|
|
TCPS:
Goals (PDF, 15K)
A.Mandate of the Agencies
B.Goals and Rationale of the Policy
This Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving
Humans (TCPS) describes standards and procedures for governing research
involving human subjects.
The people of Canada, through Acts of Parliament2 have created and funded the CIHR, NSERC and SSHRC to promote,
assist and undertake research in the domains indicated by their names.
In discharging our mandates, the Agencies wish to promote research that
is conducted according to the highest ethical standards. The Agencies
have therefore adopted this Policy as our standard of ethical conduct
for research involving human subjects. As a condition of funding, we require,
as a minimum, that researchers and their institutions apply the ethical
principles and the articles of this Policy.
The interests of the Agencies in promoting ethical research, combined
with the evolving needs of the research community, have led us to define
a common policy of ethical conduct for research involving human subjects.
This Policy seeks to respond to, and address, several needs:
1. The Policy addresses the interdependent duties to research subjects3, which are shared by researchers, institutions and Research Ethics
Boards (REBs).
2. By addressing common issues and needs, the Policy seeks to articulate
ethical norms that transcend disciplinary boundaries. The fundamental
ethical issues and principles in research involving human subjects are
common across the social sciences and humanities, the natural sciences
and engineering, and the health sciences. They reflect shared fundamental
values that are expressed in the duties, rights, and norms of those involved
in research. Research subjects reasonably expect that their rights shall
be equally recognized and respected, regardless of the researcher's discipline.
Similarly, Canadian society legitimately expects that the benefits and
harms of research shall be fairly distributed.
3. The Policy seeks to harmonize the ethics review process. The Agencies
expect that REBs will benefit from common procedures within a shared ethical
framework. This will also benefit those projects involving researchers
from different disciplines or institutions. The Agencies hope that the
Policy will serve as an educational resource.
4. The effective working of ethics review—across the range of disciplines
conducting research involving human subjects—requires reasonable
flexibility in the implementation of common principles. The Policy therefore
seeks to avoid imposing one disciplinary perspective on others, while
expressing the shared principles and wisdom of researchers in diverse
fields. It is designed to help both researchers and REBs, as a matter
of sound ethical reasoning, to scrutinize the contexts and accommodate
the needs of specialized research disciplines.
5. The Policy updates some norms, while seeking to encourage continued
reflection and thoughtful consensus around more contentious ethical issues.
The Policy does not offer definitive answers to such ethical questions.
Rather, it seeks (a) to outline guiding principles and basic standards
and (b) to identify major issues, and points of debate and consensus,
which are essential to the development and implementation of coherent
policies for research ethics.
See Canadian Institutes of Health Research Act, Statutes of Canada, 2000, Chapter 6; Natural Science and
Engineering Research Council Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985, Chapter N-21; Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council Act, Revised Statutes of Canada, 1985,
Chapter S-12. [Back]
During preparation
of this Policy Statement, there was extensive discussion of the optimal
term to describe those on, or about whom, the research is carried out. This
discussion focused on the terms "participant" and "subject."
Though research subjects may participate actively in research, so also do
many others, including the researchers and their staff, administrators in the
institutions, and funding sponsors and members of research ethics boards.
Research subjects are unique among the many participants because it is
they who bear the risks of the research. The Agencies have therefore chosen
to retain the word "subject" because of its relative unambiguity
in this context, and because the prime focus of the Policy Statement is
on those who bear the risks of research. [Back]
< Contents| Next
>
|