Proactive disclosure Print version ![Print version Print version](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_printversion2.gif) ![ÿ](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_spacer.gif) | ![ÿ](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_spacer.gif) | ![Strong and safe communities Strong and safe communities](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/2002iscom_e.jpeg) Natural Resources Canada > Earth Sciences Sector > Priorities > Strong and safe communities > Geodynamics
Geodynamics North Cascadia margin deformation from GPS measurements
J. A. Henton, H. Dragert, R. McCaffrey, K. Wang and R. D. Hyndman
This article compares results from Continuous GPS stations and
campaign GPS surveys and finds that the horizontal velocities identified
by each method are consistent. The horizontal deformation is consistent
with strain accumulation across the subduction thrust, indicating that
the northern Juan de Fuca plate is fully locked. The GPS observations fit
an elastic dislocation model to 1st order. No clear deformation patterns,
relating to the 1946 or 1918 crustal earthquakes, are resolved. Rates of
shortening across the coastal margin from the elastic model are ~1.5
times larger than observed (likely due to the limitations of such models).
Recent densification of repeated GPS campaign measurements across Vancouver
Island, British Columbia, is beginning to consolidate the pattern of crustal
deformation for the northern Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ). Deformation
is generally consistent with a fully locked subduction megathrust fault
surface and no free-slip zones are resolved. As a result, the northern
CSZ margin accumulates the full slip-deficit (i.e. at the rate of Juan
de Fuca/North America relative plate convergence) along its length with
no apparent abrupt changes in the width of the seismogenic zone. The observed
horizontal velocity field fits the elastic dislocation model well to first
order and shows no significant components of rigid block motion. The widths
of the locked zones off central Vancouver Island and southern Vancouver
Island are approximately 55 km and 85 km respectively, assuming equivalent
widths for their respective transition zones. Directions of observed principal
strain axes are well aligned with the direction of convergence but the
magnitude of the observed rate of margin normal shortening is about 1.5
time smaller than predicted by the dislocation models; i.e. observed velocities
for the inland GPS sites are larger than predicted by the model. This
discrepancy can be minimized by introducing time-dependent viscous deformation
within the mantle underlying the CSZ as demonstrated by the viscoelastic
model developed by Wang and He. For northern Vancouver Island, the deformation
measurements also provide evidence for crustal strain that is not fully
accounted for by current elastic models of a locked subduction thrust
fault. The northwesterly motion of the continuous GPS site HOLB, the reduced
deformation motions in this region, and the small-scale margin parallel
extension measured here mark a pronounced change in the character of the
accumulating crustal strain in the margin overlying the Explorer Plate.
This change in strain rates to the north of the locked subducting Juan
de Fuca Plate may play a role in the origin of large crustal earthquakes
on central Vancouver Island.
![Top Top](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_up.gif)
WCDA Horizontal Velocities and southwestern British Columbia GPS Sites |
![WCDA horizontal velocity field WCDA horizontal velocity field](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_wcdahorvel_.gif) WCDA horizontal velocity field
|
The black arrows show the observed horizontal velocities at GPS sites
relative to DRAO (Penticton, BC). The data are for periods of two years
(WSLR) to six years (ALBH & HOLB) and were processed with CGPS22.
Velocity vectors are shown with their 95% confidence ellipses determined
from regression errors. Datum biases (i.e. steps typically associated
with physical alterations affecting the antennae at tracker sites or reference
frame changes) were removed by permitting step functions to be fit during
the linear-regression process. We also simultaneously fit an annual (365.25-day)
period sinusoid to the data during regression. Velocities have been corrected
for differential North American plate motion between each tracker site
and DRAO, the reference site.
![GPS campaign sites of southwestern British Columbia GPS campaign sites of southwestern British Columbia](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_swbcgps_.gif) GPS campaign sites of southwestern British Columbia
|
The networks comprising these sites are summarized in Table 1. The surveys
were carried out by the Geodetic Survey of Canada. The PAL survey of 1999
was done in cooperation with Rob McCaffrey, RPI, supported by NSF funding.
Each survey used 4 to 6 Ashtech receivers with each site being occupied
a minimum of two days. All site positions were calculated with respect
to DRAO by rigorously combining daily solutions into survey epoch averages.
