Transportation Safety Board of Canada / Bureau de la sécurité des transports du Canada
Menu (access key: M)
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
Skip first menu (access key: 1)
TSB Home Media Room Statistics Reports What's New
Marine Pipeline Rail Air Site Map
Transportation Safety Board of Canada

Curve Graphic

Publication

Heading Graphic

Horizontal Line

Business Plan 2002-2003

Introduction
Priorities 2002-2003
Modern Comptrollership
Impacts / Risks of Business Plan and Resource Allocation
Annex A (2002-2003 Resource Allocation
Annex B (Modern Comptrollership Priorities)

Introduction

Since its inception in 1990, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) has developed a strong world-wide reputation for conducting independent investigations into transportation occurrences and for the professional skills it applies to investigations. By embarking upon a strategic planning process and building upon these strengths, the TSB has committed to improve its ability to advance transportation safety through a transition to internal practices which will be more rigorously aligned with the principles of modern management.

This undertaking is motivated largely by three factors:

Optimal use of available
resources
  • a broad sense that more structured planning and resource utilization practices are required in order to ensure optimal use of available resources;
Modern Comptrollership
  • the results of a formal modern comptrollership capacity assessment which indicate obvious strengths within the traditional accountability structure but a number of opportunities for improvement in the broader areas of accountability embraced by modern management practices; and, perhaps most importantly,
Balancing activities with available resources
  • the desire to ensure that there exists an appropriate balance between the activities required of the TSB to successfully achieve its mandate and the resources assigned to it for that purpose.

The publication of the TSB Business Plan 2002-2003 represents another key step in this transition. For the first time, a formal business plan has been published by the TSB bridging the gap between the Strategic Plan 2001-2002 to 2005-2006 published in January 2002 and the operational planning that will govern the activities for the TSB over the next twelve months. This first iteration of a business plan represents work in progress that will clearly mature in subsequent years as the organization gains more experience from working within a formal planning and management structure.

The current TSB Strategic Plan clearly describes our mission, values, strategic objectives and strategies that provide the framework for achieving the organization’s outcomes and desired results. We have identified five strategies which we see as a means of enhancing the organization’s strengths to provide a sound basis from which to move forward. Senior management then identified four goals that stand out as the highest priorities for our 2002-2003 Business Plan. Three other important issues were also identified as requiring attention during this fiscal year.

Back to top

Priorities 2002-2003

First Priority:

Establish a formalized Business Planning & Resource Management Structure.

Linkage to Strategic Objective # 3.

Improve Organizational effectiveness.

1 - To establish a formalized business planning and resource management structure.

During the course of the next six months, the TSB will establish the basic elements of a planning and resource management structure and employ the framework in preparation for fiscal year 2003-2004. Thereafter, the TSB resource planning will be rooted within a structured process and will be aligned with the government planning cycle. This will afford the obvious advantages of being better prepared to provide fully considered input to central agencies at the appropriate point within the fiscal planning cycle and providing a much higher level of predictability for resource managers within the TSB. Obviously, the development of a fully mature business planning and performance management model will require more than one year to achieve. However, the immediate establishment of a basic model is seen as being essential to addressing the three motivating factors for change mentioned above and to achieving the Strategic Objective of improving organizational effectiveness and ensuring appropriate resource levels.

 
Second Priority:

Conduct a Formal Stakeholder Needs Analysis.

Linkage to Strategic Objective # 1.

Improve the efficiency & effectiveness of TSB products in terms of timeliness and quality.

2 - To conduct a formal stakeholder needs analysis.

The TSB has always welcomed feedback on its activities and products but, with the exception of one narrowly focused client survey in 2000, it has never sought feedback from its stakeholders in a formal fashion. The information derived from such a review is essential if sound decisions are to be made with respect to TSB processes and products and how they can have the greatest impact towards the enhancement of transportation safety. The review will specifically target "change agents" such as regulators, operators, industry and associations within the transportation sector and will seek qualitative feedback on how the TSB can most effectively influence safety in transportation. The results of this review will provide feedback essential to ensuring the effectiveness of TSB products and services in terms of timeliness, content, quality and influence.

