing the potential limitations of the traditional exemption approach, the cultural industries Sectoral Advisory Group on International Trade (SAGIT) in its 1999 report entitled Canadian Culture in a Global World: New Strategies for Culture and Trade, considers that Canada is at crossroads in the relationship between cultural policies and international agreements on trade and investment. The SAGIT's analysis of the implications of the evolving international environment led the group to recommend a new approach to cultural trade based on the premise that instead of defining ourselves simply as the producers and consumers of tradeable goods and services, we must now step forward and reaffirm the importance of our cultural diversity, and the ability of each country to ensure that its own stories and experiences will be available to both its own citizens and the rest of the world.

In September 2002 SAGIT released a draft text of an instrument entitled International Agreement on Cultural Diversity - A Model for Discussion in order to further their work from 1999 and contribute to the current discussions on developing a new international instrument on cultural diversity.

Top of page

Elements of a New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity (NIICD)

The process of developing and building consensus for an NIICD is enhancing the profile of cultural diversity in a profound way by raising the level of understanding for why it is important and how it benefits us, and exploring the relationship between culture and social and economic development. A truly successful instrument - based on a clear vision, principles and objectives - would recognize cultural diversity as a public good, similar to the environment and sustainable development, requiring due consideration in the development of public policy at the international level.

The NIICD would, by international agreement, recognize the legitimate role of governments to support, promote and safeguard cultural diversity as a key public interest objective. It would give countries and communities the flexibility to make their own choices about how they want to evolve - ensuring that nations have all the tools at their disposal to create the right conditions for the creation, production, distribution, promotion and conservation of cultural content while still remaining open to all the world has to offer. The instrument would also acknowledge the roles of international organizations, the private sector and civil society in safeguarding cultural diversity.

Amid growing recognition that the policy of a cultural exemption in trade agreements may no longer be an effective way of dealing with cultural trade issues, an international instrument would also reconcile this right of governments to pursue their cultural policy objectives with the structure of the international trading system. An instrument would articulate and justify what makes cultural products different from other types of merchandise and identify the conditions under which domestic policies/measures could be pursued. In this way, the instrument would provide clarity by establishing rules for what governments may or may not do with respect to culture/trade issues.

Hence, at a very practical level, an instrument that reflects a consensus on the unique economic and social role of cultural activities in a global context will provide certainty and predictability for the movement of cultural goods and services in international markets. This kind of clarity would enable governments to make policy for the public interest while encouraging business to invest with confidence.

Top of page

Canada, Advancing the Idea of an Instrument Internationally

As a first step, Canada is encouraging international dialogue on the importance of cultural diversity and hopes to facilitate a global consensus on the centrality of cultural diversity to social and economic development in a global environment. This consensus should be based on a common vision, principles and objectives for the realization of the social and economic benefits of cultural diversity for all citizens. A New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity (NIICD) can be the articulation of this global consensus.

Canada is working with institutions and civil society to build support for an NIICD. Canada's pursuit of raising recognition on the importance of cultural diversity to the international agenda, has led to the creation of significant voices, both domestically and internationally, which include Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and cultural sector organizations. Some of the key NGOs include the following:

  • the Coalition for Cultural Diversity (CCD), which consists of 32 Canadian national associations in the cultural milieu calling for an NIICD, and encourages sister coalitions in other countries to support an NIICD; and
  • the International Network on Cultural Diversity (INCD), which currently includes over 300 organizations from more than 40 countries and is a world wide network of artists and cultural groups dedicated to countering the homogenizing effects of globalization on culture. The Canadian Conference of the Arts (CCA) houses the INCD's Secretariat.

In the past two years, Declarations and/or Action Plans have emerged from the following multilateral fora, which include reference to the social and economic importance of cultural diversity and, in some cases, the need for an international instrument:

Top of page

A Look Ahead

In the short term, international discussions on cultural diversity and the development of an NIICD will continue in the following fora:

In the medium term Canada plans to engage in further domestic consultations with all stakeholders and encourages other countries to do the same with a view to expanding the dialogue on the development of a New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity.




[ Print friendly ]

Canada's Commitment to Cultural Diversity
New International Instrument on Cultural Diversity
International Network on Cultural Policy
La Francophonie and Cultural Diversity
Canada @ the OAS
Canada @ UNESCO
International Relations and Policy Development
Multilateral Relations
Bilateral Relations
Policy Development
Speeches / Statements / Releases
Site Map
Any comments?

Date modified: 2003/02/21
Important Notices