Home : Reports and Publications : Audit & Evaluation : Program Evaluation Study: EDP and UEDI
This chapter summarizes the major findings of our review regarding:
The major findings of our review regarding the perceived need for the program are as follows:
The representatives whom we surveyed during the course of the study were asked to rate the need for the program on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is not need at all, 3 is somewhat of a need and 5 is a major need. The average rating varied from 4.5 amongst the clients surveyed to 3.6 amongst representatives from the delivery agencies as indicated below.
The perceived need for the programs reflects that:
The results of the PALS survey regarding the types of disabilities that people face are summarized below:
Examples of additional barriers that we identified in our literature review include:
Many of the CFDCs indicated that demand for EDP services has not been high in their region and the many entrepreneurs with disabilities would be eligible to receive essentially the same services through the general loan fund as they receive through the EDP.
Factors that contribute to the increasing need include:
The results of the PALS survey illustrates how the percentage of the population with disabilities increases as the population ages. The rate of disability increases from 3% of the population for people aged 14 years or younger to 41% for people aged 65 years or more as indicated in the chart.
The major findings of our review between the fit of the program with priorities of the organizations involved as well as other resources in the community are as follows:
The EDP and UEDI were created in response to the Federal Task Force on Disabilities, which identified employment as a major issue for persons with disabilities and a leading cause of the relatively high incidence of poverty. These concerns continue. The labour force participation rate of adults with disabilities was 46% in 2001 (including people who were employed as well as those who were unemployed but looking for work) as compared to 79% for those persons without disabilities. Only 42% of adults with disabilities were employed in 2001 as compared to 74% of adults without disabilities. The median income of adults with disabilities was $15,921 in 2001 as compared to $24,000 for adults without disabilities.
The Task Force recommended that changes be made to ensure that existing programs are inclusive for those with disabilities and that new programming be developed to address key barriers that have constrained people with disabilities from participating equally in the economy. EDP and UEDI create employment opportunities for persons with disabilities by facilitating self-employment and supporting entrepreneurship. The programs are also consistent with WD’s focus on entrepreneurship and sustainable communities.
While the commitment to the target group is generally strong across the delivery agencies, some of the agencies (particularly some of the CFDCs) indicated that they do not currently place a high priority on the program because:
Twenty-three percent of clients and 50% of the stakeholders were aware of other programs and services in the community that could assist entrepreneurs with disabilities. In general, the programs are much more limited in scope than the EDP and UEDI with respect to the assistance that they can provide. It was noted that most programs targeted specifically at people with disabilities are employment programs rather than entrepreneurship programs while most programs targeted at entrepreneurs are not tailored to the needs of entrepreneurs with disabilities. A profile of other programs that were identified in Western Canada as well as in other regions is provided in Appendix V. The delivery agencies for EDP and UEDI have developed relationships with many of the other resources that are available such as the Opportunities Fund, Opportunity Works, and SEED Winnipeg.