 
Third Priority:

Improve Quality and Timeliness of TSB Products.

Linkage to Strategic Objective # 1.

Improve the efficiency & effectiveness of TSB products in terms of timeliness and quality.

3 - To improve the quality and timeliness of TSB products

In the late ‘90s, the TSB undertook fundamental changes with respect to its investigation functions that included: organizational restructuring to merge investigation and safety deficiency analysis; development and implementation of the Integrated Safety Investigation Methodology (ISIM); and the increased role of investigation teams in the entire investigation process including writing of the report and the early communication of safety issues. These have proven to be sound directions for the TSB, but it is apparent that there remain issues of quality, standards, timeliness and process optimization that can and must be acted upon in the near term. Consequently, an internal project will be undertaken in fiscal year 2002-2003. Changes indicated by this project will be applied to current activities and products, but they will also be relevant to results obtained from the stakeholder needs analysis review. This project will include interaction and coordination with the work undertaken on learning as described below in the fourth priority.

 
Fourth Priority:

Establish the TSB as a learning organization.

Linkage to Strategic Objective # 3.

Improve Organizational effectiveness.

 

4 -To establish the TSB as a learning organization

The fourth major priority for fiscal year 2002-2003 is to transform the TSB into a learning organization by developing a comprehensive corporate training, development and learning strategy. This priority is linked to the strategic objective of improved organizational effectiveness. Resource and budget considerations of the past couple of years have led to decreased levels of development activity and internal training. Such a posture is not sustainable for any organization in the long term. However, for the TSB, whose ability to influence change is almost entirely dependent upon its reputation for technical currency and credibility, the maintenance of knowledge in a rapidly advancing technological world is critical. Developing a learning culture will ensure that corporate and employee needs are addressed. Initial activities will include the development of an employee orientation program, training plans to address mandatory training, a pilot project on the development of an occupational analysis and competency profiles, and a survey of employee needs. During fiscal year 2002-2003 efforts will also be concentrated on beginning to catch up on essential training that has not been achieved during the recent past.

   

Other Important Issues

Three other issues of importance will also be addressed: responsive workplace, governance, and information technology / information management renewal.

Other Important Issues:
  • Responsive Workplace
  • Governance
  • IT / IM Renewal
There exist within the TSB some areas of employee discontent with respect to compensation, job classification and work environment. Although this is typical for any organization, it exists at an elevated level in TSB and must be addressed in order to reestablish "normal working relationships. This activity will first focus on improving communication between management and employees to ensure that the standards, policies and requirements for compensation and job classification are well understood. Secondly, employee input on their work environment will be sought through the Public Service employee survey and a detailed action plan will be developed to address the most significant employee concerns. Furthermore, if any areas require adjustment because there have been problems in the past, those adjustments will be undertaken as quickly as possible.

In response to Program Review reductions, major organizational changes were implemented in the late ‘90s under the aegis of TSB 2000. Now, three to four years after implementation of these changes, there remain several questions of governance and organization that tend to detract from the organization’s ability to deal with and resolve the numerous challenges which it faces. Efforts to resolve these issues are restricted to internal deliberations for the moment. It is entirely possible, however, that external assistance will be required to address the question of governance in a thorough and objective manner. Should that be the case, the additional funding that would be required has not yet been identified. This issue will be reevaluated as the year progresses.

The renewal of our information technology / information management is a major undertaking in both time and financial resources. Additional funding has been obtained to cover most of the costs of the implementation of information technology renewal, with the majority of the project being completed in this fiscal year. Efforts will also be made towards the development of multi-year plans for the maintenance of our information technology infrastructure. A comprehensive review of the current state of information management within the TSB is currently being completed and will serve as the foundation upon which a detailed action plan can be developed.

The Bottom Line

Impact of Business Plan on TSB on-going activities.

 

 

It has not been difficult to identify the areas outlined above as requiring priority attention over the next fiscal year. It was substantially more difficult, however, to determine the source of financial and human resources to address them. The TSB was fortunate to obtain approximately one million dollars for fiscal year 2001-2002 to address major areas such as information technology, infrastructure renewal and capital needs that were clearly accumulating a bow wave of demand. 

