RCMP Blood Task Force — Archives

December 22, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system.

On December 19, 2003, the Attorney General, Michael Bryant, signed the direct indictments under s. 577 of the Criminal Code of Canada in relation to the Blood Task Force’s charges currently before the courts in Hamilton and Toronto. The effect of the direct indictment is to send the charges directly to trial in the Superior Court without a preliminary hearing in the Ontario Court of Justice. As a matter of law, a direct indictment can only be issued with the personal consent of the Attorney General.

Currently, two court appearances are scheduled for January 2004. Firstly, the legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell are set to appear on January 7, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. in Room 111, Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West in Toronto, Ontario. Secondly, legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault are to appear at the Hamilton Court House on January 30, 2004 at 9 a.m. in Court Room 100. The Hamilton Court House is located at 45 Main Street East in Hamilton, Ontario. The accused were remanded by the Ontario Court of Justice for these appearances; however, with the filing of the direct indictments, the matters will next be spoken to in the Superior Courts.

As the holiday season is upon us, the RCMP Blood Task Force would like to wish you and your loved ones a happy and safe holiday season.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

D. Hvidston, Cst BTF Liaison Officer

B. Fair, Insp. OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

November 12, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system.

Legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared at Old City Hall in Toronto on November 10th, 2003, for a Case Management Conference. The next court date for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell is set for January 7, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. in Room 111, Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West in Toronto, Ontario. This scheduled court appearance will also be a Case Management Conference.

As a reminder, legal counsel for Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault will be appearing at the Hamilton Court House on December 19, 2003 at 9 a.m. in Court Room 100. The Hamilton Court House is located at 45 Main Street East in Hamilton, Ontario.

Crown attorneys have not received a direction from the Attorney General’s Office (Ontario) on whether to proceed by direct indictment. A decision on this matter is expected shortly.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

Sincerely,

D. Hvidston, Cst
BTF Liaison Officer

B. Fair, Insp.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

October 22, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system.

Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault appeared at the Hamilton Court House on October 17, 2003. Crown attorneys have not received a direction from the Attorney General’s Office (Ontario) on whether to proceed by direct indictment. A decision on this matter is expected shortly. The next court date for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault is set for December 19, 2003 at 9 a.m. in Room 100, Hamilton Court House, 45 Main Street East in Hamilton, Ontario.

As a reminder, legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell will be appearing on November 10, 2003 at 9 a.m. in Court Room 111 at Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West in Toronto, Ontario for a Case Management Conference.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

Sincerely,

D. Hvidston, Cst
BTF Liaison Officer

B. Fair, Insp.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

October 2, 2003
RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

Court Appearances
The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system. Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault appeared in court on September 24, 2003 at 9:00 am in Hamilton.

The Crown Counsel is still waiting to see if the application for Direct Indictment has been approved.

The next court appearance for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault is as follows:

October 17, 2003 at 09:00 a.m.
Courtroom 100
Hamilton Court House
45 Main St. E.
Hamilton, Ontario

As a reminder, the next court appearance for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell is scheduled as follows:

November 10, 2003 at 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario

Staffing Changes
We would like to update you on some staffing changes for the Blood Task Force-Toronto North.

Superintendent Rod Knecht was recently promoted to Chief Superintendent, Officer in Charge of the RCMP Criminal Operations Section in Alberta, and transferred to Edmonton. Insp. Brad Fair has taken over the day to day duties of ‘Officer in Charge’ of the Blood Task Force-Toronto North investigation. Insp. Fair has been assigned to the Blood Task Force since the onset of the investigation. He can be contacted through the toll free number. (1-888-530-1111)

Cst. Heather Jamieson will be retiring from the RCMP on October 22, 2003. Cst. David Hvidston will be assuming Cst. Jamieson’s duties on the Blood Task Force at that time, and all inquiries regarding Infected/Affected Persons should go through him. Cst. Hvidston has worked on the Blood Task Force for over five years, and can be contacted through the toll free number.

Contact Numbers
The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

Sincerely,

B. Fair, Insp.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

September 18, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system.

Legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court on September 4, 2003 for a Case Management Conference. Typically, a Case Management Conference is a meeting with a judge and counsel to deal with the time management and logistical issues relating to the court case. The evidence is not discussed nor are witnesses heard at a Case Management Conference.

The next scheduled court date for these individuals is as follows:

November 10, 2003 at 9:00 a.m.
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen Street West
Toronto, Ontario

As a reminder, legal counsel for Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault will be appearing on September 24 at 9:00 a.m. at the Hamilton Court House in Courtroom 100. The Hamilton Court House is located at 45 Main Street East in Hamilton, Ontario.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

July 30, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian blood system.

Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault appeared in court on July 30, 2003.

The next court appearance for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault is adjourned, as follows:

September 24, 2003
09:00 am
Courtroom 100
Hamilton Court House
45 Main St. E
Hamilton, Ontario

These court adjournments continue due to the ‘normal intake period’ when disclosure is provided and procedural matters are discussed between Crown Counsel and Defence Counsel.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

June 27, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

Legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court on June 23, 2003. At that time, approximately 95% of the investigative file was disclosed to the Defence Counsels. During this court appearance, Crown Counsel applied to the Attorney General’s Office to proceed by direct indictment.

The next scheduled court date for these individuals is as follows:

September 4, 2003 at 2:00 pm
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

June 20, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences relating to the Canadian Blood System.

Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell will be appearing in court on:

June 23, 2003 at 0900 hrs
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario

A newsletter will be sent out to update you on that court appearance.

Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault appeared in court on June 11, 2003. At that time, approximately 97% of the investigative file was disclosed to the Defence Counsels.

During this court appearance, Crown Counsel applied to the Attorney General’s Office to proceed by direct indictment. Below is an explanation of ‘direct indictment’.

"Section 577 of the Criminal Code permits the Attorney General or Deputy Attorney
General to send a case directly to trial without a preliminary hearing, or after an accused has been discharged at a preliminary hearing. The consent to proceed by direct indictment must be given in writing by the Attorney General or Deputy Attorney General. This power is an extraordinary one, and is only granted in exceptional circumstances where the absence of a preliminary hearing will not severely prejudice the accused's ability to have a fair trial, and the public interest requires a departure from the usual procedure of indictment following an order to stand trial made at a preliminary inquiry."

