| |
|
Case Study on Renewable
Grid-Power Electricity
Baseline Study
and Economic Report
Submitted
by Marbek Resource Consultants in association with Resources
for the Future
May
21, 2004
|
|
Appendix A: Survey of Renewable Energy
Fiscal Instruments
INTRODUCTION
This appendix provides a brief overview of fiscal
instruments used to promote the uptake of renewable energy technologies.
Although there are a wide variety of potential instruments,
three have emerged as “preferred methods” for RE
promotion in Canada, the U.S. and other jurisdictions:
-
Research and development subsidies for renewable
energy technologies
-
Generation subsidies for renewable energy
-
Renewable (energy) portfolio standards and
green procurement.
While other instruments (e.g., income tax credits
and deductions, lower taxes on biofuels or renewable energy
equipment) have been used with some success, they are generally
considered to have less of an impact than the four broad-based
mechanisms identified above.
For each of the three, the discussion provides
a brief description of the instrument, an overview of the current
Canadian situation, and experience in other jurisdictions.
R&D SUBSIDIES
Description & Benefits
Subsidies for research and development of renewable
energy technologies (RETs) are quite common, including government-sponsored
research programs, joint initiatives, grants and tax incentives.
Increased support for R&D and demonstration programs could
help advance current grid-power renewable energy technologies
(RETs) and develop next-generation technologies, thus reducing
technical and information barriers to their widespread use.
Current Canadian Situation
Existing Canadian federal R&D subsidies for
renewable energy include the following:
-
Renewable Energy Technologies Program
(RETP) – This program, administered by the
Office of Energy Research and Development, supports efforts
by Canadian industry to develop and commercialize advanced
renewable energy technologies that can serve as cost-effective
and environmentally responsible alternatives to conventional
energy generation. The subsidy is for both technology (as
in support for the DynaMotive prototype bio-oil facility in
Vancouver) and information programs (as in support for the
Canadian Wind Energy Association).
-
Community Energy Technology Centre
(CETC) – Operated within Natural Resources
Canada, CETC provides funding from a revolving fund where
project proponents pay back the cost of district heating project
feasibility studies. This subsidy has been used for projects
in North Vancouver, Revelstoke and Kamloops, B.C.
-
Renewable Energy in Remote Communities
(RERC) – This program aims to accelerate the
deployment of renewable energy technologies in more than 300
remote Canadian communities that are not connected to the
main electricity grid or natural gas networks. RERC provides
community decision-makers with the tools, information and
knowledge needed to assess the feasibility of renewable energy
systems, to select the most cost-effective technologies and
to implement projects.
-
Foundation for Sustainable Development
Technology in Canada (SDTC) – This federally
funded organization, consisting of business, academic and
not-for-profit organizations, works at arm’s length
from the federal government to provide seed money for innovations
that reduce GHG emissions and improve air quality. The fund
now has over $6 million to distribute on a project-by-project
basis.
-
Technology Early Actions Measures
(TEAM) – This program supports cost-effective
technology projects that will lead to significant reductions
in GHG emissions. The program is a component of the Climate
Change Action Fund (CCAF), operating with a $150 million fund
established in the 1998 federal budget.
-
National Fuel Cell Research and Innovation
Initiative – The National Research Council
launched this $30 million program in 1999 to further strengthen
fuel cell industry R&D. As part of the initiative, a new
National Fuel Cell Research Facility was created in B.C. Funding
for the project is provided from existing federal programs.
Foreign Experience
Many countries provide R&D subsidies for renewable
energy. For example, the United Kingdom is developing and testing
ocean wave energy devices through a research and development
program that includes promotion of technologies and expertise
of overseas markets. Denmark, the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany
also have active renewables R&D subsidy programs.
GENERATION SUBSIDIES
Description & Benefits
A generation subsidy for renewable energy improves
the competitiveness of these technologies relative to conventional
generation (e.g., fossil fuels and nuclear). Subsidies can be
offered for capital costs of equipment installation and initial
marketing (e.g., green pricing, green tags/renewable energy
credits/certificates, and capital cost allowances) or to generators
on a per-kWh basis for actual green electricity production (e.g.,
production incentives, market incentives, and net metering).
Utilities benefit from these subsidies by building
customer loyalty, expanding business lines and developing expertise
prior to renewable electric market competition.
Current Canadian Situation
Existing Canadian federal renewable energy generation
subsidies include the following:
-
Wind Power Production Incentive (WPPI)
– Started in 2002, this incentive attempts to cover
half of the current cost of the premium for 500 kW and larger
wind energy systems in Canada compared to conventional sources
(in northern and remote locations, the minimum capacity is
20 kW). It provides $260 million of financial support for
1,000 MW of new capacity over the next five years. The WPPI
is expected to leverage approximately $1.5 billion in capital
investments across Canada.