Table 1. GPS Campaign Networks of Southwestern British Columbia
Network Name |
Number of Stations |
First Survey Period |
Second Survey Period |
Processing Software |
Central Vancouver Island (CVI) |
17 |
August, 1992 |
September, 1997 |
Bernese 4.0 |
Port Alberni (PAL) |
21 |
June, 1994 |
July, 1999 |
Bernese 4.2 |
Juan de Fuca (JDF) |
15 |
October, 1991 |
August, 1996 |
CGPS 22 |
Campaign velocities and strains |
Campaign velocities
The site displacements divided by the time between surveys determines
site velocities relative to the reference site DRAO. The rate of differential,
rigid-body North American plate motion between individual campaign GPS
sites and DRAO is removed. Velocity vectors are plotted with estimated
95% confidence ellipses.
The vector directions are all nearly parallel within the estimated uncertainties
and largely agree with the direction of Juan de Fuca Plate convergence.
The displacements are consistent with the deformation signal expected
from a locked CSZ subduction thrust surface. The largest displacements
(~10 mm/yr) occur towards the coastal margin and decrease landward. For
the central Vancouver Island region, the effect of deformation associated
with the 1918 or 1946 crustal earthquakes is not evident in the data.
The poorer CVI solutions (i.e. error ellipses greater by a factor up to
~2) are likely a consequence of GPS broadcast modifications and testing
(i.e. anti-spoofing) during the period of the 1992 survey.
Campaign Strains
Principal horizontal strain rates averaged over an entire network are
also computed from the observed velocities. The results for each campaign
network are given in the inset boxes in the upper-left corner of the velocity
field diagrams (error values are 1-σ).
The principal shortening-axis rate (negative values indicate shortening) is
2
which is oriented at an azimuth (clockwise from north) of
θ 2 ;
1
is the principal extension-axis rate. These strain rates are assumed to
be uniform over the entire network (i.e., velocity gradients are assumed
to be linear). Measurements are not sufficiently dense nor sufficiently
precise to verify this assumption.
For the networks of southern Vancouver Island (i.e. Juan de Fuca &
Port Alberni) the principal axes of shortening correspond well to the
direction of relative Juan-de-Fuca/North-America plate convergence for
northern Cascadia. Furthermore, these regions exhibit nearly uni-axial
shortening:
{magnitude of 2} >>
{magnitude of 1}
The region of central Vancouver Island is located near the northern edge
of the of the subducting Juan de Fuca plate. This region is more tectonically
complex and may be subject to interactions between the Juan de Fuca, North
America, and Explorer plates. Additionally, two large crustal earthquakes
(M 7)
have occurred in this area over the past century. For this network, the
principal axis of shortening deviates significantly from the N62°E
direction of JDF/NA plate convergence averaged for northern Cascadia.
There is also increased margin-parallel extension, consistent with the
north-northwest motion observed for the continuous GPS site HOLB on northern
Vancouver Island. Nonetheless, shortening in the direction of plate convergence remain.
![Central Vancouver IslandGPS campaign velocity field Central Vancouver IslandGPS campaign velocity field](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_cvi_.gif) Central Vancouver Island GPS campaign velocity field
|
![Port AlberniGPS campaign velocity field Port AlberniGPS campaign velocity field](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_abi_.gif) Port Alberni GPS campaign velocity field
|
![Juan de FucaGPS campaign velocity field Juan de FucaGPS campaign velocity field](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_jdf_.gif) Juan de Fuca GPS campaign velocity field
|
Cascadia subduction thrust model |
Cascadia elastic slip-dislocation model
The interplate surface may be characterized by four regimes. Proceeding
landward or downdip, there is first a narrow region of stable sliding
inferred to be limited to the frontal thrusts. From the deformation front
extending downdip, the plates remain fully locked. Then a transition zone
from fully locked to stable sliding occurs. Finally stable sliding resumes
at greater depths. Together, the locked and transition zones form the
zone of potential seismic rupture. Varying widths of these zones are modelled
for comparison with observed surface deformation patterns and rates. The
Cascadia model widths are based upon previous horizontal and vertical
geodetic data as well as thermal data. The depth contour geometry of the
megathrust fault surface was determined from a suite of data including
offshore multichannel seismic reflection surveys, seismic refraction studies,
Benioff-Wadati seismicity, seismic tomography, and teleseismic receiver
waveform analyses.
