National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy
Canada
Contact Us
Help
Search
Canada Site

About Us

Media Room

Library

Home
Achieving a Balance
" " Energy &
Climate Change
" " Capital Markets
About
Documents
FAQs
Committee
Program Contact
   
" "Brownfields
Subscribe to NRTEE e-briefs
Email thisEmail this

 

© 2006

_
""
" "

Case Study on Renewable Grid-Power Electricity

Baseline Study and Economic Report

Submitted by Marbek Resource Consultants in association with Resources for the Future

May 21, 2004

Next »

Appendix A: Survey of Renewable Energy Fiscal Instruments

INTRODUCTION

This appendix provides a brief overview of fiscal instruments used to promote the uptake of renewable energy technologies. Although there are a wide variety of potential instruments, three have emerged as “preferred methods” for RE promotion in Canada, the U.S. and other jurisdictions:

  • Research and development subsidies for renewable energy technologies
  • Generation subsidies for renewable energy
  • Renewable (energy) portfolio standards and green procurement.

While other instruments (e.g., income tax credits and deductions, lower taxes on biofuels or renewable energy equipment) have been used with some success, they are generally considered to have less of an impact than the four broad-based mechanisms identified above.

For each of the three, the discussion provides a brief description of the instrument, an overview of the current Canadian situation, and experience in other jurisdictions.

R&D SUBSIDIES

Description & Benefits

Subsidies for research and development of renewable energy technologies (RETs) are quite common, including government-sponsored research programs, joint initiatives, grants and tax incentives. Increased support for R&D and demonstration programs could help advance current grid-power renewable energy technologies (RETs) and develop next-generation technologies, thus reducing technical and information barriers to their widespread use.

Current Canadian Situation

Existing Canadian federal R&D subsidies for renewable energy include the following:

  • Renewable Energy Technologies Program (RETP) – This program, administered by the Office of Energy Research and Development, supports efforts by Canadian industry to develop and commercialize advanced renewable energy technologies that can serve as cost-effective and environmentally responsible alternatives to conventional energy generation. The subsidy is for both technology (as in support for the DynaMotive prototype bio-oil facility in Vancouver) and information programs (as in support for the Canadian Wind Energy Association).
  • Community Energy Technology Centre (CETC) – Operated within Natural Resources Canada, CETC provides funding from a revolving fund where project proponents pay back the cost of district heating project feasibility studies. This subsidy has been used for projects in North Vancouver, Revelstoke and Kamloops, B.C.
  • Renewable Energy in Remote Communities (RERC) – This program aims to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy technologies in more than 300 remote Canadian communities that are not connected to the main electricity grid or natural gas networks. RERC provides community decision-makers with the tools, information and knowledge needed to assess the feasibility of renewable energy systems, to select the most cost-effective technologies and to implement projects.
  • Foundation for Sustainable Development Technology in Canada (SDTC) – This federally funded organization, consisting of business, academic and not-for-profit organizations, works at arm’s length from the federal government to provide seed money for innovations that reduce GHG emissions and improve air quality. The fund now has over $6 million to distribute on a project-by-project basis.
  • Technology Early Actions Measures (TEAM) – This program supports cost-effective technology projects that will lead to significant reductions in GHG emissions. The program is a component of the Climate Change Action Fund (CCAF), operating with a $150 million fund established in the 1998 federal budget.
  • National Fuel Cell Research and Innovation Initiative – The National Research Council launched this $30 million program in 1999 to further strengthen fuel cell industry R&D. As part of the initiative, a new National Fuel Cell Research Facility was created in B.C. Funding for the project is provided from existing federal programs.

Foreign Experience

Many countries provide R&D subsidies for renewable energy. For example, the United Kingdom is developing and testing ocean wave energy devices through a research and development program that includes promotion of technologies and expertise of overseas markets. Denmark, the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany also have active renewables R&D subsidy programs.

GENERATION SUBSIDIES

Description & Benefits

A generation subsidy for renewable energy improves the competitiveness of these technologies relative to conventional generation (e.g., fossil fuels and nuclear). Subsidies can be offered for capital costs of equipment installation and initial marketing (e.g., green pricing, green tags/renewable energy credits/certificates, and capital cost allowances) or to generators on a per-kWh basis for actual green electricity production (e.g., production incentives, market incentives, and net metering).

Utilities benefit from these subsidies by building customer loyalty, expanding business lines and developing expertise prior to renewable electric market competition.

