Use the back button
to return to your initial selection.
HOME |
THE
NETWORKS | CANVAC
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17
Facing the reality of a pandemic threat
CANVAC's multi-disciplinary
research into attitudes on immunization proves extremely timely
The looming threat of an avian influenza pandemic has
produced a crisis-to-opportunity scenario in which the urgent
need for new and better vaccines can be addressed on a global
basis.
People make a fundamental leap of faith in medical science
when it comes to vaccines, says Dr. Paul Ritvo, a principal
investigator with the Canadian Network for Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics
(CANVAC).
"When you are vaccinated, you must trust the vaccine
will be beneficial and that the detriments, if any, will be
minor," says Dr. Ritvo, a leading expert on public
attitudes towards vaccines. "It is no small event. No
one can sustain the illusion that something that will make
you immune for most of your remaining days is not a powerful
intervention to your immune system."
Dr. Ritvo, a researcher at Toronto's University Health Network
and York University, is the lead author of the April, 2005
Nature Medicine paper on the challenge of making
the best use of vaccine technology.
It was Dr. Ritvo's background in psychology and the
CANVAC team's expertise across several fields –
including health policy, anthropology, internal medicine,
bioethics and epidemiology – that made the project possible.
They were approached by the high-impact, prestigious journal
because of the prodigious research CANVAC had done on how
the public views vaccination.
"Because of CANVAC, we were able collect a unique group
of researchers who all were interested in vaccines and able
to contribute different expertise and perspectives. We pulled
together a unique, composite of views. It is very rare for
that to happen."
It is also very timely for that to happen.
Given the current threat of an avian influenza pandemic,
peoples' faith in medical science and the power of vaccines
to save lives are becoming critical issues. Dr. Ritvo
says an avian influenza pandemic is obviously a much worse
health threat than the SARS outbreak of 2003 that caused 44
deaths and "virtually paralyzed" Toronto. But given
that harsh reality, there is also a chance for positive change.
"It is unfortunate that the opportunity only comes amid
crisis. But because of the avian flu, there is now a great
opportunity to do something very meaningful for international
health."
The challenge, as CANVAC researchers point out, is a considerable
one.
"Currently, only 2% of the world's pharmaceutical activity
involves vaccines," says Dr. Ritvo. "A huge
amount of money and activity is directed towards pharmaceutical
agents, which will save a lesser number of lives than effective
vaccines. We must direct more capital and labour towards vaccine
development."
Unfortunately, the economics of the pharmaceutical industry
work against this. There is more money to be made in creating
and marketing drugs that are taken consistently, over long
periods of time, than in researching, creating and delivering
vaccines, many of which require few doses to be effective.
What's needed, says Dr. Ritvo and others such as Dr. Jeffrey
Sachs (Director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University)
and Dr. Michael Kremer (Gates Professor of Developing
Societies at Harvard) is a fundamental shift in how governments
relate to the big pharmaceutical corporations.
"Essentially, it means creating new structures,"
says Dr. Ritvo, "a new hybrid of co-operative capitalism.
For example, when you create a vaccine purchase fund, you
have governments investing tax revenue into a fund that will
ensure proper profit for companies producing effective, lifesaving
vaccines useful all over the globe"
While creating new structures is a slow and difficult process,
the very real concern over avian influenza – the World
Health Organization has said it is not a matter of "if"
the pandemic will strike but "when" it arrives –
likely will speed needed changes.
"It used to be perceived that these infectious influenzas
would take several months to move from one side of the world
to the next, somewhat correlated with naval shipping time
periods and frequencies," says Dr. Ritvo. "But
with air travel, that three to six months has been revised
to 12 hours. That is the standard on which we are now operating.
However long it takes one person to go from one part of the
globe to the other, that's how long it could take for an infection
to spread. We're a global village and we haven't caught up
to the vulnerability of being a village. The pandemic threat
is a way of conceptualizing this."
The Nature Medicine paper points out the need for
greater global cooperation, calling for more resources to
be applied to developing HIV and malaria vaccines to reduce
mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. We can't afford the luxury
of thinking that something happening thousands of miles away
does not concern us, says Dr. Ritvo.
"The vaccine issue is a wonderful example of the crisis-to-opportunity
transition. We're in crisis for good reasons, partly because
some technologies jumped out in front of other technologies.
The fluidity of international travel is way out in front of
our capacity to scan for and prevent outbreaks of disease.
That's unfortunate. But it's not going to go away by taking
an ostrich approach. We have to take on the vaccine challenge."
www.canvac.ca
![Go to Top](/web/20061109021748im_/http://www.nce-rce.gc.ca/annualreport2004_2005/images/Eng/Top.gif)
|