Government of Canada Canada
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New Who We Are DSP Home InfoSource Publications.gc.ca
Search the DSP Web site for   

Depository Services Program

SERVICE AND SUPPORT ISSUES

The effectiveness of the depository service program depends on the quality of communication between the government and the library community, the program and the depositories, as well as the provision of training, manuals, awareness materials, realistic collection and retention guidelines based on on-going consultation with the community.

Library Advisory Committee

Since 1981, with the creation of the Library Advisory Committee (LAC), co-operation between the partners in this venture has increased. The LAC is a valuable tool for communicating the real needs of the information community to government and for conveying the government's viewpoint to depositories. Through the LAC, all players have a cost-effective vehicle in place to find creative approaches to the challenging task of ensuring access to government information. The committee could play an even greater role in the on-going definition, evaluation and review of the DSP. The role of the LAC would be enhanced if there were broader regional representation on the committee.

Recommendations

  • (25) The role of the Library Advisory Committee should be expanded to include participation in evaluating depository library performance, periodic review of retention guidelines and criteria for depositories.

  • (26) Regional round tables should be established to support small and medium-sized depositories in each region. Full depository libraries must play a leadership role in these round tables.

Training and support

Until recently, beyond providing depositories with an information officer, the CGPC has made little assistance available to depositories in terms of training, written manuals and communication vehicles. Recent efforts at training sessions and the introduction of a newsletter are a good start to improve support. Given the complexity of this type of material, the complicated procedures and the scarce resources in many small libraries, the CGPC must consider its responsibility to ensure frequent training sessions in all regions and to provide all depositories with a detailed up-to-date manual. There is also a need to develop regional support systems among depositories.

Recommendation

  • (27) The CGPC should ensure that partner libraries are provided with training, manuals and on-going communications about policy changes, new products, in addition to maintaining the position of depository information officer.

Awareness

Since the DSP facilitates access to information of value to the economic, social or cultural welfare of Canadians, an essential element for the success of the program is an awareness by the public that this information is available for use through depositories. Little effort has been made to publicize the availability of this information program. It is crucial that CGPC and libraries work together to achieve this public awareness. There is a parallel need for on-going awareness activities for author departments.

Recommendation

  • (28) The DSP should coordinate, with partner libraries, on-going and effective awareness activities to maximize public use of the resources.

Core collections

Many selective depository libraries do not select even the most basic documents available to them. For example, when the Revised Statutes of Canada 1985 was released, nearly half the libraries failed to request this vital publication within the allowed time period. This situation creates a serious loss of information for the communities served by these libraries. Libraries which are identified as depositories and have inadequate or non-existent collections of government publications undermine the credibility of the DSP. A Core collection of federal government documents geared towards each type of depository would greatly increase access in many instances. This raises the question of whether Core collections should be recommended or required. In addition, there is question of who should identify Core items - the CGPC or depositories.

Recommendation

  • (29) Selective depositories must provide a minimum level of service in order to maintain their status. Core collections as established by the DSP should form the minimum collection required. Core collections should be developed by the CGPC in consultation with the LAC and knowledgeable members of the library community.

Retention guidelines

A common requirement of depository libraries has been that libraries retain all the publications made available to them through the depository program. Many libraries have extensive collections dating back to the last century and choose to maintain these collections in excellent condition. However, small and medium-sized libraries and those serving clients who are not engaged in historical research, encounter grave problems in housing thousands of old, little-used documents. Most libraries have retention and weeding policies for non-depository documents that emphasize keeping an up-to-date and useful current collection and which are not consistent with the depository retention policies. The space and staff constraints faced by libraries must be balanced with the need to provide access in each region to all depository documents regardless of the date of receipt.

Recommendations

  • (30) All depositories should be subjected to reasonable and appropriate retention and weeding guidelines and, with the exception of Core items and ephemeral publications, selectives should be permitted to discard most documents after five years, following agreed on procedures.

  • (31) Full depositories in each region should cooperate to pool resources to ensure that all documents continue to be available for research purposes in each region..

Table of Contents
Next Section


Last updated: 2001-12-27 Important Notices