The next court appearance for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault is adjourned, as follows:

July 30, 2003
09:00 am
Courtroom 100
Hamilton Court House
45 Main St. E
Hamilton, Ontario

These court adjournments continue due to the ‘normal intake period’ when disclosure is provided and procedural matters are discussed between Crown Counsel and Defence Counsel.

Crown Counsel for the case involving the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault, are presently interviewing potential witnesses for the court case. The Blood Task Force continues to actively investigate certain aspects of the Canadian blood system in the 1980's.

As you may be aware, Canadian Blood Services took over responsibility for the blood system on September 28, 1998. At that time, Canadian Blood Services inherited the Canadian Red Cross Society’s records. The Blood Task Force and Canadian Blood Services are working together at the Blood Task Force’s request, to identify and locate potential witnesses for the upcoming court case. Lookback/traceback records have been analysed by the Crown Counsel and the Blood Task Force for the purpose of identifying recipients of tainted blood. Canadian Blood Services has not disclosed the identity of the blood donors or the recipients to the RCMP. In order to continue to ensure confidentiality at this time, Canadian Blood Services will be contacting past blood recipients by letter, on behalf of the RCMP, leaving it up to the recipient to contact the RCMP if they so wish. This letter will be sent out in the near future.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

May 15, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences on November 19, 2002.

The Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault’s next court appearance is adjourned, as follows:

June 11, 2003 at 0900 hrs
Courtroom 100
Hamilton Court House
45 Main St. E
Hamilton, Ontario

On April 30, 2003 at 0930 hrs, legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court. Their next court appearance is adjourned, as follows:

June 23, 2003 at 0900 hrs
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario

These court adjournments continue due to the ‘normal intake period’ when disclosure is provided and procedural matters are discussed between Crown Counsel and Defence Counsel.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

If you do not wish to continue receiving this newsletter, please contact the Blood Task Force.

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

March 10, 2003

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences on November 19, 2002.

On February 24, 2003, the RCMP laid one additional charge of criminal negligence causing bodily harm against Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell

On February 25, 2003 at 0930 hrs, legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court. Their next court appearance is adjourned, as follows:

March 27, 2003 at 0900 hrs
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario

Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault appeared in court on March 6, 2003. Their next court appearance is adjourned, as follows:

June 11, 2003 at 0900 hrs
Courtroom 100
Hamilton court House
45 Main St. E
Hamilton, Ontario

As explained in a previous newsletter, these court adjournments are due to the ‘normal intake period’ when disclosure is provided and procedural matters are discussed between Crown Counsel and Defence Counsel.

The toll free line and the website are still available for those who wish to contact the Blood Task Force.

1-888-530-1111

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

February 13, 2003
RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the court appearances for those who were charged with criminal offences on November 19, 2002.

Legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court on January 28, 2003 at 0930 hrs. Their next court appearance is adjourned, as follows:

February 25, 2003 at 0930 hrs
Courtroom 111
Old City Hall
60 Queen St. West
Toronto, Ontario

The court case for the Canadian Red Cross and Dr. Roger Perrault has been adjourned to:

March 6, 2003 at 0900 hrs,
Courtroom 100
Hamilton Court House
45 Main St. E
Hamilton, Ontario.

These court adjournments are due to the ‘normal intake period’ when disclosure is provided and procedural matters are discussed between Crown Counsel and Defence Counsel.

The RCMP Blood Task Force will continue to provide updates relating to court appearances. If you do not wish to receive any further newsletters, please call 1-888-530-1111.

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

December 24, 2002
RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

The RCMP Blood Task Force would like to update you on the first court appearances of those who were charged with criminal offences on November 19, 2002.

Legal counsel for the Canadian Red Cross, along with Dr. Roger Perrault and his legal counsel, appeared in court in Hamilton, Ontario on December 10, 2002. Their court case has been adjourned until March 6, 2003 at 0900 hrs.

Legal counsel for Dr. Roger Perrault, Dr. John Furesz, Dr. Wark Boucher, Armour Pharmaceutical Company, and Dr. Michael Rodell appeared in court in Toronto, Ontario on December 11, 2002. Their court case has been adjourned until January 28, 2003 at 0930 hrs.

The RCMP Blood Task Force will continue to provide updates relating to court appearances. If you do not wish to receive any further newsletters, please call at 1-888-530-1111.

As the holiday season approaches, the RCMP Blood Task Force would like to wish you and your loved ones a happy and safe holiday season.

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

RCMP Blood Task Force
C/O Project Oleander
:P.O. Box 33544
50 Dundurn St. S.
Hamilton, ON L8P 4X4

November 4, 2002

RCMP Blood Task Force — Toronto North

This newsletter is to provide you with an update of what the Blood Task Force (BTF) has accomplished to date, with the criminal investigation into the blood distribution system in Canada. As stated in a previous newsletter, the greater aspects of the investigation have been completed, however, certain areas of the investigation must be looked at in focused detail.

At this time, the BTF has conducted over 700 interviews, and have reviewed and analysed several million pages of documents. Major case management software continues to assist the BTF with the large volume of documents with respect to the organization and analysis of data.

The Blood Task Force continues to consult with four full-time Crown Counsel regarding legal issues. When the criminal investigation has been completed, and final decisions have been made, you will be notified by either telephone call or Newsletter regarding the outcome. The website will also be updated at that time.

The RCMP Blood Task Force realizes that the length of this investigation is difficult for all those involved, and we are persevering with this major investigation as efficiently and effectively as circumstances permit. Please be assured that the investigation is being conducted in a thorough and professional manner.

If you have any questions or concerns, please call 1-888-530-1111. The website continues to be available for persons wishing to communicate with the BTF.

www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/html/bloodtaskforce.htm.

Thank you for your continued support.

Sincerely,

R. Knecht, Supt.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force

December 19, 2001
At this time, the Blood Task Force (BTF) has conducted over 600 interviews, has seized over two million documents, and has had over 430 Infected/Affected persons (I/AP) provide information to the BTF.

The BTF remains focussed on this investigation, and is determined to complete a competent and comprehensive investigation. We have been fortunate to be able to use a Major Case Management Software. This has assisted us with the large volume of documents we process each day.

The investigation has been substantially completed, although there remains some areas of investigation that require some further inquiries. Due to the scope of the investigation, the complex nature of the issues , and the enormous amount of investigative material that requires detailed review, care must be taken to ensure that ‘no stone is left unturned.'

