• Domaines de recherche
• Publications
• Publications récentes
• Rapports de recherche
• par sujet
• par titre
• Recherche avancée
• JusteRecherche
• Fiches d'information
• Plan du site
• Communiquez avec nous

Bibliographie
Liste des arrêts cités
Annexe A

Page précédente | Table des matières

Bibliographie

BACCHUS, S. " The role of victims in the sentencing process ", dans J.V. Roberts et D. Cole (dir.), Making Sense of Sentencing, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.

BALA, N. Youth Criminal Justice Law, Toronto, Irwin Law, 2003.

BAZEMORE, G. " Crime victims and restorative justice in juvenile courts: judges as obstacle or leader? ", Western Criminology Review, vol. 1, 1998.http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/bazemore.html.

BONTA, J.S., WALLACE-CAPRETTA, S. et ROONEY, J. La justice réparatrice : évaluation du Programme de solutions réparatrices, Ottawa, Soliciteur Général Canada, 1998. http://www.sgc.gc.ca/publications/corrections/pdf/199810b_e.pdf.

BRADSHAW, W. et UMBREIT, M.S. " Crime victims meet juvenile offenders: contributing factors to victim satisfaction with mediated dialogue ", Juvenile and Family Court Journal, vol. 49, 1998, p. 17-25.

BRILLON, Y. « Punitiveness, status and ideology in three Canadian provinces », dans N. Walker et M. Hough (dir.), Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys from Five Countries, Aldershot, Gower, 1988.

CARRIERE, D. « Les services correctionnels pour adultes au Canada, 2001-2002 », Juristat, vol 23, n° 11, 2003.

CLARKE, S.H., VALENTE, E. et MACE, R.R. Mediation of interpersonal disputes: an evaluation of North Carolina's programs, Chapel Hill (North Carolina), University of North Carolina, 1992.

DAUBNEY, D. et PARRY, G. « An Overview of Bill C-41 (The Sentencing Reform Act) », dans J.V. Roberts et D. Cole (dir.), Making Sense of Sentencing, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.

DAVIS, V. et COLL. « The importance of victim satisfaction: a commentary: Discussion of restitution, the victims' viewpoint », The Justice System Journal, vol. 15, 1992, p. 759-764.

DAVIS R.C. et COLL. « Restitution: the victims' viewpoint », Justice System Journal, vol. 15, 1992, p. 746-758.

DIGNAN, J. « Repairing the damage: can reparation be made to work in the service of diversion? », British Journal of Criminology, vol. 32, 1992, p. 453 472.

DOOB, A.N. et WEBSTER, C. « Sentence Severity and Crime: Accepting the Null Hypothesis », dans M. Tonry (dir.), Crime and Justice. A Review of Research, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2004.

EREZ, E. « Victim Participation in Sentencing: And the debate goes on…. », International Review of Victimology, vol. 3, 1994, p. 17 32.

EREZ, E. et TONTODONATO, P. « Victim participation in sentencing and satisfaction with justice », Justice Quarterly, vol. 9, 1992, p. 393 417.

FELDTHUSEN, B. " The Civil Action for Sexual Battery: Therapeutic Jurisprudence? ", Ottawa Law Review, vol. 25, p. 203.

GANDY, J. et GALAWAY, B. « Restitution as a Sanction for offenders: A Public's View », dans J. Hudson and B. Galaway (dir.), Victims, Offenders, and Alternative Sanctions, Lexington (Massachussets), Lexington Books, 1980.

HAGAN, J. « Victims before the law: a study of victim involvement in the criminal justice process », Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 73, 1982, p. 317-330.

HAGAN, J. Victims Before the Law. The Organizational Domination of Criminal Law, Toronto, Butterworths, 1983.

HENDERSON, J. et GITCHOFF, G. « Victim and offender perceptions of alternatives to incarceration: an exploratory study », South African Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol. 7, 1983, p. 44 53.

HOUGH, M. et MOXON, D. " Dealing with offenders: Popular Opinion and the Views of Victims ", The Howard Journal, vol. 24, 1985, p. 160-175.

HOUGH, M. et ROBERTS, J.V. Attitudes to Punishment: findings from the British Crime Survey, Londres, Home Office, 1998.

HUDSON, J. et GALAWAY, B. (dir.). Victims, Offenders, and Alternative Sanctions, Lexington (Massachussets), Lexington Books, 1980.

LOSCHNIG-GSPANDL, M. et KILCHLING, M. " Victim/offender mediation and victim compensation in Austria and Germany: stocktaking and perspectives for future research ", European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, vol. 2, 1997, p. 1-78.