-
Market Incentive Program (MIP) for
Distributors of Emerging Renewable Electricity Sources
– This $25 million program, effective 2000-2006, is
intended to encourage electricity distributors to explore
ways of stimulating electricity sales from emerging low-impact
renewable energy sources. It provides a short-term financial
incentive up to 25% of the eligible costs of an approved project.
-
Canadian Renewable and Conservation
Expenses (CRCE) – This program, created in
1996, provides income tax write-offs for several pre-development
costs associated with renewable energy projects. It allows
full deductibility in the first year of operation for expenses
such as feasibility studies, energy resource measurement,
site preparation and approval, grid interconnection, and test
equipment.
-
Capital Cost Allowance –
The Canadian Income Tax Act provides an accelerated rate (30%)
of write-off for certain capital expenditures on renewable
energy equipment.
-
Renewable Energy Deployment Initiative
(REDI) – This program was launched in 1998
by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and is a six-year, $24
million program designed to stimulate the demand for renewable
energy systems for space and water heating and cooling. Businesses
are eligible for a refund of 25% of the purchase and installation
costs of a qualifying system, up to a maximum refund of $80,000.
Larger subsidies are available for remote applications. During
1999 and 2000, REDI received 51 applications for the incentive
program, yielding $641,000 in REDI contributions.
Existing Canadian provincial renewable energy
generation subsidies include the following:
-
Yukon – The $3 million
Yukon Green Power Initiative, launched in 1999, covers a variety
of renewable energy initiatives. The program includes a production
incentive of 2 5 cents per kWh and net metering for small-scale
renewable energy supplies.
-
B.C. – The province
provides exemptions for prescribed renewable energy equipment,
including wind, solar PV, and small hydro.
-
Nova Scotia – The province
is developing a regulatory framework to allow fair transmission
charges for renewable energy independent power producers (IPPs)
when selling directly to retail customers instead of indirectly
through an existing utility.
-
Green-Power (Green Pricing) Programs
– To respond to the increasing demand among Canadian
consumers for the choice to purchase green power at a premium,
many utilities are now offering green pricing programs, where
the end-user pays a premium for renewable grid-power. Green
power purchase programs are currently offered by the following
utilities:
-
ENMAX, AB (started in 1998):
Currently has 3,000 residential customers and 200 commercial
and industrial customers
-
EPCOR (1999): 3,100 residential
customers as of December 2001
-
SaskPower, SK: 230 business
and industrial participants in early 2002, out of the
86,000 that the utility serves
-
Ontario Power Generation (OPG):
Sells to businesses and distributors but not directly
to residential consumers
-
-
Maritime Electric (2001):
Services 55,000 residential and 11,000 industrial customers
Foreign Experience
The United States has the following renewable
energy generation subsidies:
-
Renewable Energy Production Incentive
(REPI) – This program offers 1.5 cents per
kWh for the first 10-year period of operation of renewable
energy plants; 24 individual U.S. states also have their own
subsidies. REPI funds have increased from $2.4 million in
1995 to $4.8 million in 2002. The funds compensate utilities
for the fact that they cannot qualify for the Production Tax
Credit (PTC) as they are not subject to federal taxes.
-
Production Tax Credit (PTC)
– This program is the most prominent fiscal instrument
for stimulating investment in U.S. renewables. The program
delivers a federal tax incentive for wind energy that, since
1995, has provided a tax credit of C$0.023/kWh (1995 $) for
each unit of qualifying energy. The U.S. PTC differs from
its Canadian counterpart (WPPI) in two main ways:
-
The PTC is two and a half times the size
of the Canadian incentive per unit of production, and
almost four times as valuable on an after-tax basis.
-
Unlike WPPI, the PTC is unlimited by
region, by developer, and in total budget size.
The combination of these factors has
encouraged state governments to implement their own
support programs for wind energy because the incentive
is large enough to leverage significant capital investment
in those jurisdictions with supportive policies.
-
Investment Tax Credit of
10% for new geothermal and solar-electric power plants.
-
Demonstration projects through
the National Renewable Energy Laboratory such as the Million
Solar Roofs Initiative to promote solar PV.
The following renewable energy generation subsidies,
among others, are made available overseas:
-
Germany, Denmark, Spain, the U.K.
and France have programs similar to the U.S. PTC
in size but they also have multi-year program funding in place
like Canada’s WPPI. The major benefit that EU nations
have realized is that programs with significant scale and
multi-year funding ensure significant domestic manufacturing
and industrial development.