On matters of law we continue to seek the advice of Crown counsel. While the decision whether or not to lay charges rests with the police, Crown counsel will be responsible for the conduct of the prosecution, if charges are laid. No final decision concerning charges has been made at this time. Upon completion of the criminal investigation, the outcome will be communicated to those concerned.

The RCMP BTF is mindful of the passage of time and its impact on the complainants and others, and we are proceeding with this complex investigation with all possible dispatch.

Infected/Affected Persons
Communication to those infected/affected by contaminated blood continues. We maintain our toll-free line (1-888-530-1111) at the BTF office. The website continues to be available for persons wishing to communicate with the BTF.
(www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/html/bloodtaskforce.htm.) Please remember that updates of the investigation are also recorded on our toll-free line in both French and English.

Tracebacks
If you have received your traceback results, and have not already forwarded them to the BTF, please send a copy of them to the address at the top of this letter, Attn: Cst. David Hvidston

July 17, 2001

The Blood Task Force (BTF) continues to investigate the blood distribution system in Canada.

Consultation with four full-time Crown Counsel continues on legal issues relating to the investigation. No decision has been made as to if/when criminal charges will be laid. This decision cannot be made until the police investigation is completed.

Once again, as this is an active criminal investigation, we cannot provide any further information about the investigation.

Identification of Infected Persons
The BTF is attempting to identify further persons infected with Hepatitis C who meet the following criterion.

• infected in 1989 and 1990
• first, and only time transfusion
• have no other risk factors (piercing, tattoos, IV drug use)
• have not already contacted the Blood Task Force.

If you know of anyone who meets the above-mentioned criterion, please have them/their families contact Cst. David Hvidston at 905-953-7388 or toll-free at 1-888-530-1111.

Telephone calls to the I/AP
For those of you who receive telephone updates from the BTF Provincial Coordinators, you will be receiving the next call in the near future.

Decisions in Civil Cases concerning Tainted Blood in Canada
Recently, a number of civil cases have been reported in the media that deal with the issue of "tainted blood" in Canada. The implications of these civil cases are a matter of interest to the public, and it is appropriate to outline what implications, if any, the findings in a civil proceeding have on potential criminal proceedings.

It is important to recognize that the RCMP BTF is in the final stages of its investigation, but that no decision has been made, and no decision can be made until that investigation is completed.

In a civil case, Canadian law provides that one party can sue another. The remedy that is usually sought is damages or money to serve as compensation to the plaintiff and in some cases, to seek punitive or extraordinary damages.

A criminal case is different in its scope than civil cases. In a criminal case, it is the State that initiates the proceeding. The State must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and only then can a court register a conviction. A conviction does not deal with issues of damages for pain and suffering on the part of complainants; rather it addresses the wider public interest that arose from the criminal conduct.

Some criminal cases are decided by a jury of twelve who must be unanimous in their verdict and satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the guilt of the accused. In civil cases, the jury need only be satisfied on the balance of probabilities that one party is liable to another and even then, their verdict need not be unanimous.

In civil law across Canada, the law oftentimes reflects policy considerations that are not included in criminal law. Civil law will sometimes presume a causal link between one event and another whereas in the context of Canadian criminal law since the passage of the Charter of Rights, presumptive causal links are few and far between and are rarely accepted by courts in a criminal context.

Under Canadian common law, when one party sues another, it is possible to question that party at what are called "discoveries" and then introduce that statement as part of the plaintiff's case. In Canadian criminal law, except for perjury charges, the authorities have no right to introduce the sworn testimony of an accused person into the record as part of the case for the Crown.

Therefore, it can be seen that there are a number of substantive and procedural differences between the civil and the criminal systems.

However, there is some interrelationship that must be recognized on a practical level. Let us assume that Plaintiff A is assaulted by Defendant B when B. walks up to A. on the sidewalk and punches him on the nose. A. proceeds to sue B. for damages for the tort of assault. (Civil wrongs are called 'torts'.) The police also lay a charge of assault against B under the Criminal Code.

If B. is acquitted at his criminal trial for assault (the judge has a reasonable doubt when B. testifies that it was an accident and he in no way intended to strike A.) then does the fact that the court acquitted B. at the criminal trial mean that A. can't sue B. civilly? No. A. can sue B. And in the civil court, A. will only have to prove the case on the balance of probabilities as opposed to the higher burden of proof the Crown in a criminal trial bears of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Suppose B. had been found guilty of assault on A., after the Crown had prosecuted him in a criminal court. Does the fact that he was convicted automatically mean that A. will successfully sue B. for damages?

Once again, the answer is no. It cannot be assumed that simply because of the criminal conviction, A. will be successful. Success in the civil context means not only that the judge in the civil case finds B. liable to A. for assault, but also that A. suffered some damages. A. can lead evidence of the fact of B.'s criminal conviction in the civil case, but the court May find that A. suffered no damages whatsoever. This is not what A. would describe as a successful day in civil court!

If the civil case between A. and B. had proceeded first, and B. was found liable for monetary damages to A., can the Crown lead that civil finding of liability when the criminal case comes up?

The answer is no. The factual findings of one court do not bind another court (unless it's an appeal court hearing an appeal from a lower court). What this means is that in the course of B.'s criminal trial, the fact that another court, and a civil court at that, found liability. means nothing.

Section 13 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that,

" A witness who testifies in any proceedings has the right not to have any incriminating evidence so given used to incriminate that witness in any other proceedings, except in a prosecution for perjury or for the giving of contradictory evidence. "

Only where a witness departs from what they have previously said under oath will the circumstance arise that the witness can be cross-examined on their previous statement. So if B. at the civil trial tells a story completely different from the story he told at the criminal trial, he can expect to be cross-examined on it and May find himself in even more trouble with respect to the perjury sections of the Criminal Code. If the criminal trial proceeds after the civil trial, and B. should choose to testify and then tells a story completely different from the story he told at the civil trial, once again he would find himself cross-examined on his earlier testimony and again be involving himself in further criminal proceedings with respect to perjury or giving contradictory evidence,. whatever the verdict might be on the assault charge.

It can therefore be seen that civil decisions have some impact, although a limited impact, on criminal proceedings and vice versa. Policy considerations are different in almost every respect as between the two types of proceedings.