LUTZ, G.M., FAHRNEY, K., CREW, B. et MORIARTY, M. The 1997 Iowa Adult Crime Victimization Survey, 1997, Cedar Falls (Iowa), University of Northern Iowa, 1998. http://www.csbs.uni.edu/dept/csbr/data/crime_vic.pdf.

MANSON, A. The Law of Sentencing, Toronto, Irwin Law, 2001.

MARINOS, V. et DOOB, A.N. « Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Conditional Sentences of Imprisonment », Criminal Reports, vol. 21, 1999, p. 31 41.

MATTINSON, J. et MIRRLEES-BLACK, C. Attitudes to crime and criminal justice: findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey, Londres, Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate, 2000. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hors200.pdf.

MINISTÈRE DE LA JUSTICE DU CANADA. Crime Victims. Working Paper No. 11. An Analysis of Victims/ Victim Witness Needs in the Yukon, Ottawa, ministère de la Justice du Canada, Division de la recherche et de la statistique, 1984.

MORRIS, A., MAXWELL, G.M. et ROBERTSON, J.P. " Giving victims a voice: a New Zealand experiment ", Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 32, 1993, p. 304-321.

NETZIG, L. et TRENCZEK, T. « Restorative justice as participation: theory, law, experience and research », dans B. Galaway et J. Hudson (dir.), Restorative Justice: International Perspectives, Monsey (New York), Willow Tree Press, 1996.

NOVACK, S., GALAWAY, B. et HUDSON, J. " Victim and Offender Perceptions of the Fairness of Restitution and Community-Service Sanctions ", dans J. Hudson et B. Galaway (dir.), Victims, Offenders, and Alternative Sanctions, Lexington (Massachussets), Lexington Books, 1980.

PALK, G., HAYES, H. et PRENZLER, T. " Restorative justice and community conferencing: summary of findings from a pilot study ", Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol. 10, 1998, p. 138-155.

POULSON, B. et ELTON, K. " Participants' attitudes in the Utah Juvenile Victim-Offender Mediation Program ", Juvenile and Family Court Journal, vol. 53, 2002, p. 37-45.

REED, M. et ROBERTS, J.V. " Les services correctionnels pour adultes au Canada, 1997-1998 ", Juristat, vol. 19, n° 4, 1999.

ROACH, K. Due Process and Victims' Rights. The New Law and Politics of Criminal Justice, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.

ROACH, K. " Crime Victims and Sentencing ", dans D. Stuart, R. Delisle et A. Manson, Towards a Clear and Just Criminal Law, Toronto, Carswell, 1999b.

ROACH, K. " Changing punishment at the turn of the century: Restorative Justice on the Rise ", Canadian Journal of Criminology, vol. 42, 2000, p. 249-280.

ROACH, K. " The Role of Crime Victims under the Youth Criminal Justice Act ", Alberta Law Review, vol. 40, 2003, p. 965-989.

ROBERTS, J.V. " Sentencing Trends and Sentencing Disparity ", dans J.V. Roberts et D. Cole (dir.), Making Sense of Sentencing, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999.

ROBERTS, J.V. Public Perceptions of Prosecutors: Results of a Nationwide Survey, Ottawa, ministère de la Justice du Canada, Service fédéral des poursuites, 2002.

ROBERTS, J.V. The Virtual Prison. Community Custody and the Evolution of Imprisonment, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004.

ROBERTS, J.V. et EDGAR, A. « Victim Impact Statements: Perceptions of the Judiciary », International Review of Victimology, vol. 1, n° 4, 2002.

ROBERTS, J.V. et ROACH, K. « Restorative Justice in Canada: From Sentencing Circles to Sentencing Principles », dans A. Von Hirsch, J.V. Roberts, A. Bottoms, K. Roach, K. et M. Schiff (dir.), Restorative and Criminal Justice, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003.

ROBERTS, J.V. et STALANS, L.S. Public Attitudes to Restorative Justice, Ottawa, University of Ottawa, 2004.

SANDERS, T. et ROBERTS, J.V. « Public Attitudes toward conditional sentencing: Results of a National Survey », Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, vol. 32, 2000, p. 199-207.

SANDERS, T. et ROBERTS, J.V. « Exploring Public Attitudes to Conditional Sentencing », dans J. Winterdyk, L. Coates et S. Brodie (dir.), Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, Toronto, Pearson, 2004.