Current Canadian Situation

Existing Canadian federal renewable energy generation subsidies include the following:

  • Wind Power Production Incentive (WPPI) – Started in 2002, this incentive attempts to cover half of the current cost of the premium for 500 kW and larger wind energy systems in Canada compared to conventional sources (in northern and remote locations, the minimum capacity is 20 kW). It provides $260 million of financial support for 1,000 MW of new capacity over the next five years. The WPPI is expected to leverage approximately $1.5 billion in capital investments across Canada.
  • Market Incentive Program (MIP) for Distributors of Emerging Renewable Electricity Sources – This $25 million program, effective 2000-2006, is intended to encourage electricity distributors to explore ways of stimulating electricity sales from emerging low-impact renewable energy sources. It provides a short-term financial incentive up to 25% of the eligible costs of an approved project.
  • Canadian Renewable and Conservation Expenses (CRCE) – This program, created in 1996, provides income tax write-offs for several pre-development costs associated with renewable energy projects. It allows full deductibility in the first year of operation for expenses such as feasibility studies, energy resource measurement, site preparation and approval, grid interconnection, and test equipment.
  • Capital Cost Allowance – The Canadian Income Tax Act provides an accelerated rate (30%) of write-off for certain capital expenditures on renewable energy equipment.
  • Renewable Energy Deployment Initiative (REDI) – This program was launched in 1998 by Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and is a six-year, $24 million program designed to stimulate the demand for renewable energy systems for space and water heating and cooling. Businesses are eligible for a refund of 25% of the purchase and installation costs of a qualifying system, up to a maximum refund of $80,000. Larger subsidies are available for remote applications. During 1999 and 2000, REDI received 51 applications for the incentive program, yielding $641,000 in REDI contributions.

Existing Canadian provincial renewable energy generation subsidies include the following:

  • Yukon – The $3 million Yukon Green Power Initiative, launched in 1999, covers a variety of renewable energy initiatives. The program includes a production incentive of 2 5 cents per kWh and net metering for small-scale renewable energy supplies.
  • B.C. – The province provides exemptions for prescribed renewable energy equipment, including wind, solar PV, and small hydro.
  • Nova Scotia – The province is developing a regulatory framework to allow fair transmission charges for renewable energy independent power producers (IPPs) when selling directly to retail customers instead of indirectly through an existing utility.
  • Green-Power (Green Pricing) Programs – To respond to the increasing demand among Canadian consumers for the choice to purchase green power at a premium, many utilities are now offering green pricing programs, where the end-user pays a premium for renewable grid-power. Green power purchase programs are currently offered by the following utilities:
    • ENMAX, AB (started in 1998): Currently has 3,000 residential customers and 200 commercial and industrial customers
    • EPCOR (1999): 3,100 residential customers as of December 2001
    • SaskPower, SK: 230 business and industrial participants in early 2002, out of the 86,000 that the utility serves
    • Ontario Power Generation (OPG): Sells to businesses and distributors but not directly to residential consumers
    • Nova Scotia Power (2002)
    • Maritime Electric (2001): Services 55,000 residential and 11,000 industrial customers

Foreign Experience

The United States has the following renewable energy generation subsidies:

  • Renewable Energy Production Incentive (REPI) – This program offers 1.5 cents per kWh for the first 10-year period of operation of renewable energy plants; 24 individual U.S. states also have their own subsidies. REPI funds have increased from $2.4 million in 1995 to $4.8 million in 2002. The funds compensate utilities for the fact that they cannot qualify for the Production Tax Credit (PTC) as they are not subject to federal taxes.
  • Production Tax Credit (PTC) – This program is the most prominent fiscal instrument for stimulating investment in U.S. renewables. The program delivers a federal tax incentive for wind energy that, since 1995, has provided a tax credit of C$0.023/kWh (1995 $) for each unit of qualifying energy. The U.S. PTC differs from its Canadian counterpart (WPPI) in two main ways:
    • The PTC is two and a half times the size of the Canadian incentive per unit of production, and almost four times as valuable on an after-tax basis.
    • Unlike WPPI, the PTC is unlimited by region, by developer, and in total budget size.

      The combination of these factors has encouraged state governments to implement their own support programs for wind energy because the incentive is large enough to leverage significant capital investment in those jurisdictions with supportive policies.
  • Investment Tax Credit of 10% for new geothermal and solar-electric power plants.
  • Demonstration projects through the National Renewable Energy Laboratory such as the Million Solar Roofs Initiative to promote solar PV.