Although the RCMP BTF is aware of various civil cases that have either been completed over the years across Canada or are still underway, the RCMP has undertaken its own independent gathering and review of the evidence to determine whether or not there is criminal wrongdoing to be alleged and presented to a court. The RCMP is in the final stages of its investigation and will carefully review all the information it gathers to determine whether or not a criminal charge or charges are appropriate.

Websites
Attached to this newsletter is a list of favourite/useful websites (btf_websites.pdf) that the I/AP of this investigation have forwarded to the BTF.

The RCMP does not endorse/support the attached websites, and have provided them as a service to the I/AP of this investigation.

March 12, 2001
The Blood Task Force (BTF) continues to investigate the blood distribution system in Canada. We continue to investigate all relative aspects of the case that have been subject of complaint. We rely on all resources of the RCMP in order to efficiently and effectively conclude this investigation.

Consultation with four full-time Crown Counsel continues on legal issues relating to the investigation. No decision has been made as to if/when criminal charges will be laid. This decision cannot be made until the police investigation is completed.

Once again, as this is an active criminal investigation, we cannot provide any further information about the investigation.

Destruction of Canadian Blood Committee Records
On February 26, 2001, a press release was issued by the Ottawa RCMP Commercial Crime Section, who investigated the destruction of Canadian Blood Committee Records. As a courtesy to the I/AP of this investigation, a copy of their press release is attached.

This investigation was totally separate from the BTF investigation. While the BTF investigation commenced after the Krever Inquiry, the shredded document investigation commenced as the result of issues during the Commission of Inquiry.

Once again, the BTF continues to investigate the blood distribution system in Canada.

For further enquiries regarding this press release, please contact Cpl. Louise Lafrance, "A" Division Media Relations, at 613-993-9902.

Identification of Infected Persons
The BTF is still attempting to identify further hemophiliacs, living or deceased, who used Factor VIII product and were infected with HIV between May 1 to July 1, 1985.

It has come to the BTF's attention that some treaters maintained an inventory of hemophilia blood samples in a frozen state. Investigators would be interested in identifying who these treaters were, and if the samples are still available.

If you know of a hemophiliac whose treater froze their blood, and then after diagnosis of HIV, tested old samples determining the date of infection to be within the above mentioned dates, please contact the BTF at 1-888-530-1111.

Criminal vs Civil
The BTF continues to receive phone calls on a daily basis regarding Hepatitis C compensation issues. While we encourage I/AP to contact us at any time, we must reiterate that the BTF does not deal with compensation issues. We are conducting a criminal investigation to ascertain if there was criminal wrongdoing with the blood distribution system in Canada.

Pictures
Thank you once again for sending in pictures of yourself or your loved one. It really helps humanize the I/AP Program when we can put a face to the name. We encourage you to send pictures to the BTF, however, reiterate that this is strictly voluntary.

Telephone Updates to the I/AP
If you signed a consent form to receive telephone updates from the BTF Provincial Coordinators, many of you should have received your first call by now. There have been some administrative delays, however, the remaining calls should be received in the near future.

February 26, 2001
No charges in destruction of Canadian Blood Committee records
News Release

December 6, 2000

The Blood Task Force (BTF) continues to investigate the Blood distribution system in Canada.

We are working hard to complete the investigation in an expedient, thorough and professional manner.

Over one million documents have been collected to date. The BTF has gathered the majority of information that will be required for the investigation, however, some important information still has to be obtained.

The BTF is in the final phases of the investigation. As this is still an active, ongoing investigation, we cannot provide any further information about the criminal investigation.

Crown Counsel
The BTF is continuing to consult with Crown counsel on legal issues relating to the investigation. Three Crown counsel have been assigned to provide the BTF with search warrant and other legal advice on a full time basis. No decision has been made as to if/when criminal charges will be laid. This decision cannot be made until the police investigation is completed.

Thje I/AP Program
The I/AP Program is up and running. For those of you who returned your consent form, you should be receiving your first call within the next few months from the Provincial Coordinator in your province.

For those of you who have not forwarded your consent form, you May still do so.

Please inform the BTF in writing if you no longer wish to receive calls from the Provincial Coordinator.

Putting a face to the name
Thanks to all of you who sent pictures of yourself, or your loved one to the BTF. If you haven't sent a picture yet, please consider doing so. Pictures really help to 'humanize' the program.

Change of address
Please let the BTF know if you change your address.

Legal Issues
In a previous newsletter we spoke of the difference between civil and criminal proceedings. In this newsletter, the following topics will be addressed.

• Evidence.
• Non-Publication, Confidentiality and Privacy in Court

Non-publication, confidentiality and privacy in court
It is a tradition of the Common Law, now enshrined in the Charter, that generally court proceedings are open to the public. This ensures that justice is not only done, but seen to be done.

The freedom of the media to cover court proceedings has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada, and the courts must be hesitant to limit public scrutiny. There are however limits that are recognized both by Statute Law and Common Law (Judge made law).

In cases involving young offenders, sexual assault allegations or extortion, the name of the accused, the complainant, or in some cases the witness, can be the subject matter of a prohibition. Indeed it is an offence to publish the name of a young offender.

Complainants of sexual assault and extortion have a statutory exception to having their names published in the media, however, this does not mean that members of the public may not attend and watch proceedings.

Only in exceptional circumstances can matters be held in camera, which is to say in private and behind closed doors. One compelling example involves trials under the Official Secrets Act, when it would be counter-productive to conduct a trial in public, where the revelation of the state secret would become known.

Embarrassment, or merely having a concern about one's name becoming known, are not sufficient reasons for a court to place a ban on the publication of the witness's name. The test for obtaining such an order banning publication of the complainant's name is distinct from the test of having the hearings conducted in camera. It can be said that if it is not common to have a ban on a witness's name, then it is extremely uncommon to have a court case or part of it heard in private.

In appropriate circumstances however, the court can order a ban on the publication of a witness's name. These kinds of court orders have been successfully made in both civil and criminal cases, where the revelation of the name would necessarily mean that information that would otherwise be treated as confidential would be exposed to public view. For instance, in some cases persons who have tested HIV positive or suffered from other maladies have been the subject matter of orders banning publication of their name.

These orders are not automatic. The party calling the witness must make an application to the presiding Judge, and must accompany that application with some reasonable and articuable grounds as to why it is in the public interest that the person's name not be published. Clearly there is a public interest in having persons who are HIV positive or suffer from Hepatitis feel free to step forward as witnesses in proceedings. However, the order banning publication of the witness's name is far from automatic, and in the event that the trial Judge declines to make such an order, there is no appeal from the refusal.