SESSAR, K. « Restitution or punishment: an empirical study on attitudes of the public and the justice system in Hamburg », EuroCriminology, vol. 8, 1995, p. 199-214.

SESSAR, K. « Tertiary victimization: a case of the politically abused crime victims », dans B. Galaway et J. Hudson (dir.), Criminal Justice, Restitution, and Reconciliation, Monsey (New York), Willow Tree Press, 1990.

SPROTT, J. et DOOB, A.N. « Fear, victimization, and attitudes to sentencing, the courts, and the police », Canadian Journal of Criminology, vol. 39, 1997, p. 275-291.

TONTODONATO, P. et EREZ, E. « Crime, Punishment, and Victim Distress », International Review of Victimology, vol. 3, 1994, p. 33-55.

TUFTS, J. « Attitudes du public face au système de justice pénale » Juristat, vol 20, n° 12, 2000.

TUFTS, J. et ROBERTS, J.V. « Sentencing juvenile offenders: comparing public preferences and judicial practice », Criminal Justice Policy Review, vol. 13, 2002, p. 46-64.

UMBREIT, M.S. « Crime victims confront their offenders: the impact of a Minneapolis mediation program », Journal of Research on social Work Practice, vol. 4, 1994, p. 436-447.

UMBREIT, M.S., COATES, R.B. et KALANJ, B. Victim meets offender: the impact of restorative justice and mediation, Monsey (New York), Willow Tree Press, 1994.

UMBREIT, M.S., COATES, R.B. et VOS, B. « Victim impact of meeting with young offenders: two decades of victim offender mediation practice and research », dans A. Morris et G. Maxwell (dir.), Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circles, Portland (Oregon), Hart Publishing, 2001.

VAN DIJK, J. et STEINMETZ, C. « Pragmatism, ideology and crime control: three Dutch surveys », dans N. Walker et M. Hough (dir.), Public Attitudes to Sentencing: Surveys from Five Countries, Aldershot, Gower, 1988.

VON HIRSCH, A., ROBERTS, J.V., BOTTOMS, A., ROACH, K. et SCHIFF, M. Restorative and Criminal Justice, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2003.

YOUNG, A. Le rôle de la victime au sein du processus judiciaire : une analyse bibliographique - 1989 à 1999, Ottawa, Centre de la politique concernant les victimes, ministère de la Justice du Canada, 2001.

YOUNG, A. et ROBERTS, J.V. Research Workshops on the Role of the Victim in the Criminal Process. Summary Report, Ottawa, Centre de la politique concernant les victimes, ministère de la Justice du Canada, 2001.

Liste des arrêts cités

R. c. Bratzer (2001) 160 C.C.C.(3d) 272.

R. c. Duchominsky (2003) 171 C.C.C.(3d) 526.

R. c. Iftody (2003) AJ No. 100 (Prov. Ct.).

R. c. Longboat (2003) O.J. no 598.

R. c. MacDonald (2003) 173 C.C.C. (3d) 235.

R. c. Nensi (2001) O.J. no. 5655 (Ont. Ct of J.).

R. c. Proulx [2000] 1 R.C.S. 61.

R. c. R.A.R (2000) 140 C.C.C.(3d) 523.

R. c. C.R.P (2001) O.J. no 1595.

R. c. MacAdam (2003) 171 C.C.C.(3d) 449.

R. c. M.S.R. (2002) B.C.J. no. 845.

R. c. Simms (2002) N.J. no. 3 (Prov Ct.).

R. c. Sandreswaren (2001) O.J. no 3933.

R c. Watkinson (2001) 153 C.C.C.(3d) 561.

ANNEXE A

742.3.1 Conditions obligatoires de l'ordonnance de sursis - Le tribunal assortit l'ordonnance de sursis des conditions suivantes, intimant au délinquant :

1. de ne pas troubler l'ordre public et d'avoir une bonne conduite;
2. de répondre aux convocations du tribunal;
3. de se présenter à l'agent de surveillance :
    
   1. dans les deux jours ouvrables suivant la date de l'ordonnance, ou dans le délai plus long fixé par le tribunal,
   2. par la suite, selon les modalités de temps et de forme fixées par l'agent de surveillance;
       
4. de rester dans le ressort du tribunal, sauf permission écrite d'en sortir donnée par le tribunal ou par l'agent de surveillance;
5. de prévenir le tribunal ou l'agent de surveillance de ses changements d'adresse ou de nom et de les aviser rapidement de ses changements d'emploi ou d'occupation.

Page précédente | Table des matières