![Cascadia subduction thrust model:three-dimensional view of fault-model elements from the southeast Cascadia subduction thrust model:three-dimensional view of fault-model elements from the southeast](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_thrusta_.gif) Cascadia subduction thrust model:- three-dimensional view of fault-model elements from the southeast
|
![a sample cross-section reflecting realistic geometry for the subducting slab a half-space geometric approximation (i.e. a regional Lambert conformal conic projection) that corrects for surface topography a sample cross-section reflecting realistic geometry for the subducting slab a half-space geometric approximation (i.e. a regional Lambert conformal conic projection) that corrects for surface topography](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_thrustb_.gif)
- a sample cross-section reflecting realistic geometry for the subducting slab
- a half-space geometric approximation (i.e. a regional Lambert conformal conic projection) that corrects for surface topography
|
Comparison of model-predicted and observed velocities for GPS sites in southwestern B.C.
![Northern Cascadia deformation velocities Northern Cascadia deformation velocities](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_defvel_.gif)
For this region the dislocation model predicts motions largely in the direction
of plate convergence which is modelled at 42 mm/yr @ N62°E. This
agrees well with the observed velocity field for the region. Although
the magnitude of the velocity vectors from the model were comparable to
the measurements near the seaward coast of Vancouver Island, the rates
of the more landward model-predicted vectors are significantly smaller
than the observed rates. As a result, the model predicts slightly more
shortening should be accommodated across the island than recorded by the
observations. However, overall the three-dimensional elastic dislocation
model for a fully-locked subduction thrust fits the observations well.
The model predictions for central Vancouver Island also match the CVI
GPS-determined velocity field rather well, although the GPS data for this
region are quite noisy. The dominant signal observed appears to match
the velocity field predicted at the northern terminus of the subducting
Juan de Fuca plate.
Model-predicted strain rates
![Model predicted strain rates Model predicted strain rates](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_mpdr_.gif) Model predicted strain rates
|
For the sites of the campaign networks, principal horizontal strain rates
averaged over an entire network are also computed from the model-predicted
velocities. For the regions of Juan de Fuca and Alberni Inlet, the model
predicts nearly uni-axial shortening approximately in the direction of
relative plate convergence. This agrees well with the principal strain
rates calculated from the observed velocity field for these regions. However,
the model predicts shortening rates that are approximately 1.5 times larger
than measured. This was already evident from the comparison of the model
velocity field to the observed velocity field.
For central Vancouver Island, the model also predicts strain rates larger
than the observed but, with the increased noise in the data, they cannot
be said to differ at the 95% confidence level. Nonetheless, similar to
the results for southern Vancouver Island, there is a suggestion that
the model-predicted principal rate of shortening is 50% greater than the
observed rate. As opposed to the largely uniaxial character for the region
of southern Vancouver Island, the three-dimensional nature of the strain
field at the northern end of the Juan de Fuca plate system is evident
in both the observations and the JDF plate model.
Comparison of viscoelastic model predictions to observed GPS velocities
![Viscoelastic model velocities Viscoelastic model velocities](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/geodyn/images/gpsdef_visco_.gif) Viscoelastic model velocities
|
Wang et al. (Earth Planets Space, in press, 2000) have used a viscoelastic finite-element model to calculate deformation velocities across the Cascadia
margin. Their model adopts the geometry of the slip-dislocation model
shown in Figure 6 and adds a viscoelastic substrate and a thin viscoelastic
layer on the subduction interface downdip of the locked zone, both with
a viscosity of 1019 Pa·s. Predicted deformation velocities from
this model are in better agreement with the observed and better replicate
the reduced shortening rates observed across the margin.
![Top Top](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_up.gif)
- Continuous GPS & campaign GPS horizontal velocities are consistent
- Horizontal deformation is consistent with strain accumulation across the subduction thrust:
- the northern Juan de Fuca plate is fully locked
- observations fit an elastic dislocation model to 1st order
- No clear deformation patterns relating to the 1946 or 1918 crustal earthquakes are resolved.
- Rates of shortening across the coastal margin from the elastic model are ~1.5 times larger than observed (likely due to limitations of such models)
![Top Top](/web/20061103050125im_/http://www.gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/esst_images/_up.gif)
The authors wish to thank Mike Schmidt and Yuan Lu for their important
roles in data acquisition, validation, and computer support. Thanks to
Alex Smith for his good-natured help and for his role in collecting additional
data at Gabriola Island. Thanks to the Geodetic Survey of Canada for collecting
the GPS campaign network data. Finally, many thanks to Richard Franklin
for producing this poster. Many of the figures used in this poster were
generated using the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) of Wessel and Smith [1995].
|