If the media did publish the person's name knowingly, this can constitute a contempt of court. If the media erroneously published the name after being duly diligent, there May not be a contempt at all.

In the end result, there are some protections for witnesses who May be called forward in civil or criminal cases, to maintain a level of privacy that would not otherwise be available if such an order had not been made.

Evidence
Generally speaking, there are two kinds of evidence in Canadian courts, both civil and criminal. There is testimonial evidence, or that which a witness actually speaks to from the vantage point of the witness box. Secondly, there is documentary evidence which is evidence that is established through the introduction into court of facts via documents that have been obtained.

With respect to documentary evidence, when the police seize a document, it is open to the prosecution to tender the document as evidence of the truth of its contents. This is not a case of the authorities simply handing in the document and saying "See, this is what it says", but rather, someone must testify as to the document to indicate where it was seized from and what its significance is.

For instance, in a fraud case, if the police obtain banking records, usually someone from the bank will come and explain that these records relate to a certain bank account, of a certain individual, and reveal a financial history over a specified period of time, that has relevance to the charge. These documents then become evidence of the truth of their contents to show that deposits and withdrawals were made on certain days or that certain acts were done.

Testimonial evidence is the kind of evidence that we have all seen on television and in the movies, where a witness testifies that he or she saw "A" rob the bank on a certain day, and that the perpetrator of the bank robbery is the individual sitting before the court.

Both documentary and testimonial evidence must be as free from hearsay as possible. Hearsay is when someone else told you the fact that you are testifying to. For instance, a witness would not be allowed to say that although they did not see the accused rob the bank, they were told by someone else, that that person had seen the individual rob the bank. The best person to testify, and in fact the only person who would be allowed to testify, would be the individual who actually saw the individual robbing the bank.

Similarly, a document that purports to reveal not a fact, but a hearsay fact, May be admissible for other reasons because not all of it contains hearsay, but insofar as it purports to establish facts that are not within the knowledge of the creator of the document, it May go to weight, and May mean that the document has no evidentiary value.

Hearsay is admissible however. There are many exceptions at Common Law that permit hearsay to be admitted, but these exceptions and the circumstances in which they apply are sufficient to fill several legal texts.

Opinion evidence usually emerges from the testimony of a witness. One does not have to be an expert to express opinion evidence. When a witness testifies as to things that would normally be within the knowledge of an individual, such as the speed of a motor vehicle or the general health of an individual, these things don't require any special training or knowledge. Where, however, the authorities seek to call someone to express an expert opinion on something that is not within the general realm of knowledge, then that person must be qualified as an expert before the court will allow them to give the opinion.

Evidence, both testimonial and documentary, can either be direct evidence or circumstantial evidence. Direct evidence would be where a witness says that they saw an individual in the bank, in the act of robbing it, and that that individual was the accused before the court.

Circumstantial evidence would be where a person heard a bank alarm and saw a man running out of the bank with what appeared to be a bag. This is circumstantial evidence, which May tend to prove that the accused before the court is the bank robber.

Circumstantial evidence is not second class evidence, and in fact most cases are decided on circumstantial evidence. The test is the same whether the case is based on testimonial or documentary evidence, either direct or circumstantial in nature. In all criminal cases the Crown must prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

Your comments are appreciated. Once again, contact with the BTF can be made at 1-888-530-1111 or use the online form. Please remember, that updates of the investigation are also recorded on this toll-free line in both French and English.

September 26, 2000

The RCMP Blood Task Force continues to investigate the Canadian blood system. It has now been two years and nine months since the onset of this criminal investigation. We receive many enquiries as to when this investigation will be completed. The investigation will only be concluded once we completely investigate all the issues exhaustively. Let me reassure you that the members of the Task Force continue to work toward the expedient resolution of the investigation. There is no new information that we can provide to you within the parameters of this ongoing criminal investigation. We don't feel there is any value in reiterating information that we have already provided.

Criminal investigation VS Civil proceedings
In a previous newsletter, the difference between a criminal investigation and civil proceedings was explained. The Blood Task Force receives numerous enquiries on a daily basis regarding Hep C Compensation Issues. The Blood Task Force is conducting a criminal investigation into the Canadian blood system, and is not dealing with compensation issues, and therefore is unable to provide comment.

Identification of infected/affected persons
We continue to look for persons who were infected with HIV after April 1, 1985, living or deceased that have not already identified themselves to the Blood Task Force. If you know of anybody in this time frame, please pass this request on to the infected person or their families. Our toll-free number is 1-888- 530-1111.

We would like to thank those of you who have assisted us in locating additional Infected/Affected Persons. Your assistance is appreciated.

The Infected/Affected Persons Program

RCMP Blood Task Force
C/O Project Oleander
:P.O. Box 33544
50 Dundurn St. S.
Hamilton, ON L8P 4X4

Putting a face to the name
As previously explained in past newsletters, all Infected/Affected Persons who contact the RCMP tip line have a file opened in their name. This file contains all information that you provide to the Blood Task Force.

I feel it would be beneficial to 'put a face to your name.' Providing a picture of yourself or your loved one will help us 'humanize' the Infected/Affected Persons Program. The key factor to a successful Infected/Affected Persons Program is the human element, which on occasion becomes difficult when you're dealing with large numbers of people. Providing a picture of yourself or your loved one is strictly voluntary.

The picture you provide will be placed on your file, and can be any size. Please identify the subject/s on the back of the photograph.

If you wish to provide a picture, please forward it to the address at the top of this letter, to the attention of Cst. Heather Jamieson.

Consent Letters
Many of your consent forms have been returned to the Blood Task Force, and the response has been favorable. However, there are still some that have not been received. Please return these ASAP, even if you do not wish to participate in the program.

Your comments and opinions are valued.

Heather Jamieson, Cst.
Blood Task Force Liaison Officer

Rod Knecht, Insp.
OIC RCMP Blood Task Force
Toronto North

April 14, 2000

The Blood Task Force continues to actively investigate contaminated blood issues in Canada.

Interviews have been conducted with complainants, infected/affected persons, and persons involved in the medical, legal and scientific community in Canada and internationally.