-
Germany has a legislated
requirement (the “feed-in law”) for utilities
to purchase renewable energy supplies at 90% of their retail
electricity prices. This has helped Germany achieve the highest
capacity of wind power in the world and significant developments
of solar PV. The country also has a 100 million DM (US$1 =
1.734 DM in 1997) capital subsidy program for solar, heat
pumps, small hydro, wind and biomass.
-
Japan has incentives representing
10% of the cost of small hydro, 20% for geothermal, 50% for
wind and up to 67% for solar PV in buildings. The country
also provides low-interest loans for wind, hydro, biomass
and solar installations.
RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS
Description & Benefits
A renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, is a popular
form of legislation taking the form of a market share requirement
or quota obligation. An RPS defines a target share or amount
of renewable energy to be supplied by an obligated entity such
as a power producer (e.g., utility) at a federal, regional or
local level. The target can be met through real supply of renewable
energy or through purchase of renewable energy credits when
regional renewables are inaccessible.
There are three types of targets a renewable portfolio
standard can define:
1. A minimum renewable energy percentage
of total annual supply, where the percentage goes up
every year or few years (e.g., starting at 1% of total and increasing
annually by a percentage point until 2010)
2. A minimum renewable energy incremental
annual supply (GWh) (e.g., starting at 200 GWh/yr and
increasing annually by 100 GWh/yr until 2010)
3. A minimum renewable energy capacity
(MW) by a certain year (e.g., target of 1000 MW by
2010).
An RPS requires each supplier of end-user electricity
to demonstrate, through ownership of tradable “renewable
energy credits” (RECs), that they have supported the generation
of a certain amount of renewable power. The regulatory role
is limited to:
-
-
Making available proxy credits at a specified
price
-
Auditing the creation and retirement of credit
-
Verifying that sellers possess the required
number of credits at the end of each year
-
Ensuring full compliance, and imposing a
sufficiently large penalty on sellers that fall short.
A renewable procurement target
is similar to an RPS, except it is usually internally defined
by a large organization such as a federal, provincial or municipal
government. This procurement target sets a goal to purchase
a certain share or amount of the organization’s total
annual electricity from renewable sources. Renewable procurement
targets can also be defined in three ways, similar to the RPS
types above, except electricity is consumed rather than supplied.
Also similar to an RPS, a procurement target can be met through
real consumption of renewable energy or through purchase of
renewable energy credits when regional renewables are inaccessible.
Some benefits of RPS legislation are that it:
-
Helps utilities prepare for future annual
obligations well in advance
-
Works well with financial incentives including
penalties for non-compliance
-
Helps consumers get the best price for renewable
electricity, since a renewable electricity market is created
with competition between generators bidding to meet the utility's
obligations
-
Uses industry-friendly mechanisms to diversify
energy markets
-
Fosters fair competition and market stabilit
-
Sparks economic development, especially in
rural areas
-
Is competitively neutral since it applies
equally to all sellers
-
Does not require the centralized collection
and dissemination of funds or require government agencies
to make decisions about winners and losers. The market decides
which renewable plants to build, where, and for what price.
Current Canadian Situation
Although no national RPS is planned for Canada,
a federal-provincial working group is currently examining how
renewable portfolio standards could work in the Canadian context
(considering that utilities are under provincial jurisdiction).
As an unlegislated measure, Canada’s 2002
federal Climate Change Action Plan set a minimum renewable procurement
target of 10% (3.9 Mt) of new electricity-generating capacity
in Canada. If implemented, it would be the strongest federal
procurement program in North America. This plan suggested the
following to help achieve the federal goal:
-
Expanded production incentives
-
Renewable energy portfolio standards in provinces
-
Increased efforts to develop market demand
-
A proposed emissions trading system
-
Voluntary purchase of green power by consumers
-
A proposed electricity-labelling scheme indicating
the relative environmental impact of different electricity-generating
sources.
Although no Canadian provincial portfolio standards
have been legislated yet, following is a summary of progress
on provincial RPSs and defined procurement targets:
-
BC – In 2002, B.C.
proposed 50% of all new capacity from “B.C. Clean Electricity”
by 2012 as a voluntary goal with no legislation behind it.
The broad definition for the 50% includes efficiency improvements
at existing facilities, cogeneration of heat and power, and
all low-impact renewable energy technologies. Possible rate
increases of 0.1%-0.2% over the next decade are expected.
Policies such as net metering and interconnection standards
will be developed to support the goal.
-
AB – In 2002, Alberta
proposed 3.75% renewables capacity (~600 MW new capacity)
by 2008 with no legislative action pending. The following
efforts will assist with reaching this goal: (1) emissions
intensity of electricity supplied to consumers will be reported
by electricity retailers; (2) at least 25% of electricity
consumed at government facilities will be generated from green
power sources in 2004; and (3) the government will continue
to support the development of green corridors, thus promoting
increased use of alternative fuel vehicles.