We anticipate confirmation, during the current fiscal year, that this level of funding will be added to our resource base on an ongoing basis thereby helping the TSB to face the numerous on-going resource pressures. Nevertheless, there remains a gap between what resource managers require to accomplish the work they feel they have been asked to do and the amount of funds allocated to the TSB. Our collective decision to address critical change issues only places more pressure on current allocations (approved budget allocations for fiscal year 2002-2003 are shown in Appendix A) and, therefore, trade offs have to be made.

For the forthcoming year, there will be areas where less will be accomplished than in past years and, in some cases, activities will cease, at least for this year. None of these decisions has been easy because there is a sense that adjustments subsequent to Program Review reduced the TSB to a level of activity that is inadequate for the sustained achievement of its mandate. However, we have embarked upon a path of change which we collectively have agreed is essential. The reallocation of resources reflected in this year’s Business Plan is an investment in the TSB’s future. There are definite risks attached to this strategy, the most important of which are outlined later in this document. Nevertheless, we must manage in such a way as to minimize those risks and not allow ourselves to be deterred from our vision of change.

Key government-wide management improvement initiatives help TSB achieve its own objectives.

 

The creation of a new Strategic Plan and this Business Plan has provided an excellent opportunity for the TSB to take a step back and to view itself in a broad context. As a federal agency, the objectives and goals of this organization must represent not only priorities for the achievement of its specific mandate but those of the government and of Canadians as well. The directions established by the federal government in its document Results for Canadians: A Management Framework for the Government of Canada or in such documents as Public Service: Priorities for 2001-2002 provide the fundamental signposts for basic values and priorities that should be reflected by all government institutions.

A variety of other, more detailed programs or priorities flow logically from these seminal documents. These must not be viewed as being an optional adjunct to or in conflict with internal TSB business activities because, in virtually every case, they help to define the strong, professional type of organization that the TSB aims to be. Initiatives such as Modern Comptrollership do not detract from the accomplishment of TSB’s Strategic Outcomes and Objectives; they are entirely complementary to the directions established at Merrickville in October 2001 and in subsequent deliberations. By fully integrating all elements of Modern Comptrollership into the development of the TSB business plan framework, the successful implementation of a modern management framework can be more easily accomplished which will, in turn, facilitate our ability to effectively manage our program and achieve our desired outcomes.

TSB is fully committed to an agenda of change. The TSB is now fully committed to and embarked upon an agenda of change that will require persistence, patience, understanding and a certain level of risk. We must be careful to retain those organizational strengths that have an enduring value while discarding philosophies and practices that may have served us well in the past but that will limit success in the future. We are challenging ourselves and we are being challenged by external agents to undertake fundamental changes in the way we view our personal and corporate contributions. Our success in this endeavor will be contingent upon a shared understanding of what we seek to achieve and the personal engagement of everyone within the TSB.

Back to top

Modern Comptrollership

Linking TSB Strategic Objectives with Modern Comptrollership. The Government of Canada has committed to excellence in four areas critical to establish and sustain a well-performing public sector serving the Canadian public; citizen focus, responsible spending, values and results. A key component of this effort which impacts on all of us is the application of modern management principles identified in the Modern Comptrollership initiative.

Modern comptrollership is a change in emphasis from ensuring the integrity of financial administration to the establishment of a means which facilitates the achievement of our management and operational objectives. With Modern Comptrollership, the Government is looking beyond departmental accountability in terms of controlling financial transactions. Modern Comptrollership practices are founded upon integrated performance information, sound risk management, appropriate control systems and a shared set of values.

In late 2001, we conducted a Modern Comptrollership Capacity Assessment. It was a self-assessment of current TSB capabilities relative to modern management practices defined by 33 Modern Comptrollership criteria. The purpose was to identify areas for improvement so that action plans can be prepared. For detailed results of this assessment, please refer to the TSB InfoNet. Senior Management reviewed the results of the assessment and has identified a number of criteria to be included as an integral part of our current business planning initiative. The integration of these criteria into this year’s planning process are the first steps towards integrating Modern Comptrollership into every management activity.