The investigative team continues to look at five specific areas:

• 1. Donor screening
• 2. Factor Concentrates
• 3. Blood Testing
• 4. Transmission of Hepatitis C
• 5. Look back/Trace back

Although the Blood Task Force has acquired considerable information in relation to this investigation, investigators are cognizant that members of the public May be in possession of information or documentation which May assist the members of the Task Force. Any person with information is encouraged to contact the Blood Task Force (1-888-530-1111) or use the online form.

As this is an ongoing criminal investigation, specific details of the investigation cannot be disclosed. Please be assured that the Blood Task Force is working extremely hard to complete this investigation in a thorough, timely and professional manner.

The Infected/Affected Persons Program
The Blood Task Force is continuing with a proactive approach regarding the Infected/Affected Persons (I/AP) Program. In the near future, Victim Service Agency representatives, or RCMP officers, from across Canada, will be assisting the Blood Task Force with phone calls to I/AP that have identified themselves to the Blood Task Force. These Provincial and Territorial Coordinators will be contacting the I/AP periodically by phone, updating them on the investigation, and offering local services or referrals if requested. The task of phone calls is being provided by the provincial and territorial coordinators as this will offer a better and more efficient service geographically to the I/AP. This service will be provided to the I/AP, only with their consent. Consent forms will be sent to all identified I/AP in the near future.

The Provincial Coordinators, who will be making these phone calls, were brought to the RCMP Training Academy in Regina on Feb. 24-26, 2000, for training on issues specific to this investigation. The complainant groups for this investigation were requested to attend this conference as a guest speaker/resource person, and were asked to provide information regarding their group and how the group offers support to I/AP. They also provided us with personal stories and explained to us what it is like to live with these viruses. Hearing these personal testimonies was an extremely important aspect of this conference and helped us understand I/AP issues.

Contrary to recent media releases across Canada, this conference was not a forum for all I/AP to provide their testimony on how contaminated blood has affected their lives. This conference was strictly for training of Victim Services Agency representatives and RCMP officers, who will be assisting the Blood Task Force.

December 1, 1999
The purpose of this newsletter is to provide you with information regarding the RCMP Blood Task Force investigation to date. This particular newsletter is being sent to all complainant groups, and infected/affected persons who have been identified by the Task Force. Please feel free to share this newsletter with members of your group. For those of you who have received the newsletter in the past, certain items have been repeated for the benefit of all readers.

Recent media release
Regarding a recent media release during the week of November 15, 1999, the RCMP BTF would like to clearly state, that in accordance with conducting the investigation with the highest objective standard possible, it would be premature to draw final conclusions about charges at this stage of the investigation. Preliminary conclusions similar to those recently reported in the media, only serve to cause unnecessary anguish for those who have been infected/affected by contaminated blood. Decisions with respect to charges will be made only when all the information is gathered.

Four complaints
Four groups have laid formal complaints with the RCMP. The groups are the Hepatitis C Society, the Canadian Hemophilia Society, the Infected Spouses and Children’s Society, and the HIV-T Group. The HIV-T Group submitted their complaint on July 20, 1999. The HIV-T Group represents individuals who contracted HIV through blood transfusions. All aspects of these complaints are being investigated.

The term "victim"
It has been brought to our attention that some of the complainant groups find the term “victim” offensive. We do not intend to refer to infected persons in any manner that is offensive, and recognize their concerns.

The Blood Task Force has adopted the term “Infected/Affected Persons”. However, it should be noted that the term “victim” will still be utilized in some circumstances. Various programs across Canada dealing with victims of crime issues are referred to as “Victim Service Agencies”. In the future, the Blood Task Force will be utilizing these agencies’s services.

The investigation
As you are aware, on November 26, 1997, Commissioner Murray announced that the RCMP would conduct a review of the findings of the Commission of Inquiry on the Blood System in Canada, to determine whether there were grounds to launch a criminal investigation. On February 12, 1998, the RCMP Blood Task Force launched a full-scale criminal investigation into the blood system in Canada.

Interviews were conducted with complainants, victims and academia, as well as persons involved in the medical, legal and scientific community in Canada. The investigative team was able to exact issues into four inclusive areas; donor screening, factor concentrates, blood testing, and the transmission of Hepatitis C. The Task Force has since identified the requirement to investigate look back/trace back. To date, the Task Force has spoken with over one thousand persons, and has obtained over 100,000 documents.

Because of the complexity, and the amount of information involved, this investigation will take a long time to complete. In any criminal investigation, there are challenges. This investigation has challenges which are unique to it. For example, much of the information surrounding the issues under investigation is in excess of fifteen years old. This presents a challenge to the investigators in locating information and those persons that have/had information. We are also dealing with complex criminal law issues.

As this is an ongoing criminal investigation, specific details of the investigation cannot be disclosed. Please be assured that the Blood Task Force is working extremely hard to complete this investigation in a thorough, timely and professional manner.

Resources
At present, the Blood Task Force has fourteen members assigned to this investigation. These include a legally trained member, a member with scientific training and an Infected/Affected Person Liaison. We also have a support staff that assist with office duties, translation, transcribing, and data entry. In each province and territory a member has been designated to assist with the investigation when required.

In January 1999, the Blood Task Force realized that there was a traditional and a non-traditional aspect to this investigation. As a result, the Task Force was separated into two teams. The traditional investigation is based out of Ottawa, and is dealing strictly with a succinct aspect of the blood system. Two RCMP officers, apart from the aforementioned group, are handling this investigation. The non-traditional investigation is being investigated by the Task Force working out of the Toronto North Detachment in Newmarket, Ontario.

Commissioner's visit to the Blood Task Force
On September 22, 1999, Commissioner Murray met with members of the Blood Task Force office in Newmarket, Ontario. Presentations were provided on the status of the investigation, our computer system, the Infected/Affected Persons Program, and legal issues specific to this investigation.

HIV-T Group
On October 23, 1999, the HIV-T Group held their annual meeting in Toronto, Ontario. Members of the RCMP Blood Task Force were invited to attend to give a brief overview of the investigation, and to respond to questions. During the question period, concern was voiced about an item that had been included on a questionnaire developed by the RCMP and in a HIV-T Group newsletter. The question was; When were you tested sero-negative? The purpose of this question was to try and identify those who had sero-converted after a test was available to locate the HI Virus. The question was directed to identify individuals who were infected in that particular time period. However, the thrust of the investigation continues to address all aspects surrounding the contamination of the blood system during the years 1980 - 1990. If you have any further concerns regarding this question, please contact Cst. Norma Crossman by calling (905) 953-7388 or 1-888-530-1111.

