Natural Resources CanadaGovernment of Canada
 
 Français ÿ  Contact us ÿ  Help ÿ  Search ÿ  Canada site
 ESS Home ÿ  Priorities ÿ  Products &
 services
ÿ  About the
 Sector
ÿ  Site map
Satellite image of Canada
Natural Resources Canada
Radiocarbon Dating
.Home
.Laboratory
.Age Calculations
.Quality Assurance
.International Quality Assurance
.Collaborative Study
.IAEA Radiocarbon Q/A Program
.TIRI
.Internal Crosschecks
.Publications
.RC Dates
.Date List Publications
.Special Projects
.Ambient Levels
.Comparisons
.Marine Reservoir Ages


Geological Survey of Canada
Geological Survey of Canada


Proactive disclosure


Print version Print versionÿ
ÿGeological Survey of Canada
Natural Resources Canada > Earth Sciences Sector > Geological Survey of Canada > Radiocarbon Dating
Radiocarbon Dating
Collaborative Study

The Geological Survey of Canada Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory ceased operation at the end of 2005. This site will be maintained to provide reference information on the samples dated during the 45 years of operation of the GSC laboratory from 1960 to 2005.

The GSC Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory participated in a program that was designed to exhaustively investigate all aspects of C-14 dating (Scott et al, 1990). A three year study, with Dr. E.M. Scott as principal investigator, was undertaken by the University of Glasgow in 1986. The study had four main aims, namely:

  • to provide important information for C-14 users by quantifying the uncertainties on the results routinely obtained from C-14 laboratories;
  • to provide an objective cross-check and verification of different laboratory techniques;
  • to provide quantative insight into the validity of routinely quoted errors; and
  • to assign and numerically assess the contribution of the various experimental processes to the overall error.

The study was carried out in three stages to systematically assess various aspects of the radiocarbon dating technique.

The figure below (figure 8, Scott et al., opt. cit), which includes data from all 3 stages, compares the GSC laboratory with other laboratories worldwide.


larger image
[GIF, 19.2 kb, 344 X 368, notice]

The offset for the GSC laboratory, to the left of the Y-axis, indicates a negative bias of less than 20 years, thus GSC age estimates may be slightly younger than the true age of the sample. The very small confidence interval attests to the high precision of the GSC laboratory.

Stage 1 was designed to investigate variations in the different counting techniques (gas proportional, liquid scintillation, and accelerator mass spectrometry). The samples underwent no laboratory treatment, therefore only samples of calcium carbonate for gas proportional and AMS laboratories, or benzene for the liquid scintillation laboratories were dated.

    Expected Normalized Uncorrected del C-13
Stage 1 No treatment        
GSC-4308 carbonate 3600 3610 +/- 70 3690 +/- 70 -30.0
GSC-4308R carbonate 3600 3600 +/- 60 3680 +/- 60 -30.0
GSC-4309 carbonate 3600 3530 +/- 60 3610 +/- 60 -29.7
GSC-4314 carbonate -66 -160 +/- 50 -150 +/- 50 -25.9
GSC-4312 carbonate -66 -100 +/- 50 -90 +/- 50 -25.5

Stage 1
Stage 1

Stage 2 was designed to investigate the effects of different laboratory processing techniques on various sample materials (pre-treated algal carbonate, wood cellulose, and humic acid). The GSC laboratory selected algal carbonate and wood cellulose to test our acid digestion and burning techniques, respectively. The samples were pre-treated in Glasgow before aliquots were sent to the participating laboratories. The pre-treatment for carbonate and wood cellulose are noted below:

  • carbonate: a bulk sample of a marine alga (Lithothamnion) was collected and hand sorted to remove shell fragments; leached with dilute (0.5M) HCl to remove approximately the outer 10% of the material; washed with distilled water and dried. The sample was thoroughly mixed during washing and after drying; and
  • wood cellulose: prepared from 20 rings (dendrochronologically dated) by successive boiling in 2M potassium hydroxide, followed by bleaching in sodium chlorite, and then washed with distilled water and dried. The sample was thoroughly mixed by tumbling.
    Expected Normalized Uncorrected del C-13
Stage 2 No treatment        
GSC-4437 "marine alga, carbonate" 2120 2050 +/- 60 1690 +/- 60 -2.6
GSC-4438 "marine alga, carbonate" 2120 2020 +/- 60 1660 +/- 60 -2.8
GSC-4439 wood cellulose 2250 2150 +/- 60 2130 +/- 60 -24.1
GSC-4440 wood cellulose 2250 2160 +/- 60 2170 +/- 60 -25.9

Stage 2
Stage 2

Stage 3 was designed to investigate the effects of complete laboratory treatment on the dating of natural samples of wood, shells, and peat. During Stage 3 of the study GSC dated all the types of material available, i.e. wood, peat, and shells, as well as a marine sediment. Each gas preparation was counted in both the 2 L and 5 L counters except for the marine sediment, and one of the shell samples (GSC-4666), because the gas leaked from the cylinder before it was re-counted.

    Expected Normalized Uncorrected del C-13
Stage 3 Standard treatment        
5-L counter
GSC-4674 wood 290 +/- 15 280 +/- 50 290 +/- 50 -25.3
GSC-4671 peat 3395 3380 +/- 60 3460 +/- 60 -29.5
GSC-4676 wood 2185 +/- 10 2210 +/- 50 2230 +/- 50 -26.1
GSC-4666 marine shells 670 700 +/- 50 260 +/- 50 +2.0
GSC-4677 wood 2185 +/- 10 2140 +/- 60 2150 +/- 60 -25.6
GSC-4677X wood 2185 +/- 10 2180 +/- 80 2190 +/- 80 -25.6
GSC-4673 wood 100 +/- 15 70 +/- 50 100 +/- 50 -26.6
GSC-4672 peat 3395 3340 +/- 50 3380 +/- 50 -27.0
GSC-4667 marine shells 670 650 +/- 50 250 +/- 50 +0.2
2-L counter
GSC-4308 2 carbonate 3600 3620 +/- 60 3680 +/- 60 -28.9
GSC-4674 2 wood 290 +/- 15 340 +/- 60 350 +/- 60 -25.3
GSC-4671 2 peat 3395 3370 +/- 60 3440 +/- 60 -29.5
GSC-4676 2 wood 2185 +/- 10 2210 +/- 60 2220 +/- 60 -26.1
GSC-4677 2 wood 2185 +/- 10 2290 +/- 70 2300 +/- 70 -25.6
GSC-4673 2 wood 100 +/- 15 150 +/- 60 180 +/- 60 -26.6
GSC-4672 2 peat 3395 3470 +/- 60 3500 +/- 60 -27.0
GSC-4667 2 marine shells 670 720 +/- 60 320 +/- 60 +0.2

All the study data has been summarized in a table.

The figures for each stage indicate that the GSC age estimates compare very favourably with the expected ages (cf. table listing). In stage 1 and 2 the GSC laboratory tended to provide ages slightly younger than the expected ages, but in stage 3 of the study, in which each laboratory carried out the complete treatment on natural samples, the GSC age estimates were excellent.

Stage 3
Stage 3

2006-04-13Important notices