Key Criteria for the Implementation of Modern Comptrollership

Leading the list of criteria selected by Senior Management are managerial commitment, planning and resources management. The objectives in selecting these criteria are:

  • to initiate dialogue on modern comptrollership, with emphasis on its benefits, to raise awareness, increase understanding and build commitment amongst all levels of managers,
  • to establish close linkages between resource allocation decisions and strategic and Business Plan priorities, and
  • to develop processes to regularly review resource allocations based on changing and/or new priorities.

As a means of demonstrating senior management’s commitment to Modern Comptrollership, the creation of a Strategic Plan this year is a clear and essential first step. This Business Plan includes descriptions of the next steps in the process toward achieving the latter two objectives as well as full integration with our management practices.

Senior management also selected the following Modern Comptrollership criteria which are closely related to our strategic objectives: integrated departmental performance reporting, knowledge management, management tools and techniques, specialist support and measuring client satisfaction.
The objectives in selecting these criteria are:

  • the establishment of high level performance measures linked to strategic vision and priorities covering both financial and non-financial aspects and providing a historical and future oriented view employing quantitative and anecdotal information,
  • a survey of our clients on their needs and level of satisfaction where the results can be tracked over time, and be considered in strategic and business planning,
  • the close partnership of managers and functional specialists and the provision to them of various analytical models and techniques and decision making support tools that integrate financial and non-financial information, and
  • the development of widespread organizational learning initiatives that recognize the importance of knowledge sharing and are supportive of collaborative mechanisms and structures to encourage knowledge transfer and lessons learned.

The Strategic Plan has indicated several strategies that these criteria relate to and initiatives currently underway to conduct a client survey and to develop a training, development and learning framework are illustrative of the approach TSB is taking towards modern management.

In selecting this first set of criteria, senior management recognizes that work will also take place on other Modern Comptrollership elements as some are naturally inter-dependant and others are enablers. During the upcoming fiscal year, we will continue the integration of the Modern Comptrollership principles with the management practices adopted this year.

Back to top

Impacts / Risks of Business Plan and Resource Allocation

As noted earlier, this Business Plan and the related resource allocation for fiscal year 2002-2003 require that some difficult choices and compromises be made. As a result, some activities will be curtailed and certain things will not be done. The Senior Management Committee has considered and accepted the impacts and the risks arising from these decisions. Senior management also commits to managing activities and resources in such a way as to minimize those risks while ensuring that we do not deviate from our renewal agenda. There are three major impacts/risks identified that will require on-going monitoring throughout the year.

Reduced Investigation Activity

Limited resources will result in reduced investigation activity involving, to various degrees, deployment to accident sites, number and depth of investigations, and timeliness of public reports. This reduced level of activity may be perceived negatively by external stakeholders such as regulators, coroners, manufacturers, operators, and individual citizens for various reasons, depending on their individual interests. Data collection will be impacted. Some safety deficiencies may be left unidentified and unattended. This could represent a significant risk for the transportation system but the level of risk is difficult to quantify. Senior management accepts that some temporary reduction in the level of investigation activities is necessary for the organization to proceed with its renewal plan. Careful monitoring will be required throughout the year to ensure that essential work continues to be done in line with our legislated mandate. Investigation and safety analysis processes must be optimized so that those safety deficiencies that pose high risks to the travelling public will not be left unattended. The possibility of adverse reaction can be mitigated through on-going communication with stakeholders to explain the renewal plan and manage their expectations while data is collected through the stakeholder needs analysis to help define the acceptable level of activity for future planning purposes.

Reduction in Formal Safety Communications

The reduction in the number of investigation reports, Reflexions magazines and statistical reports may result in not getting the safety message out effectively to key stakeholders who can influence change within the transportation system. No hard data is currently available to determine the potential impact of these temporary reductions. However, a number of measures can be taken to potentially reduce risks, such as:

  • increased use of informal communication with stakeholders,
  • establishing stronger linkages and partnership arrangements with other agencies in government and industry (while maintaining our independence),
  • increased reliance on the web site to make safety information available,
  • prioritization of communication activities to focus on the most important safety messages, and
  • adjustments to internal processes to increase efficiency and timeliness.