TIPS HOTLINE: ( 1-888-530-1111)

The tips hotline has been operating out of Ottawa since the Task Force was formed. In late November, the line will be transferred to the Newmarket Office, however the number remains the same. There May be a short time period when you will not be able to reach us on this line. Please be patient, and try your call at a later date. If urgent, contact us at 905-953-7388.

The tips hotline is available for persons who have information about the Canadian blood distribution system and the decision-making process between 1980 and 1990. Specifically, if a person saw documents, overheard conversations, or attended meetings that relate specifically to decisions made about the blood distribution system during those years, the Blood Task Force would like to talk to them. Communication with the Task Force is confidential. All information received will be reviewed by the Task Force and investigators will follow-up on all tips.

The tips hotline will also provide a recorded update of the investigation. This will be updated on a regular basis.

Identifying Infected/Affected Persons
We are continuing to identify persons who were infected with HIV after April 1, 1985, living or deceased. We require the following information:

• date blood product was received;
• type of product received;
• date tested;
• any pertinent information re: trace back/look back.

If you have information, please phone our tips hotline, or or use the online form

What happens when I call in?
Initially when you call in, your name, birth date, address, phone #, and a brief description of how and when you were infected will be requested. Arrangements will be made to have a statement taken from you. The statement will be taken by a member of the Task Force, or an investigator at your local police department. Once a statement has been obtained, a file will be opened in your name at the Blood Task Force office.

If persons wish to keep their identity confidential, the Task Force will do everything within their lawful means to protect this information.

Legal issues
We are frequently asked questions regarding legal issues. One question that is continually asked is “What is the difference between criminal and civil proceedings?”

The following information is designed to provide general information about various matters related to law. It is not intended to be specific legal advice, or complete in any way, and should not replace consultation with a lawyer.

It is a relatively safe assumption that much of what members of the public know about court proceedings they learn from watching television. A word of caution is in order to those who think that what they see on television is an accurate reflection of our justice system. Most of the programming involves depictions of court proceedings in various parts of the United States. While there are similarities between the system of justice in our country and that of the United States, the differences far outweigh these. One should also keep in mind that fictional television is often designed to entertain us and not necessarily to educate us. As a result, there May be inaccuracies or parts crucial to a full understanding of the system not included in the television production because of a lack of viewer appeal.

Difference between Criminal and Civil proceedings
One of the easiest ways to begin to understand the difference between criminal and civil proceedings is to look at who is involved and why.

In civil proceedings, one party (the plaintiff), perhaps a private citizen, believes he/she has suffered some loss because of the actions of another (the defendant). If the parties cannot resolve the issue between themselves, they ask the courts to decide. Each side will ordinarily hire a lawyer to represent them in the proceedings, which includes the process of preparing and presenting the facts supporting their side. The process is an adversarial one. The Judge enforces the rules of the court, and the jury (or the judge alone if the trial is without a jury) decides who wins and the amount of the award. The Judge also decides who will have to pay the court costs and legal fees.

In criminal proceedings, the court is dealing with a set of rules which prohibit certain acts which the government has put into place. These rules or laws are designed to protect people, property and the morality of society. There are over 40,000 criminal and quasi-criminal offences within Canada’s laws. If a person or persons choose to carry out unlawful activities, their actions will be considered to be against all citizens of Canada. These laws are referred to as criminal laws and are found in the Criminal Code of Canada and various other statutes. Under our system of government, the Federal Parliament has the responsibility to determine what rules or laws are included in the Criminal Code. Government has the responsibility to also enforce the law once it is passed. This includes the investigation of allegations that a law has been broken, as well as the laying of charges and the prosecution of those charges. If it has been determined, following an investigation, that a law has been broken and a charge is laid, someone must present the information uncovered in the investigation to the court. That person is referred to as a Crown prosecutor because they present the evidence on behalf of the Crown. The Crown is one party in a criminal proceeding and the Crown prosecutor is there on behalf of the state, which is in other words, all Canadian citizens.

The other party is the individual who it is alleged to have carried out the acts prohibited by the law. The accused is usually represented by a defence lawyer who the accused has hired, or in the case of someone who cannot afford a lawyer, one is appointed through legal aid. The Judge enforces the rules of the court, and the jury (or the judge alone if the trial is without a jury) decides whether the accused is innocent or guilty.

The procedure between the courts in civil matters and in criminal matters is somewhat similar. The use of the adversarial system, having a Judge and/or a jury to decide, and the fact that there are rules governing the procedure in each case, are some examples. Also, the procedures for presenting evidence and calling witnesses are similar. However, in criminal law, because the consequences for an individual are considered so serious, and because the state has many resources at its disposal, there are safeguards in the system which are designed to remove the possibility of an innocent person being wrongfully convicted.

For example, the Judge and/or jury in both civil and criminal proceedings have to have some basis upon which to decide between the two parties. This is what is known as the “burden of proof” and they are different in criminal and civil proceedings. In criminal matters the Crown or the state, through a prosecutor, must prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused needs only to introduce a reasonable doubt about whether he/she is guilty as charged. He/she does so by attacking the evidence put forward by the Crown or by introducing evidence. In civil proceedings the burden of proof is on the balance of probabilities. In other words, the Judge and/or jury must on the basis of the evidence, make a decision in favour of one or the other. The degree of difficulty required to prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt, is greater than what is required to prove a case on the balance of probabilities.

November 8, 1999

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

The RCMP's Blood Task Force investigation continues to move forward, and is progressing extremely well. We are into our nineteenth month of investigation. As stated in previous letters, because this is an ongoing criminal investigation, we cannot provide specific details. However, information continues to be accumulated and analyzed in a timely manner.

New complaint
On July 20, 1999, the HIV-T Group submitted a formal complaint to the RCMP. The HIV-T Group represents individuals who contracted HIV through blood transfusions. Their complaint consists of twelve issues. Our investigation to date has covered the majority of these issues, however, after consultation with the complainant, the Task Force will be addressing some issues more succinctly in view of the new information.

The term "victim"
It has been brought to our attention that some of the complainant groups find the terminology "victim" offensive. We do not intend to refer to infected persons in a derogatory manner, and recognize their concerns.