The following renewable energy generation subsidies, among others, are made available overseas:

  • Germany, Denmark, Spain, the U.K. and France have programs similar to the U.S. PTC in size but they also have multi-year program funding in place like Canada’s WPPI. The major benefit that EU nations have realized is that programs with significant scale and multi-year funding ensure significant domestic manufacturing and industrial development.
  • Germany has a legislated requirement (the “feed-in law”) for utilities to purchase renewable energy supplies at 90% of their retail electricity prices. This has helped Germany achieve the highest capacity of wind power in the world and significant developments of solar PV. The country also has a 100 million DM (US$1 = 1.734 DM in 1997) capital subsidy program for solar, heat pumps, small hydro, wind and biomass.
  • Japan has incentives representing 10% of the cost of small hydro, 20% for geothermal, 50% for wind and up to 67% for solar PV in buildings. The country also provides low-interest loans for wind, hydro, biomass and solar installations.

RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARDS

Description & Benefits

A renewable portfolio standard, or RPS, is a popular form of legislation taking the form of a market share requirement or quota obligation. An RPS defines a target share or amount of renewable energy to be supplied by an obligated entity such as a power producer (e.g., utility) at a federal, regional or local level. The target can be met through real supply of renewable energy or through purchase of renewable energy credits when regional renewables are inaccessible.

There are three types of targets a renewable portfolio standard can define:

1. A minimum renewable energy percentage of total annual supply, where the percentage goes up every year or few years (e.g., starting at 1% of total and increasing annually by a percentage point until 2010)

2. A minimum renewable energy incremental annual supply (GWh) (e.g., starting at 200 GWh/yr and increasing annually by 100 GWh/yr until 2010)

3. A minimum renewable energy capacity (MW) by a certain year (e.g., target of 1000 MW by 2010).

An RPS requires each supplier of end-user electricity to demonstrate, through ownership of tradable “renewable energy credits” (RECs), that they have supported the generation of a certain amount of renewable power. The regulatory role is limited to:

  • Certifying credits
  • Making available proxy credits at a specified price
  • Auditing the creation and retirement of credit
  • Verifying that sellers possess the required number of credits at the end of each year
  • Ensuring full compliance, and imposing a sufficiently large penalty on sellers that fall short.

A renewable procurement target is similar to an RPS, except it is usually internally defined by a large organization such as a federal, provincial or municipal government. This procurement target sets a goal to purchase a certain share or amount of the organization’s total annual electricity from renewable sources. Renewable procurement targets can also be defined in three ways, similar to the RPS types above, except electricity is consumed rather than supplied. Also similar to an RPS, a procurement target can be met through real consumption of renewable energy or through purchase of renewable energy credits when regional renewables are inaccessible.

Some benefits of RPS legislation are that it:

  • Helps utilities prepare for future annual obligations well in advance
  • Works well with financial incentives including penalties for non-compliance
  • Helps consumers get the best price for renewable electricity, since a renewable electricity market is created with competition between generators bidding to meet the utility's obligations
  • Uses industry-friendly mechanisms to diversify energy markets
  • Fosters fair competition and market stabilit
  • Sparks economic development, especially in rural areas
  • Is competitively neutral since it applies equally to all sellers
  • Does not require the centralized collection and dissemination of funds or require government agencies to make decisions about winners and losers. The market decides which renewable plants to build, where, and for what price.

Current Canadian Situation

Although no national RPS is planned for Canada, a federal-provincial working group is currently examining how renewable portfolio standards could work in the Canadian context (considering that utilities are under provincial jurisdiction).

As an unlegislated measure, Canada’s 2002 federal Climate Change Action Plan set a minimum renewable procurement target of 10% (3.9 Mt) of new electricity-generating capacity in Canada. If implemented, it would be the strongest federal procurement program in North America. This plan suggested the following to help achieve the federal goal:

  • Expanded production incentives
  • Renewable energy portfolio standards in provinces
  • Increased efforts to develop market demand
  • A proposed emissions trading system
  • Voluntary purchase of green power by consumers
  • A proposed electricity-labelling scheme indicating the relative environmental impact of different electricity-generating sources.

Although no Canadian provincial portfolio standards have been legislated yet, following is a summary of progress on provincial RPSs and defined procurement targets:

  • BC – In 2002, B.C. proposed 50% of all new capacity from “B.C. Clean Electricity” by 2012 as a voluntary goal with no legislation behind it. The broad definition for the 50% includes efficiency improvements at existing facilities, cogeneration of heat and power, and all low-impact renewable energy technologies. Possible rate increases of 0.1%-0.2% over the next decade are expected. Policies such as net metering and interconnection standards will be developed to support the goal.
  • AB – In 2002, Alberta proposed 3.75% renewables capacity (~600 MW new capacity) by 2008 with no legislative action pending. The following efforts will assist with reaching this goal: (1) emissions intensity of electricity supplied to consumers will be reported by electricity retailers; (2) at least 25% of electricity consumed at government facilities will be generated from green power sources in 2004; and (3) the government will continue to support the development of green corridors, thus promoting increased use of alternative fuel vehicles.
  • ON – In 2002, Ontario proposed 10% renewables by 2010, with the Legislature expected to act in spring 2004. The following efforts will assist with reaching this goal: (1) the provincial government has committed to purchase 20% of its electricity from green sources; and (2) all newly constructed government buildings will also use energy-efficient or clean sources of energy. The probable impact of Ontario’s proposed RPS on blended wholesale prices is <1% for the first years and <2% by 2010.
  • QC – The provincial regulator, Régie de l’Énergie, has called for a wind resource commitment of 50 MW per year for seven years, making the total installed capacity 450 MW.
  • NB – In 2002, New Brunswick declared it will implement an RPS.
  • NS – According to the Nova Scotia Energy Strategy Progress Report II (2004), Nova Scotia created a short-term (three-year) voluntary renewable energy target starting in December 2001 for new IPPs totalling 2.5% of provincial generation capacity, or approximately 50 MW. The Electricity Marketplace Governance Committee of Nova Scotia has now recommended an RPS to begin in 2006. A small green-power premium will likely be applied to the electricity rates of all N.S. electricity consumers. Current estimates indicate such an increase would likely occur in three to five years and be less than 0.5%-1%.
  • PE – Prince Edward Island has proposed 10% renewables by 2010.

Lastly, in terms of green procurement, the Canadian government has purchased green power from utilities in Alberta, Saskatchewan (25,000 MWh for $12.4 million), and P.E.I. (13,000 MWh for $4.5 million). A number of municipalities currently have renewable procurement targets:

  • Calgary, AB – Calgary’s transit authority recently signed a commitment to purchase 21,000 MWh/yr of wind-generated electricity from a local independent power producer, Vision Quest Wind Electric, for the next 10 years. Calgary is the first city in North America to offer users a green-powered public transit system.
  • Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), BC – In 2002, the GVRD, along with the following municipalities, agreed to purchase green power from BC Hydro under the pilot Green Power Certificates Program:
    • Capital Regional District (Victoria) Building Services Group
    • Corporation of the City of White Rock
    • Resort Municipality of Whistler.
  • Alberta Urban Municipalities Association – This group made a formal commitment that that 2% of the power needs of municipalities participating in the electric aggregation initiative would be obtained through green procurement.

Foreign Experience

Renewable portfolio standards are credited for some of the most significant renewable energy success stories in the United States, resulting in low-cost wind power proliferating in Texas and promising solar generation in Arizona. Seventeen U.S. states have set RPS or similar goals for encouraging renewable power generation; of those, the standards most widely studied are:
  • California – In 2002, California legislated to generate 20% of its electricity from renewable energy no later than 2017 by increasing the supply of renewable power by 1% per year from the current 10%. This is the most stringent RPS to date in the U.S., although it represents a smaller leap for a state that already has a viable renewable energy market.
  • Texas – The Texas renewable energy mandate of 1999 requires utilities to acquire 400 MW of new generating capacity from renewable technologies by 2003, increasing to 850 MW by 2005, 1,400 MW by 2007 and 2,000 MW by 2009 (equal to 3% of total capacity). The Texas RPS, along with the U.S. Federal Production Tax Credit, resulted in the construction of more than 10 wind projects in the first year, with a combined new generating capacity of 1,200 MW. This new capacity far exceeds the 2005 target, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, and is ahead of every other U.S. state for the same period. Texas also has an accessible wind resource, which helps tremendously. Highlights of the Texas RPS include:
    • Ease of administration
    • Allowance for renewable energy credit trading
    • Requirement for all retailers to disclose where their electricity comes from
    • Allowance for net metering
    • Robust tracking system
    • Adequate enforcement through penalties.
  • Arizona – Arizona is building toward an RPS of 1.1% in 2007 with 60% of that from solar sources, which are plentiful in the state. July 2003 results include 5 MW of PV, according to a report by Arizona’s Cost Evaluation Working Group.
  • Nevada – Nevada’s RPS, signed in 2001, requires the total renewable electricity supplied in the state to increase from 5% in 2003 to 15% in 2013 by 2% increments every two years. It also allows the Nevada Public Utilities Commission to develop a trading mechanism for renewable energy credits for the state’s utilities.
Other foreign RPS legislation includes:
  • The United Kingdom previously established renewable procurement targets for electricity suppliers but has now adopted a portfolio standard approach.
  • Denmark requires a minimum amount of biomass to be used in coal-fired plants and has a national RPS.
  • Australia has legislated an RPS of 2% by 2010.