Internal Understanding and Buy-In

TSB staff and managers are known to have a great sense of duty. They are dedicated to their mission in advancing transportation safety. With resources becoming scarce, the level of activities had to be curtailed over the years. While the renewal initiatives described in this Business Plan will bring about benefits in the long term, level of activities, including those associated with investigation operations will be further curtailed in the short term. These changes will not be readily endorsed by everyone. This could result in an increase in the stress and frustration levels of certain employees leading to reduced motivation, lower productivity and a high staff turnover rate. Senior management is taking steps to mitigate this impact by enhancing communication to ensure that staff at all levels understand the plan and the longer term benefits, that they see the progress being made, and that they can appreciate that the current situation is temporary. Early approval of budgets and training plans will permit responsibility centre managers to complete their operational work plans and to effectively manage their resources.

Other Impacts and Risks

Senior management has also identified and assessed a number of other impacts/risks for the coming year, such as: reduced participation in international undertakings, specialists working outside of their area of expertise, employee training currency issues, inability to reduce backlogs, inadequate specialist support, increased difficulty in responding to a major occurrence, limited investment in systems development and capital asset replacement, and loss of corporate knowledge due to staff attrition. All of these potential risks could have a negative impact on the TSB. However, prudent and sensible management of financial, human and material resources can go a long way towards mitigating these risks as the organization implements its renewal plan. Senior management expects that managers at all levels within the organization will contribute to effectively minimizing these risks through the sound management and periodic re-allocation of their allotted resources.

Throughout this period of change the TSB will ensure that it fulfills its obligations as a federal government agency in the areas of official languages, employment equity, access to information and privacy, information management, as well as occupational health and safety. Current government priorities and initiatives will also be implemented to the extent that resources permit and that they can be integrated into the TSB renewal plan. Senior management will ensure that the right balance is maintained between the government-wide agenda and the TSB’s own legislated mandate and internal agenda so that maximum progress can be achieved towards the TSB’s stated outcomes.

Back to top

Annex A

2002-2003 Resource Allocation

Budgets for fiscal year 2002-2003 were approved by the Executive Director on March 27, 2002. Approved allocations are shown in the following table.

RC

Salaries
$

Overtime
$

O+M
$

Total
$

Executive

 1,064,658

1,000

295,500

1,361,158

Corporate Services

 1,441,708

 30,000

938,000

2,409,708

ISAD

 2,857,786

100,000

1,528,000

4,485,786

DGIO + regional admin

 1,020,087

9,000

306,000

1,335,087

Engineering

 1,593,378

100,000

594,000

2,287,378

Air

 4,352,320

310,000

1,250,000

5,912,320

Marine

1,907,206

200,000

329,000

2,436,206

Rail

1,872,816

250,000

300,000

2,422,816

Total

 16,109,959

1,000,000

5,540,500

 22,650,459

Business Plan Key Initiatives

 0

0

1,100,000

1,100,000

Grand Total

16,109,959

 1,000,000

6,640,500

 23,750,459

Funding has been specifically set aside for the various key initiatives described in this Business Plan. Preliminary allocations are shown in the following table.

Business Plan Key Initiatives

Planning and Resource Management Framework

$ 55,000

Stakeholder Needs Analysis

$ 130,000

Quality

$ 47,000

Learning

$ 100,000

Responsive Workplace

$ 38,000

Governance

$ 10,000

Information Technology / Information Management Renewal

$ 720,000

Total

$ 1,100,000

Back to top

Annex B

Modern Comptrollership Priorities

Modern Comptrollership Criteria

Capacity Assessment Rating

Target Rating Desired

Planning

1

3.5

Resource Management

1

3

Managerial Commitment

1.5

3

Integrated Departmental Performance Reporting

1.5

3

Knowledge Management

1.5

2.5

Management Tools and Techniques

1

3

Specialist Support

1.5

3

Measuring Client Satisfaction

2

3



Updated: 2003-01-07

Back to the top

Important Notices