We will be adopting the terminology "Infected/Affected Persons" at the Blood Task Force. However, it should be noted that the term "victim" will still have to be utilized in some circumstances. Most existing programs across Canada that deal with victims of crime are referred to as "Victim Service Agencies". In the future, the Blood Task Force will be utilizing these agencies' services.

We are committed to responding to your concerns and invite you to forward your views.

Infected/Affected Persons
We are continuing to identify persons infected with HIV after April 1, 1985, Iiving or deceased. We will require the following information:

• date blood product was received:
• type of product received;
• date tested;
• any pertinent information re: traceback/lookback;

What happens when I call in?
When you initially call in, your personal details will be gathered (name, birth date, address, phone #, and a brief description of how and when you were infected.) Arrangements will be made to have a statement taken from you. The statement will be taken by a member of the Task Force, or an investigator at your local police department.

Once a statement has been obtained, a file will be opened in your name at the RCMP Toronto North Blood Task Force office. If persons wish to keep their identity unknown, the Task Force will do everything within their lawful means to protect this information.

Anyone with information relating to the investigation is asked to call the TIPS line at 1-888-530- 1111 or use the online form.

June 18, 1999

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

The RCMP’s Blood Task Force Investigation remains on track and is progressing extremely well.

In the December letter, we advised that the investigation had moved to a more focused phase. While information about “systems and science” is still important, the Task Force is now in a position to concentrate on certain decisions taken about blood and blood product distribution in Canada between 1980 and 1990. It is important that the public understand that, while the investigation has not reached any final conclusions, interviews with key players in the Canadian blood system continue to provide the Task Force with an ever greater understanding.

This edition includes information about the investigation which should prove helpful in assisting you in understanding the strategy to date.

To provide some background, a criminal investigation is about gathering data, usually in the form of interviews, which are analyzed and compared with what is already known. We verify the accuracy of the information and determine the next steps. This May take the form of any one of the following: researching sources available to the public, another interview, a consent to search or a search warrant. Any investigation will go through several rounds of this process, each time narrowing down or expanding on what other information is required.

Interviews conducted abroad enable investigators to not only come to understand more about the system and science of the Blood Program, but also to determine what information was available in other parts of the world. This allows them to put the Canadian situation in a global context and be very specific in their focus in subsequent interviews. Since our last letter, teams of investigators have conducted interviews in Australia, Costa Rica, Switzerland, Belgium, the US and France. All of these interviews produced useful information. The interviews conducted in France were particularly helpful, given the ongoing experience with prosecutions related to the administration of the blood program in that country.

As indicated in a previous letter, RCMP resources dedicated to the investigation have been critical to its success. As a national organization with resources in many specialties the RCMP is well positioned to carry out this type of investigation. Moreover, as an organization dedicated to public service, it remains committed to this very important task. On June 15th, 1999, an investigator with a medical background will join the Task Force full-time. His involvement will enhance the existing expertise and, as such, be very valuable to the investigation.

Anyone with information relating to the investigation is asked to call the TIPS line at 1-888-530- 1111 or use the online form.

February 19, 1999

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

We would like to take the time to update you on the status of our investigation. Our focus remains on the structures and systems relating to the decision making process within the Canadian blood program. The investigation is very complex and we have gathered a large amount of information and documentation. To date we have audio interviewed in excess of 100 individuals and gathered more than 30,000 documents.

The Task Force has streamlined and improved efficiency by using a Major Case Management System, which is supported by the RCMP computer system. It is a research, management and presentation system for the paper documents, electronic documents and additional information of our project. The system provides us with analytical tools and capabilities. We are able to search and locate documents based on queries, which saves a great deal of time. This Management System gives us the tools to prepare briefs from the material, to prepare and print structured reports listing information of interest and work in tables and forms.

We continue to urge anyone with information relating to the investigation to call the TIPS line at 1-888- 530-1111.

December 3, 1998

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

With the introduction of new information, the investigation has become extremely focused and we have again requested information from Canadians who have any key evidence, to come forward. We have come to believe that people with key information for this investigation are out there and we need their cooperation.

The Task Force has 20 full time staff, which includes 12 investigators, a research analyst and a liaison to keep people informed. So far, the Task Force has received approximately 500 tips from the 1-888 number and two via the Internet. There have been approximately 575 interviews conducted. The investigators have traveled to the United States, Germany and The Netherlands for information, and have sought assistance from Police Agencies nationally and internationally.

Because of the complexity of the investigation and the amount of information, investigations of this kind take a long time to complete. The Task Force has streamlined and improved efficiency by using a new Major Case Management System, supported by the RCMP computer system.

We continue to urge anyone with information relating to the investigation to call the TIPS line at 1-888-530-1111 or through the Internet.

July 23, 1998

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

The Blood Task Force continues to draw upon all resources of the RCMP, nationally and internationally (i.e. analytical services, Canadian Police College, Community Policing Branch, Foreign Services Branch) towards the expeditious resolve of this investigation. We have benefitted from the assistance, experience and co-operation of policing partners, as well as private and public organisations, locally, nationally and internationally.

Over 500 calls have been received on the TIPS hotline since its implementation in February, and in excess of 500 interviews of witnesses, victims and complainants have been completed. The investigative team has been augmented by the addition of a civilian member of the RCMP, who is a lawyer, in order to assist in this very complex endeavour.

The task force continues to travel extensively throughout Canada, in addition to travelling to Germany, the Netherlands and the United States. The magnitude of information accumulated to date has permitted the investigation to become increasingly focussed. However, the sheer volume of information requires considerable time to be effectively accrued and analysed. The criminal Investigation is now into its sixth month.

The direction of the investigation is being maintained on the structures and systems relating to the decision-making processes within the Canadian blood program. Anyone with information can call the national TIPS line at 1-888-530-1111.

May 29, 1998

Letter from the RCMP Blood Task Force to victims’ groups

Our toll free TIPS telephone line (1-888-530-1111) continues to receive information on a daily basis. The interview process persists in every province as information that has been obtained during the initial stages of the review and criminal investigation is analysed and placed onto a computerized file management system.

The investigation has expanded geographically with Blood Task Force personnel travelling to foreign jurisdictions as part of the information gathering process. With the addition of personnel and the new computer system in Toronto, the task force is moving to a more accommodating location commencing June 5, 1998. However, correspondence will continue to be received at the following address:

Royal Canadian Mounted Police
c/o Blood Task Force
345 Harry Walker Parkway South
Newmarket, Ontario L3Y 8P6
Fax: (905) 953-7747