-
ON – In 2002, Ontario
proposed 10% renewables by 2010, with the Legislature expected
to act in spring 2004. The following efforts will assist with
reaching this goal: (1) the provincial government has committed
to purchase 20% of its electricity from green sources; and
(2) all newly constructed government buildings will also use
energy-efficient or clean sources of energy. The probable
impact of Ontario’s proposed RPS on blended wholesale
prices is <1% for the first years and <2% by 2010.
-
QC – The provincial
regulator, Régie de l’Énergie, has called
for a wind resource commitment of 50 MW per year for seven
years, making the total installed capacity 450 MW.
-
NB – In 2002, New Brunswick
declared it will implement an RPS.
-
NS – According to the
Nova Scotia Energy Strategy Progress Report II (2004), Nova
Scotia created a short-term (three-year) voluntary renewable
energy target starting in December 2001 for new IPPs totalling
2.5% of provincial generation capacity, or approximately 50
MW. The Electricity Marketplace Governance Committee of Nova
Scotia has now recommended an RPS to begin in 2006. A small
green-power premium will likely be applied to the electricity
rates of all N.S. electricity consumers. Current estimates
indicate such an increase would likely occur in three to five
years and be less than 0.5%-1%.
-
PE – Prince Edward
Island has proposed 10% renewables by 2010.
Lastly, in terms of green procurement, the Canadian
government has purchased green power from utilities in Alberta,
Saskatchewan (25,000 MWh for $12.4 million), and P.E.I. (13,000
MWh for $4.5 million). A number of municipalities currently
have renewable procurement targets:
-
Calgary, AB – Calgary’s
transit authority recently signed a commitment to purchase
21,000 MWh/yr of wind-generated electricity from a local independent
power producer, Vision Quest Wind Electric, for the next 10
years. Calgary is the first city in North America to offer
users a green-powered public transit system.
-
Greater Vancouver Regional District
(GVRD), BC – In 2002, the GVRD, along with
the following municipalities, agreed to purchase green power
from BC Hydro under the pilot Green Power Certificates Program:
-
Capital Regional District (Victoria)
Building Services Group
-
Corporation of the City of White Rock
-
Resort Municipality of Whistler.
-
Alberta Urban Municipalities Association
– This group made a formal commitment that that 2% of
the power needs of municipalities participating in the electric
aggregation initiative would be obtained through green procurement.
Renewable portfolio standards are credited for some of the most
significant renewable energy success stories in the United States,
resulting in low-cost wind power proliferating in Texas and promising
solar generation in Arizona. Seventeen U.S. states have set RPS
or similar goals for encouraging renewable power generation; of
those, the standards most widely studied are:
-
California – In 2002,
California legislated to generate 20% of its electricity from
renewable energy no later than 2017 by increasing the supply
of renewable power by 1% per year from the current 10%. This
is the most stringent RPS to date in the U.S., although it
represents a smaller leap for a state that already has a viable
renewable energy market.
-
Texas – The Texas renewable
energy mandate of 1999 requires utilities to acquire 400 MW
of new generating capacity from renewable technologies by
2003, increasing to 850 MW by 2005, 1,400 MW by 2007 and 2,000
MW by 2009 (equal to 3% of total capacity). The Texas RPS,
along with the U.S. Federal Production Tax Credit, resulted
in the construction of more than 10 wind projects in the first
year, with a combined new generating capacity of 1,200 MW.
This new capacity far exceeds the 2005 target, according to
the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, and is ahead of
every other U.S. state for the same period. Texas also has
an accessible wind resource, which helps tremendously. Highlights
of the Texas RPS include:
-
-
Allowance for renewable energy credit
trading
-
Requirement for all retailers to
disclose where their electricity comes from
-
Allowance for net metering
-
-
Adequate enforcement through penalties.
-
Arizona – Arizona
is building toward an RPS of 1.1% in 2007 with 60% of that
from solar sources, which are plentiful in the state. July
2003 results include 5 MW of PV, according to a report by
Arizona’s Cost Evaluation Working Group.
-
Nevada – Nevada’s
RPS, signed in 2001, requires the total renewable electricity
supplied in the state to increase from 5% in 2003 to 15% in
2013 by 2% increments every two years. It also allows the
Nevada Public Utilities Commission to develop a trading mechanism
for renewable energy credits for the state’s utilities.
Other foreign RPS legislation includes:
-
The United Kingdom previously
established renewable procurement targets for electricity
suppliers but has now adopted a portfolio standard approach.
-
Denmark requires a minimum
amount of biomass to be used in coal-fired plants and has
a national RPS.
-
Australia has legislated
an RPS of 2% by 2010.
|
|